Derivation of Australian diagnostic reference levels for paediatric multi detector computed tomography

Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography procedures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Previous paediatric diagnostic reference levels (PDRL) literature reviews for commonly performed procedures of the brain, chest and abdomen revealed wide DRL variation and deviation of scanning protocols across CT centres. The current review went further to determine the extent and possible factors of DRL variation in the same procedure, age or weight group, between scanners and CT centres for the standardisation of CT practice globally.

METHODS

The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart was used to screen articles in Science Direct, Medline, Academic Search Complete via EBSCOhost, PubMed, and CINAHL via EBSCOhost including the Google search engine.

RESULTS

A total of 6573 articles were retrieved and screened against the established criteria and finally, 52 articles were selected and synthesised narratively.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review show variation of brain PDRLs up to a factor of 2 fold for the same examination and age group. Factors attributable to dose variations noted in this review were largely related to the setting of the scan protocols such as the use of different phantom sizes, dose parameters, and age groups. This indicates the need to standardise methods of establishing PDRLs and alignment with the European Commission and ICRP recommended guidelines are proposed.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

The review highlights different methods for establishing PDRLs and their implication which could guide radiographers and medical physicists in future PDRLs establishment for dose optimization.

Dual-Layer Detector Head CT to Maintain Image Quality While Reducing the Radiation Dose in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation exposure in the CT diagnostic imaging process is a conspicuous concern in pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether 60-keV virtual monoenergetic images of the pediatric cranium in dual-layer CT can reduce the radiation dose while maintaining image quality compared with conventional images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred six unenhanced pediatric head scans acquired by dual-layer CT were retrospectively assessed. The patients were assigned to 2 groups of 53 and scanned with 250 and 180 mAs, respectively. Dose-length product values were retrieved, and noise, SNR, and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated for each case. Two radiologists blinded to the reconstruction technique used evaluated image quality on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical assessment was performed with ANOVA and the Wilcoxon test, adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Mean dose-length product values were 717.47 (SD, 41.52) mGy×cm and 520.74 (SD, 42) mGy×cm for the 250- and 180-mAs groups, respectively. Irrespective of the radiation dose, noise was significantly lower, SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher, and subjective analysis revealed significant superiority of 60-keV virtual monoenergetic images compared with conventional images (all P < .001). SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio, and subjective evaluation in 60-keV virtual monoenergetic images were not significantly different between the 2 scan groups (P > .05). Radiation dose parameters were significantly lower in the 180-mAs group compared with the 250-mAs group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual-layer CT 60-keV virtual monoenergetic images allowed a radiation dose reduction of 28% without image-quality loss in pediatric cranial CT.

Dual-layer spectral CT improves the image quality of cerebral unenhanced CT scan in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality and determine the optimal energies of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) in unenhanced pediatric cerebral scans by dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (DLCT).

METHODS

Fifty-three consecutive unenhanced cerebral scans by a DLCT scanner in children (age ≤ 12 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional images (CI) and VMIs were reconstructed. The gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), posterior fossa, and subcalvarial artifac tindex (PFAI, SAI) were calculated. Two radiologists independently determined the image quality using a 5-point Likert-type scale based on GM - WM differentiation (GWMA), subcalvarialspace (SAA), beam hardening artifacts in the posterior fossa (PFAA), and the overall diagnostic quality. The student t-test and Wilcoxon test were used to determining the statistical significance.

RESULTS

Compared with CI, superior noise were observed in VMI at low keV levels and were lowest at 100 keV (P < 0.001); the SNR and CNR were significantly higher at the 45 keV to 75 keV levels (all Ps of <0.005). The best GWMA were noticed at the 50 keV level compared to other keV levels (all P < 0.05). The optimal SAA and PFAA were found at 100 keV, respectively. The assessment of overall diagnostic quality was the best at 50 keV (P < 0.013 to < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The VMI scan significantly improved the quality of pediatric cerebral images compared with those from CI. The optimal energy level for the brainparenchyma was 50 keV while those for subcalvarial space and posterior fossa were 100 keV.

