Assessment of BRAFV600E and SMOF412E mutations in epithelial odontogenic tumours

Anti-MAPK Targeted Therapy for Ameloblastoma: Case Report with a Systematic Review

Ameloblastoma, a benign yet aggressive odontogenic tumor known for its recurrence and the severe morbidity from radical surgeries, may benefit from advancements in targeted therapy. We present a case of a 15-year-old girl with ameloblastoma successfully treated with targeted therapy and review the literature with this question: Is anti-MAPK targeted therapy safe and effective for treating ameloblastoma? This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and searched multiple databases up to December 2023, identifying 13 relevant studies out of 647 records, covering 23 patients treated with MAPK inhibitor therapies. The results were promising as nearly all patients showed a positive treatment response, with four achieving complete radiological remission and others showing substantial reductions in primary, recurrent, and metastatic ameloblastoma sizes. Side effects were mostly mild to moderate. This study presents anti-MAPK therapy as a significant shift from invasive surgical treatments, potentially enhancing life quality and clinical outcomes by offering a less invasive yet effective treatment alternative. This approach could signify a breakthrough in managing this challenging tumor, emphasizing the need for further research into molecular-targeted therapies.

Molecular pathogenesis of ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma (AM) is a benign, although aggressive, epithelial odontogenic tumour originating from tooth-forming tissues or remnants. Its aetiopathogenesis remains unclear; however, molecular analysis techniques have allowed researchers to progress in understanding its genetic basis. The high frequency of BRAF p.V600E as a main driver mutation in AM is well established; nevertheless, it is insufficient to explain its tumourigenesis. In this review, we aimed to integrate the current knowledge about the biology of AM and to describe the main genetic alterations reported, focusing on the findings of large-scale sequencing and gene expression profiling techniques. Current evidence shows that besides BRAF mutation and activation of the MAPK pathway, alterations in Hedgehog and Wnt/β-catenin pathway-related genes are also involved in AM pathogenesis. Recently, a tumour suppressor gene, KMT2D, has been reported as mutated by different research groups. The biological impact of these mutations in the pathogenesis of AM has yet to be elucidated. Further studies are needed to clarify the impact of these findings in the identification of novel biomarkers that could be useful for diagnosing, classifying, and molecular targeting this neoplasm.

Association of MDM2 Overexpression in Ameloblastomas with MDM2 Amplification and BRAFV600E Expression

Ameloblastoma is a rare tumor but represents the most common odontogenic neoplasm. It is localized in the jaws and, although it is a benign, slow-growing tumor, it has an aggressive local behavior and high recurrence rate. Therefore, alternative treatment options or complementary to surgery have been evaluated, with the most promising one among them being a targeted therapy with the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B (BRAF), as in ameloblastoma the activating mutation V600E in BRAF is common. Studies in other tumors have shown that the synchronous inhibition of BRAF and human murine double minute 2 homologue (MDM2 or HDM2) protein is more effective than BRAF monotherapy, particularly in the presence of wild type p53 (WTp53). To investigate the MDM2 protein expression and gene amplification in ameloblastoma, in association with BRAFV600E and p53 expression. Forty-four cases of ameloblastoma fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin were examined for MDM2 overexpression and BRAFV600E and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry, and for MDM2 ploidy with fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sixteen of forty-four (36.36%) cases of ameloblastoma showed MDM2 overexpression. Seven of sixteen MDM2-positive ameloblastomas (43.75%) were BRAFV600E positive and fifteen of sixteen MDM2-positive ameloblastomas (93.75%) were p53 negative. All MDM2 overexpressing tumors did not show copy number alterations for MDM2. Overexpression of MDM2 in ameloblastomas is not associated with MDM2 amplification, but most probably with MAPK activation and WTp53 expression. Further verification of those findings could form the basis for the use of MDM2 expression as a marker of MAPK activation in ameloblastomas and the trial of dual BRAF/MDM2 inhibition in the management of MDM2-overexpressing/BRAFV600E-positive/WTp53 ameloblastomas.

Prevalence of BRAF p.V600E and Detection Methods in Benign Mixed and Malignant Odontogenic Tumors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The BRAF p.V600E genetic variant facilitates the pathogenesis of various tumors by triggering tumor proliferation and progression. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of BRAF p.V600E in benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal and malignant odontogenic tumors. In addition, we discussed the different detection methods used to assess for aberrant BRAF.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in Prospero (CRD42023445689). A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases was performed to answer the question "What is the prevalence of the BRAF p.V600E mutation in benign mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors?" The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Initially, 387 records were identified, but only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 70 patients with benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumors and 63 with malignant odontogenic tumors were included in the analysis. We found that the BRAF p.V600E mutation had a prevalence of 31.42% in mixed tumors and 26.98% in malignant odontogenic tumors. Moreover, immunohistochemistry showed high concordance with DNA-based molecular methods.

CONCLUSION

In general, the BRAF p.V600E variant exhibited a prominent prevalence in mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors. However, most of the findings are based on small cohorts of patients and further studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Does BRAF mutation status and related clinicopathological factors affect the recurrence rate of ameloblastoma? A systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to analyse the recurrence rate in BRAFv600e+ and BRAFv600e- ameloblastomas and explore its association with clinicopathological variables.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and grey literature, without any limitation on start date or language up to 20 June 2023. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted and Metaregression analyses were performed based on available clinicopathological factors.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the criteria for meta-analysis of outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall recurrence rates between the two groups (risk difference = 0.001, p-value = 0.987). Increasing male:female ratio in the BRAFv600e+ group was associated with a lower reported recurrence, suggesting a higher recurrence rate in females. The odds of having mandibular lesion were four times higher in BRAFv600e+ cases compared to BRAFv600e- cases (confidence interval: 2.121-7.870, p < 0.001, I2  = 28.37%).

CONCLUSION

Within the BRAFv600e+ group, females showed a higher reported recurrence rate. This specific clinical group may benefit from BRAFv600e mutation investigation and potential upscaled surgical treatment and additional BRAF inhibitor therapy, which needs validation in future studies.

The Role of BRAF Inhibitors in the Management of Ameloblastoma: A Literature Review

Ameloblastoma is one of the most prevalent but enigmatic benign odontogenic tumors of the jaw, accounting for approximately 10% of all maxillary and mandibular tumors. This neoplasia is distinguished by exhibiting several clinical and histological variants along with several mutations that affect its behavior. The ameloblastoma treatment plan is determined by the tumor's size, anatomical location, histologic variant, and anatomical involvement. On chromosome 7, there is a proto-oncogene called BRAF. When BRAF is mutated, it becomes an oncogene and continuously produces proteins like MEK and ERK, members of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). In the signaling pathway, these proteins activate transcription factor inside the nucleus that helps in cell division and growth. Numerous neoplasms have been linked to more than 40 BRAF mutations. The most common one is BRAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600E, whose treatment has been linked to a positive outcome. BRAF inhibitors like vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and sorafenib have shown excellent results, especially in metastatic ameloblastoma. BRAF, particularly in the case of metastatic ameloblastoma, inhibitors such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and sorafenib, has demonstrated outstanding results. Targeted therapies have been employed as adjuvant therapies to enhance cosmetic outcomes, even though no reports of serial cases demonstrate their effectiveness in ameloblastomas. In the treatment of ameloblastomas, the identification of BRAF V600E and additional mutations as the prime targeted therapies has proven to be a significant breakthrough where surgical treatment was contraindicated. In this article, we review the presence of BRAF V600E mutations, their inhibitors, and targeted therapies in ameloblastoma.

BRAF inhibitors in BRAF V600E-mutated ameloblastoma: systematic review of rare cases in the literature

BACKGROUND

Ameloblastoma in 66% of the cases harbor a somatic mutation of the "mitogen-activated protein kinase" signaling pathway (BRAF V600E). In V600E mutations, BRAF is in the permanent "on" state and relays the growth-promoting signals independently of the EGFR pathway. Therefore, mutant BRAF represents a target for handful of new drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search, with the search terms "Vemurafenib, Dabrafenib, Ameloblastoma, and BRAF." These included seven case reports with nine patients who underwent monotherapy with Dabrafenib or Vemurafenib or combination therapy with Dabrafenib and Trametinib.

RESULTS

The patients age ranges from 10 years up to 86 years. The distribution of women and men is 4:5. Patients with an initial diagnosis of ameloblastoma, as well as recurrences or metastasized ameloblastoma were treated. Indications cover neoadjuvant therapy up to the use in metastasized patients in an irresectable state. Results ranging from "only" tumor size reduction to restitutio ad integrum.

CONCLUSION

We see the use of BRAF Inhibitors to reduce tumor size with consecutive surgical treatment as a reasonable option for therapy. However, we are aware that at present the data are based only on case reports with the longest follow-up of just 38 months. We encourage further clinical trials in the use of BRAF Inhibitors for selecting ameloblastoma patients in a multi-center setting.

Genomic profiling and precision medicine in complex ameloblastoma

BACKGROUND

Ameloblastoma may present a significant treatment challenge in the locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic setting. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can identify targetable genomic alterations to aid in treatment.

METHODS

Ameloblastoma samples were sequenced using hybrid-capture based sequencing. A systematic literature review was performed to examine outcomes in studies employing targeted treatment in ameloblastoma.

RESULTS

We reviewed 14 cases of Ameloblastoma using CGP. There were six patients with activating BRAF mutations, five with PIK3CA, five with SMO, four with FGFR2, one with EGFR, and one with ROS1. All cases were MSI stable and the median TMB was 2.5 mutations/Mb. A separate literature review of clinical outcomes in ameloblastoma showed a predominance of at least partial response to targeted treatment (7/12 cases).

CONCLUSION

CGP is helpful in identifying specific driver mutations in patients with complex ameloblastoma. Targeted treatment has been employed with success in achieving treatment response.

BRAF V600E Mutation in Ameloblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The discovery that ameloblastoma has a high mutation incidence of BRAF V600E may enable a better investigation of pathophysiology. However, there is inconsistent evidence regarding this mutation occurrence and its association with clinical information. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to pool the overall mutation prevalence of BRAF V600E in reported ameloblastoma cases and to determine its association with patient demographic and clinicopathological features. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive article search was conducted through four databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science). Seventeen articles between 2014 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria with 833 ameloblastoma cases. For each included study, the significance of BRAF V600E on the outcome parameters was determined using odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analysis prevalence of BRAF V600E in ameloblastoma was 70.49%, and a significant meta-analysis association was reported for those younger than 54 years old and in the mandible. On the contrary, other factors, such as sex, histological variants, and recurrence, were insignificant. As a result of the significant outcome of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastoma pathogenesis, targeted therapy formulation can be developed with this handful of evidence.

Adenoid ameloblastoma harbors beta-catenin mutations

Adenoid ameloblastoma is a very rare benign epithelial odontogenic tumor characterized microscopically by epithelium resembling conventional ameloblastoma, with additional duct-like structures, epithelial whorls, and cribriform architecture. Dentinoid deposits, clusters of clear cells, and ghost-cell keratinization may also be present. These tumors do not harbor BRAF or KRAS mutations and their molecular basis appears distinct from conventional ameloblastoma but remains unknown. We assessed CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) exon 3 mutations in a cohort of 11 samples of adenoid ameloblastomas from 9 patients. Two of the 9 patients were female and 7 male and in 7/9 patients the tumors occurred in the maxilla. Tumors of 4 of these 9 patients harbored CTNNB1 mutations, specifically p.Ser33Cys, p.Gly34Arg, and p.Ser37Phe. Notably, for one patient 3 samples were analyzed including the primary tumour and two consecutive recurrences, and results were positive for the mutation in all three tumors. Therefore, 6/11 samples tested positive for the mutation. In the 6 mutation-positive samples, ghost cells were present in only 2/6, indicating beta-catenin mutations are not always revealed by ghost cell formation. Dentinoid matrix deposition was observed in 5/6 mutation-positive samples and clear cells in all 6 cases. None of the cases harbored either BRAF or KRAS mutations. Beta-catenin immunoexpression was assessed in the samples of 8 patients. Except for one wild-type case, all cases showed focal nuclear expression irrespective of the mutational status. Together with the absence of BRAF mutation, the detection of beta-catenin mutation in adenoid ameloblastomas supports its classification as a separate entity, and not as a subtype of ameloblastoma. The presence of this mutation may help in the diagnosis of challenging cases.

The diagnostic utility of BRAF VE1 mutation-specific immunohistochemistry in ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma is a benign, locally aggressive odontogenic neoplasm with variable solid and cystic morphology. On account of its histologic variety, diagnostically challenging cases can bear resemblance to odontogenic keratocyst/keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) or dentigerous cyst (DC). BRAF^V600E mutation has been reported to be specific for and frequent in ameloblastoma, and this study evaluated the usefulness of immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the BRAF VE1 mutant-specific antibody as a diagnostic adjunct in this setting. We investigated 46 ameloblastomas, 30 KCOTs, and 30 DCs. BRAF VE1 IHC was performed on all cases and allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) for BRAF^V600E mutation was performed on 30 ameloblastomas and any IHC-positive KCOT/DC. BRAF VE1 IHC was positive in 31/37 (83.8%) mandibular ameloblastomas but not in any maxillary ameloblastomas (0/9), KCOT (0/30), or DC (0/30). Equivocal staining was seen in 1/37 (3.3%) mandibular ameloblastomas. Of the 30 ameloblastomas subjected to AS-PCR, BRAF^V600E mutation was identified in 19/23 (82.6%) mandibular ameloblastomas and 0/7 (0.0%) maxillary ameloblastomas. BRAF^V600E mutant ameloblastomas were positive by IHC in 18/19 (94.7%) cases and equivocal in 1/19 (5.3%) cases. All 11 (100.0%) BRAF-wild type ameloblastomas were negative by IHC. BRAF VE1 is an excellent tool for the diagnosis of mandibular ameloblastoma but of limited utility in the maxilla, where it less commonly occurs and where BRAF^V600E mutation is considerably less frequent.

