How to use the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for diagnosis in multiparametric breast MRI: a pictorial essay

Deep Learning k-Space-to-Image Reconstruction Facilitates High Spatial Resolution and Scan Time Reduction in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Breast MRI

BACKGROUND

For time-consuming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the breast, deep learning-based imaging acceleration appears particularly promising.

PURPOSE

To investigate a combined k-space-to-image reconstruction approach for scan time reduction and improved spatial resolution in breast DWI.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

133 women (age 49.7 ± 12.1 years) underwent multiparametric breast MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T/T2 turbo spin echo, T1 3D gradient echo, DWI (800 and 1600 sec/mm2).

ASSESSMENT

DWI data were retrospectively processed using deep learning-based k-space-to-image reconstruction (DL-DWI) and an additional super-resolution algorithm (SRDL-DWI). In addition to signal-to-noise ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) comparisons among standard, DL- and SRDL-DWI, a range of quantitative similarity (e.g., structural similarity index [SSIM]) and error metrics (e.g., normalized root mean square error [NRMSE], symmetric mean absolute percent error [SMAPE], log accuracy error [LOGAC]) was calculated to analyze structural variations. Subjective image evaluation was performed independently by three radiologists on a seven-point rating scale.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Friedman's rank-based analysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise post-hoc tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Both DL- and SRDL-DWI allowed for a 39% reduction in simulated scan time over standard DWI (5 vs. 3 minutes). The highest image quality ratings were assigned to SRDL-DWI with good interreader agreement (ICC 0.834; 95% confidence interval 0.818-0.848). Irrespective of b-value, both standard and DL-DWI produced superior SNR compared to SRDL-DWI. ADC values were slightly higher in SRDL-DWI (+0.5%) and DL-DWI (+3.4%) than in standard DWI. Structural similarity was excellent between DL-/SRDL-DWI and standard DWI for either b value (SSIM ≥ 0.86). Calculation of error metrics (NRMSE ≤ 0.05, SMAPE ≤ 0.02, and LOGAC ≤ 0.04) supported the assumption of low voxel-wise error.

DATA CONCLUSION

Deep learning-based k-space-to-image reconstruction reduces simulated scan time of breast DWI by 39% without influencing structural similarity. Additionally, super-resolution interpolation allows for substantial improvement of subjective image quality.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Assessment of the contribution of the ADC value to the Kaiser score in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions with non-mass enhancement morphology on MRI

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a supplementary tool to the Kaiser score (KS) in diagnosing breast cancer in non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions using breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 360 cases with NME on MRI images. Two breast radiologists independently evaluated each lesion using the Kaiser score (KS) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, without knowledge of the pathological outcomes. NME lesions with a KS above 4 and an ADC value below 1.3 × 10-3mm2/s were classified as malignant. Inter-rater reliability was determined using Cohen's Kappa (κ) statistics. The diagnostic performance of KS, DWI, and their combination was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC), and the results were compared across the benign and malignant groups.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of KS surpassed that of DWI in predicting the malignancy of NMEs (p = 0.003). The sensitivity of KS alone was 93 %; however, when ADC data was incorporated, the sensitivity decreased to 86 %, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.060). The specificity of the combined KS and ADC (94 %) was significantly higher than that of KS alone (89 %) and DWI alone (73 %) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that although the combination of KS and ADC increased specificity and reduced unnecessary biopsies, the resulting decrease in sensitivity was unacceptable. Therefore, KS alone is superior to the KS-ADC combination in detecting malignancy in NME lesions.

Reliability of Kaiser Score in Assessing Additional Breast Lesions Identified on Staging MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer

(1) Background: The Kaiser score is a user-friendly tool that evaluates lesions on breast MRI and has been studied in the general population and a few specific clinical scenarios. We aim to evaluate the performance of the Kaiser score in the characterization of additional lesions identified on staging breast MRI. (2) Methods: The Kaiser score of the biopsied additional lesions identified on staging MRI in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients was retrospectively determined. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic capability of the Kaiser score and whether it is affected by different imaging and pathological parameters of the additional and the index lesion. (3) Results: Seventy-six patients with ninety-two MRI-detected lesions constitute the studied population. There was a statistically significant difference in the Kaiser score between benign and malignant lesions, irrespective of the pathology of the index cancer (p = 0.221) or the size and the imaging features of the additional lesion. Using a cutoff of 5 and above for suspicious lesions, biopsy could have been avoided in 34/92 lesions. (4) Conclusions: The Kaiser score can assist radiologists in the evaluation of additional MRI lesions identified in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients, thus decreasing the number of unneeded biopsies and delays in definitive surgical management.

Application of the Kaiser score on contrast-enhanced mammography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions: comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging

Background

The Kaiser score (KS) as a clinical decision rule has been proven capable of enhancing the diagnostic efficiency for suspicious breast lesions and obviating unnecessary benign biopsies. However, the consistency of KS in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM-KS) and KS on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-KS) is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic efficacy and agreement of CEM-KS and MRI-KS for suspicious breast lesions.

Methods

This retrospective study included 207 patients from April 2019 to June 2022. The radiologists assigned a diagnostic category to all lesions using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Subsequently, they were asked to assign a final diagnostic category for each lesion according to the KS. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The agreement in terms of the kinetic curve and the KS categories for CEM and MRI were evaluated via the Cohen kappa coefficient.

Results

The AUC was higher for the CEM-KS category assignment than for the CEM-BI-RADS category assignment (0.856 vs. 0.776; P=0.047). The AUC was higher for MRI-KS than for MRI-BI-RADS (0.841 vs. 0.752; P =0.015). The AUC of CEM-KS was not significantly different from that of MRI-KS (0.856 vs. 0.841; P=0.538). The difference between the AUCs for CEM-BI-RADS and MRI-BI-RADS was not statistically significant (0.776 vs. 0.752; P=0.400). The kappa agreement for the characterization of suspicious breast lesions using CEM-KS and MRI-KS was 0.885.

Conclusions

The KS substantially improved the diagnostic performance of suspicious breast lesions, not only in MRI but also in CEM. CEM-KS and MRI-KS showed similar diagnostic performance and almost perfect agreement for the characterization of suspicious breast lesions. Therefore, CEM holds promise as an alternative when breast MRI is not available or contraindicated.

Breast lesions on MRI in mass and non-mass enhancement: Kaiser score and modified Kaiser score + for readers of variable experience

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance of three readers using BI-RADS and Kaiser score (KS) based on mass and non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions.

METHODS

A total of 630 lesions, 393 malignant and 237 benign, 458 mass and 172 NME, were analyzed. Three radiologists with 3 years, 6 years, and 13 years of experience made diagnoses. 596 cases had diffusion-weighted imaging, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured. For lesions with ADC > 1.4 × 10-3 mm2/s, the KS was reduced by 4 as the modified KS +, and the benefit was assessed.

RESULTS

When using BI-RADS, AUC was 0.878, 0.915, and 0.941 for mass, and 0.771, 0.838, 0.902 for NME for Reader-1, 2, and 3, respectively, better for mass than for NME. The diagnostic accuracy of KS was improved compared to BI-RADS for less experienced readers. For Reader-1, AUC was increased from 0.878 to 0.916 for mass (p = 0.005) and from 0.771 to 0.822 for NME (p = 0.124). Based on the cut-off value of BI-RADS ≥ 4B and KS ≥ 5 as malignant, the sensitivity of KS by Readers-1 and -2 was significantly higher for both Mass and NME. When ADC was considered to change to modified KS +, the AUC and the accuracy for all three readers were improved, showing higher specificity with slightly degraded sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of KS compared to BI-RADS was most noticeable for the less experienced readers in improving sensitivity. Compared to KS, KS + can improve specificity for all three readers. For NME, the KS and KS + criteria need to be further improved.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

KS provides an intuitive method for diagnosing lesions on breast MRI. BI-RADS and KS face greater difficulties in evaluating NME compared to mass lesions. Adding ADC to the KS can improve specificity with slightly degraded sensitivity.

KEY POINTS

KS provides an intuitive method for interpreting breast lesions on MRI, most helpful for novice readers. KS, compared to BI-RADS, improved sensitivity in both mass and NME groups for less experienced readers. NME lesions were considered during the development of the KS flowchart, but may need to be better defined.

Differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions using dual-energy CT-based model: development and validation

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a dual-energy CT (DECT)-based model for noninvasively differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions detected on DECT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled patients with suspected breast cancer who underwent dual-phase contrast-enhanced DECT from July 2022 to July 2023. Breast lesions were randomly divided into the training and test cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Clinical characteristics, DECT-based morphological features, and DECT quantitative parameters were collected. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine independent predictors of benign and malignant breast lesions. An individualized model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of the model, whose calibration and clinical usefulness were assessed by calibration curve and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 200 patients (mean age, 49.9 ± 11.9 years; age range, 22-83 years) with 222 breast lesions. Age, lesion shape, and the effective atomic number (Zeff) in the venous phase were significant independent predictors of breast lesions (all p < 0.05). The discriminative power of the model incorporating these three factors was high, with AUCs of 0.844 (95%CI 0.764-0.925) and 0.791 (95% CI 0.647-0.935) in the training and test cohorts, respectively. The constructed model showed a preferable fitting (all p > 0.05 by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and provided enhanced net benefits than simple default strategies within a wide range of threshold probabilities in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The DECT-based model showed a favorable diagnostic performance for noninvasive differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected on DECT.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The combination of clinical and morphological characteristics and DECT-derived parameter have the potential to identify benign and malignant breast lesions and it may be useful for incidental breast lesions on DECT to decide if further work-up is needed.

