1
|
Santos R, Astruc G, Poulet N, Besnard A. Spatially structured freshwater fish population dynamics at the River Basin District scale: Implication for environmental management and fish conservation. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 317:115180. [PMID: 35617857 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
European Union environmental policy has created a unique regulatory framework to favour aquatic ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation across European countries. Identifying the spatial structure of freshwater fish population dynamics is crucial to define region-specific management and conservation planning. To implement evidence-driven management and conservation decisions at a regional scale we assessed spatial heterogeneity in common freshwater fish population dynamics in France with a focus on trends in River Basin Districts (RBDs). The abundance and biomass growth rates of 18 common European freshwater fish species were estimated with state-space models on 546 sites distributed across the 5 main RBDs sampled in France between 1990 and 2011. Anguilla anguilla, Rutilus rutilus, Salmo trutta fario and Esox spp. exhibited large scale decline in abundance and/or biomass in several RBDs. The other species showed spatial heterogeneity in population growth rates. The main declines were observed in the Adour-Garonne and Loire-Bretagne RBDs, where management and conservation measures are urgently needed to halt the erosion of freshwater fish populations. In each of the 5 investigated RBDs, our results highlight areas where most of the common species we studied exhibited negative population growth rates. Freshwater fish surveys provide the fundamental information necessary to inform the European environmental policies and local environmental management needed to restore freshwater biodiversity. The next steps are to identify the main drivers of freshwater biodiversity erosion in the areas where we demonstrated major declines and to define the most cost-effective restoration measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Santos
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.
| | - Guillelme Astruc
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Poulet
- Pôle Ecohydraulique, Office Français de La Biodiversité; Institut des Mécaniques des Fluides, Toulouse, France
| | - Aurélien Besnard
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stefanidis K, Oikonomou A, Papastergiadou E. Responses of different facets of aquatic plant diversity along environmental gradients in Mediterranean streams: Results from rivers of Greece. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2021; 296:113307. [PMID: 34328867 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Aquatic and riparian plants play a crucial role in the functioning of riverine ecosystems. Hence, analyzing multiple facets of plant diversity could be extremely useful for assessing the ecological integrity of lotic ecosystems. The main objective of this study was to investigate the response of multiple facets of aquatic plant diversity, such as species richness, taxonomic distinctness and compositional dissimilarity, to environmental factors (i.e. nutrient pollution and hydromorphological alteration) in 72 stream reaches of mainland Greece. We employed Generalized Additive Models to identify the variables with the highest influence and examine the response of species richness and taxonomic distinctness to environmental gradients. The relationship between compositional dissimilarity and the environment was examined with Generalized Dissimilarity Modelling. Our results supported our hypothesis that human disturbances play a considerable role in shaping macrophyte assemblages. In particular, phosphates and hydromorphological modification were significant predictors of species richness, whereas taxonomic distinctness was unaffected by indicators of anthropogenic stress but it was influenced mostly by elevation, water temperature and pH. Concerning the compositional dissimilarity, geographic distance, elevation, temperature and total inorganic nitrogen were the most important environmental parameters. Our findings suggest that human stressors, such as hydromorphological modification and nutrient enrichment, affect the plant species richness at stream reach scale, but when considering community composition or taxonomic distinctness, environmental factors associated with the natural variability (e.g. elevation, temperature and geographic distance) are of higher importance. Overall, our results emphasize the advantage of examining multiple aspects of diversity when designing conservation schemes and management plans for riparian areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Stefanidis
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, 46.7 km of Athens-Sounio Ave., 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki, Greece; Department of Biology, University of Patras, University Campus Rio, GR 26500, Patras, Greece.
