The Effect of Linagliptin versus Metformin Treatment-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The impact of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with other hypoglycemic agents.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA. Studies were identified by searching PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, WANGFANG DATA, VIP DATABASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to Dec 30, 2023. The main result was HRQOL scores. The outcomes were extracted using the mean difference (MD) from each study. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

Forty studies (4,579 participants) were included, with 32 pooled for meta-analysis. DPP-4 inhibitors alongside conventional treatment significantly enhanced HRQOL compared to conventional treatment alone (MD = 9.85, 95% CI [7.98-11.71], P < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 94%, P < 0.001), as assessed by SF-36 using a random-effects model. No additional benefit was found when measured by DTR-QOL using a fixed-effects model (MD = 2.29, 95% CI [-0.06-4.64], P = 0.06; heterogeneity, I2 = 49%, P = 0.1) and compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors. Subgroup analysis indicated that DPP-4 inhibitors favored patients ≥ 60 years old on medication for ≥ 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitors were superior for T2DM HRQOL improvement. More long-term, multicenter evidence is needed to generalize findings and compare them with newer hypoglycemic agents.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023440134.

Effect of DPP-4i inhibitors on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

About 20-40% patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) had an increased risk of developing diabetic nephropathy (DN). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) were recommended for treatment of T2DM, while the impact of DPP-4i on renal function remained unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of DPP-4i on renal parameter of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in T2DM.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. A fixed or random-effects model was used for quantitative synthesis according to the heterogeneity, which was assessed with I2 index. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed with standard methods, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were identified. Administration of DPP-4i produced no significant effect on eGFR (WMD, -0.92 mL/min/1.73m2, 95% CI, -2.04 to 0.19) in diabetic condition. DPP-4i produced a favorable effect on attenuating ACR (WMD, -2.76 mg/g, 95% CI, -5.23 to -0.29) in patients with T2DM. The pooled estimate was stable based on the sensitivity test. No publication bias was observed according to Begg's and Egger's tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with DPP-4i preserved the renal parameter of eGFR in diabetic condition. Available evidences suggested that administration of DPP-4i produced a favorable effect on attenuating ACR in patients with T2DM. INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE REGISTER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (PROSPERO) NUMBER: CRD.42020144642.

An exploratory clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes on maintenance hemodialysis

Background

Dulaglutide is a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide remain unclear in insulin-treated patients with T2DM on maintenance hemodialysis (HD).

Methods

Dulaglutide treatment was initiated, and the insulin dose was adjusted according to the needs of individual participants. Primary outcomes were changes in the mean and standard deviation (SD) of blood glucose (BG) levels and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for six days, glycated albumin (GA), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), pre-dialysis blood glucose levels, and daily total insulin dose from the baseline over 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were changes in treatment satisfaction and QOL levels from the baseline, measured by using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (DTR-QOL) scores.

Results

The analysis was performed on the 12 participants who completed the study. The GA level (median − 1.8 [interquartile range − 6.6, − 0.3] %; p = 0.026) and daily total insulin dose (− 15.0 [− 24.5, − 9.4] U/day; p = 0.002) significantly decreased without increasing hypoglycemia (area over the glucose curve < 70 mg/dL: 0.0 [− 0.2, 0.0] mg·24 h/dl; p = 0.917). Four patients successfully withdrew from insulin therapy. The levels of HbA1c, SD of BG, and MAGE showed a decreasing tendency, but no significant improvement. Regarding treatment satisfaction and QOL, the total scores of DTSQ (8.0 [0.3, 12.5]; p = 0.041) and DTR-QOL (15.5 [− 1.8, 42.0]; p = 0.023) significantly improved.

Conclusion

Dulaglutide may help improve glycemic control, treatment satisfaction, and QOL without increasing hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with T2DM on maintenance HD.

Trial registration This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) on October 11, 2016 (registration ID, UMIN000024283).