KEY POINTS

It is important to characterize incidental breast lesions on DECT for patient management. DECT-based model can differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions with good performance. DECT-based model is a potential tool for distinguishing breast lesions detected on DECT.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast

Breast MR imaging and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) are both techniques that employ intravenously injected contrast agent to assess breast lesions. This approach is associated with a very high sensitivity for malignant lesions that typically exhibit rapid enhancement due to the leakiness of neovasculature. CEM may be readily available at the breast imaging department and can be performed on the spot. Breast MR imaging provides stronger enhancement than the x-ray-based techniques and offers higher sensitivity. From a patient perspective, both modalities have their benefits and downsides; thus, patient preference could also play a role in the selection of the imaging technique.

Identification of impactful imaging biomarker: Clinical applications for breast and prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

 Imaging biomarkers are quantitative parameters from imaging modalities, which are collected noninvasively, allow conclusions about physiological and pathophysiological processes, and may consist of single (monoparametric) or multiple parameters (bi- or multiparametric).

METHOD

 This review aims to present the state of the art for the quantification of multimodal and multiparametric imaging biomarkers. Here, the use of biomarkers using artificial intelligence will be addressed and the clinical application of imaging biomarkers in breast and prostate cancers will be explained. For the preparation of the review article, an extensive literature search was performed based on Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. The results were evaluated and discussed for consistency and generality.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 Different imaging biomarkers (multiparametric) are quantified based on the use of complementary imaging modalities (multimodal) from radiology, nuclear medicine, or hybrid imaging. From these techniques, parameters are determined at the morphological (e. g., size), functional (e. g., vascularization or diffusion), metabolic (e. g., glucose metabolism), or molecular (e. g., expression of prostate specific membrane antigen, PSMA) level. The integration and weighting of imaging biomarkers are increasingly being performed with artificial intelligence, using machine learning algorithms. In this way, the clinical application of imaging biomarkers is increasing, as illustrated by the diagnosis of breast and prostate cancers.

KEY POINTS

· Imaging biomarkers are quantitative parameters to detect physiological and pathophysiological processes.. · Imaging biomarkers from multimodality and multiparametric imaging are integrated using artificial intelligence algorithms.. · Quantitative imaging parameters are a fundamental component of diagnostics for all tumor entities, such as for mammary and prostate carcinomas..

CITATION FORMAT

· Bäuerle T, Dietzel M, Pinker K et al. Identification of impactful imaging biomarker: Clinical applications for breast and prostate carcinoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 354 - 362.

Characteristics of Suspicious Breast Lesions Visible Only on MR Imaging: Is It Possible to Classify into Immediate Biopsy and Careful Observation Groups?

PURPOSE

To investigate the characteristics of suspicious MRI-only visible lesions and to explore the validity of subcategorizing these lesions into the following two groups: lesions that would require immediate biopsy (4Bi) and lesions for which careful clinical follow-up could be recommended (4Fo).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 108 MRI-only visible lesions in 106 patients who were diagnosed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 between June 2018 and June 2022 at our institution was performed by two radiologists. The breast MR images were evaluated according to BI-RADS and additional MRI descriptors (linear ductal, branching, and apparent diffusion coefficient values). The lesions were categorized by previously reported classification systems, and the positive predictive values (PPVs) for the different categories were determined and compared. Subsequently, a new classification system was developed in this study.

RESULTS

The total malignancy rate was 31% (34/108). No significant differences between benign and malignant lesions were identified for focus and mass lesions. For non-mass lesions, linear ductal and heterogeneous internal enhancement suggested a benign lesion (P = 0.0013 and P = 0.023, respectively), and branching internal enhancement suggested malignancy (P = 0.0066). Segmental distribution suggested malignancy (P = 0.0097). However, the PPV of segmental distribution with heterogeneous enhancement was significantly lower than that of category 4 segmental lesions with other enhancement patterns (11% vs. 59%; P = 0.0198).As a new classification, the distribution of focal, linear, and segmental was given a score of 0, 1, or 2, and the internal enhancement of heterogeneous, linear-ductal, clumped, branching, and clustered-ring enhancement was given a score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. When categorized using a scoring system, a statistically significant difference in PPV was observed between 4Fo (n = 27) and 4Bi (n = 33) (7% vs. 61%, P = 0.000029).

CONCLUSION

The new classification system was found to be highly capable of subcategorizing BI-RADS category 4 MRI-only visible non-mass lesions into 4Fo and 4Bi.

Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced breast MRI and recently also contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) are available for breast imaging. The aim of the current overview is to explore existing evidence and ongoing challenges of contrast-enhanced breast imaging.

METHODS

This narrative provides an introduction to the contrast-enhanced breast imaging modalities breast MRI and CEM. Underlying principle, techniques and BI-RADS reporting of both techniques are described and compared, and the following indications and ongoing challenges are discussed: problem-solving, high-risk screening, supplemental screening in women with extremely dense breast tissue, breast implants, neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) response monitoring, MRI-guided and CEM- guided biopsy.

RESULTS

Technique and reporting for breast MRI are standardised, for the newer CEM standardisation is in progress. Similarly, compared to other modalities, breast MRI is well established as superior for problem-solving, screening women at high risk, screening women with extremely dense breast tissue or with implants; and for monitoring response to NST. Furthermore, MRI-guided biopsy is a reliable technique with low long-term false negative rates. For CEM, data is as yet either absent or limited, but existing results in these settings are promising.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced breast imaging achieves highest diagnostic performance and should be considered essential. Of the two contrast-enhanced modalities, evidence of breast MRI superiority is ample, and preliminary results on CEM are promising, yet CEM warrants further study.

Diagnostic accuracy of the breast MRI Kaiser score in suspected architectural distortions and its comparison with mammography

Suspicious architectural distortion is an elusive finding in breast cancer diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Kaiser score for suspicious architectural distortions observed on mammography and compare it with the BI-RADS score of the lesion. Mammograms performed between January 2013 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of suspicious architectural distortion. Forty-one patients, who had at least 1 year of radiological follow-up or pathology results, and underwent breast MRI, were included in the study. Mammography findings and the BI-RADS category of the lesion were assessed. MRI findings were evaluated and Kaiser scoring was performed according to the tree flowchart. Ninety-one percent of the enhanced lesions had a Kaiser score of 5 and above. In the diagnosis of malignancy, the Kaiser score yielded an accuracy of 75.61% (AUC 0.833). A statistically significant correlation was observed indicating that a malignant diagnosis was more prevalent in patients with a Kaiser score of 5 and above (p < 0.05). Additionally statistically significant relationship was also observed between the BI-RADS category of architectural distortions on mammography and the Kaiser score (p = 0.007). The combined utilization of mammography findings and the evidence-based Kaiser score in suspected architectural distortions provides more accurate results in the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.

Multiparametric Approach to Breast Cancer With Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Era of Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment

ABSTRACT

A multiparametric approach to breast cancer imaging offers the advantage of integrating the diverse contributions of various parameters. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is the most important MRI sequence for breast imaging. The vascularity and permeability of lesions can be estimated through the use of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters. The increased use of ultrafast DCE-MRI has facilitated the introduction of novel kinetic parameters. In addition to DCE-MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging provides information associated with tumor cell density, with advanced diffusion-weighted imaging techniques such as intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging, and time-dependent diffusion MRI opening up new horizons in microscale tissue evaluation. Furthermore, T2-weighted imaging plays a key role in measuring the degree of tumor aggressiveness, which may be related to the tumor microenvironment. Magnetic resonance imaging is, however, not the only imaging modality providing semiquantitative and quantitative parameters from breast tumors. Breast positron emission tomography demonstrates superior spatial resolution to whole-body positron emission tomography and allows comparable delineation of breast cancer to MRI, as well as providing metabolic information, which often precedes vascular and morphological changes occurring in response to treatment. The integration of these imaging-derived factors is accomplished through multiparametric imaging. In this article, we explore the relationship among the key imaging parameters, breast cancer diagnosis, and histological characteristics, providing a technical and theoretical background for these parameters. Furthermore, we review the recent studies on the application of multiparametric imaging to breast cancer and the significance of the key imaging parameters.

Panoramic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast With a Wearable Coil Vest

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer, the most common malignant cancer in women worldwide, is typically diagnosed by x-ray mammography, which is an unpleasant procedure, has low sensitivity in women with dense breasts, and involves ionizing radiation. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality and works without ionizing radiation, but is currently constrained to the prone imaging position due to suboptimal hardware, therefore hampering the clinical workflow.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work is to improve image quality in breast MRI, to simplify the clinical workflow, shorten measurement time, and achieve consistency in breast shape with other procedures such as ultrasound, surgery, and radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To this end, we propose "panoramic breast MRI"-an approach combining a wearable radiofrequency coil for 3 T breast MRI (the "BraCoil"), acquisition in the supine position, and a panoramic visualization of the images. We demonstrate the potential of panoramic breast MRI in a pilot study on 12 healthy volunteers and 1 patient, and compare it to the state of the art.