| | - Anthi Oikonomou
- Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, 46.7 km of Athens-Sounio Ave., 19013, Anavyssos, Attiki, Greece
| | - Eva Papastergiadou
- Department of Biology, University of Patras, University Campus Rio, GR 26500, Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Indigenous Environmental Justice within Marine Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Indigenous Peoples’ Involvement in Marine Governance and Management. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13084217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We develop and apply a systematic review methodology to identify and understand how the peer-reviewed literature characterises Indigenous peoples’ involvement in marine governance and management approaches in terms of equity and justice worldwide. We reviewed the peer-reviewed English-language research articles between January 2015 and September 2020 for examples of Indigenous peoples’ involvement in marine governance and management using the analytical lens of environmental justice. The majority of research studies highlighted that Indigenous peoples experienced some form of environmental injustice linked to existing marine governance and management, most notably in the context of inequitable decision-making procedures surrounding the establishment and operation of marine protected areas. However, there are significant gaps in the current literature, including a notable absence of studies exploring Indigenous women and other gender minorities’ involvement in marine planning and management and the limited number of studies about Indigenous peoples living throughout Asia, the Arctic, Russia, and Africa. More studies are needed to explore collaborative and intersectional approaches, including co-governance and co-management and ecosystem-based management, and critically evaluate what constitutes inclusive, equitable, and just marine governance and management processes, practices, and outcomes for different Indigenous peoples occupying diverse social–ecological systems.
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Enabling Renewable Energy While Protecting Wildlife: An Ecological Risk-Based Approach to Wind Energy Development Using Ecosystem-Based Management Values. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12229352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Acceptance of wind energy development is challenged by stakeholders’ concerns about potential effects on the environment, specifically on wildlife, such as birds, bats, and (for offshore wind) marine animals, and the habitats that support them. Communities near wind energy developments are also concerned with social and economic impacts, as well as impacts on aesthetics, historical sites, and recreation and tourism. Lack of a systematic, widely accepted, and balanced approach for measuring the potential damage to wildlife, habitats, and communities continues to leave wind developers, regulators, and other stakeholders in an uncertain position. This paper explores ecological risk-based management (RBM) in wind energy development for land-based and offshore wind installations. This paper provides a framework for the adaptation of ecosystem-based management to wind energy development and examines that framework through a series of case studies and best management practices for applying risk-based principles to wind energy. Ten case studies indicate that wind farm monitoring is often driven by regulatory requirements that may not be underpinned by scientific questions. While each case applies principles of adaptive management, there is room for improvement in applying scientific principles to the data collection and analysis. Challenges and constraints for wind farm development to meet RBM framework criteria include collecting sufficient baseline and monitoring data year-round, engaging stakeholder facilitators, and bringing together large and diverse scientific teams. The RBM framework approach may provide insights for improved siting and consenting/permitting processes for regulators and their advisors, particularly in those nations where wind energy is still in the early development stages on land or at sea.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cloud Data Scraping for the Assessment of Outflows from Dammed Rivers in the EU. A Case Study in South Eastern Europe. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12197926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The availability of environmentally related data is a crucial issue in simulating natural processes. The proposed research demonstrates that although currently there is a plethora of data published on the internet, by national and international official sources, their retrieval is sometimes hard to be achieved; hence smart programming tools/technologies could facilitate the automatic harvesting of these data in personal databases for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of hydrosystems that encompass hydropower schemes. The implemented methodology relies on the use of custom-made web scrapping tools to access dams’ hourly outflows in combination with water demand data in order to investigate the water balance, as modified by human intervention, in areas located downstream of dams. For this purpose, derivatives of the Electricity Market Directive and Water Framework Directive of the European Union (EU) have been regarded as web-based databases. The outcomes of the methodological approach demonstrate that the modelled net water discharges downstream—i.e., the river discharges after subtracting the water demands—are assessed with high simulation accuracy at a daily time scale. The reliability of the output estimates is further supported by the combination of measured data from gauge telemetry with the data derived by the proposed methodology. This research allows new insights, such as dams’ outflows and water demand retrieval and exploitation, into the sustainable management of water resources and contributes to the quantification of rivers’ outflows to the coastal zone.
Collapse
|
7
|
The Benthic Quality Index to Assess Water Quality of Lakes May Be Affected by Confounding Environmental Features. WATER 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/w12092519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
To assess if environmental differences other than water quality may affect the outcome of the Benthic Quality Index, a comparison of the application of four different methods (Benthic Quality Index—BQIES, Lake Habitat Modification Score—LHMS, Lake Habitat Quality Assessment—LHQA and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development—OECD) used to classify the lake ecological and hydro-morphological status of 10 Italian lakes was performed. Five lakes were natural and five were reservoirs belonging to both Alpine and Mediterranean Ecoregions. The 10 lakes were sampled using the Water Framework Directive compliant standardized national protocol, which includes sampling soft sediment in the littoral, sublittoral and deep layers along transects with a grab of 225 cm2 during spring and autumn. The application of Generalised Linear Mixed Effect Models both at the lake level and at the single station of each lake highlighted that, at the lake level, no significant correlations existed between any couple of hydro-morphological, ecological and trophic status assessments, with each metric representing a different facet of human impact on the environment. At the single site level, we found significant effects of depth on the metrics of biodiversity. The best approximation of single-site macroinvertebrates diversity among the metrics of overall lake quality was with the LHMS, but not with the BQIES. Our hypotheses that lake macroinvertebrates assemblages depend also on other potential confounding variables of habitat degradation and intrinsic differences between lakes were confirmed, with depth playing a major role. Therefore, the assessment of lakes with different depths may produce different whole-lake BQIES values, only because of the effect of depth gradient and not because of differences in lake quality.
