Perineal Post-related Vulvar Necrosis: A Rare Case Series and Review of Literature

Are complications related to the perineal post on orthopaedic traction tables for surgical fracture fixation more common than we think? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Traction tables have long been utilized in the management of fractures by orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the complications inherent to the use of a perineal post when treating femur fractures using a traction table.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The search phrase used was "fracture" AND "perineal" AND "post" AND ("femur" OR "femoral" OR "intertrochanteric" OR "subtrochanteric"). Inclusion criteria for this review were: level of evidence (LOE) of I - IV, studies reporting on patients surgically treated for femur fractures, studies reporting on patients treated on a fracture table with a perineal post, and studies that reported the presence or absence of perineal post-related complications. The rate and duration of pudendal nerve palsy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten studies (2 prospective and 8 retrospective studies; 2 LOE III and 8 LOE IV) were included consisting of 351 patients of which 293 (83.5%) were femoral shaft fractures and 58 (16.5%) were hip fractures. Complications associated with pudendal nerve palsies were reported in 8 studies and the mean duration of symptoms ranged between 10 and 639 days. Three studies reported a total of 11 patients (3.0%) with perineal soft tissue injury including 8 patients with scrotal necrosis and 3 patients with vulvar necrosis. All patients that developed perineal skin necrosis healed through secondary intention. No permanent complications relating to pudendal neurapraxia or soft tissue injuries were reported at final follow-up timepoints.

CONCLUSION

The use of a perineal post when treating femur fractures on a fracture table poses risks for pudendal neurapraxia and perineal soft tissue injury. Post padding is mandatory and supplemental padding may also be required. Appropriate perineal skin examination prior to use is also important. Occurring at a higher rate than previously thought, appropriate post-operative examination for any genitoperineal soft tissue complications and sensory disturbances should not be ignored.

To Summarize and Analyze the Epidemiological Characteristics and Prognostic Risk Factors of Patients with Pelvic Fracture Complicated with Perineal Injury

This study is aimed at summarizing and analyzing the epidemiological characteristics and prognostic risk factors of patients with a pelvic fracture with perineal injury. The clinical data of 153 patients with pelvic fracture with perineal injury treated in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The data of sex, age, injury mechanism, pelvic fracture type, shock index (SI), perineal wound depth, concomitant injury, total hospital stay, and death were collected by the electronic medical record system. Among the 153 patients, there were 94 males and 59 females, with an average age of (43.2 ± 16.8) years. The cases were mainly concentrated into two age groups: 20-29 years old and 50-59 years old. In a year, pelvic fractures were mainly concentrated in 1-2 months and 11-12 months. In terms of injury time, there were mainly two periods of time in a day: 10 : 00～12 : 00 and 15 : 00～18 : 00. The MOTS-RTS scores of the patients in the undead group and the dead group were (7.12 ± 1.52), (2.69 ± 0.96), ISS scores were (27.36 ± 15.84), (61.32 ± 7.08), GCS scores were (12.84 ± 3.69), (4.13 ± 1.25), APACH II scores were (12.87 ± 8.84), (32.41 ± 6.98), and SOFA scores were (6.68 ± 5.87), (17.12 ± 3.12). The MOTS-RTS and GCS scores of the nondeath group were significantly higher, while the ISS score, APACH II score, SOFA score, and shock index were significantly lower. The overall mortality rate of 153 patients was 13.7%. The average area of perineal trauma in undead and dead patients was (54.5 ± 113.52) cm2 and (262.63 ± 300.84) cm2, respectively. The average depth of perineal trauma was (9.63 ± 7.22) cm and (16.23 ± 10.13) cm, respectively. The larger the area of perineal injury and the deeper the depth of perineal trauma, the worse their prognosis. Cox multivariate analysis showed that complications, MOTS-RTS score, ISS score, GCS score, perineal trauma area, and perineal trauma depth were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with pelvic fracture with perineal injury. Most of the patients with pelvic fracture complicated with perineal injury are 20-29 years old and 50-59 years old. The more serious the perineal injury is, the higher the mortality is. The main causes of death are refractory hemorrhagic shock and infection.