RESULTS

With the BraCoil, we demonstrate up to 3-fold signal-to-noise ratio compared with clinical standard coils and acceleration factors up to 6 × 4. Panoramic visualization of supine breast images reduces the number of slices to be viewed by a factor of 2-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Panoramic breast MRI allows for high-quality diagnostic imaging and facilitated correlation to other diagnostic and interventional procedures. The developed wearable radiofrequency coil in combination with dedicated image processing has the potential to improve patient comfort while enabling more time-efficient breast MRI compared with clinical coils.

Quantitative evaluation of Kaiser score in diagnosing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with high-grade background parenchymal enhancement

Background

High-grade background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), including moderate and marked, poses a considerable challenge for the diagnosis of breast disease due to its tendency to increase the rate of false positives and false negatives. The purpose of our study was to explore whether the Kaiser score can be used for more accurate assessment of benign and malignant lesions in high-grade BPE compared with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scans from 2 medical centers. Included were patients who underwent DCE-MRI demonstrating high-grade BPE and who had a pathology-confirmed diagnosis. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or who had undergone biopsy prior to MRI examination. Two physicians with more than 7 years of experience specializing in breast imaging diagnosis jointly reviewed breast magnetic resonance (MR) images. The Kaiser score was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the BI-RADS from different BPE groups and different enhancement types. The performance of the Kaiser score and BI-RADS were compared according to diagnostic accuracy.

Results

A total of 126 cases of high-grade BPE from 2 medical centers were included in this study. The Kaiser score had a higher specificity and PPV than did the BI-RADS (87.5% vs. 46.3%) as well as a higher PPV (94.3% vs. 79.8%). The value of diagnostic accuracy and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the Kaiser score (accuracy 0.928; 95% CI: 0.883-0.973) was larger than that for BI-RADS (accuracy 0.810; 95% CI: 0.741-0.879). Moreover, the Kaiser score had a significantly higher value of diagnostic accuracy for both mass and non-mass enhancement, especially mass lesions (Kaiser score: accuracy 0.947, 95% CI: 0.902-0.992; BI-RADS: accuracy 0.821, 95% CI: 0.782-0.860), with a P value of 0.006.

Conclusions

The Kaiser score is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of high-grade BPE lesions, with a higher specificity, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy as compared to the BI-RADS.

Breast MRI - The champion in the millimeter league: MIO breast MRI - The method of choice in women with dense breasts

We perform MRI of the breast as a first pass technique. We successfully established 10-minute-protocols (including T2 images) with a fixed dosage of 5 ml 1 M CM. A high spatial resolution of 526 × 526, better 672 × 672 or maximum (1.024 × 1.024, MIO MRI) is vital to achieve best results. We use fixation tools to avoid motion artifacts. Motion correction algorithms can, however, often eliminate such artifacts when they are present. In initial breast MRI exams, morphologic features are the most important criteria for lesion evaluation. If previous exams are available for comparison, the main criteria indicating a suspicious lesion are an increase in lesion size or the depiction of new lesions. High quality HR MRI of the breast is the method of choice in women with dense or extremely dense breasts in all cases (screening, assessment, follow up). In density type A or B, MRI can be helpful in defined constellations, e.g. when MX and US are limited or contraindicated. According to our experience, 95% or more of all carcinomas of the breast are detectable on MRI. The remaining 5% of MRI-occult lesions are intraductal tumors or very small invasive carcinomas depicted with mammography due to associated microcalcifications. MRI is, however, superior to all other imaging modalities in the detection of the clinically relevant DCIS (high risk DCIS, intermediate type). Consecutive MRI examinations in intervals of 12 to 24 months allow a reliable detection of invasive breast cancer with an average size of 7-8 mm. This corresponds to a rate of metastasis-free locoregional lymph nodes in >95% of cases. The rate of interval cancers is <2%. In conclusion, this strategy may increase the overall-lifetime survival of breast cancer patients to more than 95%. Inversely, mortality may be reduced to <5%. Taking these improvements in early breast cancer detection and survival that can be achieved through the implementation of QA HR MRI of the breast into account, it should be discussed to modify oncologic guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer. MRI is the best diagnostic tool we have and according to our experience, a first pass, quality-assured high-resolution breast MRI protocol provides best diagnostic results at minimal procedural effort.

Improved Differential Diagnosis Based on BI-RADS Descriptors and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Breast Lesions: A Multiparametric MRI Analysis as Compared to Kaiser Score

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To develop the nomogram utilizing the American College of Radiology BI-RADS descriptors, clinical features, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 341 lesions (161 malignant and 180 benign) were included. Clinical data and imaging features were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent variables. ADC as a continuous or classified into binary form with a cutoff value of 1.30 × 10-3 mm2/s, incorporated other independent predictors to construct two nomograms, respectively. Receiver operating curve and calibration plot was employed to test the models' discriminative ability. The diagnostic performance between the developed model and the Kaiser score (KS) was also compared.

RESULTS

In both models, high patient age, the presence of root sign, time-intensity curves (TICs) types (plateau and washout), heterogenous internal enhancement, the presence of peritumoral edema, and ADC were independently associated with malignancy. The AUCs of two multivariable models (AUC, 0.957; 95% CI: 0.929-0.976 and AUC, 0.958; 95% CI: 0.931-0.976) were significantly higher than that of the KS (AUC, 0.919, 95% CI: 0.885-0.946; both P < 0.001). At the same sensitivity of 95.7%, our models showed an increase in specificity by 5.56% (P = 0.076) and 6.11% (P = 0.035), respectively, as compared to the KS.

CONCLUSION

The models incorporating MRI features (root sign, TIC, margins, internal enhancement, and presence of edema), quantitative ADC value, and patient age showed improved diagnostic performance and might have avoided more unnecessary biopsies in comparison with the KS, although further external validation is required.

Contrasts Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR in Diagnosing Malignancies of Breast Nonmass Enhancement Lesions Based on Morphologic Assessment

BACKGROUND

Nonmass enhancement (NME) breast lesions are considered to be the leading cause of unnecessary biopsies. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences are typically used to differentiate between benign and malignant NMEs. It is important to know which one is more effective and reliable.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of DCE curves and DWI in discriminating benign and malignant NME lesions on the basis of morphologic characteristics assessment on contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI images.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 180 patients with 184 lesions in the training cohort and 75 patients with 77 lesions in the validation cohort with pathological results.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T/multi-b-value DWI (b values = 0, 50, 1000, and 2000 sec/mm2 ) and time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories and volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (TWIST-VIBE) sequence.

ASSESSMENT

In the training cohort, a diagnostic model for morphology based on the distribution and internal enhancement characteristics was first constructed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model (ADC + morphology) and the time-intensity curves (TIC) model (TIC + morphology) were then established using binary logistic regression with pathological results as the reference standard. Both models were compared for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) in the training and the validation cohort.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and two-sample t-tests/Mann-Whitney U-test/Chi-square test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For the TIC/ADC model in the training cohort, sensitivities were 0.924/0.814, specificities were 0.615/0.615, and AUCs were 0.811 (95%, 0.727, 0.894)/0.769 (95%, 0.681, 0.856). The AUC of the TIC-ADC combined model was significantly higher than ADC model alone, while comparable with the TIC model (P = 0.494). In the validation cohort, the AUCs of TIC/ADC model were 0.799/0.635.

DATA CONCLUSION

Based on the morphologic analyses, the performance of the TIC model was found to be superior than the ADC model for differentiating between benign and malignant NME lesions.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

The added value of apparent diffusion coefficient and microcalcifications to the Kaiser score in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions

PURPOSE

To explore the added value of combining microcalcifications or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the Kaiser score (KS) for diagnosing BI-RADS 4 lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 194 consecutive patients with 201 histologically verified BI-RADS 4 lesions. Two radiologists assigned the KS value to each lesion. Adding microcalcifications, ADC, or both these criteria to the KS yielded KS1, KS2, and KS3, respectively. The potential of all four scores to avoid unnecessary biopsies was assessed using the sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) and compared between KS and KS1.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of KS, KS1, KS2, and KS3 ranged from 77.1% to 100.0%.KS1 yielded significantly higher sensitivity than other methods (P < 0.05), except for KS3 (P > 0.05), most of all, when assessing NME lesions. For mass lesions, the sensitivity of these four scores was comparable (p > 0.05). The specificity of KS, KS1, KS2, and KS3 ranged from 56.0% to 69.4%, with no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05), except between KS1 and KS2 (p < 0.05).The AUC of KS1 (0.877) was significantly higher than that of KS (0.837; P = 0.0005), particularly for assessing NME (0.847 vs 0.713; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

KS can stratify BI-RADS 4 lesions to avoid unnecessary biopsies. Adding microcalcifications, but not adding ADC, as an adjunct to KS improves diagnostic performance, particularly for NME lesions. ADC provides no additional diagnostic benefit to KS. Thus, only combining microcalcifications with KS is most conducive to clinical practice.

