Effect of Medication Copayment on Adherence and Discontinuation in Medicare Beneficiaries with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Administrative Claims Database Analysis

The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs on insulin use among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with Medicare Advantage insurance-2014-2018

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between insulin out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) and adherence to insulin in Medicare Advantage (MA) patients.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

The study is based on Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, real-world data asset with de-identified administrative claims and electronic health record data.

STUDY DESIGN

Using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses, we identified the likelihood of patients with diabetes having ≥60 consecutive days between an expected insulin fill date and the actual fill date (refill lapse) by OOPC, categorized by $0, >$0-$20 (reference), >$20-$35, >$35-$50, and > $50 per 30-day supply.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

The study included MA enrollees with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and prescription claims for insulin between 2014 and 2018.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Those with average insulin OOPC per 30-day supply >$35 or $0 were more likely to have an insulin refill lapse versus OOPC of >$0 to $20, with odds ratios ranging 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.22) to 1.74 (95% CI 1.66-1.83) depending on OOPC group and diabetes type.

CONCLUSIONS

Capping average insulin OOPC at $35 per 30-day supply may help avoid cost-related insulin non-adherence in MA patients; efforts to address non-cost barriers to medication adherence remain important.

Fracture risk in women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant risedronate versus immediate release risedronate or alendronate: a claims data analysis in the USA

The study results indicate that women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant risedronate have a lower risk of fracture than those initiated on immediate release risedronate or alendronate. A large proportion of women discontinued all oral bisphosphonate therapies within 1 year of treatment start.

PURPOSE

Using a US claims database (2009-2019), we compared risk of fractures between women with osteoporosis initiated on gastro-resistant (GR) risedronate and those initiated on (a) immediate release (IR) risedronate or (b) immediate release alendronate.

METHODS

Women aged ≥ 60 years with osteoporosis who had ≥ 2 oral bisphosphonate prescription fills were followed for ≥ 1 year after the first observed bisphosphonates dispensing (index date). Fracture risk was compared between the GR risedronate and IR risedronate/alendronate cohorts using adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs), both overall and in subgroups with high fracture risk due to older age or comorbidity/medications. Site-specific fractures were identified based on diagnosis codes recorded on medical claims using a claims-based algorithm. Persistence on bisphosphonate therapy was evaluated for all groups.

RESULTS

aIRRs generally indicated lower fracture risk for GR risedronate than IR risedronate and alendronate. When comparing GR risedronate to IR risedronate, statistically significant aIRRs (p < 0.05) were observed for pelvic fractures in the full cohorts (aIRRs = 0.37), for any fracture and pelvic fractures among women aged ≥ 65 years (aIRRs = 0.63 and 0.41), for any fracture and pelvic fractures among women aged ≥ 70 years (aIRRs = 0.69 and 0.24), and for pelvic fracture among high-risk women due to comorbidity/medications (aIRR = 0.34). When comparing GR risedronate to alendronate, statistically significant aIRRs were observed for pelvic fractures in the full cohorts (aIRR = 0.54), for any fracture and wrist/arm fractures among women aged ≥ 65 years (aIRRs = 0.73 and 0.63), and for any fracture, pelvic, and wrist/arm fractures among women aged ≥ 70 years (aIRRs = 0.72, 0.36, and 0.58). In all cohorts, ~ 40% completely discontinued oral bisphosphonates within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation rates of oral bisphosphonate therapy were high. However, women initiated on GR risedronate had a significantly lower risk of fracture for several skeletal sites than women initiated on IR risedronate/alendronate, particularly those aged ≥ 70 years.