Unicystic adenoid ameloblastoma: A new variant?

Adenoid ameloblastoma with dentinoid is an uncommon benign odontogenic neoplasm, and its unicystic variant seems to be even rarer. A 34-year-old man was referred for evaluation of an asymptomatic swelling in the posterior maxilla. Intraoral examination showed an expansive lesion, soft to palpation, covered by a normal color mucosa. Cone beam computed tomography revealed a well-defined unilocular hypodense tumor involving the left maxillary sinus. Histopathological examination of the surgically excised specimen showed a cystic tumor lined by an ameloblastic-like epithelium containing columnar basal cells with hyperchromatic and polarized nuclei. In some areas of the capsule, the tumor showed mural infiltration by sheets of cells containing central whirling structures. Dentinoid material was also observed in association with ameloblastic-like cells. The tumor was BRAF and KRAS wild-type. Collectively, these findings were consistent with the diagnosis of a unicystic variant of adenoid ameloblastoma with dentinoid.

Ameloblastic Carcinoma of the Maxilla: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature from 1948 to 2021

Ameloblastic carcinoma is a rare malignant neoplasm arising from the odontogenic epithelium. Ameloblastic carcinoma commonly occurs de novo affecting the posterior segments of the mandible. Presently, only less than 100 cases have been reported arising from the maxilla. We report a unique case of maxillary ameloblastic carcinoma in a 68-year-old male with a 5.6 cm positron emission tomography (PET) avid left maxillary sinus mass. The patient underwent a left maxillectomy which revealed hyperchromatic and pleomorphic tumor cells arranged in a nested and trabecular architecture. The tumor cells showed distinct peripheral palisading with reverse polarization. Areas of bone destruction, necrosis, lymphovascular and perineural invasions, as well as atypical mitoses, were identified. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for keratin cocktail (AE1/AE3 and CAM 5.2), keratin 19, p40, and weakly positive for MDM2, while negative for calretinin. Molecular analysis revealed wild-type BRAF; however, alterations in CDKN2A/B, MTAP, RB1, SMARCA4, STK11, FGF12, SETD2, and TP53 were present. This histopathologic and molecular profile supported the diagnosis of ameloblastic carcinoma. There has been no evidence of disease recurrence or metastasis eleven months after the initial diagnosis.

Identification of BRAF V600E mutation in odontogenic tumors by high-performance MALDI-TOF analysis

Odontogenic tumors are rare lesions with unknown etiopathogenesis. Most of them are benign, but local aggressiveness, infiltrative potential, and high recurrence rate characterize some entities. The MAP-kinase pathway activation can represent a primary critical event in odontogenic tumorigenesis. Especially, the BRAF V600E mutation has been involved in 80–90% of ameloblastic lesions, offering a biological rationale for developing new targeted therapies. The study aims to evaluate the BRAF V600E mutation in odontogenic lesions, comparing three different detection methods and focusing on the Sequenom MassARRAY System. 81 surgical samples of odontogenic lesions were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis, Sanger Sequencing, and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight mass spectrometry (Sequenom). The BRAF V600E mutation was revealed only in ameloblastoma samples. Moreover, the presence of BRAF V600E was significantly associated with the mandibular site (ρ = 0.627; P value <0.001) and the unicystic histotype (ρ = 0.299, P value <0.001). However, any significant difference of 10-years disease-free survival time was not revealed. Finally, Sequenom showed to be a 100% sensitive and 98.1% specific, suggesting its high-performance diagnostic accuracy. These results suggest the MAP-kinase pathway could contribute to ameloblastic tumorigenesis. Moreover, they could indicate the anatomical specificity of the driving mutations of mandibular ameloblastomas, providing a biological rational for developing new targeted therapies. Finally, the high diagnostic accuracy of Sequenom was confirmed.

Precision drugging of the MAPK pathway in head and neck cancer

The mitogen-activating protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is central for cell proliferation, differentiation, and senescence. In human, germline defects of the pathway contribute to developmental and congenital head and neck disorders. Nearly 1/5 of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) harbors MAPK pathway mutations, which are largely activating mutations. Yet, previous approaches targeting the MAPK pathway in HNSCC were futile. Most recent clinical evidences reveal remarkable, or even exceptional pharmacologic vulnerabilities of MAPK1-mutated, HRAS-mutated, KRAS-germline altered, as well as BRAF-mutated HNSCC patients with various targeted therapies, uncovering diverse opportunities for precision drugging this pathway at multiple “genetically condemned” nodes. Further, recent patient tumor omics unveil novel effects of MAPK aberrations on direct induction of CD8⁺ T cell recruitment into the HNSCC microenvironment, providing evidences for future investigation of precision immunotherapy for this large subset of patients. MAPK pathway-mutated HNSCC should warrant precision therapy assessments in vigorous manners.

The Molecular Pathology of Odontogenic Tumors: Expanding the Spectrum of MAPK Pathway Driven Tumors

Odontogenic tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of lesions that arise from the odontogenic apparatus and their remnants. Although the etiopathogenesis of most odontogenic tumors remains unclear, there have been some advances, recently, in the understanding of the genetic basis of specific odontogenic tumors. The mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (MAPK/ERK) pathway is intimately involved in the regulation of important cellular functions, and it is commonly deregulated in several human neoplasms. Molecular analysis performed by different techniques, including direct sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and allele-specific qPCR, have uncovered mutations in genes related to the oncogenic MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in odontogenic tumors. Genetic mutations in this pathway genes have been reported in epithelial and mixed odontogenic tumors, in addition to odontogenic carcinomas and sarcomas. Notably, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) and KRAS proto-oncogene GTPase (KRAS) pathogenic mutations have been reported in a high proportion of ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, respectively. In line with the reports about other neoplasms that harbor a malignant counterpart, the frequency of BRAF p.V600E mutation is higher in ameloblastoma (64% in conventional, 81% in unicystic, and 63% in peripheral) than in ameloblastic carcinoma (35%). The objective of this study was to review MAPK/ERK genetic mutations in benign and malignant odontogenic tumors. Additionally, such genetic alterations were discussed in the context of tumorigenesis, clinical behavior, classification, and future perspectives regarding therapeutic approaches.

Genetic Profile of Adenomatoid Odontogenic Tumor and Ameloblastoma. A Systematic Review

Purpose: To perform a comprehensive and systematic critical appraisal of the genetic alterations reported to be present in adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) compared to ameloblastoma (AM), to aid in the understanding in their development and different behavior.

Methods: An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science during March 2021. Eligibility criteria included publications on humans which included genetic analysis of AOT or AM.

Results: A total of 43 articles reporting 59 AOTs and 680 AMs were included. Different genomic techniques were used, including whole-exome sequencing, direct sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing panels and TaqMan allele-specific qPCR. Somatic mutations affecting KRAS were identified in 75.9% of all AOTs, mainly G12V; whereas a 71% of the AMs harbored BRAF mutations, mainly V600E.