Collapse
|
8
|
Roubeau Dumont E, Larue C, Michel HC, Gryta H, Liné C, Baqué D, Maria Gross E, Elger A. Genotypes of the aquatic plant Myriophyllum spicatum with different growth strategies show contrasting sensitivities to copper contamination. CHEMOSPHERE 2020; 245:125552. [PMID: 31846788 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Genotypic variability has been considered for years as a key attribute in species adaptation to new environments. It has been extensively studied in a context of chemical resistance, but remains poorly studied in response to chemical exposure in a context of global change. As aquatic ecosystems are particularly affected by environmental changes, we aimed to study how genotypic variability could inflect the sensitivity of aquatic plants to chemicals. Seven genotypes of Myriophyllum spicatum were exposed to three copper concentrations at 0, 0.15 and 0.5 mg/L. The sensitivity of the different genotypes was assessed through several endpoints such as relative growth rate (RGR) and morphological traits, as well as physiological markers, such as plant biomacromolecular composition. Our results showed that genotypes exhibited significant differences in their life-history traits in absence of chemical contamination. Some trait syndromes were observed, and three growth strategies were identified: (1) biomass production and main shoot elongation, (2) dry matter storage with denser whorls to promote resource conservation and (3) lateral shoot production. An up to eightfold difference in sensitivity for growth-related endpoints was observed among genotypes. Differences in sensitivity were partly attributed to morphological life-history traits. Our results confirm that genotypic variability can significantly affect M. spicatum sensitivity to Cu, and may influence the outcomes of laboratory testing based on the study of one single genotype. We recommend including genotypic variation as an assessment factor in ecological risk assessment and to study this source of variability more in depth as a possible driver of ecosystem resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Camille Larue
- EcoLab, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France
| | - Hiram Castillo Michel
- Beamline ID21, ESRF-The European Synchrotron, CS40220, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France
| | - Hervé Gryta
- Laboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR 5174), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, UPS, 118 route de Narbonne, Bat 4R1, 31062, Toulouse, France
| | - Clarisse Liné
- EcoLab, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France; CIRIMAT, UMR CNRS 5085/LCMI, Université Paul-Sabatier, F 31062, Toulouse Cedex 4, France
| | - David Baqué
- EcoLab, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Arnaud Elger
- EcoLab, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Terasmaa J, Bartout P, Marzecova A, Touchart L, Vandel E, Koff T, Choffel Q, Kapanen G, Maleval V, Vainu M, Millot C, Qsair Z, Al Domany M. A quantitative assessment of the contribution of small standing water bodies to the European waterscapes - case of Estonia and France. Heliyon 2019; 5:e02482. [PMID: 31687576 PMCID: PMC6819953 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The abundance and properties of small standing water bodies (SSWB) is globally not well known for their ecological importance is undervalued and their detection suffers from technical limitations. In the current study, we used a combination of GIS-based methods (satellite, orthophoto, ground validation) to evaluate regional estimates of standing water body (SWB) inventories in two geographically different parts of Europe – France, and Estonia. In our study the SWBs surface area threshold limit was 0.00001 km2, exceeding the limits of previous studies (>0.002 km2). The total number of SWBs in Estonia is 111 552 (2.5 per km2) and in France 598 371 (1.1 per km2). Our estimates show that the median size of SWBs in Estonia and France is 0.0003 km2 and 0.0007 km2 respectively, meaning that most of the SSWBs are not included in the global inventories, and their number is therefore underestimated. SSWBs (area below 0.01 km2) form a significant share of the total shoreline length of SWBs, 70.3% in Estonia and 58.8% in France. As nearshore areas are often very productive with diverse habitats, the SSWBs hold a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. Our results provide quantitative evidence that SSWBs are vital and abundant landscape elements, freshwater resources, and habitats that should not be ignored in global inventories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaanus Terasmaa
- Institute of Ecology, School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 25, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia
| | - Pascal Bartout
