1
|
Watrowski R, Schuster E, Hofstetter G, Fischer MB, Mahner S, Van Gorp T, Polterauer S, Zeillinger R, Obermayr E. Association of Four Interleukin-8 Polymorphisms (-251 A>T, +781 C>T, +1633 C>T, +2767 A>T) with Ovarian Cancer Risk: Focus on Menopausal Status and Endometriosis-Related Subtypes. Biomedicines 2024; 12:321. [PMID: 38397923 PMCID: PMC10886609 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Interleukin-8 (IL-8) is involved in the regulation of inflammatory processes and carcinogenesis. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the IL-8 gene have been shown to alter the risks of lung, gastric, or hepatocellular carcinomas. To date, only one study examined the role of IL-8 SNPs in ovarian cancer (OC), suggesting an association between two IL-8 SNPs and OC risk. In this study, we investigated four common IL-8 SNPs, rs4073 (-251 A>T), rs2227306 (+781 C>T), rs2227543 (+1633 C>T), and rs1126647 (+2767 A>T), using the restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique. Our study included a cohort of 413 women of Central European descent, consisting of 200 OC patients and 213 healthy controls. The most common (73.5%) histological type was high-grade serous OC (HGSOC), whereas 28/200 (14%) patients had endometriosis-related (clear cell or endometrioid) OC subtypes (EROC). In postmenopausal women, three of the four investigated SNPs, rs4073 (-251 A>T), rs2227306 (+781 C>T), and rs2227543 (+1633 C>T), were associated with OC risk. Furthermore, we are the first to report a significant relationship between the T allele or TT genotype of SNP rs1126647 (+2767 A>T) and the EROC subtype (p = 0.02 in the co-dominant model). The TT homozygotes were found more than twice as often in EROC compared to other OC subtypes (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.015). None of the examined SNPs appeared to influence OC risk in premenopausal women, nor were they associated with the aggressive HGSOC subtype or the stage of disease at the initial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Watrowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helios Hospital Muellheim, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Heliosweg 1, 79379 Muellheim, Germany;
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynaecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.S.); (R.Z.)
| | - Eva Schuster
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynaecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.S.); (R.Z.)
| | - Gerda Hofstetter
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Michael B. Fischer
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
- Center for Biomedical Technology, Department for Biomedical Research, Danube University Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefan Polterauer
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
| | - Robert Zeillinger
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynaecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.S.); (R.Z.)
| | - Eva Obermayr
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynaecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.S.); (R.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Severe Endometriosis and Establishment of Preoperative Prediction Model. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12102348. [PMID: 36292037 PMCID: PMC9601177 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately 10% (176 million) of women of reproductive age worldwide suffer from endometriosis, which has a high rate of postoperative recurrence. The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors of severe endometriosis and establish a preoperative prediction model. A retrospective analysis of a database established between January 2020 and March 2022 including 491 women with a pathology-based endometriosis diagnosis was conducted. Subjects were divided into two groups: the non-severe group (ASRM ≤ 40) and the severe group (ASRM > 40). Age ≥ 40 years, bilateral lesions, pelvic nodules, adenomyosis, APTT, CA125 ≥ 34.5 U/mL, D-dimer ≥ 0.34 mg/L, and maximum cyst diameter ≥ 58 mm were independent correlation factors for severe endometriosis. The logistic regression equation for these factors showed good diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.846), which was similar to the model with intraoperative indicators (AUC = 0.865). Patients with severe endometriosis also had a shorter APTT and higher D-dimer and PLT, indicating hypercoagulability. In conclusion, we constructed a simple and feasible formula involving parameters that are preoperatively accessible to predict the severity of endometriosis. This study is of reference value for determining the timing of and alternatives to surgery. At the same time, attention should be paid to the primary prevention of venous thrombosis and cardiovascular metabolic diseases in patients with severe endometriosis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Watrowski R, Obermayr E, Wallisch C, Aust S, Concin N, Braicu EI, Van Gorp T, Hasenburg A, Sehouli J, Vergote I, Zeillinger R. Biomarker-Based Models for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Mass: A Multicenter Validation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071780. [PMID: 35406551 PMCID: PMC8997061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal genital malignancy in women. We aimed to develop and validate new proteomic-based models for non-invasive diagnosis of OC. We