• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4640408)   Today's Articles (208)   Subscriber (50364)
For: Deshmukh VL, Yelikar KA, Waso V. Comparative study of efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction or labour. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2013;63:321-4. [PMID: 24431667 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-012-0337-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2012] [Accepted: 12/01/2012] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]  Open
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Zambrano Guevara LM, Buckheit C, Kuller JA, Gray B, Dotters-Katz S. Evidence Based Management of Labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2024;79:39-53. [PMID: 38306291 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
2
Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022:10.1007/s00404-022-06867-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06867-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
3
Kerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas DM, Weeks AD. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;6:CD014484. [PMID: 34155622 PMCID: PMC8218159 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
4
Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S, Jones LV, Gyte G, Caldwell DM. Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2018;20:1-584. [PMID: 27587290 DOI: 10.3310/hta20650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]  Open
5
Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;291:537-44. [PMID: 25138128 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3429-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
6
Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014:CD001338. [PMID: 24924489 PMCID: PMC6513439 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001338.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA