Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardioprotective effect of extracellular vesicles derived from ticagrelor-pretreated cardiomyocyte on hyperglycemic cardiomyocytes through alleviation of oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play important roles in diabetes mellitus (DM) via connecting the immune cell response to tissue injury, besides stimulation to muscle insulin resistance, while DM is associated with increased risks for major cardiovascular complications. Under DM, chronic hyperglycemia, and subsequent increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) further lead to cardiac growth remodeling and dysfunction. The purinergic drug ticagrelor is a P₂Y₁₂ receptor antagonist. Although it is widely used in cardioprotection, the underlying molecular mechanism of its inhibitory effect on diabetic cardiomyopathy is poorly elucidated. Here, we aimed to understand how ticagrelor exerts its cardio-regulatory effects. For this purpose, we investigated the anti-oxidative and cardioprotective effect of EVs derived from ticagrelor-pretreated cardiomyocytes under DM conditions. To mimic DM in cardiomyocytes, we used high glucose incubated H9c2-cells (HG). HG cells were treated with EVs, which were derived from either ticagrelor-pretreated or untreated H9c2-cells. Our results demonstrated that ticagrelor-pretreated H9c2-derived EVs significantly decreased the hyperglycemia-induced aberrant ROS production, prevented the development of apoptosis and ER stress, and alleviated oxidative stress associated miRNA-expression profile. Importantly, EVs derived from ticagrelor-pretreated H9c2-cells enhanced endothelial cell migration and tube formation, suggesting a modulation of the EV profile in cardiomyocytes. Our data, for the first time, indicate that ticagrelor can exert an important regulatory effect on diabetic cardiomyopathy through extracellular vesicular modulation behind its receptor-inhibition-related effects.

Real-World Use and Outcomes of Oral Antiplatelets Among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-related readmission is an important hospital quality measure. Medication management therapy, especially adherence to antiplatelet agents post discharge, could play an important role in reducing readmission rates. Newer agents such as ticagrelor and prasugrel have been shown, in randomized control trials, to have superior effectiveness to cardiovascular outcomes compared to clopidogrel, but they are more expensive and have more common adverse events such as bleeding and dyspnea.

OBJECTIVE

We compared real-world readmission rates and adherence to antiplatelet agents among patients who initiated these agents post discharge.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohortstudy of patients with an index ACS-related hospitalization between 1 July 2017 and 31 December 2018. Using integrated pharmacy and medical claims data from a large national pharmacy benefits manager for commercially insured adults aged ≥ 18 years, we compared ACS-related readmission and medication adherence (as medication possession ratio (MPR)) among the three agents. ANOVA and logistic regression, controlling for demographics such as age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, were used to estimate any association between the agents and 365-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

Of the 948 eligible patients, 86, 342, and 520 were initiated on prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel (PTC), respectively. There were 4.7%, 5.3%, and 8.5% readmissions rates in the PTC cohorts, respectively, but these were not statistically significant in either the ANOVA or the logistic regression analyses. MPR was highest in the ticagrelor (88.1%) cohort, followed by the prasugrel (79.1%) and clopidogrel (76.4%) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor cohort had the highest medication adherence. Clopidogrel cohort had the highest readmission rate but the difference with the other cohorts was statistically insignificant.

Comparison of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There has been inconsistent data on the direct comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarise the current available evidence.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis (PROSPERO-registered CRD42020166810) of randomized trials up to Feb 2020 that compared prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome with respect to the composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiovascular death, and secondary endpoints including MI, stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or above), stent thrombosis, all-cause death and other safety outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 11 eligible RCTs with 6098 patients randomized to prasugrel (n=3050) or ticagrelor (n=3048), 180 and 207 had the composite endpoint events in the prasugrel arm and the ticagrelor arm respectively over a weighted mean follow up period of 11±2 months. Compared with prasugrel, the ticagrelor group had similar risk in the primary composite endpoint (Risk Ratio (RR)= 1.17; 95% CI=0.96-1.42; p=0.12, I2=0%). Compared to prasugrel, there was no significant difference associated with the use of ticagrelor groups with respect to stroke (RR=1.05; 95% CI=0.66-1.67; p=0.84, I2=0%); cardiovascular death (RR=1.01; 95% CI=0.75-1.36; p=0.95, I2=0%); BARC type 2 or above bleeding (RR=1.16; 95% CI =0.89-1.52; p=0.26, I2=0%); stent thrombosis (RR=1.58; 95% CI =0.90-2.76; p=0.11, I2=0%); all cause death (RR=1.10; 95% CI =0.86-1.43; p=0.45, I2=0%) except MI (RR=1.38; 95% CI=1.05-1.81; p=0.02, I2=0%) Conclusion: Compared with prasugrel, ticagrelor did not reduce the primary composite endpoint of MI, stroke and cardiovascular death at a weighted mean follow up of 11 months. There was no significant difference between the secondary outcomes except myocardial infarction.