A new scoring system for differentiating malignant from benign "second-look" breast lesions detected by MRI in patients with known breast cancer

AIM

To propose a scoring system made of reproducible and objective criteria to aid in differentiating malignant from benign "second-look" breast lesions detected at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively for "second-look" lesions identified on breast MRI studies performed at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust breast unit over a 2-year period (from January 2020 to January 2022). Ninety-five "second look" MRI-detected lesions were included in this retrospective study. Lesions were assessed according to margins, T2 signal, internal enhancement patterns, contrast kinetics, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns.

RESULTS

Fifty-two per cent of the included lesions were confirmed at histopathology to be malignant. The most common contrast kinetics identified in malignant lesions was the plateau pattern followed by the washout pattern while the most common pattern in benign lesions was the progressive pattern. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cut-off value for separating benign and malignant lesions at the unit was found to be 1.1 × 10-3 mm2/s. Based on the MRI features described above, a scoring system is suggested to help differentiate benign from malignant "second-look" lesions. According to the present results, setting a score of 2 or more points as an indication for biopsy was 100% reliable in identifying malignant lesions and avoiding biopsies in >30% of lesions.

CONCLUSION

The suggested scoring system could avoid biopsy of >30% of the "second-look" lesions detected by MRI without missing any malignant lesions.

Analysis of radiomic features derived from post-contrast T1-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for breast lesion evaluation: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, and its diagnosis relies on medical imaging and the invasive, uncomforted biopsy. Recent advances in quantitative imaging and specifically the application of radiomics has proved to be a very promising technique, facilitating both diagnosis and therapy. The purpose of this study is to assess radiomic features derived from post-contrast T1w Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps for the evaluation of breast pathologies.

METHODS

MRI data from 52 women were retrospectively reviewed, involving 54 breast lesions, both malignant and benign. Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) was applied as a standard MRΙ protocol, including dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRΙ in all cases. All patients were examined on a 1.5T MRI scanner, and 216 features were initially extracted from DCE-MRI images. Histological analysis of the breast lesions was performed, and a comparative analysis of the results was carried out to assess the accuracy of the method.

RESULTS

Following surgery and histological analysis, 30 lesions were found to be malignant and 24 benign. Implementation of a Machine Learning (ML) classification algorithm with 5-fold cross-validation resulted in a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 66%, Negative Predictive Value of 82% and overall accuracy of 67% in differentiating malignancy from benevolence.

CONCLUSION

Texture analysis and ML methodology based on the first post-contrast dynamic sequences and ADC maps may be employed to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions, offering a promising new tool for diagnostic analysis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results of this study will enhance knowledge around application and performance of radiomics in breast MRI, thus helping MRI radiographers who use AI-enabled technologies to better delineate the pros and cons of these procedures.

Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer?

There is limited information about whether the level of enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) can be used to predict malignancy. The purpose of this study was to correlate the level of enhancement with the presence of malignancy and breast cancer (BC) aggressiveness on CEM. This IRB-approved, cross-sectional, retrospective study included consecutive patients examined with CEM for unclear or suspicious findings on mammography or ultrasound. Excluded were examinations performed after biopsy or during neoadjuvant treatment for BC. Three breast radiologists who were blinded to patient data evaluated the images. The enhancement intensity was rated from 0 (no enhancement) to 3 (distinct enhancement). ROC analysis was performed. Sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were calculated after dichotomizing enhancement intensity as negative (0) versus positive (1-3). A total of 156 lesions (93 malignant, 63 benign) in 145 patients (mean age 59 ± 11.6 years) were included. The mean ROC curve was 0.827. Mean sensitivity was 95.4%. Mean LR- was 0.12%. Invasive cancer presented predominantly (61.8%) with distinct enhancement. A lack of enhancement was mainly observed for ductal carcinoma in situ. Stronger enhancement intensity was positively correlated with cancer aggressiveness, but the absence of enhancement should not be used to downgrade suspicious calcifications.

Breast MRI: an illustration of benign findings

Despite its unparalleled sensitivity for aggressive breast cancer, breast MRI continually excites criticism for a specificity that lags behind that of modern mammographic techniques. Radiologists reporting breast MRI need to recognise the range of benign appearances on breast MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy. This review summarises the reported diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI with particular attention to the technique's specificity, provides a referenced reporting strategy and discusses factors that compromise diagnostic confidence. We then present a pictorial review of benign findings on breast MRI. Enhancing radiological skills to discriminate malignant from benign findings will minimise false positive biopsies, enabling optimal use of multiparametric breast MRI for the benefit of screening clients and breast cancer patients.

Correlation of CT-data derived from multiparametric dual-layer CT-maps with immunohistochemical biomarkers in invasive breast carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

To examine the correlation of quantitative measurements from material decomposition maps calculated from dual-layer CT (DLCT)-image datasets with immunohistochemical biomarkers of invasive breast carcinomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients at the University Breast Cancer Center who underwent a clinically indicated dual-layer CT-scan for staging of invasive ductal breast carcinoma from 01/2016 to 07/2020 were prospectively included. Iodine concentration maps and maps of the effective atomic numbers (Zeffective) were reconstructed from the image datasets. ROI-based evaluations of the index tumors and predefined references tissues for normalization were performed semi-automatically in identical anatomical positions using dedicated evaluation software. Statistical analysis was essentially descriptive using Spearmańs rank correlation and (multivariable) partial correlation.

RESULTS

Bivariate showed statistically significant correlations of iodine contents (r = -0.154/-0.202/0.180, p = 0.039/0.006/0.015), and Zeffective-values (r = -0.158/-0.199/0.179, p = 0.034/0.007/0.016) for all 184 carcinomas and the subgroup of 168 invasive ductal carcinomas. The results were confirmed by multivariate analyses with "age", "diameter" and "ACR-grade" as possible confounders. Normalization of the measured target values with those in the aorta confirmed significant correlations of iodine content and Zeffective compared to Estrogen (r = 0.174, p = 0.019), Progesteron (r = 0.168/0.177, p = 0.024/0.017), and HER2 receptor expression (r = -0.222/-0.184, p = 0.003/0.013). All CT-parameters showed significant correlations with immunohistochemical subtyping (r = 0.191/0.192, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results indicate that iodine content and Zeffective-values derived from DLCT-examinations correlate with hormone receptor expression in invasive breast carcinomas. Assignments to benign entities already seam feasible in clinical routine CT-diagnostics. After further investigations iodine content and Zeffective may be translated as diagnostical and prognostical biomarkers into clinical routine in the long term.

Diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score in the evaluation of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate whether the Kaiser score (KS) could improve the diagnostic performance of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) in evaluating breast enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM).

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-nine patients with 375 lesions (231 malignant and 144 benign) were included in this retrospective study from April 2019 to December 2021.Two readers with different levels of experience in breast imaging were asked to give a BI-RADS assessment category according to the CEM BI-RADS and final score based on the KS. The diagnostic performance of all lesions, mass and non-mass enhancement (NME) were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were measured. The weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to investigate the interreader agreement.

RESULTS

The AUCs of the KS for all lesions were 0.915 (95 %CI: 0.884-0.947) and 0.876 (95 %CI: 0.838-0.914) for two readers. When mass and NME were evaluated separately, the AUCs of the KS for mass were higher than those for NME (p < 0.001). The AUCs of BI-RADS for all lesion diagnoses ranged between 0.821 (95 %CI: 0.778-0.864) and 0.842(95 %CI: 0.801-0.883) for two readers. The AUCs of the KS were higher than those of BI-RADS (p < 0.001, p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in the sensitivity between the KS (97.4 %) and BI-RADS (99.6 %) for all lesions (p = 0.130). The specificity of the KS was significantly higher than that of BI-RADS (p < 0.001). Compared with BI-RADS, the application of the KS could have potentially obviated 41.7 % to 47.9 % unnecessary biopsies in 144 benign lesions. Interreader agreement between the two readers of the KS was almost perfect (k = 0.883 [95 % CI: 0.842-0.924]).

CONCLUSION

The use of the KS provided a high diagnostic performance in distinguishing malignant and benign breast lesions on CEM and outperformed BI-RADS. The application of the KS can downgrade up to 47.9% of unnecessary biopsies of benign breast lesions.

Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) combined with the Kaiser score (KS) in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) BI-RADS 4A lesions to potentially reduce unnecessary breast biopsies.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 106 patients with 109 DBT BI-RADS 4A lesions from June 2019 to June 2021. For the absence of enhancement on CEM, the lesions were downgraded to BI-RADS 3. For lesions with enhancement, the readers were asked to classify all enhancing lesions referring to the KS for breast MRI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Two readers rated all cases and interreader agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa coefficients.

RESULTS

There were ninety-five benign lesions and 14 malignant lesions. CEM combined with KS's accuracy, represented by the area under the curve (AUC), ranged between 0.880 and 0.906. The use of the KS improved the performance, with a significant difference relative to a single BI-RADS reading or US (p < 0.001). CEM with KS had higher specificity than CEM with BI-RADS or US (p < 0.001), without difference in sensitivity (p > 0.05). CEM combined with KS could have potentially obviated 72 (75.8%) to 78 (82.1%) unnecessary benign biopsies in 95 benign lesions previously DBT classified as BI-RADS 4A. The interreader agreement was substantial (kappa: 0.727) for KS.