Conclusions: The available genetic data reports that AOTs and AM harbor somatic mutations in well-known oncogenes, being KRAS G12V/R and BRAFV600E mutations the most common, respectively. The relatively high frequency of ameloblastoma compared to other odontogenic tumors, such as AOT, has facilitated the performance of different sequencing techniques, allowing the discovery of different mutational signatures. On the contrary, the low frequency of AOTs is an important limitation for this. The number of studies that have a assessed the genetic landscape of AOT is still very limited, not providing enough evidence to draw a conclusion regarding the relationship between the genomic alterations and its clinical behavior. Thus, the presence of other mutational signatures with clinical impact, co-occurring with background KRAS mutations or in wild-type KRAS cases, cannot be ruled out. Since BRAF and RAS are in the same MAPK pathway, it is interesting that ameloblastomas, frequently associated with BRAFV600E mutation have aggressive clinical behavior, but in contrast, AOTs, frequently associated with RAS mutations have indolent behavior. Functional studies might be required to solve this question.

Genetic Study of BRAF V600E and SMO L412F Mutations in Japanese Patients with Ameloblastoma

Background and aim: Ameloblastoma is a benign, intraosseous, progressively growing, epithelial, odontogenic neoplasm. BRAF and SMO mutations have been reported in ameloblastoma. In this study, we evaluated BRAF V600E and SMO L412F mutations; and assessed the relationship between BRAF V600E mutant expression and the clinicopathological features in Japanese patients with ameloblastoma. Methods: We examined 24 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. All specimens were from patients with mandibular ameloblastoma: 20 were conventional ameloblastoma and 4 were unicystic ameloblastoma. The BRAF V600E mutation was assessed by Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemistry, and the SMO L412F mutation was assessed only by Sanger sequencing. Results: Twenty of the 24 (83%) ameloblastoma samples carried the BRAF V600E mutation; 22 of the 24 (92%) samples were immunohistochemically positive for BRAF V600E. However, the SMO L412F mutation was not detected in any of them. The BRAF V600E mutation status did not correlate with the clinicopathological features, such as age, sex, location, method, recurrence, and subtype. Conclusion: BRAF inhibitors could be a potential treatment option for Japanese patients with ameloblastoma, harboring the BRAF V600E mutation.

Analysis of BRAF V600E expression and disease-free survival in patients with ameloblastoma

The correlation between BRAF mutation and the aggressiveness of ameloblastoma remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of BRAF V600E expression with clinicopathological features and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with ameloblastoma. Seventy-four conventional ameloblastoma samples were collected. Immunohistochemistry using anti-BRAF V600E antibody was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrieved from the patient medical records. BRAF V600E immunoreactivity was detected in 50/74 cases (67.6%); 39 were strongly positive and 11 weakly. There was a significant difference in BRAF V600E expression between ameloblastoma and dental follicle (P = 0.034). However, there was no significant association of BRAF V600E expression with any clinicopathological features, including sex, age, location, duration, tumour size, radiographic appearance, cortical perforation, recurrence, and histological subtype. DFS analysis revealed that patients with BRAF-mutated ameloblastoma had a shorter median survival time (84 months vs 168 months) and lower 5-year survival rate (59% vs 67%) compared to the BRAF wild-type group; however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.169). Moreover, logistic regression analysis revealed that treatment with enucleation was an independent risk factor for tumour recurrence (odds ratio 9.236; P = 0.028). This study demonstrated that the BRAF V600E mutation was not associated with any clinicopathological features of ameloblastoma. A trend towards earlier recurrence in tumours with BRAF mutation was observed, but this requires further investigation. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the treatment modality is an important factor in determining recurrence in ameloblastoma despite genetic alterations.

Comparative Analysis Between Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor and Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) form a spectrum of rare benign and malignant odontogenic neoplasms, respectively. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative systematic review of the clinicopathological, genetic, therapeutic, and prognostic features of DGCT and GCOC. The electronic search was performed until December 2020 on seven electronic databases. Case reports, series, and research studies with enough histopathological criteria for diagnosis and all genomic studies were included. Both DGCT and GCOC showed a male prevalence (p = 0.043), with mandibular and maxillary predilections, respectively (p = 0.008). Peripheral DGCT (DGCTp) affected most elderly people (p < 0.001), and central DGCT (DGCTc) and GCOC occurred mainly in younger individuals. Unilateral enlargement of maxilla or mandible was the most common clinical sign associated with a radiolucent or mixed image. Ameloblastomatous epithelium was often present in both neoplasms. Basaloid and large cells with vesicular nuclei were also frequently seen in GCOC. β-catenin expression and mutations (CTNNB1 gene) were found in DGCT and GCOC. Conservative surgery was mostly used for DGCTp, while radical resection was chosen for DGCTc and GCOC. High recurrence rates were found in DGCTc and GCOC. Metastasis occurred in 16.7% of GCOC cases and the 5-year survival rate was 72.6%. DGCT and GCOC share numerous clinicopathological features and demand a careful histopathological evaluation, considering the overlap features with other odontogenic tumors and the possibility of malignant transformation of DGCT. A strict regular post-operative follow-up is mandatory due to high recurrence rates and metastatic capacity in GCOC.

Malignant Odontogenic Tumours: A Systematic Review of Cases Reported in Literature

Background: Malignant odontogenic tumours (MOTs) arise either de novo from the tooth forming tissues, their developmental residues or from existing odontogenic epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms in the jaws. Their management requires extensive surgery due to their infiltrative nature and risk of metastasis. There is a need to understand the clinical and pathological features of MOTs to inform both treatment algorithms and prognostication. This is an area of diagnostic pathology which presents substantial difficulties in diagnosis, compounded by inconsistent use of terminology. Thus, this systematic review aimed to describe the clinical and pathological features of MOTs with a view to consolidating the literature and defining problematic areas in diagnosis and classification. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Additionally, the grey literature and reference lists of selected papers searched for completeness. Nine hundred and sixty articles were initially identified. Following removal of duplicates and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 312 articles were included for qualitative analysis. Results: The 312 articles encompassed a total of 507 patients with most lesions located within the mandible (74.3%). The most common first histological diagnosis was ameloblastic carcinoma (25.7% of all diagnoses), but there is considerable variation in how and when various diagnostic terms are used, and several misdiagnoses were reported. An initial benign diagnosis was made in 24.7% of patients, followed by a later malignant diagnosis and in this sub-group, the most common benign first diagnosis was ameloblastoma (42.4%). Cervical lymph nodes were the most common site of metastasis (9.3% of patients). With respect to distant metastasis (DM), the lungs were the most common organ affected (11.2% of DM patients) with metastasising ameloblastoma the most commonly reported tumour which metastasised to the lungs. Overall, 26.8% of patients developed recurrence. Conclusion: Overall, the quality of the literature on MOTs is poor. This review of the literature has highlighted variations in diagnostic terms and criteria which has resulted in areas of confusion with potential for misdiagnosis. This consolidation of primary data has identified key areas for targeted research including further discussion on the malignant potential of ameloblastoma.