Cost-sharing and adherence, clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and costs: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: US health plans are adopting benefit designs that shift greater financial burden to patients through higher deductibles, additional copay tiers, and coinsurance. Prior systematic reviews found that higher cost was associated with reductions in both appropriate and inappropriate medications. However, these reviews were conducted prior to contemporary benefit design and medication utilization. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship and factors associated with cost-sharing and (1) medication adherence, (2) clinical outcomes, (3) health care resource utilization (HRU), and (4) costs. METHODS: A systematic review of literature published between January 2010 and August 2020 was conducted to identify the relationship between cost-sharing and medication adherence, clinical outcomes, HRU, and health care costs. Data were extracted using a standardized template and were synthesized by key questions of interest. RESULTS: From 1,995 records screened, 79 articles were included. Most studies, 71 of 79 (90%), reported the relationship between cost-sharing and treatment adherence, persistence and/or discontinuation; 16 (20%) reported data on cost-sharing and HRU or medication initiation, 11 (14%) on costsharing and health care costs, and 6 (8%) on cost-sharing and clinical outcomes. The majority of publications found that, regardless of disease area, increased cost-sharing was associated with worse adherence, persistence, or discontinuation. The aggregate data suggested the greater the magnitude of cost-sharing, the worse the adherence. Among studies examining clinical outcomes, cost-sharing was associated with worse outcomes in 1 study and the remaining 3 found no significant differences. Regarding HRU, higher-cost-sharing trended toward decreased outpatient and increased inpatient utilization. The available evidence suggested higher cost-sharing has an overall neutral to negative impact on total costs. Studies evaluating elimination of copays found either decreased or no impact in total costs. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature shows consistent impacts of higher cost sharing on initiation and continuation of medications, and the greater the cost-sharing, the worse the medication adherence. The evidence is limited regarding the impact of cost-sharing on clinical outcomes, HRU, and costs. Limited evidence suggests increased cost-sharing is associated with more inpatient care and less outpatient care; however, a neutral to no difference was suggested for other outcomes. Although increased costsharing is intended to decrease total costs, studies evaluating reducing or eliminating cost-sharing found that total costs did not rise. Today's growing cost-containment environment should carefully consider the broader impact cost-sharing has on treatment adherence, clinical outcomes, resource use, and total costs. It may be that cost-sharing is a blunt, rather than precise, tool to curb health care costs, affecting both necessary and unnecessary health care use. DISCLOSURES: This study and the development of this article were funded by the National Pharmaceutical Council. Mr Sils is an employee of the National Pharmaceutical Council. Dr Graff is a former employee of the National Pharmaceutical Council. Drs Fusco and Kistler and Ms Ruiz are employees of Xcenda. Xcenda received funding to conduct the literature review.

Medication Adherence and Cardiometabolic Control Indicators Among American Indian Adults Receiving Tribal Health Services: Protocol for a Longitudinal Electronic Health Records Study

BACKGROUND

American Indian adults have the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in any racial or ethnic group and experience high rates of comorbidities. Uncontrolled cardiometabolic risk factors-insulin resistance, resulting in impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension-increase the risk of mortality. Mortality is significantly reduced by glucose- and lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medication adherence. Medication adherence is low among American Indian adults living in non-Indian Health Service health care settings. Virtually nothing is known about the nature and extent of medication adherence among reservation-dwelling American Indian adults who primarily receive their medications without cost from Indian Health Service or tribal facilities. Electronic health records (EHRs) offer a rich but underused data source regarding medication adherence and its potential to predict cardiometabolic control indicators (C-MCIs). With the support of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (CNO), we address this oversight by using EHR data generated by this large, state-of-the-art tribal health care system to investigate C-MCIs.

OBJECTIVE

Our specific aims are to determine, using 2018 EHR data, the bivariate relationships between medication adherence and C-MCIs, demographics, and comorbidities and each C-MCI and demographics and comorbidities; develop machine learning models for predicting future C-MCIs from the previous year's medication adherence, demographics, comorbidities, and common laboratory tests; and identify facilitators of and barriers to medication adherence within the context of social determinants of health (SDOH), EHR-derived medication adherence, and C-MCIs.

METHODS

Drawing on the tribe's EHR (2018-2021) data for CNO patients with T2D, we will characterize the relationships among medication adherence (to glucose- and lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs) and C-MCIs (hemoglobin A1c ≤7%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg); patient demographics (eg, age, sex, SDOH, and residence location); and comorbidities (eg, BMI ≥30, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease). We will also characterize the association of each C-MCI with demographics and comorbidities. Prescription and pharmacy refill data will be used to calculate the proportion of days covered with medications, a typical measure of medication adherence. Using machine learning techniques, we will develop prediction models for future (2019-2021) C-MCIs based on medication adherence, patient demographics, comorbidities, and common laboratory tests (eg, lipid panel) from the previous year. Finally, key informant interviews (N=90) will explore facilitators of and barriers to medication adherence within the context of local SDOH.

