Assessment of the relative contribution of volume and concentration changes in Yttrium-90 labelled resin microspheres on ionization chamber measurements

90Y PET for Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Residual Activity in Delivery Apparatus After Radioembolization

Assessment of residual activity is critical for quality assurance after ⁹⁰Y radioembolization. The resin microsphere manufacturer's indirect method of estimating the residual activity is laborious and vulnerable to inaccuracies. Furthermore, the method cannot localize the exact site of residual activity. ⁹⁰Y PET/CT for qualitative and quantitative assessment of residual activity has not, to our knowledge, been described. We show an example of ⁹⁰Y PET/CT of residual activity in the delivery apparatus and catheters packed inside the delivery box. Focally intense residual activity was clearly localized to the stopcock junction. Residual activity was directly quantified by setting the PET volume-of-interest isocontour threshold to 1%.

3D image-based dosimetry for Yttrium-90 radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of imaging method on absorbed dose estimates

BACKGROUND

To improve therapy outcome of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy (⁹⁰Y SIRT), patient-specific post-therapeutic dosimetry is required. For this purpose, various dosimetric approaches based on different available imaging data have been reported. The aim of this work was to compare post-therapeutic 3D absorbed dose images using Technetium-99m (^99mTc) MAA SPECT/CT, Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) bremsstrahlung (BRS) SPECT/CT, and ⁹⁰Y PET/CT.

METHODS

Ten SIRTs of nine patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were investigated. The ^99mTc SPECT/CT data, obtained from ^99mTc-MAA-based treatment simulation prior to ⁹⁰Y SIRT, were scaled with the administered ⁹⁰Y therapy activity. 3D absorbed dose images were generated by dose kernel convolution with scaled ^99mTc/⁹⁰Y SPECT/CT, ⁹⁰Y BRS SPECT/CT, and ⁹⁰Y PET/CT data of each patient. Absorbed dose estimates in tumor and healthy liver tissue obtained using the two SPECT/CT methods were compared against ⁹⁰Y PET/CT.

RESULTS

The percentage deviation of tumor absorbed dose estimates from ⁹⁰Y PET/CT values was on average -2 ± 18% for scaled ^99mTc/⁹⁰Y SPECT/CT, whereas estimates from ⁹⁰Y BRS SPECT/CT differed on average by -50 ± 13%. For healthy liver absorbed dose estimates, all three imaging methods revealed comparable values.

CONCLUSION

The quantification capabilities of the imaging data influence ⁹⁰Y SIRT tumor dosimetry, while healthy liver absorbed dose values were comparable for all investigated imaging data. When no ⁹⁰Y PET/CT image data are available, the proposed scaled ^99mTc/⁹⁰Y SPECT/CT dosimetry method was found to be more appropriate for HCC tumor dosimetry than ⁹⁰Y BRS SPECT/CT based dosimetry.