also compared them to the modified Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA-50), the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) and our earlier Proteomic Model 2017. Biomarkers were assessed using bead-based multiplex technology (Luminex®) in 356 women (250 with malignant and 106 with benign ovarian tumors) from five European centers. The training cohort included 279 women from three centers, and the validation cohort 77 women from two other centers. Of six previously studied serum proteins (CA125, HE4, osteopontin [OPN], prolactin, leptin, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor [MIF]), four contributed significantly to the Proteomic Model 2021 (CA125, OPN, prolactin, MIF), while leptin and HE4 were omitted by the algorithm. The Proteomic Model 2021 revealed a c-index of 0.98 (95% CI 0.96, 0.99) in the training cohort; however, in the validation cohort it only achieved a c-index of 0.82 (95% CI 0.72, 0.91). Adding patient age to the Proteomic Model 2021 constituted the Combined Model 2021, with a c-index of 0.99 (95% CI 0.97, 1) in the training cohort and a c-index of 0.86 (95% CI 0.78, 0.95) in the validation cohort. The Full Combined Model 2021 (all six proteins with age) yielded a c-index of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97, 0.99) in the training cohort and a c-index of 0.89 (95% CI 0.81, 0.97) in the validation cohort. The validation of our previous Proteomic Model 2017, as well as the ROMA-50 and CPH-I revealed a c-index of 0.9 (95% CI 0.82, 0.97), 0.54 (95% CI 0.38, 0.69) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.85, 0.98), respectively. In postmenopausal women, the three newly developed models all achieved a specificity of 1.00, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 1.00, and a sensitivity of >0.9. Performance in women under 50 years of age (c-index below 0.6) or with normal CA125 (c-index close to 0.5) was poor. CA125 and OPN had the best discriminating power as single markers. In summary, the CPH-I, the two combined 2021 Models, and the Proteomic Model 2017 showed satisfactory diagnostic accuracies, with no clear superiority of either model. Notably, although combining values of only four proteins with age, the Combined Model 2021 performed comparably to the Full Combined Model 2021. The models confirmed their exceptional diagnostic performance in women aged ≥50. All models outperformed the ROMA-50.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Watrowski
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
| | - Eva Obermayr
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
| | - Christine Wallisch
- Section for Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Stefanie Aust
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.I.B.); (J.S.)
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (T.V.G.); (I.V.)
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.I.B.); (J.S.)
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (T.V.G.); (I.V.)
| | - Robert Zeillinger
- Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center-Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (E.O.); (S.A.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Watrowski R, Kostov S, Alkatout I. Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2021; 16:501-525. [PMID: 34691301 PMCID: PMC8512506 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.108800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Almost all gynecological and general-surgical operations are - or can be - performed laparoscopically. In comparison to an abdominal approach, the minimally invasive access offers several advantages; however, laparoscopy (both conventional and robotic-assisted) can be associated with a number of approach-specific complications. Although the majority of them are related to the laparoscopic entry, adverse events may also occur due to the presence of pneumoperitoneum or the use of laparoscopic instruments. Unfortunately, a high proportion of complications (especially affecting the bowel and ureter) remain unrecognized during surgery. This narrative review provides comprehensive up-to-date information about definitions, classifications, risk factors and incidence of surgical complications in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy, with a special focus on gynecology. The topic is discussed from various perspectives, e.g. in the context of stage of surgery, injured organs, involved instruments, and in relation to malpractice claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Watrowski
- St. Josefskrankenhaus, Teaching Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stoyan Kostov
- Department of Gynecology, Medical University Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Ibrahim Alkatout
