Calculation of midplane dose for total body irradiation from entrance and exit dose MOSFET measurements

Comparison of different TBI techniques in terms of dose homogeneity - review study

Total body irradiation (TBI) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy, used in conjunction with chemotherapy with the purpose of immunosuppression. Since the target in TBI is the whole body, so achieving uniform dose distribution throughout the entire body during TBI is necessary. As recommended by AAPM dose variation must be within ±10% of the prescription dose. With the evidences from literature there is limited substantiation to consider a treatment method better than others, but with regard to the size of the treatment room, workload of the radiotherapy department and prevalent technology used within each treatment department it is recommended to make the suitable and optimum method in each department. In this work, a review study was performed on different TBI techniques with the purpose of assessment and comparison of dose distribution homogeneity in these methods.

A Monte Carlo evaluation of beam characteristics for total body irradiation at extended treatment distances

The aim is to study beam characteristics at large distances when focusing on the electron component. In particular, to investigate the utility of spoilers with various thicknesses as an electron source, as well as the effect of different spoiler‐to‐surface distances (STSD) on the beam characteristics and, consequently, on the dose in the superficial region. A MC model of a 15 MV Varian accelerator, validated earlier by experimental data at isocenter and extended distances used in large‐field total body irradiation, is applied to evaluate beam characteristics at distances larger than 400 cm. Calculations are carried out using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc code packages and phase space data are analyzed by the beam data processor BEAMdp. The electron component of the beam is analyzed at isocenter and extended distances, with and without spoilers as beam modifiers, assuming vacuum or air surrounding the accelerator head. Spoiler thickness of 1.6 cm is found to be optimal compared to thicknesses of 0.8 cm and 2.4 cm. The STSD variations should be taken into account when treating patients, in particular when the treatment protocols are based on a fixed distance to the patient central sagittal plane, and also, in order to maintain high dose in the superficial region.

PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐, 87.55.de, 87.55.K‐