Adenoid ameloblastoma with dentinoid is molecularly different from ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors

BACKGROUND

Adenoid ameloblastoma is a rare epithelial neoplasm, histologically characterized by the presence of ameloblastoma-like features, duct-like structures, epithelial whorls, and cribriform architecture. Dentinoid material is usually present. Some advocate adenoid ameloblastoma is an ameloblastoma variant. However, there are overlapping features not only with ameloblastoma, but also with adenomatoid odontogenic tumor. Most ameloblastomas are characterized by the presence of BRAF p.V600E mutations and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors harbor signature KRAS mutations. The molecular features of adenoid ameloblastoma remain unknown.

METHODS

Nine adenoid ameloblastoma cases were screened by TaqMan allele-specific qPCR to assess BRAF p.V600E, ameloblastoma signature mutation, and KRAS p.G12V and p.G12R, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor signature mutations.

RESULTS

BRAF and KRAS mutations were not detected in any of the adenoid ameloblastoma cases.

CONCLUSION

The molecular results support adenoid ameloblastoma as an entity distinct from adenomatoid odontogenic tumor and ameloblastoma.

Correlation of BRAF mutational status with clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ameloblastoma: the experience of 11 Italian centres

AIMS

Ameloblastoma is a rare odontogenic tumour with an aggressive local behaviour. Mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, namely BRAF V600E mutations, are a common finding. To date, there is no clear correlation between BRAF V600 mutation and clinical outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for ameloblastoma between May 1998 and June 2018, at 11 participating Italian centres. BRAF mutational status was evaluated by quantitative PCR/pyrosequencing. The primary end points were to determine BRAF mutational status in primitive and recurrent ameloblastoma, and to assess the relapse-free interval (RFI); the secondary end point was to investigate the correlation of BRAF mutational status with the clinical features of the tumour and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients were included: 33 (44.5%) were BRAF wild type and 41 (55.4%) BRAF V600 mutated. BRAF V600 mutated ameloblastomas occurred more frequently in younger patients (p=0.0031), were located at the mandible (p=0.0009) and presented with unicystic variant. After a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 (28.3%) patients relapsed (30.3% and 26.8% in the BRAF wild type and BRAF mutated group, respectively). At univariable Cox models, none of the investigated variables, including microscopic margin involvement, was associated with RFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Local recurrence occurs in 30% of patients with ameloblastoma. BRAFV600 mutation is associated with younger age, mandibular localisation and with unicystic ameloblastoma. Neither BRAF mutation nor microscopically positive surgical margins were associated with RFI. Further studies are needed to elucidate outcomes of this rare disease according to clinical, histopathological and comprehensive molecular features.

Clinico-pathological study of malignant odontogenic tumours from a national referral centre

BACKGROUND

Malignant odontogenic tumours are extremely rare tumours occurring within the jaws. Our study was performed to determine the demographic and clinico-pathological features of malignant odontogenic tumours amongst a multi-ethnic Asian population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of malignant odontogenic tumours diagnosed at the Institute for Medical Research, Malaysia, from 2009 to 2019. All cases were independently reviewed and reclassified following the criteria set out in the latest edition of the World Health Organization 2017 reference text. Demographic and clinico-pathological data were recorded for each case.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cases of malignant odontogenic tumours were identified. The patients' age ranged from 16 to 79 years with the mean age at diagnosis being 50.8 years (SD = 16.18). There was a male predominance (66.7%) in this cohort of patients. The ethnic distribution appeared to reflect the Malaysian population with most cases seen amongst the Malay ethnic group (66.7%). Ameloblastic carcinoma was the most frequently diagnosed malignant odontogenic tumour (45.8%) and was also predominantly seen in males (90.9%). All patients with clear cell odontogenic carcinoma were females. There was no obvious sex predilection in primary odontogenic carcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS). The mandible (79.2%) was more frequently involved compared to the maxilla.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis and management of malignant odontogenic tumours are challenging due to the rarity of these tumours. Our study has elucidated the clinico-pathological features of malignant odontogenic tumours seen in a multi-ethnic Asian population.

Molecular biological findings of ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma is benign odontogenic tumours that mainly occur in the jawbone. This tumour induces aggressive invasion into the surrounding bone and has a high recurrence rate after surgery. Therefore, mandibular resection is performed in many patients with this tumour, causing aesthetic and functional problems. It is necessary to develop a novel treatment strategy for ameloblastoma, but there are currently no innovative treatments. Although our understanding of the molecular biological mechanisms of ameloblastoma is still insufficient, there have been many recent reports of new molecular biological findings on ameloblastoma. Therefore, bioactive factors that have potential for novel therapeutic methods, such as molecular targeted therapy, have been discovered in ameloblastoma. In this review, we summarize the molecular biological findings of ameloblastoma reported over several decades, focusing on factors involved in invasion into surrounding tissues and disease-specific gene mutations. We also mention the effect of the interaction between tumour cells and stromal components in ameloblastoma on tumour development.

Scientific field of dental Science: Oral surgery, Odontogenic tumor, Ameloblastoma.

BRAF p.V600E status in epithelial areas of ameloblastoma with different histological aspects: Implications to the clinical practice

BACKGROUND

BRAF p.V600E is reported in up to 80% of ameloblastomas. Despite the high frequency, the presence of this mutation in different histopathological areas of the tumour has not been investigated. This information has an important role in the use of BRAF p.V600E assessment as an auxiliary tool in the differential diagnosis between unicystic ameloblastoma and other odontogenic cystic lesions, especially when only incisional biopsies are available. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate BRAF p.V600E heterogeneity in unicystic ameloblastoma.

METHODS

Five cases of ameloblastoma and two dentigerous cysts were analysed. The regions exhibiting different microscopic characteristics were selected from each ameloblastoma case and manually dissected. TaqMan allele-specific qPCR or Sanger sequencing was performed to determine BRAF p.V600E status.

RESULTS

We screened the mutation in a small cohort of UA and no molecular heterogeneity was found. Four cases of ameloblastoma (80%) exhibited BRAF p.V600E in all different areas evaluated. One case did not harbour the mutation in any microscopic region analysed. The BRAF mutation was absent in the dentigerous cysts.

CONCLUSION

Ameloblastomas appear to exhibit a homogeneous profile regarding the BRAF p.V600E no matter what histological feature is observed under light microscopy, suggesting that this molecular test may contribute to establish the correct diagnosis in cases microscopically resembling other odontogenic lesions.

Insight into the molecular pathogenesis of odontogenic lesions

BACKGROUND

Odontogenic tumors, derived from epithelial, ectomesenchymal, and/or mesenchymal elements of the tooth-forming apparatus, constitute a heterogeneous group of lesions, including hamartomas, benign and malignant neoplasms with metastatic capabilities.

HIGHLIGHT

This review provides a comprehensive overviewof the pathogenesis of odontogenic tumors and explains the associated molecular events in the context of hallmarks of cancer established by Hanahan D and Weinberg RA. Diagrammatic representations depicted in the article would facilitate easier understanding.