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li L, Tian J, Zhang L, Liu L, Sheng C, Huang Y, Zheng H, Song F, Chen K. Utility of Preoperative Inflammatory Markers to Distinguish Epithelial Ovarian Cancer from Benign Ovarian Masses. J Cancer 2021; 12:2687-2693. [PMID: 33854628 PMCID: PMC8040725 DOI: 10.7150/jca.51642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory markers have been reported to be predictors for the presence of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), however, the cut-off value of each marker remains unclear and predictive capability of the markers in different histology types of EOC is still unknown. Methods: A total of 207 patients with benign ovarian masses and 887 EOC patients who underwent surgical resection, and were pathologically diagnosed were included. We compared the difference of preoperative inflammatory markers between benign ovarian masses and EOC patients. Stratified analysis by histology subtype was further conducted. Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to evaluate the predictive capability of the markers. Results: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were significantly associated with all stages and subtypes of EOC (P<0.001). The optimal cut-off points based on ROC curve analyses for NLR, PLR, and LMR were found to be 2.139 (AUC=0.749, P<0.001), 182.698 (AUC=0.730, P<0.001), and 3.619 (AUC = 0.709, P<0.001), respectively. In low CA125 level patients, high level of NLR and PLR increase the risk of endometrioid EOC, while low level of LMR were significantly associated with an increased risk of serous EOC. Conclusions: In addition to CA125, NLR, PLR, and LMR could be used as predictors of EOC and preoperative inflammatory markers may be used as a potential biomarker for predicting different histotypes of EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Tian
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Department of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Liwen Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Luyang Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Sheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yubei Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Fengju Song
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kexin Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eo WK, Kim KH, Park EJ, Kim HY, Kim HB, Koh SB, Namkung J. Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers for distinguishing malignant and benign ovarian masses. J Cancer 2018; 9:1165-1172. [PMID: 29675097 PMCID: PMC5907664 DOI: 10.7150/jca.23606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of inflammatory markers for distinguishing malignant and benign ovarian masses. Methods: Preoperative demographic, clinicopathologic, and laboratory variables were reviewed in patients with an ovarian mass that was subsequently diagnosed as either epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) or a benign ovarian mass on histologic analysis. The differences between variables of the two groups were further evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was applied to evaluate variables to predict the presence of EOC. Results: According to the analysis of 229 patients with EOC, 120 (52.4%) patients had serous adenocarcinoma. Of the 229 patients, 110 (48.1%) patients had stage I or II disease and 119 (52.0%) had stage III or IV disease. There was a significant difference between EOC and benign ovarian mass in median values of variables such as age, white blood cell (WBC) count, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (all P < 0.001, except for WBC count [P = 0.009]). In addition, there was significant difference in median values of these continuous variables among early-stage EOC, advanced-stage EOC, and benign ovarian mass (P < 0.001 for all variables). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] = 4.14, P < 0.001), CA125 levels (OR = 9.87, P < 0.001), NLR (OR = 1.76, P = 0.049), PLR (OR = 2.41, P = 0.004), and LMR (OR = 0.51, P = 0.024) were found to significantly predict the presence of EOC. Conclusion: The three LMR, NLR, and PLR markers were found to be predictors for the presence of EOC. Further prospective studies to assess these markers as screening tools for the presence of EOC are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan Kyu Eo
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Hyung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine; Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Eun Joo Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University. Seoul, Korea
| | - Heung Yeol Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Kosin University, Busan, Korea
| | - Hong-Bae Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Bong Koh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of Daegu, School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jeong Namkung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND D-dimer has been widely used for the diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian cancer, but there is still controversy on its prediction value of ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVES To explore the clinical significance of plasma D-dimer level on ovarian cancer systematically. METHODS Using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science libraries, all the relevant studies for the diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma D-dimer for ovarian cancer and the relationship between elevated D-dimer level and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk of ovarian cancer were searched till May 30, 2016. Standardized mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were appropriately pooled. RESULTS A total of 15 eligible studies involving a total of 1437 cancer patients were included. No significant association was found between high D-dimer level and overall survival of patients with ovarian cancer (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 0.90-1.95, P = .044). However, subgroup analysis indicated that the sample sizes could explain the heterogeneity