RESULTS

Funding was obtained in early 2022. The University of Florida and CNO approved the institutional review board protocols and executed the data use agreements. Data extraction is in process. We expect to obtain results from aims 1 and 2 in 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings will yield insights into improving medication adherence and C-MCIs among American Indian adults, consistent with CNO's State of the Nation's Health Report 2017 goal of reducing T2D and its complications.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/39193.

The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs for insulin on medication adherence and health care utilization in patients with commercial insurance; 2007-2018

BACKGROUND: High out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) for insulin can lead to cost-related nonadherence and poor outcomes, prompting payers to limit insulin OOPCs. However, data are scarce on whether insulin OOPCs at policy-relevant levels is associated with improved adherence and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify associations between insulin OOPCs and insulin adherence, noninsulin antihyperglycemic (AHG) medication adherence, and diabetes-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, real-world data asset with deidentified administrative claims and electronic health record data. Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D), insulin use on January 1 of a study year (index date: 2007-2018), continuous commercial health plan eligibility 12 months pre-index and post-index date, and at least 1 insulin claim during the 12-month follow-up period were included. Average insulin OOPCs per 30-day supply in the follow-up period was identified and categorized ($0, > $0-$20 [referent group], > $20-$35, > $35-$50, and > $50). The proportion of patients with a gap in insulin supply of 60 or more continuous days, AHG nonadherence per modified proportion of days covered less than 0.80, and a diabetes-related ED visit or hospitalization were identified and compared by insulin OOPC category vs more than $0 to $20 using pairwise chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The study included 21,085 individuals with T1D and 72,512 with T2D. Patients with average OOPCs more than $50 were more likely to have a gap in insulin supply vs those with OOPCs more than $0 to $20, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.14 (95% CI =1.05-1.24) and 1.38 (95% CI = 1.32-1.45) for T1D and T2D, respectively. Those with T2D and OOPCs more than $35 were also more likely to have a 60-day gap in insulin supply (OR 1.17; 95% CI = 1.11-1.23). Odds of having a diabetes-related hospitalization or ED visit did not increase with higher OOPCs; rather, associations tended to be inverse. Nonadherence to AHG medications in the T2D cohort was higher with insulin OOPCs more than $20 vs those more than $0-$20 (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with T2D were more likely to have a 60-day gap in insulin supply when the OOPC was more than $35 per 30-day supply and with the OOPC more than $50 in those with T1D. These findings suggest that health plans can facilitate adherence to insulin therapy and possibly to noninsulin AHG medications by protecting patients with diabetes from experiencing high insulin OOPC. A study with a longer follow-up period is warranted to fully assess ED and hospitalization outcomes. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Health Data for Action Research Program. The study sponsor played no role in the design or conduct of this study. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.

Fracture rates and economic outcomes in patients with osteoporosis prescribed risedronate gastro-resistant versus other oral bisphosphonates: a claims data analysis

Patients with osteoporosis prescribed risedronate gastro-resistant had a lower incidence of fractures versus those prescribed other oral bisphosphonates. Administration of risedronate gastric-resistant does not require fasting, and this more convenient dosing administration may explain its improved efficacy.

PURPOSE

Up to half of patients do not follow complex dosing instructions of immediate-release bisphosphonates used for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures, which can result in suboptimal effectiveness. Risedronate gastro-resistant (GR) offers a more convenient dosing option by eliminating the need for fasting. This study compares fracture rates and outcomes between osteoporosis women treated with risedronate GR (GR cohort) versus other oral bisphosphonates (other cohort).