- Department of Geography, EA 1210 CEDETE, Orleans University, UFR Collegium LLSH, 10 rue de Tours, BP 46527, 45065, Orléans cedex 2, France
| | - Agata Marzecova
- Institute of Ecology, School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 25, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia
| | - Laurent Touchart
- Department of Geography, EA 1210 CEDETE, Orleans University, UFR Collegium LLSH, 10 rue de Tours, BP 46527, 45065, Orléans cedex 2, France
| | - Egert Vandel
- Institute of Ecology, School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 25, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia
| | - Tiiu Koff
- Institute of Ecology, School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 25, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia
| | - Quentin Choffel
- Department of Geography, EA 1210 CEDETE, Orleans University, UFR Collegium LLSH, 10 rue de Tours, BP 46527, 45065, Orléans cedex 2, France
| | - Galina Kapanen
- Institute of Ecology, School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 25, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia
| | - Véronique Maleval
- Department of Geography, Limoges University, Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines, 39E rue Camille Guérin, 87036, Limoges cedex, France
| | - Marko Vainu
- Institute of Ecology, School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Narva mnt 25, Tallinn, 10120, Estonia
| | - Camille Millot
- Department of Geography, EA 1210 CEDETE, Orleans University, UFR Collegium LLSH, 10 rue de Tours, BP 46527, 45065, Orléans cedex 2, France
| | - Zoubida Qsair
- Department of Geography, EA 1210 CEDETE, Orleans University, UFR Collegium LLSH, 10 rue de Tours, BP 46527, 45065, Orléans cedex 2, France
| | - Mohammad Al Domany
- Department of Geography, EA 1210 CEDETE, Orleans University, UFR Collegium LLSH, 10 rue de Tours, BP 46527, 45065, Orléans cedex 2, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weigand H, Beermann AJ, Čiampor F, Costa FO, Csabai Z, Duarte S, Geiger MF, Grabowski M, Rimet F, Rulik B, Strand M, Szucsich N, Weigand AM, Willassen E, Wyler SA, Bouchez A, Borja A, Čiamporová-Zaťovičová Z, Ferreira S, Dijkstra KDB, Eisendle U, Freyhof J, Gadawski P, Graf W, Haegerbaeumer A, van der Hoorn BB, Japoshvili B, Keresztes L, Keskin E, Leese F, Macher JN, Mamos T, Paz G, Pešić V, Pfannkuchen DM, Pfannkuchen MA, Price BW, Rinkevich B, Teixeira MAL, Várbíró G, Ekrem T. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 678:499-524. [PMID: 31077928 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Effective identification of species using short DNA fragments (DNA barcoding and DNA metabarcoding) requires reliable sequence reference libraries of known taxa. Both taxonomically comprehensive coverage and content quality are important for sufficient accuracy. For aquatic ecosystems in Europe, reliable barcode reference libraries are particularly important if molecular identification tools are to be implemented in biomonitoring and reports in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). We analysed gaps in the two most important reference databases, Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) and NCBI GenBank, with a focus on the taxa most frequently used in WFD and MSFD. Our analyses show that coverage varies strongly among taxonomic groups, and among geographic regions. In general, groups that were actively targeted in barcode projects (e.g. fish, true bugs, caddisflies and vascular plants) are well represented in the barcode libraries, while others have fewer records (e.g. marine molluscs, ascidians, and freshwater diatoms). We also found that species monitored in several countries often are represented by barcodes in reference libraries, while species monitored in a single country frequently lack sequence records. A large proportion of species (up to 50%) in several taxonomic groups are only represented by private data in BOLD. Our results have implications for the future strategy to fill existing gaps in barcode libraries, especially if DNA metabarcoding is to be used in the monitoring of European aquatic biota under the WFD and MSFD. For example, missing species relevant to monitoring in multiple countries should be prioritized for future collaborative programs. We also discuss why a strategy for quality control and quality assurance of barcode reference libraries is needed and recommend future steps to ensure full utilisation of metabarcoding in aquatic biomonitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Weigand
- Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 Rue Münster, 2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
| | - Arne J Beermann
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitaetsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| | - Fedor Čiampor
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Zoology Lab, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84523 Bratislava, Slovakia.
