Protective role of thioredoxin reductase 1 in cadmium-induced DNA damage

Human AP endonuclease 1: a potential marker for the prediction of environmental carcinogenesis risk

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) functions mainly in DNA repair as an enzyme removing AP sites and in redox signaling as a coactivator of various transcription factors. Based on these multifunctions of APE1 within cells, numerous studies have reported that the alteration of APE1 could be a crucial factor in development of human diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration. In fact, the study on the combination of an individual's genetic make-up with environmental factors (gene-environment interaction) is of great importance to understand the development of diseases, especially lethal diseases including cancer. Recent reports have suggested that the human carcinogenic risk following exposure to environmental toxicants is affected by APE1 alterations in terms of gene-environment interactions. In this review, we initially outline the critical APE1 functions in the various intracellular mechanisms including DNA repair and redox regulation and its roles in human diseases. Several findings demonstrate that the change in expression and activity as well as genetic variability of APE1 caused by environmental chemical (e.g., heavy metals and cigarette smoke) and physical carcinogens (ultraviolet and ionizing radiation) is likely associated with various cancers. These enable us to ultimately suggest APE1 as a vital marker for the prediction of environmental carcinogenesis risk.

Base excision DNA repair defect in thioredoxin-1 (Trx1)-deficient cells

Thioredoxin-1 (Trx1) is an antioxidant enzyme with a protective role in the removal of oxidative stress. We investigated the mechanism by which the redox modulator Trx1 affects base excision repair (BER) activity to understand the protective role of Trx1. We constructed a Trx1 knockdown system to demonstrate the specific mechanism of Trx1 shRNA cells compared with that in the wild type cells, leading to increased cellular susceptibility to a sublethal dose of BER-inducible toxicant, nitrosomethylurea (NMU). In addition, we observed a modulatory role of Trx1 in the BER pathway via the p53 downstream gene, growth arrest, and DNA-damage-inducible protein 45 α (Gadd45a). The protein level and function of p53, a Trx1 downstream gene, coincidently decreased in the Trx1 shRNA cells. Futhermore, Trx1 shRNA cells showed decreased Gadd45a expression and interaction of Gadd45a with apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) as well as APE activity. In conclusion, Trx1 might cooperate in the control of APE1 function by modulating the p53-mediated BER via the protein-protein interaction between Gadd45a and APE1, providing insight into the novel role of redox factor Trx1 in modulation of BER.

Toxicogenomic approaches for understanding molecular mechanisms of heavy metal mutagenicity and carcinogenicity

Heavy metals that are harmful to humans include arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and nickel. Some metals or their related compounds may even cause cancer. However, the mechanism underlying heavy metal-induced cancer remains unclear. Increasing data show a link between heavy metal exposure and aberrant changes in both genetic and epigenetic factors via non-targeted multiple toxicogenomic technologies of the transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and epigenome. These modifications due to heavy metal exposure might provide a better understanding of environmental disorders. Such informative changes following heavy metal exposure might also be useful for screening of biomarker-monitored exposure to environmental pollutants and/or predicting the risk of disease. We summarize advances in high-throughput toxicogenomic-based technologies and studies related to exposure to individual heavy metal and/or mixtures and propose the underlying mechanism of action and toxicant signatures. Integrative multi-level expression analysis of the toxicity of heavy metals via system toxicology-based methodologies combined with statistical and computational tools might clarify the biological pathways involved in carcinogenic processes. Although standard in vitro and in vivo endpoint testing of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity are considered a complementary approach linked to disease, we also suggest that further evaluation of prominent biomarkers reflecting effects, responses, and disease susceptibility might be diagnostic. Furthermore, we discuss challenges in toxicogenomic applications for toxicological studies of metal mixtures and epidemiological research. Taken together, this review presents toxicogenomic data that will be useful for improvement of the knowledge of carcinogenesis and the development of better strategies for health risk assessment.