Measurement of Angle of Descent (AOD) by Transperineal Ultrasound in Labour to Predict Successful Vaginal Delivery

Predicting Vaginal Delivery Success: Role of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound Angle of Descent at a Single Center

BACKGROUND Assessment of labor progress via digital vaginal examination is subjective, while intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography is deemed more objective and effective. The angle of descent (AoD) is a reliable intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameter with minimal inter-observer and intra-observer errors. This study compared intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography with digital vaginal examination in evaluating the angle of descent for vaginal delivery selection in 70 women. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Hospital Palembang in Indonesia, using a consecutive sampling method to measure AoD of 70 patients at admission and every 2 h during labor progression. Patients were monitored until childbirth, and outcomes of successful vaginal or cesarean delivery were reported. A diagnostic test determined the optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery and its predictive value. RESULTS The study included 70 patients with a mean age of 28.29±6.09 years and a body mass index of 30.59±3.49 kg/m². Among them, 29 (41%) had successful vaginal deliveries. Adequate contraction frequency at admission was strongly associated with successful vaginal delivery (P<0.001). The optimal AoD for predicting successful vaginal delivery was 94.5°, with an area under the curve of 0.567 (95% CI 0.425-0.710), sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 45.7%, and accuracy of 54.3%. CONCLUSIONS Intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography for measuring AoD can be a valuable adjunct in labor management. Further investigations are needed to validate the optimal AoD in Indonesian pregnant women.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression

Intrapartum ultrasonography serves as a valuable tool for the objective evaluation of labor progression and effectively identifies underlying factors, such as asynclitism, in cases of abnormal labor progression. Among the various ultrasound measurement techniques, the angle of progression (AOP) demonstrates favorable reproducibility and accuracy in assessing fetal head descent. In the context of abnormal labor, interventions differ across different stages of labor, emphasizing the importance of investigating the utility of AOP according to labor stages in this review article. Pre-labor assessment of AOP can be beneficial in terms of counseling for the timing of induction of labor, while a wider AOP value during the prolonged first stage of labor has demonstrated a positive correlation with successful vaginal delivery and shorter time to delivery. In the second stage of labor, the AOP has exhibited efficacy in predicting the mode of delivery and complicated operative deliveries. Furthermore, it has assisted in predicting the duration of labor, thereby highlighting its potential as a decision-making model for labor progression. However, further research is needed to investigate aspects, such as the determination of cutoff values, of AOP, considering the multifaceted characteristics of labor progression, which are influenced by complex interactions among maternal, fetal, and other contributing factors.

Association between ultrasound measured angle of progression and remaining time in labor: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between ultrasound measured angle of progression (AoP) during labor and time to delivery (TTD) or second stage of labor duration (SSLD).

METHODS

This systematic review (SR) was reported according to PRISMA statement 2020. Databases investigated were MEDLINE, CINHAL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science. Other sources were references or related articles of included studies, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, thesis, expert groups. Main keywords: angle of progression, transperineal ultrasound, delivery, labor. Inclusion criteria were observational studies, single term pregnancy, cephalic presentation, AoP measurement during the first stage of labor or at the beginning of the second stage, without date restrictions. Language included: English, Italian, French, Spanish. Studies selection, evaluation of the risk of bias with Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool, and data extraction were carried out by two authors blindly and independently, with disagreement resolution by a third author. Qualitative summary of the results. This SR was registered on PROSPERO, number CDR42021232015.

RESULTS

Of 428 records, 14 were included, published from 2009 to 2021, cumulatively analyzing 2498 women. All studies highlighted an inverse relationship between AoP and TTD. Some have identified an AoP cutoff, contained in a range between 110° and 129°, beyond which the duration of labor is significantly shorter. Others, a range between 137° and 160°, beyond which the duration of the expulsive period is significantly shorter. Finally, some factors influence this association: parity, epidural, and oxytocin.

CONCLUSIONS

This SR confirms a significant association between AoP in labor and TTD. In clinical practice, AoP could help to predict the duration of labor, facilitating decision-making. The main limitations of this SR were the low number of included studies, their heterogeneity, and the high risk of bias related to confounding factors. For future research, further studies are needed to increase the strength of the evidence, obtain stratified results according to patients' characteristics and investigate groups of patients who have not yet been evaluated.

Transperineal ultrasound of fetal head progression in prolonged labor: women’s acceptance and ability to predict the mode of delivery

Background

Digital transvaginal examination of fetal head progression is subjective evaluation with many limitations. Using ultrasound (US) in the assessment of labor progression in prolonged labor is the current trend to predict the mode of delivery. The study intends to evaluate the women’s acceptance to the transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) compared with digital transvaginal examination, and its ability to predict the mode of delivery in prolonged labor. We included 28 pregnant ladies in a prolonged active phase of first or second stages of labor and followed them till delivery. TPUS was used to measure the fetal head–perineum distance (FHPD) and the angle of fetal head descent.

Results

Of the 28 participants, 53.5% of them delivered vaginally and 46.5% by Cesarean section (CS). All pregnant ladies described the TPUS as more convenient and less painful than digital vaginal examination. Cervical dilatation was negatively correlated with FHPD, and positively correlated with angle of fetal head descent. Both FHPD and angle of fetal head descent had a strong significant negative correlation. Using a cutoff value of 115° for the angle of fetal head descent, the positive predictive value (PPV) of vaginal delivery was 87%; using a cutoff value of 4.2 cm for FHPD, the PPV for vaginal delivery was 85%.

Conclusion

TPUS is more convenient, more accepted, and less painful than digital vaginal examination. Angle of head descent and FHPD are reliable predictors of the mode of delivery in prolonged labor.