Effects of the Once-Weekly DPP4 Inhibitor Omarigliptin on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A 24-Week Open-Label, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are widely used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on maintenance hemodialysis (HD), but the efficacy of the once-weekly DPP4 inhibitor omarigliptin is not known.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority/superiority, once-daily DPP4 inhibitor linagliptin-controlled, multicenter study examined glycemic control and safety of omarigliptin (UMIN000024284). Sample size was calculated to confirm non-inferiority in terms of changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). We enrolled 33 patients with T2DM on maintenance HD who had been treated with linagliptin for at least 3 months. The patients were randomized to receive omarigliptin (12.5 mg/week; n = 16) or linagliptin (5 mg/day; n = 17). Primary endpoints were changes in HbA1c and glycoalbumin (GA) over 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Differences in the mean change in primary endpoint values between the omarigliptin and linagliptin groups were - 0.61% [- 1.14, - 0.09] for HbA1c, with a two-tailed upper 95% limit (i.e., one-tailed 97.5% upper limit) of 0.25%, below the non-inferiority limit, and - 1.67% [- 4.23, + 0.88] for GA, with a two-tailed upper 95% limit of 0.75%, above the non-inferiority limit. At 24 weeks, the omarigliptin group showed significantly greater reduction in HbA1c than the linagliptin group (- 0.2% ± 0.6% vs. 0.4% ± 0.8%, two-tailed p = 0.024) and significantly greater reduction in blood glucose after a single HD session (- 18.4 ± 31.4 mg/dL vs. 25.2 ± 59.5 mg/dL, respectively, two-tailed p = 0.019). No subjects in the omarigliptin group developed hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that omarigliptin was non-inferior to linagliptin in glycemic control. Omarigliptin is feasible for glycemic control in patients with T2DM on maintenance HD.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

UMIN000024284.

Benefit of Early Add-on of Linagliptin to Insulin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized-Controlled Open-Label Trial (TRUST2)

INTRODUCTION

This trial was conducted to assess the long-term safety, efficacy, and benefit of early add-on of linagliptin to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This trial enrolled 246 subjects. The subjects were randomized to the linagliptin group or the control group and were observed for 156 weeks. After week 16, subjects in the control group were also allowed to add linagliptin to evaluate the benefit of early add-on of linagliptin to insulin. The primary end point was a change in HbA1c from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included fasting plasma glucose, daily insulin dose, and frequency of adverse events.

RESULTS

HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels significantly decreased from baseline to week 16 in the linagliptin group compared with the control group. The significant improvement in HbA1c continued until week 52. The daily insulin dose significantly decreased in the linagliptin group compared with the control group. The frequency of hypoglycemia and adverse events was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Add-on of linagliptin to insulin was tolerated, improved glycemic control, and reduced the daily insulin dose. This study demonstrates the long-term safety, efficacy and benefit of early add-on of linagliptin to insulin in Japanese T2DM patients.

Effect of Orally Administered Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Diabetes-Related Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The PIONEER 10 Randomized, Active-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

In the randomized Peptide InnOvatioN for Early diabEtes tReatment (PIONEER) 10 trial, once-daily orally administered semaglutide-the first oral glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)-was similarly tolerated with comparable (at 7 mg) or better (at 14 mg) efficacy versus the injectable GLP-1RA dulaglutide 0.75 mg. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PIONEER 10 was assessed using the Japanese-specific Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life (DTR-QoL) questionnaire.

METHODS

The DTR-QoL comprises 29 questions, providing four domain and total scores. Answers were converted to a score between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating greater HRQoL. Two estimands were prespecified: treatment policy (regardless of treatment discontinuation or rescue medication use) and trial product (assuming on treatment without rescue medication) in all randomized patients. Outcomes were assessed at weeks 26 and 52.

RESULTS

Mean baseline DTR-QoL domain scores were similar between treatment arms and were generally lower (giving more scope for improvement) for "anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment" (62.1-65.3) and "satisfaction with treatment" (53.9-57.9) than "burden on social activities and daily activities" (76.5-77.7) and "hypoglycemia" (83.5-88.2). Using the treatment policy estimand, orally administered semaglutide 7 and 14 mg improved HRQoL versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg for the total score (estimated mean change from baseline [CfB] 7.3 and 8.1 vs 3.3; estimated treatment difference [ETD] 3.9 and 4.8) and the "anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment" domain (CfB 9.7 and 10.9 vs 3.7; ETD 6.0 and 7.2) at week 52. Orally administered semaglutide 14 mg improved the "satisfaction with treatment" domain versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (CFB 13.8 vs 5.7; ETD 8.1). DTR-QoL scores for orally administered semaglutide tended to be more durable (sustained over time) than for dulaglutide. Outcomes for the trial product estimand were similar.

CONCLUSION

Orally administered semaglutide 7 and 14 mg improved the patients' HRQoL measured by the Japanese-specific DTR-QoL instrument versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg at week 52.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03015220.