CONCLUSION

A better understanding of the pathogenesis of the lesions may assist in determining patient's prognosis and devising better targeted therapeutic treatment, thus, reducing the morbidity and mortalityof patients.

An integrative analysis of genome-wide methylation and expression in ameloblastoma: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

DNA methylation regulates the expression of various genes involved in tumorigenesis. Ameloblastoma is a benign odontogenic jaw tumor. It is locally aggressive with a high level of recurrence. A delay in treatment can lead to severe facial disfigurement. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression in ameloblastoma with the aim to identify genes that may be regulated by DNA methylation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used an Infinium MethylationEPIC array to measure genome-wide methylation and the Illumina HiSeq platform to obtain gene expression data in ameloblastoma tissues from five patients and dental follicles from three healthy subjects. An integration analysis was performed using City of Hope CpG Island Analysis Pipeline software.

RESULTS

We identified 25,255 differentially methylated CpG sites and 17 differentially methylated CpG islands; six of the islands were negatively correlated with the expression of BAIAP2, DUSP6, FGFR2, FOXF2, NID2, and PAK6. Pyrosequencing and immunostaining techniques were further used to validate FGFR2, NID2, and PAK6.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis identifies a group of novel genes that may be regulated by DNA methylation and will possibly lead to new insights into the pathology and invasion mechanism of ameloblastoma.

Analyses of odontogenic tumours: the most recent classification proposed by the World Health Organization (2017)

BACKGROUND

The fourth edition of the ''WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours'' was published in January 2017 and includes a classification of odontogenic tumours. This review aims to examine the changes made in this new classification in comparison with the previous classification of 2005.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases with the keywords "odontogenic tumor", "WHO classification" and "update". Studies published from January 2009 to April 2019 with a high level of scientific evidence were included, but studies not published in English, epidemiological studies and studies with a low level of evidence were excluded.

RESULTS

The initial search found 457 articles and after eliminating duplicates, 8 studies were selected for full-text assessment. After excluding 3 epidemiological studies, 5 articles were finally included. These studies were stratified by their level of scientific evidence using SORT criteria (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy).

CONCLUSIONS

The new odontogenic tumour list has been simplified with the objective of improving its role as an international guide for diagnosis. Some changes have been possible thanks to the application of immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic techniques that allow better characterization of certain tumours. Further clinicopathological and molecular studies are needed so that this new classification can be consolidated and/or amended.

Discrepancy between immunohistochemistry and sequencing for BRAF V600E in odontogenic tumours: Comparative analysis of two VE1 antibodies

BACKGROUND

Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) along with molecular tests has been investigated in ameloblastoma for BRAF V600E detection, VE1 IHC has not been studied in odontogenic carcinomas (OCs) and benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumours (BMOTs). Here, we performed BRAF V600E mutation analysis, examined the expression pattern of VE1 IHC, and comparatively evaluated the performance of two VE1 antibodies in ameloblastomas, OCs and BMOTs.

METHODS

BRAF V600E detection was performed using Sanger sequencing in a total of 47 odontogenic tumours: 28 ameloblastomas, 6 OCs and 13 BMOTs. VE1 IHC was conducted using two different antibodies (IHC-A and IHC-V), and their performance was analysed by calculating the sensitivity and specificity compared with sequencing.

RESULTS

BRAF V600E mutations were identified in 24/28 (85.7%) ameloblastomas, 2/5 (40.0%) ameloblastic carcinomas (ACs), 3/7 (42.9%) ameloblastic fibromas and 1/2 (50.0%) ameloblastic fibro-odontomas. In the presence of the mutation, VE1 showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining in ameloblastomas and ACs, whereas all BMOTs were negative for VE1. IHC-A and IHC-V yielded a sensitivity of 76.7% and 60.0%, respectively, although both antibodies showed 100% specificity.

CONCLUSION

OCs and BMOTs have BRAF V600E mutations in common at lower frequencies than ameloblastoma. Diffuse VE1 cytoplasmic staining in AC suggests the utility of MAPK-targeted therapy as selectively applied in ameloblastoma, and consistent VE1 false-negative expression in BMOTs requires further investigation. Considering the high specificity but low sensitivity of VE1 IHC, molecular tests should be performed to determine the presence of BRAF V600E mutations in odontogenic tumours.

High frequency of BRAF V600E mutation in Iranian population ameloblastomas

Background

Ameloblastoma is a common locally invasive but slow-growing neoplasm of the jaws with an odontogenic origin. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and clinicopathologic features and behavior of ameloblastoma remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate BRAF V600E gene mutation and expression of its related proteins with clinicopathologic parameters in conventional ameloblastoma.

Material and Methods

50 Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks were included in this study. Immunohistochemistry was done using rabbit monoclonal BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody VE1. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was used for evaluating of BRAF V600E mutation.

Results

Expression of BRAF V600E antibody was Positive in 42 out of 50 cases (84%). 46 (92%) out of 50 specimens showed BRAF V600E mutation. There were 13 cases of recurrence (26%). 3 out of 4 cases with negative mutations did not show recurrence.

Conclusions

We report the highest frequency (92%) of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastomas in the Iranian population. Although there was not a significant association between BRAF V600E‑positive immunoexpression and recurrence and clinicopathologic parameters, its high frequency could emphasize its role as a therapeutic marker in the future.

Key words:Conventional ameloblastoma, BRAF V600E, recurrence.

Frequency of BRAF V600E mutation in a group of Thai patients with ameloblastomas

OBJECTIVE

BRAF V600E mutation has recently been reported in a high proportion of ameloblastomas. This study was conducted to investigate the frequency of this mutation in ameloblastoma and unicystic ameloblastoma. The correlation between clinicopathologic data and BRAF V600E mutation was also analyzed.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 51 archival samples of ameloblastomas and 22 cases of unicystic ameloblastomas were examined for BRAF V600E mutation by using anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Positivity for anti-BRAF V600E antibody was detected in 72.5% (37 of 51) of ameloblastomas, but the mutation showed no significant correlation with the clinicopathologic parameters. With regard to unicystic ameloblastoma, 95.5% (21) of the 22 cases exhibited positive immunostaining for BRAF V600E, whereas only 1 case showed the mural subtype of wild-type BRAF.

CONCLUSIONS

A high frequency of BRAF V600E mutation was detected in a group of Thai patients with ameloblastomas, suggesting the future use of BRAF-targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated ameloblastoma. However, no significant association between BRAF V600E mutation and the clinicopathologic characteristics of ameloblastomas was found in our study.