CONCLUSIONS

CEM combined with KS may be used in DBT BI-RADS 4A lesions to substantially reduce unnecessary benign biopsies.

KEY POINTS

• CEM combined with the Kaiser scoring system shows high diagnostic performance for DBT BI-RADS 4A lesions. • The application of CEM combined with the Kaiser scoring system may avoid 75.8% to 82.1% of unnecessary benign breast biopsies. • CEM combined with the KS aids clinical decision-making in DBT BI-RADS 4A lesions.

Evaluation of the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using synthetic relaxometry and the Kaiser score

Objective

To investigate whether there is added value of quantitative parameters from synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) as a complement to the Kaiser score (KS) to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.

Materials and methods

In this single-institution study, 122 patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. SyMRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were performed using a 3.0-T system. Two experienced radiologists independently assigned the KS and measured the quantitative values of T1 relaxation time (T1), T2 relaxation time (T2), and proton density (PD) from SyMRI. Pathology was regarded as the gold standard. The diagnostic values were compared using the appropriate statistical tests.

Results

There were 122 lesions (86 malignant and 36 benign) in 122 women. The T1 value was identified as the only independent factor for the differentiation of malignant and benign lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of incorporating the T1 into the KS protocol (T1+KS) was 95.1% and 92.1% for all lesions (ALL) and The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of either T1 (ALL: 82.8%, P = 0.0001; BI-RADS 4: 78.9%, P = 0.002) or KS (ALL: 90.2%, P = 0.031; BI-RADS 4: 84.2%, P = 0.031) alone. The sensitivity and specificity of T1+KS were also higher than those of the T1 or KS alone. The combined diagnosis could have avoided another 15.6% biopsies compared with using KS alone.

Conclusions

Incorporating T1 into the KS protocol improved both the sensitivity and specificity to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions, thus avoiding unnecessary invasive procedures.

Assessment of breast lesions by the Kaiser score for differential diagnosis on MRI: the added value of ADC and machine learning modeling

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score (KS) adjusted with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (KS+) and machine learning (ML) modeling.

METHODS

A dataset of 402 malignant and 257 benign lesions was identified. Two radiologists assigned the KS. If a lesion with KS > 4 had ADC > 1.4 × 10^-3 mm²/s, the KS was reduced by 4 to become KS+. In order to consider the full spectrum of ADC as a continuous variable, the KS and ADC values were used to train diagnostic models using 5 ML algorithms. The performance was evaluated using the ROC analysis, compared by the DeLong test. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy achieved using the threshold of KS > 4, KS+ > 4, and ADC ≤ 1.4 × 10^-3 mm²/s were obtained and compared by the McNemar test.

RESULTS

The ROC curves of KS, KS+, and all ML models had comparable AUC in the range of 0.883-0.921, significantly higher than that of ADC (0.837, p < 0.0001). The KS had sensitivity = 97.3% and specificity = 59.1%; and the KS+ had sensitivity = 95.5% with significantly improved specificity to 68.5% (p < 0.0001). However, when setting at the same sensitivity of 97.3%, KS+ could not improve specificity. In ML analysis, the logistic regression model had the best performance. At sensitivity = 97.3% and specificity = 65.3%, i.e., compared to KS, 16 false-positives may be avoided without affecting true cancer diagnosis (p = 0.0015).

CONCLUSION

Using dichotomized ADC to modify KS to KS+ can improve specificity, but at the price of lowered sensitivity. Machine learning algorithms may be applied to consider the ADC as a continuous variable to build more accurate diagnostic models.

KEY POINTS

• When using ADC to modify the Kaiser score to KS+, the diagnostic specificity according to the results of two independent readers was improved by 9.4-9.7%, at the price of slightly degraded sensitivity by 1.5-1.8%, and overall had improved accuracy by 2.6-2.9%. • When the KS and the continuous ADC values were combined to train models by machine learning algorithms, the diagnostic specificity achieved by the logistic regression model could be significantly improved from 59.1 to 65.3% (p = 0.0015), while maintaining at the high sensitivity of KS = 97.3%, and thus, the results demonstrated the potential of ML modeling to further evaluate the contribution of ADC. • When setting the sensitivity at the same levels, the modified KS+ and the original KS have comparable specificity; therefore, KS+ with consideration of ADC may not offer much practical help, and the original KS without ADC remains as an excellent robust diagnostic method.

Can DWI provide additional value to Kaiser score in evaluation of breast lesions

OBJECTIVES

To explore added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as an adjunct to Kaiser score (KS) for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Two hundred forty-six patients with 273 lesions (155 malignancies) were included in this retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2019. All lesions were proved by pathology. Two radiologists blind to pathological results evaluated lesions according to KS. Lesions with score > 4 were considered malignant. Four thresholds of ADC values -1.3 × 10^-3mm²/s, 1.4 × 10^-3mm²/s, 1.53 × 10^-3mm²/s, and 1.6 × 10^-3mm²/s were used to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. For combined diagnosis, a lesion with KS > 4 and ADC values below the preset cutoffs was considered as malignant; otherwise, it was benign. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between KS, DWI, and combined diagnosis.

RESULTS

The AUC of KS was significantly higher than that of DWI alone (0.941 vs 0.901, p = 0.04). The sensitivity of KS (96.8%) and DWI (97.4 - 99.4%) was comparable (p > 0.05) while the specificity of KS (83.9%) was significantly higher than that of DWI (19.5-56.8%) (p < 0.05). Adding DWI as an adjunct to KS resulted in a 0-2.5% increase of specificity and a 0.1-1.3% decrease of sensitivity; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

KS showed higher diagnostic performance than DWI alone for discrimination of breast benign and malignant lesions. DWI showed no additional value to KS for characterizing breast lesions.

KEY POINTS

• KS showed higher diagnostic performance than DWI alone for differentiation of benign from breast malignant lesions. • DWI alone showed a high sensitivity but a low specificity for characterizing breast lesions. • Diagnostic performance did not improve using DWI as an adjunct to KS.

The potential of predictive and prognostic breast MRI (P2-bMRI)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important part of breast cancer diagnosis and multimodal workup. It provides unsurpassed soft tissue contrast to analyse the underlying pathophysiology, and it is adopted for a variety of clinical indications. Predictive and prognostic breast MRI (P2-bMRI) is an emerging application next to these indications. The general objective of P2-bMRI is to provide predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers in order to support personalisation of breast cancer treatment. We believe P2-bMRI has a great clinical potential, thanks to the in vivo examination of the whole tumour and of the surrounding tissue, establishing a link between pathophysiology and response to therapy (prediction) as well as patient outcome (prognostication). The tools used for P2-bMRI cover a wide spectrum: standard and advanced multiparametric pulse sequences; structured reporting criteria (for instance BI-RADS descriptors); artificial intelligence methods, including machine learning (with emphasis on radiomics data analysis); and deep learning that have shown compelling potential for this purpose. P2-bMRI reuses the imaging data of examinations performed in the current practice. Accordingly, P2-bMRI could optimise clinical workflow, enabling cost savings and ultimately improving personalisation of treatment. This review introduces the concept of P2-bMRI, focusing on the clinical application of P2-bMRI by using semantic criteria.

Breast MRI: does a clinical decision algorithm outweigh reader experience?

Objectives

Due to its high sensitivity, DCE MRI of the breast (MRIb) is increasingly used for both screening and assessment purposes. The Kaiser score (KS) is a clinical decision algorithm, which formalizes and guides diagnosis in breast MRI and is expected to compensate for lesser reader experience. The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of untrained residents using the KS compared to off-site radiologists experienced in breast imaging using only MR BI-RADS.

Methods

Three off-site, board-certified radiologists, experienced in breast imaging, interpreted MRIb according to the MR BI-RADS scale. The same studies were read by three residents in radiology without prior training in breast imaging using the KS. All readers were blinded to clinical information. Histology was used as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was conducted by comparing the AUC of the ROC curves.

Results

A total of 80 women (median age 52 years) with 93 lesions (32 benign, 61 malignant) were included. The individual within-group performance of the three expert readers (AUC 0.723–0.742) as well as the three residents was equal (AUC 0.842–0.928), p > 0.05, respectively. But, the rating of each resident using the KS significantly outperformed the experts’ ratings using the MR BI-RADS scale (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion

The KS helped residents to achieve better results in reaching correct diagnoses than experienced radiologists empirically assigning MR BI-RADS categories in a clinical “problem solving MRI” setting. These results support that reporting breast MRI benefits more from using a diagnostic algorithm rather than expert experience.

Key Points

• Reporting breast MRI benefits more from using a diagnostic algorithm rather than expert experience in a clinical “problem solving MRI” setting.

• The Kaiser score, which provides a clinical decision algorithm for structured reporting, helps residents to reach an expert level in breast MRI reporting and to even outperform experienced radiologists using MR BI-RADS without further formal guidance.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09015-8.