National diagnostic reference levels: What they are, why we need them and what's next

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are an optimisation tool for medical imaging procedures using ionising radiation. They give an indication of the expected radiation dose received by an average-sized patient undergoing a given imaging procedure. Comparison of typical (median) exposure levels for common imaging procedures with DRLs helps imaging facilities identify procedures that may be amenable to further optimisation. Undertaking comparisons with published DRLs is a requirement for medical imaging facilities under the Code for Radiation Protection in Medical Exposure and for their access to Medicare rebates under the Diagnostic Imaging Accreditation Scheme (DIAS). The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency has created the National Diagnostic Reference Level Service to facilitate the collection of data for the establishment of national DRLs in Australia and to assist imaging facilities in comparing their typical doses with the national DRLs. National DRLs have been established in computed tomography, nuclear medicine, and for image-guided and interventional procedures. DRLs must be subject to ongoing review and revision by the national authority to ensure they reflect current practice. This ongoing cycle of assessment and review helps to ensure that the ratio of benefit to risk for patients is maximised.

Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common radiological examinations using the European guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility to determine regional diagnostic reference levels (RDRLs) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using the European guidelines and to compare RDRLs derived from weight and age groups, respectively.

METHODS

Data were collected from 31 hospitals in 4 countries, for 7 examination types for a total of 2978 patients. RDRLs were derived for each weight and age group, respectively, when the total number of patients exceeded 15.

RESULTS

It was possible to derive RDRLs for most, but not all, weight-based and age-based groups for the seven examinations. The result using weight-based and age-based groups differed substantially. The RDRLs were lower than or equal to the European and recently published national DRLs.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to derive RDRLs. However, a thorough review of the clinical indications and methodologies has to be performed previous to data collection. This study does not support the notion that DRLs derived using age and weight groups are exchangeable.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Paediatric DRLs should be derived using weight-based groups with access to the actual weight of the patients. DRLs developed using weight differ markedly from those developed with the use of age. There is still a need to harmonize the method to derive solid DRLs for paediatric radiological examinations.

Establishing paediatric diagnostic reference levels using reference curves - A feasibility study including conventional and CT examinations

PURPOSE

To derive Regional Diagnostic Reference Levels (RDRL) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using weight-based DRL curves and compare the outcome with DRL derived using the weight groups.

METHODS

Data from 1722 examinations performed at 29 hospitals in four countries were included. DRL was derived for four conventional x-ray (chest, abdomen, pelvis, hips/joints) and two types of CT examinations (thorax, abdomen). DRL curves were derived using an exponential fit to the data using weight as an independent variable and the respective radiation dose indices (P_KA, CTDI_vol, DLP) as dependent variables. DRL was also derived for weight groups for comparison. The result was compared with national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) curves.

RESULTS

The derived curves show similarities with the NDRL curves available and corresponded sufficiently well with DRL for weight groups using the same data set, if sufficient number of data was available.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that weight-based DRL curves are a feasible approach and could be used together with DRL for weight groups. The main advantage of DRL curves is its application in the clinic. When the examination frequency is low, time to collect enough data to establish typical values for one or several weight groups may be unreasonably long. The curve provides the means to compare dose level faster and with fewer data points.

Ct Dosimetry for The Australian Cohort Data Linkage Study

Children undergoing computed tomography (CT) scans have an increased risk of cancer in subsequent years, but it is unclear how much of the excess risk is due to reverse causation bias or confounding, rather than to causal effects of ionising radiation. An examination of the relationship between excess cancer risk and organ dose can help to resolve these uncertainties. Accordingly, we have estimated doses to 33 different organs arising from over 900 000 CT scans between 1985 and 2005 in our previously described cohort of almost 12 million Australians aged 0-19 years. We used a multi-tiered approach, starting with Medicare billing details for government-funded scans. We reconstructed technical parameters from national surveys, clinical protocols, regulator databases and peer-reviewed literature to estimate almost 28 000 000 individual organ doses. Doses were age-dependent and tended to decrease over time due to technological improvements and optimisation.

Assessment of computed tomography radiation doses for paediatric head and chest examinations using paediatric phantoms of three different ages

INTRODUCTION

With the rapid development of computed tomography (CT) scanners, the assessment of the radiation dose received by the patient has become a heavily researched topic and may result in a reduction in radiation exposure risk. In this study, radiation doses were measured using three paediatric phantoms for head and chest CT examinations in Najran, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Thirteen scanners were included in the study to estimate the CT radiation doses using three phantoms representing three age groups (1-, 5-, and 10-year-old patients).

