Multimodality Screening for Lower Genital Tract Infections Between 18 and 24 Weeks of Pregnancy and its Efficacy in Predicting Spontaneous Preterm Delivery

Lower genital tract infections between 18 and 24 weeks of pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcome

Introduction

Lower genital tract infection (LGTI) is common among apparently healthy-looking pregnant women, and its overall prevalence is 40%-54%. LGTI is strongly associated with major adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous preterm delivery (SPTD), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and neonatal morbidities.

Materials and Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat with the objective of finding out the presence of LGTI in the second trimester and looking for its association with various adverse pregnancy outcomes. Two hundred and fifty pregnant women were screened for the presence of vaginal discharge. Various microbiological examinations were done. Diagnosis of specific LGTI was made based on the predecided criteria. Patients were followed up till delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Data were compared to find out a possible association between LGTI and various adverse pregnancy outcomes such as SPTD, PROM, and neonatal deaths.

Results

Out of 194 LGTI cases diagnosed, 54% were having bacterial vaginosis (BV), while 3% were diagnosed having trichomonas. While observing an association of LGTIs and adverse pregnancy outcomes, a maximum number of PROM were observed in the BV and beta Streptococcus infections group. Neonatal admissions were required in 60% of cases. Intrauterine fetal deaths and neonatal deaths were observed in only laboratory-positive cases mainly associated with beta Streptococcus infection and trichomonas.

Conclusion

In this study, the most common LGTI prevalent in pregnant women was BV and the least common was trichomoniasis. There was a significant positive association present between LGTIs and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as SPTD and PROM.

Vulvovaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy are common and can cause extensive inflammation, which could contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Symptomatic yeast infections are likely to cause more inflammation than asymptomatic. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between symptomatic and asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and searched eight databases until 01 July 2022. We included studies reporting on pregnant women with and without laboratory confirmed vulvovaginal yeast infection and preterm birth or eight other perinatal outcomes. We used random effects meta-analysis to calculate summary odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals for the association between yeast infection and outcomes. We described findings from studies with multivariable analyses. We assessed the risk of bias using published tools.

RESULTS

We screened 3909 references and included 57 studies. Only 22/57 studies reported information about participant vulvovaginal symptoms. Preterm birth was an outcome in 35/57 studies (49,161 women). In 32/35 studies with available data, the summary OR from univariable analyses was 1.01 (95% CI 0.84-1.21, I2 60%, prediction interval 0.45-2.23). In analyses stratified by symptom status, we found ORs of 1.44 (95% CI 0.92-2.26) in two studies with ≥ 50% symptomatic participants, 0.84 (95% CI 0.45-1.58) in seven studies with < 50% symptomatic participants, and 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.35) in four studies with asymptomatic participants. In three studies with multivariable analysis, adjusted ORs were greater than one but CIs were compatible with there being no association. We did not find associations between vulvovaginal yeast infection and any secondary outcome. Most studies were at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only three studies controlled for confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find strong statistical evidence of an increased risk for preterm birth or eight other adverse perinatal outcomes, in pregnant women with either symptomatic or asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infection. The available evidence is insufficient to make recommendations about testing and treatment of vulvovaginal yeast infection in pregnancy. Future studies should assess vulvovaginal symptoms, yeast organism loads, concomitant vaginal or cervical infections, and microbiota using state-of-the-art diagnostics.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020197564.

Asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization and adverse pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

During pregnancy, vaginal colonization by Candida spp is common. Some studies suggest an association between asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but the evidence is inconsistent. This review aimed to systematically review the association between asymptomatic vaginal colonization by Candida spp and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to May 6, 2020 for published studies on vaginal Candida/yeast and pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials that included pregnant women who were tested for asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization and reported on adverse pregnancy outcomes were eligible.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two reviewers independently selected and extracted the data. Critical appraisal was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort and case-control studies and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference in preterm birth rate between Candida-positive and Candida-negative women (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.22; I², 0%) in 15 studies among 33,321 women for either spontaneous preterm birth only (odds ratio, 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.31; I², 0%) or all preterm birth (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.35; I², 21%). Subgroup analyses for a treatment strategy including only studies reporting on spontaneous preterm birth did not reveal any statistically significant associations either, although the odds ratio was increased for the untreated Candida-positive women (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.81; I², 13%) in 3 studies among 5175 women. Asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization was not associated with small for gestational age, perinatal mortality, or any other adverse pregnancy outcome.

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization is not associated with preterm birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Previous studies reported that treatment of this microorganism reduces preterm birth rate. Our results suggest that this effect is unlikely to rely on treatment of vaginal Candida.