Evidence-Based and Structured Diagnosis in Breast MRI using the Kaiser Score

BACKGROUND

 Breast MRI is the most sensitive method for the detection of breast cancer and is an integral part of modern breast imaging. On the other hand, interpretation of breast MRI exams is considered challenging due to the complexity of the available information. Clinical decision rules that combine diagnostic criteria in an algorithm can help the radiologist to read breast MRI by supporting objective and largely experience-independent diagnosis.

METHOD

 Narrative review. In this article, the Kaiser Score (KS) as a clinical decision rule for breast MRI is introduced, its diagnostic criteria are defined, and strategies for clinical decision making using the KS are explained and discussed.

RESULTS

 The KS is based on machine learning and has been independently validated by international research. It is largely independent of the examination technique that is used. It allows objective differentiation between benign and malignant contrast-enhancing breast MRI findings using diagnostic BI-RADS criteria taken from T2w and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1w images. A flowchart guides the reader in up to three steps to determine a score corresponding to the probability of malignancy that can be used to assign a BI-RADS category. Individual decision making takes the clinical context into account and is illustrated by typical scenarios.

KEY POINTS

· The KS as an evidence-based decision rule to objectively distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions is based on information contained in T2w und dynamic contrast-enhanced T1w sequences and is largely independent of specific examination protocols.. · The KS diagnostic criteria are in line with the MRI BI-RADS lexicon. We focused on defining a default category to be applied in the case of equivocal imaging criteria.. · The KS reflects increasing probabilities of malignancy and, together with the clinical context, assists individual decision making..

CITATION FORMAT

· Baltzer PA, Krug KB, Dietzel M. Evidence-Based and Structured Diagnosis in Breast MRI using the Kaiser Score. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1829-5985.

A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Methods

This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test.

Results

The study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18-67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity.

Conclusion

For MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup.

Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of indeterminate breast (BIRADS 3 & 4A) in a general population

OBJECTIVE

Currently, mammography and ultrasonography are the most used imaging techniques for breast cancer screening. However, these examinations report many indeterminate studies with a low probability of being malignant, i.e., BIRADS 3 and 4A. This prospective study aims to evaluate the value of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to clarify the BIRADS categorization of indeterminate mammography or ultrasonography studies.

METHODS

MRI studies acquired prospectively from 105 patients previously classified as BIRADS 3 or 4A were analyzed independently by four radiologists with different experience levels. Interobserver agreement was determined by the first-order agreement coefficient (AC1), and divergent results were re-analyzed for consensus. The possible correlation between the MRI and the mammography/ultrasound findings was evaluated, and each study was independently classified in one of the five BIRADS categories (BIRADS 1 to 5). In lesions categorized as BIRADS 4 or 5 at MRI, histopathological diagnosis was established by image-guided biopsy; while short-term follow-up was performed in lesions rated as BIRADS 3.

RESULTS

Breast MRI was useful in diagnosing three invasive ductal carcinomas, upgraded from BIRADS 4A to BIRADS 5. It also allowed excluding malignancy in 86 patients (81.9%), avoiding 22 unnecessary biopsies and 64 short-term follow-ups. The MRI showed good diagnostic performance with the area under roc curve, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.995, 100%, 83.5%, 10.5%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI showed to be useful as a problem-solving tool to clarify indeterminate findings in breast cancer screening and avoiding unnecessary short-follow-ups and percutaneous biopsies.

The diagnostic dilemma with the plateau pattern of the time-intensity curve: can the relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) optimise the ADC parameter for differentiating breast lesions?

AIM

To assess the performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative ADC (rADC) to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions using the plateau pattern of the time-intensity curve (Type II TIC), including the impact of lesions-enhancement subtypes and menopausal status of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2016 and December 2019, 408 patients with 169 benign and 239 malignant lesions with Type II TIC underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, with b-values of 50 and 800 s/mm². ADC and rADC values were calculated by placing regions of interest (ROIs) on the lesion, the parenchyma of the normal breast, and the pectoralis major muscle. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to compare the diagnostic performance of each parameter in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. Further classification was undertaken to study the discriminatory performance of each parameter in the different lesions enhancement subtypes (mass-like enhancement [MLE] and non-MLE [NMLE]) and menopausal status of patients (pre-menopausal and post-menopausal).

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the ADC and rADC values between benign and malignant lesions. The sensitivities of lesion ADC, gland rADC, and muscle rADC were 79.29%, 77.51%, and 79.29%, respectively, with specificities of 94.56%, 82.01%, and 94.98%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of muscle rADC was the highest (AUC=0.92), especially in the MLE subtype (AUC=0.96), and was not affected by the menopausal status.

CONCLUSION

Muscle rADC and lesion ADC assessment improved the diagnostic performance of breast MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions with Type II TIC, especially muscle rADC in the MLE subtype.

Intratumoral Intensity in T2-weighted MRI and the Association With Histological and Molecular Prognostic Factors in Women With Invasive Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intratumoral T2 signal intensity on MRI and histopathological and molecular expression of biomarkers of aggressiveness (histological grade, hormonal status, HER2, and Ki-67).

METHODS

This retrospective study included all women with invasive breast cancer undergoing MRI from January 2014 to October 2016. The intratumoral T2 signal as interpreted at consensus by two radiologists was compared to histopathological and molecular prognostic factors from the surgical specimen. Statistical analyses used Pearson χ 2 test with a confidence level of 95% (P ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Fifty patients with 50 lesions met study criteria (mean age 65.8 ± 13.5 years). Mean lesion size was 28 mm ± 15.7 mm (range, 15 to 76 mm). Cancer types were invasive ductal (35/50, 70%), invasive lobular (10/50, 20%), and mixed (5/50, 10%). Most lesions were histological grade 1 or 2 (41/50, 82%) and luminal type (45/50, 90%). On T2 images, lesions were hypointense in 62% (31/50), isointense in 20% (10/50), and hyperintense in 18% (9/50) of cases. Among hypointense lesions, 94% (29/31) were low or intermediate grade tumors (P = 0.02), low HER2 overexpression (30/31, 97%) (P = 0.005), and high ER status (30/31, 97%) (P = 0.006), high PR (26/31, 84%) (P = 0.02), and low incidence of necrosis (2/31, 6%). The difference in Ki-67 tumoral expression between groups was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Intratumoral T2 hypointensity in invasive breast cancer is associated with better prognostic tumors, such as histological low-grade high hormone receptor status.

A Multicentric Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping and the Kaiser Score in the Assessment of Breast Lesions

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentric study, individual patient data from 3 different centers were analyzed. Consecutive patients receiving standardized multiparametric breast magnetic resonance imaging for standard nonscreening indications were included. At each center, 2 experienced radiologists with more than 5 years of experience retrospectively interpreted the examinations in consensus and applied the KS to every histologically verified lesion. The corresponding mean ADC of each lesion was measured using a Wielema type 4 region of interest. According to established methods, the KS and ADC were combined, yielding the KS+ score. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and compared between the KS, ADC, and KS+ (DeLong test). Likewise, the potential to help avoid unnecessary biopsies was compared between the KS, ADC, and KS+ based on established high sensitivity thresholds (McNemar test).

RESULTS

A total of 450 lesions in 414 patients (mean age, 51.5 years; interquartile range, 42-60.8 years) were included, with 219 lesions being malignant (48.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-53.4%). The performance of the KS (AUROC, 0.915; CI, 0.886-0.939) was significantly better than that of the ADC (AUROC, 0.848; CI, 0.811-0.880; P < 0.001). The largest difference between these parameters was observed when assessing subcentimeter lesions (AUROC, 0.909 for KS; CI, 0.849-0.950 vs 0.811 for ADC; CI, 0.737-0.871; P = 0.02).The use of the KS+ (AUROC, 0.918; CI, 0.889-0.942) improved the performance slightly, but without any significant difference relative to a single KS or ADC reading (P = 0.64).When applying high sensitivity thresholds for avoiding unnecessary biopsies, the KS and ADC achieved equal sensitivity (97.7% for both; cutoff values, >4 for KS and ≤1.4 × 10-3 mm2/s for ADC). However, the rate of potentially avoidable biopsies was higher when using the KS (specificity: 65.4% for KS vs 32.9% for ADC; P < 0.0001). The KS was superior to the KS+ in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the KS and ADC may be used to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. However, KS proved superior in this task including, most of all, when assessing small lesions less than 1 cm. Using the KS may avoid twice as many unnecessary biopsies, and the combination of both the KS and ADS does not improve diagnostic performance.

An A.I. classifier derived from 4D radiomics of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI data: potential to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies

Objectives

Due to its high sensitivity, DCE MRI of the breast (bMRI) is increasingly used for both screening and assessment purposes. The high number of detected lesions poses a significant logistic challenge in clinical practice. The aim was to evaluate a temporally and spatially resolved (4D) radiomics approach to distinguish benign from malignant enhancing breast lesions and thereby avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Methods

This retrospective study included consecutive patients with MRI-suspicious findings (BI-RADS 4/5). Two blinded readers analyzed DCE images using a commercially available software, automatically extracting BI-RADS curve types and pharmacokinetic enhancement features. After principal component analysis (PCA), a neural network–derived A.I. classifier to discriminate benign from malignant lesions was constructed and tested using a random split simple approach. The rate of avoidable biopsies was evaluated at exploratory cutoffs (C₁, 100%, and C₂, ≥ 95% sensitivity).