between studies. And elevated D-dimer could predict increased risk of mortality when the sample sizes were >100 (HR 1.800, 95% CI: 1.283-2.523, P = .845). Besides, plasma D-dimer level was significantly higher in malignant ovarian cancer patients compared with benign controls (SMD 0.774, 95% CI: 0.597-0.951, P = .39), higher in advanced ovarian cancer patients (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] classification III and IV) than in early stage ovarian cancer patients (FIGO classification I and II, SMD 0.611, 95% CI: 0.373-0.849, P = .442). And high D-dimer level indicated high VTE risk (OR 4.068, 95% CI: 2.423-6.829, P = .629) of ovarian cancer patients. CONCLUSION The plasma D-dimer level in ovarian cancer patients can predict the changes that correlated with disease progression and the VTE risk. But its predictive value for the prognosis of ovarian cancer was significantly dependent on the sample sizes. More well-designed studies with large sample sizes are needed to validate and update the findings of present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiacong Wu
- Nantong Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nantong
| | - Ziyi Fu
- Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Medical Institute, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | - Guangquan Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Pengfei Xu
- Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Medical Institute, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
| | - Juan Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xuemei Jia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Preoperative measurement of serum C-reactive protein: is it useful in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses? Int J Biol Markers 2017; 32:e83-e89. [PMID: 27516000 DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum biomarkers may help to discriminate malignant from benign adnexal masses with equivocal features on imaging. Adequate discrimination of such tumors is crucial for referring patients to either a specialized cancer center or a nonspecialized gynecology service. AIM We aimed to investigate whether the preoperative level of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), alone or combined with CA125 and menopausal status in the Ovarian Score (OVS), is useful in the prediction of malignancy in women with ovarian tumors. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 293 patients who underwent surgery in a tertiary cancer center. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curves (AUC) for CRP, CA125 and OVS were calculated in different scenarios, as well as their sensitivity and specificity, using standard cutoff points (for CRP, 10 mg/L; for CA125, 35 U/mL). RESULTS CA125 and the OVS performed significantly better than CRP alone in the differentiation of benign disease from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) (AUC = 0.86 for CA125, 0.79 for OVS, and 0.73 for CRP). OVS and CRP alone were superior to CA125 only in the differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors from advanced stages of EOC and non-EOC. Sensitivity and specificity were 52.5% and 83%, respectively, for CRP, 77.9% and 66.7% for CA125, and 71.3% and 67.8% for OVS. CONCLUSIONS OVS is as good as CA125 in the differentiation of benign tumors from ovarian cancer. The addition of CA125 and menopausal status to CRP enhanced the relatively low discriminatory power of isolated CRP.
Collapse
|
9
|
Usefulness of the preoperative platelet count in the diagnosis of adnexal tumors. Tumour Biol 2016; 37:12079-12087. [PMID: 27207344 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-5090-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Platelets seem to play a role in the development of ovarian cancer. Platelet count (PLT) is an ubiquitous available parameter. We analyzed retrospectively data of 756 patients with primary adnexal tumors: 584 benign and 172 malignant (148 invasive and 24 borderline) cases. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CA125, PLT, and a combination of CA125 and PLT. The cutoff values for CA125 and PLT were 35 U/ml and 350/nl, respectively. The median age of patients with benign and malignant tumors was 45 and 64 years, respectively. A total of 77/172 (44.8 %) malignant and 50/584 (8.6 %) benign cases presented with thrombocytosis (PLT ≥350/nl). The median PLT differed between benign and malignant cases (257/nl vs. 330/nl; p < 0.001), similarly as CA125 did (17 vs. 371 U/ml; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, age, CA125, and thrombocytosis predicted independently the presence of malignancy. The results of CA125 were false positive in 21 % and false negative in 13 %. If considered together, thrombocytosis + CA125 were false positive only in 9 %, whereas the false negative rate was 12 %. The sensitivity and specificity of CA125, thrombocytosis, and thrombocytosis + CA125 for detecting adnexal malignancy were 0.88/0.78, 0.45/0.91, and 0.81/0.94, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of CA125, thrombocytosis, and thrombocytosis + CA125 was 0.79, 0.61, and 0.91, respectively. In conclusion, PLT is an ubiquitously available parameter that could be useful in the diagnostic evaluation of pelvic mass. Considering thrombocytosis additionally to CA125 improves the specificity and PPV and reduces the false positive rate in detecting adnexal malignancy.
Collapse
|