LGR5+ epithelial tumor stem-like cells generate a 3D-organoid model for ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma (AM) is a benign but locally aggressive tumor with high recurrences. Currently, underlying pathophysiology remains elusive, and radical surgery remains the most definitive treatment with severe morbidities. We have recently reported that AM harbors a subpopulation of tumor epithelial stem-like cells (AM-EpiSCs). Herein, we explored whether LGR5⁺ epithelial cells in AM possess stem-like cell properties and their potential contribution to pathogenesis and recurrence of AM. We found that LGR5 and stem cell-related genes were co-expressed in a subpopulation of AM epithelial cells both in vivo and in vitro, which were enriched under 3D-spheroid culture. As compared to LGR5⁻ counterparts, LGR5⁺ AM epithelial cells showed increased expression of various EMT- and stemness-related genes, and functionally, exhibited increased capacity to form 3D-spheroids and generate human tumor 3D organoids, which recapitulated the histopathologic features of distinct subtypes of solid AM, thus, contributing a useful human tumor platform for targeted therapeutic screening. Treatment with a selective BRAF^V600E inhibitor, vemurafenib, unexpectedly enriched the subpopulation of LGR5⁺ AM-EpiSCs in tumor 3D organoids, which may have explained therapeutic resistances and recurrences. These findings suggest that LGR5⁺ AM-EpiSCs play a pivotal role in pathogenesis and progression of AM and targeted inhibition of both BRAF and LGR5 potentially serves a novel nonsurgical adjuvant therapeutic approach for this aggressively benign jaw tumor.

Ameloblastoma cell lines derived from different subtypes demonstrate distinct developmental patterns in a novel animal experimental model

Objective

Ameloblastoma is a representative odontogenic tumor comprising several characteristic invasive forms, and its pathophysiology has not been sufficiently elucidated. A stable animal experimental model using immortalized cell lines is crucial to explain the factors causing differences among the subtypes of ameloblastoma, but this model has not yet been disclosed. In this study, a novel animal experimental model has been established, using immortalized human ameloblastoma-derived cell lines.

Methodology

Ameloblastoma cells suspended in Matrigel were subcutaneously transplanted into the heads of immunodeficient mice. Two immortalized human ameloblastoma cell lines were used: AM-1 cells derived from the plexiform type and AM-3 cells derived from the follicular type. The tissues were evaluated histologically 30, 60, and 90 days after transplantation.

Results

Tumor masses formed in all transplanted mice. In addition, the tumors formed in each group transplanted with different ameloblastoma cells were histologically distinct: the tumors in the group transplanted with AM-1 cells were similar to the plexiform type, and those in the group transplanted with AM-3-cells were similar to the follicular type.

Conclusions

A novel, stable animal experimental model of ameloblastoma was established using two cell lines derived from different subtypes of the tumor. This model can help clarify its pathophysiology and hasten the development of new ameloblastoma treatment strategies.

A review of the molecular profile of benign and malignant odontogenic lesions

Odontogenic cysts and tumors are heterogeneous lesions, originating from elements or remnants of the odontogenic apparatus. Although the majority of these lesions are benign and never undergo malignant transformation, rare malignant tumors may arise de novo or from benign precursors. The molecular basis of these lesions is still poorly understood. This article summarizes and discusses studies using small, medium, and large-scale and/or "-omic" techniques to describe the molecular characteristics of benign and malignant odontogenic lesions and briefly debates strategies to increase the use of "-omic" and multi-omic approaches or integrative analyses in the research of these lesions. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular aspects of odontogenic lesions by using large-scale approaches will enable us to refine the classification of this heterogeneous group of disorders and provide more accurate biomarkers for precise diagnosis, prognosis, and development of molecular tools in the management of patients with these conditions.

An immunohistochemical and genetic study of BRAFV600E mutation in Japanese patients with ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma is an odontogenic tumor of the jaw. It most frequently occurs in the mandible, and less often in the maxilla. Mandibular ameloblastoma harbors a BRAF mutation that causes a valine (V) to glutamic acid (E) substitution at codon 600 (BRAF^V600E ). We examined specimens from 32 Japanese patients to detect the prevalence of the BRAF^V600E mutation, and to evaluate the relationship between immunohistochemical (IHC) expression and genetic results, of BRAF^V600E+ ameloblastoma. Among the 32 cases, 22 (69%) were IHC positive for BRAF^V600E protein, and 10 (31%) were IHC negative; and polymerase chain reaction showed 16 of 21 tested cases (76%) carried the BRAF^V600E mutation. Our findings indicate that that samples that stain IHC positive for BRAF^V600E protein are more likely to carry the BRAF^V600E mutation. These results support assessments for BRAF mutations, and the use of BRAF inhibitors as targeted therapy for ameloblastoma in Japanese patients.

Conservative management is effective in unicystic ameloblastoma occurring from the neonatal period: A case report and a literature review

Unicystic ameloblastoma (UA), a benign odontogenic tumor of the jaw, represents less than a third of all ameloblastomas and seems less aggressive than other types of ameloblastoma. We present here the first case of UA that developed prenatally and was successfully managed in the early neonatal period with marsupialization and curettage performed carefully to avoid injury to the tooth germ. BRAF and SMO mutations were not detected. After 2 years of follow-up, complete reossification and normal eruption of deciduous teeth were noted, and there was no recurrence of UA. We recommend conservative treatment of UA in the pediatric population to avoid loss of and/or injury to the tooth germ, provided close follow-up is carried out all through the individual's growth for early detection of potential recurrences, growth impairments, or tooth eruption disorders. The intratumoral somatic mutational status of BRAF, SMO, RAS family, and FGFR2 may help determine personalized targeted treatment, particularly in case of recurrence.

Radiographic estimation of the growth rate of initially underdiagnosed ameloblastomas

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the specific growth rate (SGR) of ameloblastoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

cases of ameloblastoma initially underdiagnosed (e.g. cases overlooked or diagnosed as reactive lesions) which had adequate radiographic documentation to evaluate their progression were retrospectively selected. Two panoramic radiographs were analyzed to determine the specific growth rate (SGR) of each tumor, defined as the logarithm of the ratio of final tumor area (when the diagnosis of ameloblastoma was made) to the initial tumor area (when the lesion was underdiagnosed), divided by the time interval between the radiographic images. The tumor area was measured using the software ImageJ.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with mandibular ameloblastomas were selected, including 5 males and 7 females, with a mean age of 24.9 years (range: 14-61 years). In four cases, the lesion was associated with the crown of an impacted third molar. In three cases, it was initially diagnosed as a periapical lesion. Three cases were extrafollicular and were not noticed in the initial radiographs. Two cases were initially diagnosed as ameloblastoma, but the surgery was delayed for personal reasons. The mean interval of time between the two radiographic images was 4.3 years (range: 0.4-9 years). Based on our analysis, ameloblastoma grows in average 40.4% per year (range: 14.9-88.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ameloblastoma is a progressively growing tumor, but its growth rate seems to be smaller than initially reported in the literature. Better understanding the radiographic progression of ameloblastoma might improve its early diagnosis, management, and prognosis.

MAID chemotherapy regimen as a treatment strategy for metastatic malignant ameloblastoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Ameloblastoma is generally characterized as a benign tumor originating in odontogenic epithelium. However, few cases of metastatic malignant ameloblastoma have also been reported. Due to the low incidence of malignant ameloblastoma, there is no established treatment regimen. To explore effective treatment for malignant ameloblastoma, we reported this case study.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

This report described a case of a 28-year-old malignant ameloblastoma female patient with multiple metastasis (brain and lung).