METHODS

Claims from women with osteoporosis in the USA were analyzed. Patients were classified into the two cohorts based on the first oral bisphosphonate observed (index date) and matched 1:1 based on patient characteristics. Patients were observed for ≥ 2 years following the index date. Fracture rates, health care resource utilization and costs, and treatment persistence were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 2,726 patients were selected in each cohort (median age: 60.0 years). The incidence of fractures was lower in the GR versus the other cohort for any fracture sites (incidence rate ratio, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.70-0.97) and spine fractures (0.71, 0.54-0.95), although the respective rate of medication discontinuation at 2 years was 80.5% and 74.4%. Time to first fracture was delayed for the GR cohort, reaching statistical significance after 36 months. The GR cohort incurred fewer hospitalizations (incidence rate per 1,000 patient-years: GR = 106.74; other = 124.20, p < 0.05) translating into lower hospitalization costs per patient per year (GR = $3,611; other = $4,603, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients prescribed risedronate GR versus other bisphosphonates had a lower incidence of fractures, which may be explained by the fact that the GR formulation is absorbed even when taken with food.

Real-world utilization of bempedoic acid in an academic preventive cardiology practice

BACKGROUND

Lipid management for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease remains insufficient for many with currently available therapies.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate real-world use of bempedoic acid.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients in our Center for Preventive Cardiology who were prescribed bempedoic acid between February 2020 and July 2021. Patients were managed according to clinical standards of care, with lipid assessments at months ≤3, 6, and 12 post-bempedoic acid initiation.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were prescribed bempedoic acid, with 64 initiating therapy. The majority had atherosclerosis (89%), familial hypercholesterolemia (64%), and statin intolerance (74%), with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 120 mg/dL. Prior authorization requests and appeals of denials were required in 90% and 19% of cases, respectively. Cost-mitigating strategies reduced median monthly drug costs from $432 pre-insurance approval to $80 post-insurance approval, to $10 after financial assistance intervention. Bempedoic acid reduced LDL-C by -36.7%, -31%, and -20.3% at ≤3, 6, and 12, respectively, with >20% achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL. There was substantial inter-individual heterogeneity in LDL-C lowering. We observed high rates of drug discontinuation (35.9%), mostly related to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (32.8%), primarily musculoskeletal complaints. Use of reduced dose bempedoic acid (<180 mg) was associated similar LDL-C lowering but TEAE and drug discontinuation were still common.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world use of bempedoic acid was limited by insurance and cost barriers requiring substantial post-prescription interventions. In patients at heightened risk for atherosclerotic events and statin intolerance, bempedoic acid was associated with clinically meaningful LDL-C lowering, but high rates of TEAEs and drug discontinuations.

A cross-sectional study clarifying profiles of patients with diabetes who discontinued pharmacotherapy: reasons and consequences

BACKGROUND

Although diabetes is one of the fastest increasing diseases in prevalence worldwide and demands significant medical resources, more than half of all patients with diabetes do not achieve the expected target level of blood glucose. As a potential cause of poor glycemic control, insufficient adherence to medication has long been discussed and variably studied. However, dropout from treatment as another plausible cause has not been fully examined. The aim of this study was to clarify profiles of patients with diabetes who discontinued pharmacotherapy (Discont group) by extracting reasons of their decisions and by comparing with those who continued (Cont group) in terms of the related factors to glycemic control.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, internet-based survey was conducted among Japanese with diabetes registered in a database. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of the 8-item version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) level, and demographic and disease characteristics was completed by all participants. Reasons for medication discontinuation and resumption were also received retrospectively from participants in the Discont group. To examine the risk of uncontrolled HbA_1c, logistic regression analysis was conducted in each group.

RESULTS

In the Discont group (148 cases), older age at resumption of pharmacotherapy and current smoking habit increased the probability of uncontrolled HbA_1c, whereas in the Cont group (146 cases), a familial history of diabetes and better medication adherence in MMAS-8 scores decreased the probability of uncontrolled HbA1c. A relationship between medication adherence and HbA_1c level was seen in the Cont but not in the Discont group. About 70 % of those in the Discont group made their decision to terminate diabetes treatment without consulting physicians and half of them perceived their situations inappropriately.

CONCLUSIONS

Those who discontinued pharmacotherapy were less adherent to medication than those who did not discontinue. Risk factors for glycemic control also differed between those who discontinued and those who did not. More than one-third of participants with diabetes who discontinued pharmacotherapy had inappropriate perceptions of their disease, which medical professionals should be aware of for better interventions.