| | - Filipe O Costa
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710--057 Braga, Portugal.
| | - Zoltán Csabai
- University of Pécs, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Hydrobiology, Ifjúság útja 6, H7624 Pécs, Hungary.
| | - Sofia Duarte
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710--057 Braga, Portugal.
| | - Matthias F Geiger
- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Michał Grabowski
- University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.
| | - Frédéric Rimet
- INRA, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, UMR Carrtel, FR-74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France.
| | - Björn Rulik
- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Malin Strand
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Swedish Species Information Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | - Alexander M Weigand
- Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25 Rue Münster, 2160 Luxembourg, Luxembourg; University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitaetsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| | - Endre Willassen
- University of Bergen, University Museum of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
| | - Sofia A Wyler
- info fauna - Centre Suisse de Cartographie de la Faune (CSCF), Avenue de Bellevaux 51, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
| | - Agnès Bouchez
- INRA, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, UMR Carrtel, FR-74200 Thonon-les-Bains, France.
| | - Angel Borja
- AZTI - Marine Research Division, Herrera Kaia, Portualdea z/g, 20110 Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
| | - Zuzana Čiamporová-Zaťovičová
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Zoology Lab, Dúbravská cesta 9, 84523 Bratislava, Slovakia.
| | - Sónia Ferreira
- CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal
| | | | - Ursula Eisendle
- University of Salzburg, Department of Biosciences, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Jörg Freyhof
- Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), 12587 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Piotr Gadawski
- University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.
| | - Wolfram Graf
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management (IHG), Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33/DG, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Arne Haegerbaeumer
- Bielefeld University, Department of Animal Ecology, Konsequenz 45, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| | | | - Bella Japoshvili
- Ilia State University, Institute of Zoology, ⅗ Cholokashvili ave, 0179 Tbilisi, Georgia.
| | - Lujza Keresztes
- Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Center of Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Cliniclor 5-7, 400006 Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Emre Keskin
- Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty, Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Evolutionary Genetics Laboratory (eGL), Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Florian Leese
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitaetsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
| | - Jan N Macher
- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Tomasz Mamos
- University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland.
| | - Guy Paz
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa 31080, Israel.
| | - Vladimir Pešić
- University of Montenegro, Department of Biology, Cetinjski put bb., 20000 Podgorica, Montenegro
| | | | | | | | - Buki Rinkevich
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa 31080, Israel.
| | - Marcos A L Teixeira
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710--057 Braga, Portugal
| | - Gábor Várbíró
- MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, Department of Tisza River Research, Bem square 18/C, H4026 Debrecen, Hungary.
| | - Torbjørn Ekrem
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU University Museum, Department of Natural History, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Coastal ecosystems are important ecosystem services (ES) suppliers. The degradation of these ecosystems jeopardizes the quality of ES provision. The Biodiversity 2020 Strategy aims at maintaining and restoring ES, although clear guidelines are missing on how to define the state to which ES should be restored. In this respect, synergies between ES assessments and the Water Framework Directive (WFD) exist, but methodological approaches to connect both are lacking. The Marine Ecosystem Services Assessment Tool (MESAT) can overcome this problem. In this study, the tool is applied to semi-open and open coastal water bodies in the Southern Baltic Sea, the Greifswald Bay and Pomeranian Bay. The resulting changes in ES provision confirm the ability of MESAT to be applied in all WFD water body types and a multitude of environmental and anthropogenic gradients. Nevertheless, problems such as data scarcity, spatial extent and historical background of the case studies require adaptations in the assessment process. The spatial extent of all case studies allowed to cover a connected system with a strong environmental (salinity) gradient. Analyzing changes in ES provision in connected systems can help to better understand linkages between ES provision and environmental and anthropogenic stressors as well as trade-offs between ES across water bodies. This information can be further used to support the design of management plans. From the analysis of all MESAT case studies, major factors were identified for the tool to be transfered into a European context, as well as potential problems and solutions. Following the WFD is a strong advantage, which ensures the tool’s transferability to other areas.