Results

Four hundred seventy (295 malignant) lesions in 329 female patients (mean age 55.1 years, range 18–85 years) were examined. Eighty-six DCE features were extracted based on automated volumetric lesion analysis. Five independent component features were extracted using PCA. The A.I. classifier achieved a significant (p < .001) accuracy to distinguish benign from malignant lesion within the test sample (AUC: 83.5%; 95% CI: 76.8–89.0%). Applying identified cutoffs on testing data not included in training dataset showed the potential to lower the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions by 14.5% (C₁) and 36.2% (C₂).

Conclusion

The investigated automated 4D radiomics approach resulted in an accurate A.I. classifier able to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Its application could have avoided unnecessary biopsies.

Key Points

• Principal component analysis of the extracted volumetric and temporally resolved (4D) DCE markers favored pharmacokinetic modeling derived features.

• An A.I. classifier based on 86 extracted DCE features achieved a good to excellent diagnostic performance as measured by the area under the ROC curve with 80.6% (training dataset) and 83.5% (testing dataset).

• Testing the resulting A.I. classifier showed the potential to lower the number of unnecessary biopsies of benign breast lesions by up to 36.2%, p < .001 at the cost of up to 4.5% (n = 4) false negative low-risk cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07787-z.

Diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score for characterizing lesions on breast MRI with comparison to a multiparametric classification system

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and to compare it with the BI-RADS-based multiparametric classification system (MCS).

METHOD

Two breast radiologists, blinded to the clinical and pathological information, separately evaluated a database of 499 consecutive patients with structural 3.0 T breast MRI and 697 histopathologically verified lesions. The Kaiser scores and corresponding MCS categories were recorded. The sensitivity and specificity of the Kaiser score and the MCS categories to differentiate benign from malignant lesions were calculated. The interobserver reproducibility and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) parameters were analysed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the MCS were 100 % and 12 %, respectively, and those of the Kaiser score were 98.5 % and 34.8 % for reader 1 and 98.7 % and 47.5 % for reader 2. The area under the ROC-curve was 85.9 and 87.6 for readers 1 and 2. The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.882. Reader 1 upgraded six lesions from BI-RADS 3 to a Kaiser score of >4, and reader 2 upgraded seven lesions. When applying the Kaiser score to 158 benign lesions readers 1 and 2 would have reduced the biopsy rate by 22.8 % and 35.4 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kaiser score showed high diagnostic accuracy with excellent interobserver reproducibility. The MCS had perfect sensitivity but low specificity. Although the Kaiser score had slightly lower sensitivity, its specificity was 3-4 times greater than that of the MCS. Thus, the Kaiser score has the potential to considerably reduce the biopsy rate for true negative lesions.

Correct determination of the enhancement curve is critical to ensure accurate diagnosis using the Kaiser score as a clinical decision rule for breast MRI

OBJECTIVES

the Kaiser score is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool to improve breast MRI interpretation. Contrast enhancement kinetics are the second most important diagnostic criterion, thus defining the curve type plays a crucial role in Kaiser score assessment. We investigate whether the timepoint used to determine the initial enhancement (earlyor peak) for the signal-intensity time curve analysis affects the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score.

METHODS

This IRB-approved, retrospective, single-center study included 70 consecutives histologically verified breast MRI cases. Two off-site breast radiologists independently read all examinations using the Kaiser score, assessing the initial enhancement using three approaches: -first (1 st), second (2nd) and peak (maximum) of either 1 st or 2nd post-contrast timepoints. The initial enhancement was then compared to the last timepoint (delayed enhancement) to determine the curve type. Visual assessment of curve types was used for this study. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Kaiser score reading results using the peak enhancement of either the first or second timepoint performed significantly better than the other approaches (P < 0.05, respectively) and specifically achieved higher sensitivity. Diagnostic accuracy (AUC area under the curve) ranged between 85.4 % and 91.6 %, without significant differences between the two readers (P < 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score is significantly influenced by how the initial enhancement timepoint is determined. Peak enhancement should be used as initial timepoint to avoid pitfalls due to timing or physiological differences.

Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm

BACKGROUND

 Considering radiological examinations not as mere images, but as a source of data, has become the key paradigm in the diagnostic imaging field. This change of perspective is particularly popular in breast imaging. It allows breast radiologists to apply algorithms derived from computer science, to realize innovative clinical applications, and to refine already established methods. In this context, the terminology "imaging biomarker", "radiomics", and "artificial intelligence" are of pivotal importance. These methods promise noninvasive, low-cost (e. g., in comparison to multigene arrays), and workflow-friendly (automated, only one examination, instantaneous results, etc.) delivery of clinically relevant information.

METHODS AND RESULTS

 This paper is designed as a narrative review on the previously mentioned paradigm. The focus is on key concepts in breast imaging and important buzzwords are explained. For all areas of breast imaging, exemplary studies and potential clinical use cases are discussed.

CONCLUSION

 Considering radiological examination as a source of data may optimize patient management by guiding individualized breast cancer diagnosis and oncologic treatment in the age of precision medicine.

KEY POINTS

  · In conventional breast imaging, examinations are interpreted based on patterns perceivable by visual inspection.. · The radiomics paradigm treats breast images as a source of data, containing information beyond what is visible to our eyes.. · This results in radiomic signatures that may be considered as imaging biomarkers, as they provide diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic information.. · Radiomics derived imaging biomarkers may be used to individualize breast cancer treatment in the era of precision medicine.. · The concept and key research of radiomics in the field of breast imaging will be discussed in this narrative review..

CITATION FORMAT

· Dietzel M, Clauser P, Kapetas P et al. Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 898 - 908.

Impact of specificity on cost-effectiveness of screening women at high risk of breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound

PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to analyze the comparative cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography vs conventional imaging in a screening setting for women with high risk of breast cancer, with particular focus on the impact of specificity of MRM.

METHOD

Decision analytic modelling and Markov Modelling were applied to evaluate cumulative costs of each screening modality and their subsequent treatments as well as cumulative outcomes in quality adjusted life years (QALYs). For the selected time horizon of 30 years, false positive and false negative results were included. Model input parameters for women with high risk of breast cancer were estimated based on published data from a US healthcare system perspective. Major influence factors were identified and evaluated in a deterministic sensitivity analysis. Based on current recommendations for economic evaluations, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the model stability.

RESULTS

In a base-case analysis, screening with XM vs. MRM and treatment resulted in overall costs of $36,201.57 vs. $39,050.97 and a cumulative effectiveness of 19.53 QALYs vs. 19.59 QALYs. This led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $ 45,373.94 per QALY for MRM. US and XM + US resulted in ICER values higher than the willingness to pay (WTP). In the sensitivity analyses, MRM remained a cost-effective strategy for screening high-risk patients as long as the specificity of MRM did not drop below 86.7 %.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk breast cancer patients, MRM can be regarded as a cost-effective alternative to XM in a yearly screening setting. Specificity may be an important cost driver in settings with yearly screening intervals.

[Artificial intelligence in breast imaging : Areas of application from a clinical perspective]

Klinisches/methodisches Problem

Bei der Mammadiagnostik gilt es, klinische sowie multimodal bildgebende Informationen mit perkutanen und operativen Eingriffen zu koordinieren. Aus dieser Komplexität entsteht eine Reihe von Problemen: übersehene Karzinome, Überdiagnose, falsch-positive Befunde, unnötige weiterführende Bildgebung, Biopsien und Operationen.

Radiologische Standardverfahren

Folgende Untersuchungsverfahren werden in der Mammadiagnostik eingesetzt: Röntgenmammographie, Tomosynthese, kontrastangehobene Mammographie, (multiparametrischer) Ultraschall, Magnetresonanztomographie, Computertomographie, nuklearmedizinische Verfahren sowie deren Hybridvarianten.

Methodische Innovationen

Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) verspricht Abhilfe bei praktisch allen Problemen der Mammadiagnostik. Potenziell lassen sich Fehlbefunde vermeiden, bildgebende Verfahren effizienter einsetzen und möglicherweise auch biologische Phänotypen von Mammakarzinomen definieren.

Leistungsfähigkeit

Auf KI basierende Software wird für zahlreiche Anwendungen entwickelt. Am weitesten fortgeschritten sind Systeme für das Screening mittels Mammographie. Probleme sind monozentrische sowie kurzfristig am finanziellen Erfolg orientierte Ansätze.

Bewertung

Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) verspricht eine Verbesserung der Mammadiagnostik. Durch die Vereinfachung von Abläufen, die Reduktion monotoner und ergebnisloser Tätigkeiten und den Hinweis auf mögliche Fehler ist eine Beschleunigung von dann weitgehend fehlerfreien Abläufen denkbar.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

In diesem Beitrag werden die Anforderungen der Mammadiagnostik und mögliche Einsatzgebiete der der KI beleuchtet. Je nach Definition gibt es bereits praktisch anwendbare Softwaretools für die Mammadiagnostik. Globale Lösungen stehen allerdings noch aus.