Optimizing sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor use in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A collaborative clinical practice statement

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a debilitating disease that is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and societal costs. The past three decades have brought about significant advancements in the pharmacologic management of HFrEF, and a corresponding reduction in morbidity and mortality. However, the progress to improve clinical outcomes in real-world settings has stalled in recent years, largely due to underutilization of guideline directed medical therapies (GDMT). The discovery of significant cardio-renal protection from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has ushered in a new treatment paradigm for HFrEF management with SGLT2i therapy becoming an essential component of GDMT. Our Preventive Cardiology and Heart Failure services have established an innovative, multi-disciplinary, collaborative protocol to optimize management of cardiovascular risk factors and facilitation SGLT2i use in patients with HFrEF. The goal of this collaboration is to enhance utilization and safety of SGLT2i for HFrEF management by circumventing medication access issues, the major obstacle to therapy initiation. Within this protocol, our heart failure providers identify patients for the addition of SGLT2i to a background of heart failure GDMT. The patient is then referred to preventive cardiology where the team performs a comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment, optimizes cardiovascular risk factors, and initiates SGLT2i with an emphasis on medication access, cost minimization, and mitigation of potential side effects. The heart failure team assumes responsibility for modification of heart failure-based therapies, and the preventive team manages diabetes, lipid, and metabolic-based therapies. The patient is followed by both cardiology services in a structured fashion, comparing outcome measures at regular intervals and utilizing our patient registry and bio-repository. This clinical practice statement provides a detailed evidentiary review on the cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2i, outlines the rational for creation of a collaborative protocol, details a structured program that may serve as a template for enhanced heart failure management in other health systems, and addresses challenges encountered and recommendations for use.

A Pharmacist and Health Coach-Delivered Mobile Health Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

Background

Aggressive management of blood glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol through medication and lifestyle adherence is necessary to minimize the adverse health outcomes of type 2 diabetes. However, numerous psychosocial and environmental barriers to adherence prevent low-income, urban, and ethnic minority populations from achieving their management goals, resulting in diabetes complications. Health coaches working with clinical pharmacists represent a promising strategy for addressing common diabetes management barriers. Mobile health (mHealth) tools may further enhance their ability to support vulnerable minority populations in diabetes management.

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an mHealth clinical pharmacist and health coach–delivered intervention on hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c, primary outcome), blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (secondary outcomes) in African-Americans and Latinos with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Methods

A 2-year, randomized controlled crossover study will evaluate the effectiveness of an mHealth diabetes intervention delivered by a health coach and clinical pharmacist team compared with usual care. All patients will receive 1 year of team intervention, including lifestyle and medication support delivered in the home with videoconferencing and text messages. All patients will also receive 1 year of usual care without team intervention and no home visits. The order of the conditions received will be randomized. Our recruitment goal is 220 urban African-American or Latino adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA_1c ≥8%) receiving care from a largely minority-serving, urban academic medical center. The intervention includes the following: health coaches supporting patients through home visits, phone calls, and text messaging and clinical pharmacists supporting patients through videoconferences facilitated by health coaches. Data collection includes physiologic (HbA_1c, blood pressure, weight, and lipid profile) and survey measures (medication adherence, diabetes-related behaviors, and quality of life). Data collection during the second year of study will determine the maintenance of any physiological improvement among participants receiving the intervention during the first year.

Results

Participant enrollment began in March 2017. We have recruited 221 patients. Intervention delivery and data collection will continue until November 2021. The results are expected to be published by May 2022.

Conclusions

This is among the first trials to incorporate health coaches, clinical pharmacists, and mHealth technologies to increase access to diabetes support among urban African-Americans and Latinos to achieve therapeutic goals.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/17170

Real-world utilization of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in an academic preventive cardiology practice

Objective

To determine the real-world use of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in an academic Preventive Cardiology Clinic.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients seen in our Center for Preventive Cardiology (CPC) and who received a new prescription, according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications, for one of the following pharmacotherapies with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications from May 2019 to May 2020: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Treatment endpoints were prescription patterns, medication access, patient out-of-pocket expenses, medication tolerability, and clinical cardiovascular events while on these therapies.

