1
|
Kyrochristou I, Anagnostopoulos G, Giannakodimos I, Lampropoulos G. Efficacy and safety of robotic complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:181. [PMID: 37382665 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04477-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete mesocolic excision (CME) consists of the complete removal of tumor-bearing soft tissues enveloped by the mesocolic fascia and radical lymphadenectomy at the origin of feeding vessels. We conducted a systematic review, evaluating the efficacy of the robotic CME (RCME) in patients with right-sided colon cancer and presenting the data in comparison to those concerning the open RC (right colectomy) with CME. METHODS One independent researcher searched the MEDLINE-PubMed database for published and unpublished material. RESULTS Eighty-three articles were found to refer to CME, 17 of which met the selection criteria following the PRISMA guidelines. All researchers presented short-term outcomes and agreed on the oncologic safety of CME. Different surgical approaches were proposed; however, no significant differences were noticed regarding the peri-operative outcomes. CONCLUSION Although long-term outcomes are needed to establish it as a standard of care in right-sided colon cancer, RCME is a procedure that gains more and more grounds due to its oncologic safety. The standard medial-to-lateral approach seems to have similar results to other approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilektra Kyrochristou
- 2nd Department of Surgery and Vascular Surgery Unit, General Hospital of Nikaia and Piraeus "Agios Panteleimon", Athens, Greece.
| | - Georgios Anagnostopoulos
- 2nd Department of Surgery and Vascular Surgery Unit, General Hospital of Nikaia and Piraeus "Agios Panteleimon", Athens, Greece
| | - Ilias Giannakodimos
- 2nd Department of Surgery and Vascular Surgery Unit, General Hospital of Nikaia and Piraeus "Agios Panteleimon", Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Lampropoulos
- 2nd Department of Surgery and Vascular Surgery Unit, General Hospital of Nikaia and Piraeus "Agios Panteleimon", Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuk P, Jawhara M, Al-Najami I, Helligsø P, Pedersen AK, Ellebæk MB. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic short- and long-term outcomes in complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:171-181. [PMID: 36001164 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02686-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete mesocolic excision (CME) surgery is increasingly implemented for the resection of right-sided colonic cancer, possibly resulting in improved 5-year overall and disease-free survival compared to non-CME surgery. However, it is not clear what surgical platform should be used. The aim of this study was to compare the following outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic CME-surgery for right-sided colonic cancer: (i) short-term clinical outcomes, (ii) pathological specimen quality, and (iii) long-term oncological outcomes. METHODS Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception until August 2021. Pooled proportions were calculated by applying the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was explored by I-square and supplemented by sensitivity- and meta-regression analyses. The risk of bias was evaluated by either MINORS or Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2). RESULTS Fifty-five studies with 5.357 patients (740 robot-assisted and 4617 laparoscopic) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall postoperative morbidity was 17% [95% CI (14-20%)] in the robot-assisted group and 13% [95%CI (12-13%)] in the laparoscopic group. Robot-assisted CME was associated with a shorter hospital stay, lower intraoperative blood loss, a higher amount of harvested lymph nodes, and better 3-year oerall and disease-free survival. MINORS and RoB2 indicated a serious risk of bias across studies included. CONCLUSIONS This review which includes predominantly non-randomized studies suggests a possible advantage of the robot-assisted CME compared with a laparoscopic technique for several short-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedja Cuk
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark. .,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Mohamad Jawhara
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Issam Al-Najami
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Helligsø
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sica GS, Vinci D, Siragusa L, Sensi B, Guida AM, Bellato V, García-Granero Á, Pellino G. Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:846-861. [PMID: 36097099 PMCID: PMC9944740 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation. METHODS PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques. RESULTS Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique. CONCLUSIONS The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe S Sica
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. .,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danilo Vinci
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea M Guida
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Bellato
- Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata - University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,Ospedale IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Álvaro García-Granero
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain.,Applied Surgical Anatomy Unit, Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Human Embryology and Anatomy Department, University of Islas Baleares, Palma, Spain
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Operating on the Mesentery in Robotic Colonic Surgery—General Techniques. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:281-287. [PMID: 35966983 PMCID: PMC9365489 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
AbstractDuring colorectal surgery the mesentery is the organ on which the greatest amount of operating time is focused. It has recently gained increasing attention. This technical review focuses on the mesentery during robotic colonic procedures. Specifically, we focus upon how to access, dissect, and divide the mesentery using the robotic platform. We also touch on the management of bleeding and some specific disease etiologies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Updates on Robotic CME for Right Colon Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11060550. [PMID: 34204803 PMCID: PMC8231645 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11060550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is a surgical technique introduced with the aim of ameliorating the oncologic results of colectomy. Various experiences have demonstrated favorable oncologic results of CME in comparison with standard colectomy, in which the principles of CME are not respected. The majority of the literature refers to open or laparoscopic CME. This review analyses current evidence regarding robotic CME for right colectomy. Methods. An extensive Medline (Pub Med) search for relevant case series, restricted to papers published in English, was performed, censoring video vignettes and case reports. Results. Fourteen studies (ten retrospective, four comparative series of robotic versus laparoscopic CME) were included, with patient numbers ranging from 20 to 202. Four different approaches to CME are described, which also depend on the robotic platform utilized. Intraoperative and early clinical results were good, with a low conversion and anastomotic leak rate and a majority of Clavien–Dindo complications being Grades I and II. Oncologic adequacy of the surgical specimens was found to be good, although a homogeneous histopathologic evaluation was not provided. Conclusions. Further large studies are warranted to define long-term oncologic results of robotic right colectomy with CME and its eventual benefits in comparison to laparoscopy.
Collapse
|