Intravenous Line Phase-Wrap Artifact at Bilateral Axial 3-T Breast MRI: Identification, Analysis, and Solution

Purpose

To understand and remove the source of a phase-wrap artifact produced by residual contrast agent in the intravenous line during acquisition of bilateral axial 3-T dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI.

Materials and Methods

A two-part study involved a phantom experiment, followed by an institutional review board approved clinical intervention, to evaluate the phase-wrap artifact at MRI. A phantom model evaluated artifact production by using an intravenous line filled with fluids with varying concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agent (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, and 2 mmol/mL) and by positioning the simulated intravenous line within several fields of view (FOV) at 3-T MRI in breast coils. Next, a clinical assessment was performed with a total of 400 patients (control group:interventional group, 200:200) to determine the effect of taping the intravenous line to the patients' backs. Breast MR images were assessed blindly for the presence of the artifact. Software was used for statistical analysis with a P value of less than .05 considered a significant difference.

Results

In the phantom model, the artifact was produced only with a 0.4 mmol/mL gadolinium concentration and when the tubing was either close to the edge or within a FOV of 350-450 mm. In the clinical experiment, the artifact was more prevalent in the retrospective control group than in the prospective intervention group (52.5% [105 of 200] vs 22% [44 of 200]; P < .005).

Conclusion

The presence of phase-wrap artifacts can be reduced by moving the contrast agent intravenous line out of the FOV during acquisition by taping it to a patient's back during bilateral axial 3-T DCE breast MRI.Keywords: Breast, MR-Imaging, Phantom Studies© RSNA, 2020.

[Kaiser score for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on MRI]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Kaiser score for breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on preoperative DCE-MRI between January, 2014 and June, 2019. All the cases were confirmed by surgical pathology or puncture biopsy. With pathology results as the gold standard, we evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of Kaiser score and MRI BI-RADS classification and the consistency between the diagnostic results by the two methods and the pathological results.

RESULTS

A total of 90 lesions were detected in 88 patients, including 28 benign lesions (31.1%) and 62 malignant lesions (68.9%). For diagnosis of the lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of Kaiser Score were 100%, 75%, 89.9%, 100% and 92%, as compared with 93.5%, 46.4%, 79.5%, 76.5% and 78.9% of MRI BI-RADS, respectively. The diagnostic specificity of Kaiser score was significantly higher than that of BI-RADS classification (P=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

The Kaiser score system provides a diagnostic strategy for BI-RADS classification of breast lesions with non-mass enhancement and has a better diagnostic efficacy than BI-RADS classification alone. The use of Kaiser score can significantly improve the diagnostic specificity of such breast lesions for inexperienced radiologists.

Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: An Open-Access Online Tool for Lesion Classification with High Accuracy

Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) approaches could help to objectify reporting on prostate mpMRI, but their use in many cases is hampered due to common-built algorithms that are not publicly available. The aim of this study was to develop an open-access CADx algorithm with high accuracy for classification of suspicious lesions in mpMRI of the prostate. This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics commission, with waiver of informed consent. A total of 124 patients with 195 reported lesions were included. All patients received mpMRI of the prostate between 2014 and 2017, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided and targeted biopsy within a time period of 30 days. Histopathology of the biopsy cores served as a standard of reference. Acquired imaging parameters included the size of the lesion, signal intensity (T2w images), diffusion restriction, prostate volume, and several dynamic parameters along with the clinical parameters patient age and serum PSA level. Inter-reader agreement of the imaging parameters was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. The dataset was stratified into a train set and test set (156 and 39 lesions in 100 and 24 patients, respectively). Using the above parameters, a CADx based on an Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was developed on the train set, and tested on the test set. Performance optimization was focused on maximizing the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC_AUC). The algorithm was made publicly available on the internet. The CADx reached an ROC_AUC of 0.908 during training, and 0.913 during testing (p = 0.93). Additionally, established rule-in and rule-out criteria allowed classifying 35.8% of the malignant and 49.4% of the benign lesions with error rates of <2%. All imaging parameters featured excellent inter-reader agreement. This study presents an open-access CADx for classification of suspicious lesions in mpMRI of the prostate with high accuracy. Applying the provided rule-in and rule-out criteria might facilitate to further stratify the management of patients at risk.

The Kaiser score reliably excludes malignancy in benign contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI high-risk screening exams

OBJECTIVES

MRI is an integral part of breast cancer screening in high-risk patients. We investigated whether the application of the Kaiser score, a clinical decision-support tool, may be used to exclude malignancy in contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on breast MRI screening exams.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 183 consecutive, histologically proven, suspicious (MR BI-RADS 4) lesions detected within our local high-risk screening program. All lesions were evaluated according to the Kaiser score for breast MRI by three readers blinded to the final histopathological diagnosis. The Kaiser score ranges from 1 (lowest, cancer very unlikely) to 11 (highest, cancer very likely) and reflects increasing probabilities of malignancy, with scores greater than 4 requiring biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

There were 142 benign and 41 malignant lesions, diagnosed in 159 patients (mean age, 43.6 years). Median Kaiser scores ranged between 2 and 5 in benign and 7 and 8 in malignant lesions. For all lesions, the Kaiser score's accuracy, represented by the area under the curve (AUC), ranged between 86.5 and 90.2. The sensitivity of the Kaiser score was high, between 95.1 and 97.6% for all lesions, and was best in mass lesions. Application of the Kaiser score threshold for malignancy (≤ 4) could have potentially avoided 64 (45.1%) to 103 (72.5%) unnecessary biopsies in 142 benign lesions previously classified as BI-RADS 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Kaiser score in high-risk MRI screening reliably excludes malignancy in more than 45% of contrast-enhancing lesions classified as BI-RADS 4.

KEY POINTS

• The Kaiser score shows high diagnostic accuracy in identifying malignancy in contrast-enhancing lesions in patients undergoing high-risk screening for breast cancer. • The application of the Kaiser score may avoid > 45% of unnecessary breast biopsies in high-risk patients. • The Kaiser score aids decision-making in high-risk breast cancer MRI screening programs.

Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of models based on a combination of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or time-intensity curves (TIC) in diagnosing malignancies of breast lesions.

METHODS

A double-blind retrospective study was conducted in 328 patients (254 for training and the following 74 for validation) who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast with pathological results. Two score models, the DWI model (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) + morphology + enhanced information) and the TIC model (TIC + morphology + enhanced information), were established with binary logistic regression for mass and non-mass enhancements (NMEs) in the training set. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two models (DWI model vs. TIC model); p < 0.05 was considered as statistically different. External validation was used.

RESULTS

In the training set, the sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 95.2%/95.8%, 70.8%/47.9%, and 0.932/0.891 for masses, and 94.2%/90.4%, 47.4%/47.4%, and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.686-0.884)/0.802 (95% CI, 0.691-0.887) for NMEs, respectively. The AUC of the DWI model was significantly higher than that of the TIC model (p < 0.05) for masses. In the validation set, the AUCs of the DWI/TIC model were 0.896/0.861 for masses (p < 0.05) and 0.936/0.836 for NMEs (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined with CE MRI, the DWI model was superior or equal to the TIC model in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

KEY POINTS

• Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging played an important role in the diagnosis of breast neoplasms. • On the basis of contrast-enhanced MRI, the DWI model had significantly higher diagnostic ability than the TIC model in distinguishing benign and malignant masses. • It would be reasonable to replace the time-consuming TIC with DWI for less scan time and similar diagnostic efficiency.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in predicting malignancy after percutaneous biopsy diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this retrospective study, 68 lesions (66 women) with percutaneous biopsy diagnosis of ADH and pre-operative breast DCE-MRI performed between January 2016 and December 2017 were included. Two radiologists reviewed in consensus mammography, ultrasound, and MR images. The final diagnosis after surgical excision was used as standard of reference. Clinical and imaging features were compared in patients with and without upgrade to malignancy after surgery. The diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI in predicting malignant upgrade was evaluated.

RESULTS

A 9-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy was performed in 40 (58.8%) cases and a 14-gauge core needle biopsy in 28 (41.2%) cases. Upgrade to malignancy was observed in 17/68 (25%) lesions, including 4/17 (23.5%) cases of invasive cancer and 13/17 (76.5%) cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In 16/17 (94.1%) malignant and 20/51 (39.2%) benign lesions, a suspicious enhancement could be recognized in DCE-MRI. The malignant lesion without suspicious enhancement was a low-grade DCIS (4 mm size). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of DCE-MRI on predicting malignancy were respectively 94.1%, 60.7%, 44.4%, and 96.8%. No other clinical or imaging features were significantly different in patients with and without upgrade to malignancy.

CONCLUSION

After a percutaneous biopsy diagnosis of ADH, malignancy can be ruled out in most of the cases, if no suspicious enhancement is present in the biopsy area at DCE-MRI. Breast DCE-MRI may be used to avoid surgery in more than half of the patients with final benign diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• Breast DCE-MRI can safely rule out malignancy if no suspicious enhancement is present in the biopsy area after a percutaneous biopsy diagnosis of ADH. • All cases of upgrade to high-grade DCIS and invasive cancers can be identified at breast DCE-MRI after a percutaneous biopsy diagnosis of ADH. • Breast DCE-MRI may be used to avoid surgery in more than half of the patients with final benign diagnosis.