Collapse
|
12
|
Martínez-López J, Teixeira H, Morgado M, Almagro M, Sousa AI, Villa F, Balbi S, Genua-Olmedo A, Nogueira AJA, Lillebø AI. Participatory coastal management through elicitation of ecosystem service preferences and modelling driven by "coastal squeeze". THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 652:1113-1128. [PMID: 30586798 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The Baixo Vouga Lagunar (BVL) is part of Ria de Aveiro coastal lagoon in Portugal, which is classified as a Special Protection Area under the European Habitats and Birds Directives. This part of the system, corresponding to the confluence of the Vouga River with the lagoon, is very important culturally and socioeconomically for the local communities, taking place several human activities, especially agriculture. To prevent salt water intrusion from the Ria de Aveiro into agriculture fields, a floodbank was initiated in the 90's. In frame of ongoing changes in Ria de Aveiro hydrodynamics, the existing floodbank will be now extended, introducing further changes in the ecological dynamics of the BVL and its adjacent area. As a consequence, the water level in the floodbank downstream side is expected to rise, increasing the submersion period in tidal wetlands, and leading to coastal squeeze. The aim of this study is to apply an ecosystem based-management approach to mitigate the impacts on biodiversity resulting from the management plan. To do so, we have modelled the implications of the changes in several hydrological and environmental variables on four saltmarsh species and habitats distribution, as well as on their associated ecosystem services, both upstream and downstream of the floodbank. The ecosystem services of interest were prioritized by stakeholders' elicitation, which were then used as an input to a spatial multi-criteria analysis aimed to find the best management actions to compensate for the unintended loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the BVL. According to our results, the main areas to be preserved in the BVL were the traditional agricultural mosaic fields; the freshwater courses and the subtidal estuarine channels. By combining ecology with the analysis of social preferences, this study shows how co-developed solutions can support adaptive management and the conservation of coastal ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Martínez-López
- BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain.
| | - Heliana Teixeira
- Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Mariana Morgado
- Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - María Almagro
- BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain
| | - Ana I Sousa
- Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Ferdinando Villa
- BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Stefano Balbi
- BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain
| | - Ana Genua-Olmedo
- Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Antonio J A Nogueira
- Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Ana I Lillebø
- Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lillebø AI, Teixeira H, Morgado M, Martínez-López J, Marhubi A, Delacámara G, Strosser P, Nogueira AJA. Ecosystem-based management planning across aquatic realms at the Ria de Aveiro Natura 2000 territory. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 650:1898-1912. [PMID: 30286356 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Ria de Aveiro represents a coastal territory, in which its natural capital, mostly classified under a Natura 2000 network of protected areas, is of paramount importance for the regional and national economy, supporting harbour activities and maritime traffic, agriculture, commercial fisheries, aquaculture, manufacturing, tourism, sports and recreational activities. Current and foreseen changes connected to human activities, namely land and water uses and potential conflicts, in frame of environmental policies, sustainable economic development and human well-being require the implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) planning processes considering the connectivity across marine, transitional, freshwater, and terrestrial domains. The main objective is to elaborate on the co-development of the EBM planning process across the three water domains, all characterized by high biodiversity and by the wide range of services provided by ecosystems and their abiotic components, for the mitigation of impacts from the management plan under implementation. The approach used follows a stepwise procedure in frame of resilience principles, considering the analysis of the relationship between the social and ecological components and on how these can be connected through risk assessment and a spatial multi-criteria analysis based on the delivery of ecosystem services. Stakeholders' perception matched the ecosystem services provisioning risk assessment and supported the planning EBM response that consist in saltmarshes and seagrasses meadows restoration programs. Compliance of the proposed measures is achievable regarding policies (policy targets and policy instruments) and feasibility (scientific and technological knowledge and financial resources). The EBM response can support the Vouga estuary management plan and regional smart specialization (RIS3 Centro).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana I Lillebø
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
| | - Heliana Teixeira
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
| | - Mariana Morgado
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Javier Martínez-López
- BC3 - Basque Centre for Climate Change, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain
| | - Asya Marhubi
- IMDEA Water Institute, Av/Punto Com, 2, Parque Científico Tecnológico, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Delacámara
- IMDEA Water Institute, Av/Punto Com, 2, Parque Científico Tecnológico, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - António J A Nogueira
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|