RESULTS

The volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) estimated for each phantom ranged from 6.56 to 41.12 mGy and 0.292 to 11.10 mGy for the head and chest examinations, respectively. The estimation of lifetime attributable risk (LAR) indicated that the cancer risk could reach approximately 0.02-0.16% per 500 children undergoing head and chest CT examinations.

CONCLUSION

The comparison with the published data of the European Commission (EC) and countries reported in this study revealed that the mean CTDI_vol for the head examinations was within the recommended dose reference levels (DRLs). Meanwhile, chest results exceeded the international DRLs for the one-year-old phantoms, suggesting that optimisation work is required at a number of sites.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The variation among CT doses reported in this study showed that substantial standardisation is needed.

An Australian local diagnostic reference level for paediatric whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to report a local diagnostic reference level (DRL) for paediatric whole-body (WB) fludeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) CT examinations.

METHODS:

The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) national DRL (NDRL) age category (0-4 years and 5-14 years), the International Commission on Radiological Protection age category (ICRP age) (<1, >1-5, >5-10, and >10-15 years), and European guideline weight category ( EG weight) (<5, 5-<15, 15-<30, 30-<50, and 50-<80 kg) were used to determine a local DRL for WB ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT studies. Two-structured questionnaires were designed to collect dose data, patient demographics, equipment details, and acquisition protocols for WB ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT procedures. The local DRL was based on the median ¹⁸F-FDG administered activity (MBq), dose-length product (DLP), and the CT dose index volume (CTDI_vol), values. The effective dose (E) was also calculated and reported.

RESULTS:

The local DRLs for ¹⁸F-FDG administered activity, CTDI_vol and DLP values based on ARPANSA age and ICRP age were increased from lower to higher age categories. For the EG weight category, the local DRL for ¹⁸F-FDG administered activity, CTDI_vol and DLP values were increased from the low EG weight category to the high EG weight category. The mean administered activity in our study based on ICRP age category >1-5, >5-10, and >10-15 years is 79.97, 119.40, and 176.04 MBq, which is lower than the mean administered activity reported in the North American Consensus guideline published in 2010 (99, 166, and 286 MBq) and European Association of Nuclear Medicine and Dosage Card (version 1.5.2008) (120, 189, and 302 MBq). However, the mean administered activity in our study based on ICRP age category <1 year was 55 MBq compared to the EANM Dosage card (version 1.5.2008) (70 MBq) and the NACG 2010 (51 MBq). Our study shows that the finding for ICRP age category <1 year was similar to the NACG 2010 value.

CONCLUSION:

The determined local DRL values for the radiation doses associated with WB ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT examinations are differed considerably between the ARPANSA and ICRP age category and EG weight category. Although, the determined ¹⁸F-FDG value for ICRP < 1 year is in good agreement with available publish data, it is preferable to optimise the ¹⁸F-FDG administered activity while preserving the diagnostic image quality.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

The local DRL value determined from WB ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations may help to establish the ARPANSA NDRL for WB FDG ¹⁸F-PET/CT examinations.

Validation of the Australian diagnostic reference levels for paediatric multi detector computed tomography: a comparison of RANZCR QUDI data and subsequent NDRLS data from 2012 to 2015

The national diagnostic reference level service (NDRLS), was launched in 2011, however no paediatric data were submitted during the first calendar year of operation. As such, Australian national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), for paediatric multi detector computed tomography (MDCT), were established using data obtained from a Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR), Quality Use of Diagnostic Imaging (QUDI), study. Paediatric data were submitted to the NDRLS in 2012 through 2015. An analysis has been made of the NDRLS paediatric data using the same method as was used to analyse the QUDI data to establish the Australian national paediatric DRLs for MDCT. An analysis of the paediatric NDRLS data has also been made using the method used to calculate the Australian national adult DRLs for MDCT. A comparison between the QUDI data and subsequent NDRLS data shows the NDRLS data to be lower on average for the Head and AbdoPelvis protocol and similar for the chest protocol. Using an average of NDRLS data submitted between 2012 and 2015 implications for updated paediatric DRLS are considered.