Results

Of the 2390 patients seen in our CPC clinic over the observation period, 532 (22.3%) had already started and 291 (12.2%) were newly initiated on pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications with a median treatment duration of 9.1 months. Of these, 291 patients (for a total of 320 separate drug orders) – 93 (29.1%) were prescribed PCSK9i, 131 (40.9%) EPA, 46 (14.4%) SGLT2i, and 50 (15.6%) GLP-1 RA. Nearly 80% of cases required some form of provider intervention post-prescription (authorization, appeal, financial assistance, and/or side effect management). A total of 70% of adult patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin and with an HgbA1C >7% were treated with a SGLT2i and/or GLP-1 RA – either initiated prior to or during the study period. Median monthly drug cost for the total cohort was reduced from $595.00 pre-insurance approval to $70.50 post-insurance approval, to $7.00 post-financial assistance intervention. The medications were well tolerated with any side effect occurring in 28.3%, and discontinuation due to side effects in 5.8% of cases. Clinical cardiovascular events occurred in 2.7%, of which 1.9% was due to ASCVD and 0.8% to hospitalization for heart failure. Differences in medication access, cost, tolerability and clinical cardiovascular events varied widely between the medication classes.

Conclusions

Initiation and management of pharmacotherapy with new evidence-based cardiovascular indications in a real-world setting requires substantial provider intervention, a workflow amenable to a multi-disciplinary approach which allows for high rates of medication access and cost minimization, and low rates of medication side effects and clinical cardiovascular events.

•

Over 12 months, PCSK9i, EPA, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA where prescribed in 291 patients.

•

Nearly 80% of cases required some form of provider intervention post-prescription.

•

Multi-disciplinary efforts reduced median monthly patient cost from $595 to $7.

•

Cost was the leading factor for medication non-adherence.

•

Drugs with new CV indications were well tolerated with low rates of CV events.

An Evaluation of Statin Use Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk of Cardiovascular Events Across Multiple Health Care Systems

BACKGROUND

Patients with more than one chronic condition often receive care from several providers and facilities, which may lead to fragmentation of care. Poor care coordination in dual health care system use has been associated with increased emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and costs.

OBJECTIVE

Dual health care system use is increasing among veterans, and we sought to evaluate the effect of dual health care system use on statin treatment in veterans with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events, using varying degrees of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) services.

METHODS

This was a 10-year retrospective longitudinal cohort study of national clinical and administrative data that included 689,138 veterans with type 2 diabetes who were aged 65 years or older on January 1, 2006. Patients were followed from January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2016. Administrative and clinical data from the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Corporate Data Warehouse were merged with CMS inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy data. Statin use was defined as any therapy and subcategorized as high versus low or moderate intensity per the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Marginal generalized estimating equation-type models for longitudinal data were used to model the association between dual health care utilization status (< 50%, 50%-80%, and > 80% VHA utilization, with the first group serving as the reference group) and statin use after adjusting for measured covariates.

RESULTS

The mean ages at baseline for each group were similar and ranged between 75.4 and 76.9 years. For the outcome of any statin use, the group with < 50% VHA utilization was significantly less likely to receive statin therapy compared with the group with > 80% VHA utilization (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.26-0.26), while the group with 50%-80% VHA utilization was slightly more likely (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.07). Similarly, for the high-intensity versus low-/moderate-intensity or no statins outcome, the group with < 50% VHA utilization was significantly less likely to receive a high-intensity statin compared with the group with > 80% VHA utilization (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.55-0.57), while the group with 50%-80% VHA utilization was only slightly less likely (OR = 0.95, 95% CI =0.94-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Among veterans with diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events, dual health care system utilization status appeared to affect statin use. We observed lower odds for any statin use and high-intensity statin therapy among the cohort with the lowest degree of VHA utilization (i.e., < 50%). Interventions to increase statin use among veterans at high risk of cardiovascular events with lower degrees of VHA utilization should be explored.

DISCLOSURES

This study was supported by a grant funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs' Health Services Research and Development Service and was undertaken at the Health Equity and Rural Outreach Center (HEROIC) at Ralph H. Johnson Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC. The authors report no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article. This article represents the views of the authors and not those of the Medical University of South Carolina or Veteran Health Administration.

Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees

BACKGROUND

While the traditional Medicare program imposes a deductible for hospital admissions, many Medicare Advantage plans have instituted per-diem copayments for hospital care. Little evidence exists about the effects of changes in cost-sharing for hospital care among the elderly. Changing inpatient benefits from a deductible to a per diem may benefit enrollees with shorter lengths of stay, but adversely affect the out-of-pocket burden for hospitalized enrollees with longer lengths of stay.

METHODS

We used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study to compare longitudinal changes in proportion hospitalized, inpatient admissions and days per 100 enrollees, and hospital length of stay between enrollees in MA plans that changed inpatient benefit from deductible at admission to per diem, intervention plans, and enrollees in matched control plans - similar plans that maintained inpatient deductibles. The study population included 423,634 unique beneficiaries enrolled in 23 intervention plans and 36 matched control plans in the 2007-2010 period.

RESULTS

The imposition of per-diem copayments were associated with adjusted declines of 1.3 admissions/100 enrollees (95% CI - 1.8 to - 0.9), 6.9 inpatient days/100 enrollees (95% CI - 10.1 to - 3.8) and 0.7 percentage points in the probability of hospital admission (95% CI - 1.0 to - 0.4), with no significant change in adjusted length of stay in intervention plans relative to control plans. For persons with 2 or more hospitalizations in the year prior to the cost-sharing change, adjusted declines were 3.5 admissions/100 (95% CI - 8.4 to 1.4), 31.1 days/100 (95% CI - 75.2 to 13.0) and 2.2 percentage points in the probability of hospitalization (95% CI - 3.8 to - 0.6) in intervention plans relative to control plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Instituting per-diem copayments was associated with reductions in number of admissions and hospital stays, but not length of stay once admitted. Effects of inpatient cost-sharing changes were magnified for persons with greater baseline use of hospital care.

The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in a Preventive Cardiology Practice

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In response, a multidisciplinary team approach, which includes clinical pharmacists, is recommended to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of the study was to describe interventions associated with integration of a clinical pharmacist, with an emphasis on pharmacist-generated patient cost avoidance. Methods: This is a prospective observational study detailing pharmacist-initiated interventions within an academic preventive cardiology service. Interventions targeting pharmacotherapy optimization, side effect management, patient education, medication adherence, and cost avoidance were implemented during shared office visits with providers and/or on provider consultation for remote follow-up. Tabulation of cost avoidance was arranged into 2 formats: clinical interventions implemented by the pharmacist and direct patient out-of-pocket expense reduction. Money saved per clinical intervention was extrapolated from data previously published. Patient out-of-pocket expense prior to and after pharmacist involvement was calculated to assess aggregate yearly patient cost savings. Results: Over 12 months the pharmacist intervened on 974 patients, totaling 3725 interventions. Cost avoidance strategies resulted in yearly savings of $830 748 in aggregate—$149 566 from clinical interventions and $681 182 from patient out-of-pocket expense reduction. Monthly patient out-of-pocket expense was reduced from a median (interquartile range) of $217 ($83.5-$347) before to $5 ($0-$18) after pharmacist intervention. Conclusions: Addition of a clinical pharmacist within an academic preventive cardiology clinic generated substantial pharmacotherapy interventions, resulting in significant cost avoidance for patients. The resulting cost avoidance may result in improved medication adherence and clinical outcomes.

Are newer insulins always the better option?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since its discovery almost a century ago, there have been numerous advancements in the formulations of insulin. The newer insulin analogs have structural modifications with the goal of altering pharmacokinetics to achieve either quick onset and offset of action (mealtime bolus analogs), or a prolonged steady action (basal analogs). These analogs offer many advantages over older human insulins but are several-fold more expensive. The aim of this review is to evaluate reasons for the exorbitant price of the newer insulins, to examine the evidence regarding their clinical advantages and to make value-based prescribing recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

The higher cost of newer insulins cannot be justified based on drug development or manufacturing costs. Compared with older insulins, newer analogs do not offer significant advantage in achieving hemoglobin A1c targets, but they reduce risk of hypoglycemia. The reductions in hypoglycemia are relatively modest and most apparent in those with type 1 diabetes, possibly because these individuals are more prone to hypoglycemia.

SUMMARY

When cost considerations are important, the older insulins (regular and NPH insulin) can be used safely and effectively for most individuals with type 2 diabetes who have a low risk of hypoglycemia.