Ticagrelor alleviates high-carbohydrate intake induced altered electrical activity of ventricular cardiomyocytes by regulating sarcoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria miscommunication

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with additional cardiovascular risk in mammalians while there are relationships between hyperglycemia-associated cardiovascular dysfunction and increased platelet P2Y12 receptor activation. Although P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor (Tica) plays roles in reduction of cardiovascular events, its beneficial mechanism remains poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to clarify whether Tica can exert a direct protective effect in ventricular cardiomyocytes from high-carbohydrate diet-induced MetS rats, at least, through affecting sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)-mitochondria (Mit) miscommunication. Tica treatment of MetS rats (150 mg/kg/day for 15 days) significantly reversed the altered parameters of action potentials by reversing sarcolemmal ionic currents carried by voltage-dependent Na⁺ and K⁺ channels, and Na⁺/Ca²⁺-exchanger in the cells, expressed P2Y12 receptors. The increased basal-cytosolic Ca²⁺ level and depressed SR Ca²⁺ load were also reversed in Tica-treated cells, at most, though recoveries in the phosphorylation levels of ryanodine receptors and phospholamban. Moreover, there were marked recoveries in Mit structure and function (including increases in both autophagosomes and fragmentations) together with recoveries in Mit proteins and the factors associated with Ca²⁺ transfer between SR-Mit. There were further significant recoveries in markers of both ER stress and oxidative stress. Taken into consideration the Tica-induced prevention of ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, our data provided an important document on the pleiotropic effects of Tica in the electrical activity of the cardiomyocytes from MetS rats. This protective effect seems through recoveries in SR-Mit miscommunication besides modulation of different sarcolemmal ion-channel activities, independent of P2Y12 receptor antagonism.

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor in Diabetes Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Dual antiplatelet treatment, consisting of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors, is essential for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This meta-analysis investigated whether ticagrelor, a novel P2Y12 inhibitor, was superior to clopidogrel and prasugrel in efficacy and safety for DM patients undergoing PCI. PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled trials in which ticagrelor was administered. Eligible studies were independently scrutinized to extract data and assess the trials' quality. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 8 studies consisting of 1056 patients were included. Results showed that ticagrelor reduced the major adverse cardiac events incidence compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the overall (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.79; P = 0.008) and subgroup analyses compared with clopidogrel (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.80; P = 0.01). No difference was observed in mortality rates (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.23-1.45; P = 0.25), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.28-1.60; P = 0.37), stroke (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.10-3.01; P = 0.49), and total bleeding (OR = 1.70; 95% CI, 0.91-3.17; P = 0.10) between the ticagrelor and control groups. In DM patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events compared with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the overall and in the subgroup of clopidogrel. There was no difference regarding mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. More randomized controlled trials are required to further validate these results.

Modern Antiplatelet Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. How to Make the Right Choice?

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the most important step in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment. The new generation of inhibitors of P2Y12 platelet receptors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) provide more pronounced platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. The drugs differ in pharmacodynamics and platelet reactivity tests due to different mechanisms of binding to P2Y12 receptors. The antiplatelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor provides clinical benefit and better prognosis in patients with various forms of ACS. In patients with ST-segment elevation ACS prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred over clopi-dogrel due to their higher efficacy and better clinical outcomes, and currently have preferential positions in guidelines compared to clopidogrel. The comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor (ISAR-REACT 5 trial) demonstrated superiority of prasugrel over ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation ACS, for whom an invasive evaluation is planned and in early invasive treatment non-ST-segment elevation ACS. The choice of a drug for dual antiplatelet therapy in various clinical situations remains controversial. The latest ESC guidelines on non-ST elevation ACS (2020) [1] demonstrate the possible preference for prasugrel in patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Current article demonstrates the results of recent clinical studies and the real clinical data regarding antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary interventions. The indications for the use of P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in certain groups of patients are outlined. Treatment selection of the most effective and safe drugs in patients with ACS is highlighted according to the updated European guidelines.

Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor or prasugrel is the mainstay of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to systematically perform a head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events and secondary outcome was bleeding events. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain the pooled estimate of each outcome.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs with a total number of 6990 patients (3550 treated with prasugrel and 3481 treated with ticagrelor) were included. No significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor was observed in terms of mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.13, P = 0.28), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.03, P = 0.10), non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.06, P = 0.11), stroke (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.72, P = 0.95), stent thrombosis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.21, P = 0.25), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) defined major (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.19 to 4.67, P = 0.94), minor (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.62, P = 0.18) and minimal (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.18, P = 0.11) bleeding and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined bleeding (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.36, P = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar cardiovascular outcomes and adverse bleeding events.

Ticagrelor reverses the mitochondrial dysfunction through preventing accumulated autophagosomes-dependent apoptosis and ER stress in insulin-resistant H9c2 myocytes

Ticagrelor, a P₂Y₁₂-receptor inhibitor, and a non-thienopyridine agent are used to treat diabetic patients via its effects on off-target mechanisms. However, the exact sub-cellular mechanisms by which ticagrelor exerts those effects remains to be elucidated. Accordingly, the present study aimed to examine whether ticagrelor influences directly the cardiomyocytes function under insulin resistance through affecting mitochondria-sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum (SER) cross-talk. Therefore, we analyzed the function and ultrastructure of mitochondria and SER in insulin resistance-mimicked (50-μM palmitic acid for 24-h) H9c2 cardiomyocytes in the presence or absence of ticagrelor (1-µM for 24-h). We found that ticagrelor treatment significantly prevented depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential and increases in reactive oxygen species with a marked increase in the ATP level in insulin-resistant H9c2 cells. Ticagrelor treatment also reversed the increases in the resting level of free Ca²⁺ and mRNA level of P₂Y₁₂ receptors as well as preserved ER stress and apoptosis in insulin-resistant H9c2 cells. Furthermore, we determined marked repression with ticagrelor treatment in the increased number of autophagosomes and degeneration of mitochondrion, including swelling and loss of crista besides recoveries in enlargement and irregularity seen in SER in insulin-resistant H9c2 cells. Moreover, ticagrelor treatment could prevent the altered mRNA levels of Becklin-1 and type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1), which are parallel to the preservation of ultrastructural ones. Our overall data demonstrated that ticagrelor can directly affect cardiomyocytes and provide marked protection against ER stress and dramatic induction of autophagosomes, and therefore, can alleviate the ER stress-induced oxidative stress increase and cell apoptosis during insulin resistance.