Susceptibility to oral cancers with CD95 and CD95L promoter SNPs may vary with the site and gender

Molecular basis of sex differences in cancer: Perspective from Asia

Cancer is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Sex differences in cancer are evident in death rates and treatment responses in several cancers. Asian patients have unique cancer epidemiology influenced by their genetic ancestry and sociocultural factors in the region. In this review, we show molecular associations that potentially mediate sex disparities observed in cancer in Asian populations. Differences in sex characteristics are evident at the cytogenetic, genetic, and epigenetic levels mediating processes that include cell cycle, oncogenesis, and metastasis. Larger clinical and in vitro studies that explore mechanisms can confirm the associations of these molecular markers. In-depth studies of these markers can reveal their importance as diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutic efficacy markers. Sex differences should be considered in designing novel cancer therapeutics in this era of precision medicine.

Differential cancer risk and survival in Indian oral cancer patients with genic region FAS and FASL polymorphisms

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of genic region polymorphisms of FAS and FASL in Indian patients with oral cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included 960 consenting control participants and patients with oral cancer. Genotyping was performed using Polymerase Chain Reaction -Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Cancer risk, 5-year survival, and hazards ratio (HRs), with respect to risk and clinical factors, were estimated using Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

FASL IVS2nt-124 'AG' increased risk in males with buccal mucosa cancer (BMC) but decreased risk in females. FAS 21196 'CT' decreased risk of tongue cancer (TC) and BMC in females. The survival of the patients also differed between sexes in TC and BMC. FAS 21196 'CT' increased HR by 23-fold in females with BMC when adjusted for age, stage, grade, LVS, PNI, tobacco use, and alcohol. 'TT' genotype increased the HR in females with BMC when adjusted for age, stage, grade, lymphovascular spread (LVS), perineural invasion (PNI), and perinodal spread (PNS). Our bioinformatic study revealed the presence of CTCF binding regions and CpG islands near FAS and FASL.

CONCLUSIONS

These single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) altered the risk and survival of BMC and TC patients differentially that varied with clinical and risk factors.

Polymorphic variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes alter the risk and survival of oral cancer patients

The present study investigated the prevalence of CYP2D6*4, CYP3A5*3 and SULT1A1*2, using PCR-RFLP, in normal and oral cancer (OC) patients that were stratified by OC subtype and gender. The risk of cancer, 5-year cumulative survival and hazard's ratio (HR) with respect to risk factors and clinical factors were estimated using Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models. CYP2D6*4 'GA' lowered the risk of buccal mucosa cancer (BMC) in males (OR = 0.37), whereas, 'G' allele of CYP3A5*3 increased risk of tongue cancer (TC) (OR = 1.67). SULT1A1*2 'GA' increased the risk of TC (OR = 2.36) and BMC (OR = 3.25) in females. The 5-year survival of the patients depended on factors like age, lymphovascular spread (LVS), perinodal spread (PNS), recurrence, tobacco, and alcohol. CYP3A5*3 'AG' and 'GG' had decreased the hazard ratio (HR) for BMC females when inflammatory infiltrate alone or along with other covariates, LVS, PNI, PNS, metastasis, recurrence, and relapse was adjusted. Similarly, CYP3A5*3 'AG' decreased the risk of death (HR = 0.05) when the grade was adjusted. SULT1A1*2 'GA' had decreased HR for TC males (HR = 0.08) after adjusting for inflammatory infiltrate, LVS, perineural invasion (PNI), PNS, metastasis, recurrence, and relapse. Further, our bioinformatics study revealed the presence of a CpG island within the CYP2D6 and a CTCF binding site upstream of CYP2D6. Interestingly, three CpG islands and two CTCF binding sites were also identified near the SULT1A1. In conclusion, the SNPs altered risk and survival of BMC and TC differentially in a gender specified manner, that varied with clinical and risk factors.

Quantitative assessment of the relationship between Fas/FasL genes polymorphisms and head and neck cancer risk

BACKGROUND

Molecular epidemiological studies have demonstrated a closer association between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and head and neck cancer (HNC) risk, and the results of these published studies were inconsistent. We therefore performed this meta-analysis to explore the associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and HNC risk.

METHODS

Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the association between Fas -670A>G, Fas -1377G>A, and FasL -844C>T polymorphisms and HNC risk. In addition, heterogeneity, accumulative/sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were conducted to check the statistical power.

RESULTS

Overall, 9 related publications (20 independent case-control studies) involving 3179 patients and 4217 controls were identified. Significant association of protective effects was observed between FasL -844C>T polymorphism and HNC risk in codominant and dominant model models (CT vs CC: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79-1.00, P = .05, I = 38.3%, CT+TT vs CC: OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.98, P = .02, I = 35.8%). Furthermore, the similar protective effects were observed the subgroup analysis of in Asian population and population-based controls group.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that FasL -844C>T polymorphism plays a protective role against HNC development, but the Fas -670A>G and Fas -1377G>A polymorphisms maybe not associated with HNC risk.