DIAGNOSES

The patient presented ameloblastoma of the left mandible in 2012. Three years later, local recurrence and brain metastasis was observed during a follow-up examination. Five years later, malignant ameloblastoma was detected by imaging and immunohistochemistry in the bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules and mediastinal lymph nodes.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was initially treated with tumor resection. Three years later after local recurrence and brain metastasis, she was accepted the extensive mandibulectomy supplemented with brain stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). When diagnosed with pulmonary metastasis, the patient received combined chemotherapy regimen of MAID (mesna, adriamycin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine) for 6 cycles.

OUTCOMES

The efficacy evaluation was partial remission (PR) after the 6 cycles of MAID. The last patient follow-up was July 24th 2018, and no evidence of progression was observed. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the patient was more than 9 months.

LESSONS

Surgical resection is the optimal treatment for locally recurrent ameloblastoma. SBRT may be an effective treatment for unresectable oligometastasis of malignant ameloblastoma. Finally, combined chemotherapy of MAID showed encouraging effects in the management of metastatic malignant ameloblastoma.

[BRAF gene mutations in ameloblastic fibromas]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the BRAF gene mutations in ameloblastic fibroma (AF), and to further analyze the relationship between the BRAF mutation and clinical characteristics so as to provide new reference to the study of AF's molecular pathology.

METHODS

Sixteen cases diagnosed as AF at the Department of Oral Pathology, Peking University School of Stomatology between January 1990 and December 2017 were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencings were used to detect the BRAF gene mutations. The clinicopathological data, such as the age, location of the lesion, symptoms and treatments were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The sixteen cases of AF involved nine women and seven men aged 2-67 years. Three lesions occurred in the maxilla and thirteen in the mandible. The most common presenting symptom of AF was a painless slowly enlarging mass with swelling. Ten patients received conservative treatment and the other six patients received radical surgery. Three cases relapsed during the study period. BRAF gene mutation was found in sixteen of all the sixteen samples analyzed (100%). The BRAF mutation was a point mutation with a thymine-adenine transversion at nucleotide 1 799 of 15 exons, resulting in a change at residue 600 that substituted glutamine for valine. This mutation was the strongest activator of the downstream RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK-MAPK signaling pathway. This helped to bring about a gain-of-function mutation due to a V600E substitution. Many studies identified that BRAF regulated survival, apoptosis, and proliferation of cells by inducing MAPK pathways activation. For the existing cases, none of the age, sex, location, recurrence and treatments had a statistically significant correlation with BRAF mutation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in AF. The pathogenic role remains to be clarified．.

The BRAF p.V600E mutation is a common event in ameloblastomas but is absent in odontogenic keratocysts

OBJECTIVE

Odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) are jaw lesions with a tendency to recur. PTCH1 gene mutations are common events in most OKCs; however, other genetic alterations underlying OKC pathogenesis have not yet been elucidated. BRAF p.V600E mutations have recently been detected in some odontogenic tumors, such as ameloblastoma and ameloblastic fibroma, although their involvement in OKC is still unclear. In this study we aimed to clarify the presence and/or frequency of BRAF p.V600E mutations in OKCs.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-five cases of OKCs, 13 of which were associated with Gorlin syndrome, were evaluated for BRAF p.V600E mutations by direct sequencing of the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, and frozen tissue samples. Seventeen cases of ameloblastoma and six cases of dentinogenic ghost cell tumor were also included in this study for comparative purposes.

RESULTS

BRAF p.V600E mutations were not detected in any of the OKCs or dentinogenic ghost cell tumors. In contrast, 14 of 17 cases of ameloblastoma (82.35%) were proven to harbor BRAF p.V600E mutations.

CONCLUSION

BRAF p.V600E mutations were common in ameloblastomas, as previously reported, but were absent in OKCs and dentinogenic ghost cell tumors. These results further confirmed the noninvolvement of BRAF in OKCs and suggested different pathogenic mechanisms involved in various odontogenic lesions.

BRAF V600E expression in ameloblastomas-A 36-patient cohort from Helsinki University Hospital

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate BRAF V600E percentage immunohistochemically in ameloblastomas of a single institute cohort. We were interested if age, location, histological properties, or tumor recurrence depend on the BRAF status.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

We had 36 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ameloblastoma tissue samples of patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital between the years 1983-2016. Tissue sections underwent immunohistochemistry by Ventana BenchMark XT immunostainer using Ms Anti-Braf V600E (VE1) MAB. We used R 3.4.2 and RStudio 1.1.383 to conduct statistical analysis for BRAF positivity and earlier onset as well as tumor location. We used chi-squared tests and 2-by-2 table functions to determine connections between BRAF positivity and recurrence, growth pattern, and type.

RESULTS

BRAF-positive tumors occurred in younger patients compared to BRAF-negative tumors (p = 0.015) and they located mostly to the mandible (p < 0.001). Growth patterns were limited to two in BRAF-negative tumors when BRAF-positive tumors presented with one to four growth patterns (p = 0.02). None of the maxillary tumors showed BRAF positivity and of these, 72.2% recurred.

CONCLUSIONS

An immunohistochemical BRAF marker could be a beneficial tool to predict the outcome of patients with this aggressive, easily recurring tumor.

Update on Odontogenic Tumors: Proceedings of the North American Head and Neck Pathology Society

Odontogenic tumors are rare entities, often derived from the epithelial remnants in the gnathic bones following odontogenesis. This brief manuscript will seek to address recent developments pertaining to odontogenic tumors as well as particularly uncommon odontogenic tumors and the difficulties in their diagnosis.

Bcl-2 is a prognostic marker and its silencing inhibits recurrence in ameloblastomas

OBJECTIVES

Ameloblastomas are the most common odontogenic epithelial tumors with high recurrence rate. The aim of this study was to identify apoptosis-related genes with recurrence of ameloblastomas and to evaluate its feasibility as a prognostic marker and as a target molecule preventing from recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Public microarray data were analyzed. To evaluate their expression in ameloblastoma patients, immunohistochemical staining was performed in 89 human ameloblastoma tissues. Quantitative PCR was performed by use of ameloblastoma cell line (AM-1). Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis and western blotting were conducted following transfection with siRNA. Further, AM-1 cells were implanted in the renal subcapsular layer of immunodeficient mice.

RESULTS

Microarray data analysis revealed that osteoprotegerin (OPG) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) were the two most upregulated genes in ameloblastoma. Only Bcl-2 expression was significantly (p = 0.020) associated with recurrence in conservative treatment group (n = 17) among 89 patients. Silencing of Bcl-2 increased apoptosis in AM-1 cells in vitro and inhibited tumor nodule formation of AM-1 cells in vivo.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that Bcl-2 expression is a useful biomarker to predict recurrence of ameloblastomas, and as a therapeutic target molecule to prevent recurrence of ameloblastoma.