Bone Marrow Metastases from Solid Organ Cancer in Adults

Metronomic cyclophosphamide for bone marrow carcinomatosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

In some patients with prostate cancer, bone marrow carcinomatosis develops later in the course of the disease, which has a poor prognosis. These are often heavily pretreated patients in the castration-resistant situation for whom there are no other therapeutic options, because either all available systemic therapies have already been used or the use of one is not possible due to the cytopenias associated with bone marrow carcinomatosis. In our literature search, there are no data on this treatment in the setting available, especially no clinical trial or even randomized data. This case series is to determine the clinical efficacy of metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone marrow carcinomatosis, particularly with regard to stabilization of the blood count (thrombocytopenias) and thus the possibility of further (more toxic) lines of therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective unicenter analysis was performed on eleven patients between 54 and 84 years of age on metronomic cyclophosphamide for bone marrow carcinomatosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated at a Swiss cancer center between 2014 and 2023.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received metronomic cyclophosphamide for varying periods of time; the majority had severe cytopenias (especially thrombocytopenias). Partially hematologic stabilization was achieved with administration of further systemic therapies.

CONCLUSION

Our case series demonstrates that the use of metronomic cyclophosphamide allows hematologic stabilization for months, benefiting patients who had already received all available therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Alternatively, it may act as bridging therapy to allow consecutive administration of more toxic therapies with proven survival benefit.

Two cases of prostate cancer with disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow treated with novel hormonal agents

Introduction

Disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow in prostate cancer is rare and has a poor prognosis. Although strong evidence suggests that novel hormonal agents improve the prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer, their effectiveness in cases of disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow remains unclear.

Case presentation

We encountered two cases of prostate cancer with disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow at the time of initial diagnosis. One patient was treated with enzalutamide, abiraterone, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, denosumab, and radium-223 and died 38 months after the initial diagnosis. The other patient was treated with apalutamide and denosumab, and had progression-free survival for 17 months after the initial diagnosis.

Conclusion

These results suggest that novel hormonal agents may improve the prognosis of prostate cancer even in patients with disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow.

Clinical features and treatment of bone marrow metastasis

Bone marrow metastasis (BMM) refers to the metastasis of malignant tumours originating from nonhematopoietic tissues to the bone marrow. The nonhematopoietic malignant tumour cells metastasize to the bone marrow via heterogeneous dissemination or direct invasion to form metastases and the bone marrow is infiltrated by tumour cells, resulting in the destruction of its structure and the development of haematopoietic disorders. In the present study, the clinical characteristics, prognosis and treatment of BMMs were investigated. The main clinical manifestations were moderate anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Out of 52 cases, a total of 18 patients were not treated and the remaining patients underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery or autologous stem cell transplantation in the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from September 2010 to October 2021. The primary tumours of bone marrow metastatic cancer were usually neuroblastoma and tumours originating from the breast and stomach. When bone metastases occur, patients are not necessarily accompanied by BMMs. In the present study, bone metastases occurred mainly in patients with breast and prostate cancers. The median overall survival of patients treated with antitumor therapy was significantly higher than that of untreated patients (11.5 vs. 3.3 months P<0.01). For patients with BMM, it is of great importance to actively evaluate the patient's condition and select the appropriate treatment plan for improving their prognosis.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of breast cancer combined with symptomatic bone marrow metastases: A 10-year, single-center, real-world study of 67 cases

PURPOSE

Bone marrow metastasis (BMM) is uncommon in breast cancer (BC), and early diagnosis is challenging. BMM lacks definitive treatment options and poses a great threat to the survival of patients. Herein, we investigated the clinical features, prognosis, and factors affecting the prognosis of BC patients with symptomatic BMM to help improve the understanding of this disease and provide effective diagnostic and treatment strategies.

METHODS

Clinical data of 67 patients with BC and BMM were retrospectively analyzed for clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of BMM. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors affecting overall survival following BMM (BMMOS).

RESULTS

Among patients with BMM, 86.6% were diagnosed after bone metastasis (BM), while 13.4% were diagnosed simultaneously with BM. A total of 73.1%, 13.4%, and 13.4% of the patients had hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) tumors, HER2+ tumors, and triple-negative tumors, respectively. The most common symptoms of BMM were the coexistence of anemia and thrombocytopenia (26.9%), anemia (19.4%), and pancytopenia (17.9%). The median BMMOS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-11.3). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that BMMOS was associated with platelet count <75 × 109 /L at the time of BMM diagnosis. The BMMOS of patients who underwent endocrine therapy, combined chemotherapy, and mono-chemotherapy after BMM was 15.7, 9.7, and 8.6 months, respectively, whereas that of untreated patients was 2.9 months, and the difference among the results was statistically significant (χ2  = 20.102, p < 0.0001). Changes in patient hemogram and/or body temperature during treatment were consistent with the overall effect of the disease (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

BMM should be considered in BC patients with BM, an unexplained reduction in hemogram parameters, especially anemia and thrombocytopenia, and/or fever without chills. Active, effective, individualized treatment strategies can prolong BMMOS.