IDegLira Improves Glycemic Control in Japanese Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes on Premixed Insulin Therapy

Expert Opinion on Optimising Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Using Fixed-Ratio Combination of Basal Insulin and GLP-1 RA for Treatment Intensification and Simplification

The management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) often necessitates treatment intensification, and sometimes simplification to achieve glycaemic targets and mitigate complications. This expert opinion paper evaluates the use and positioning of the fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of basal insulin (BI) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in optimising T2D management. On the basis of the evidence presented and discussions, these FRCs offer a promising approach for both treatment intensification and simplification in people with suboptimal glucose control despite receiving various therapies. In treatment intensification, FRCs provide a synergistic effect by addressing multiple pathophysiological defects contributing to hyperglycaemia. These FRCs effectively control both fasting and postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions, offering significantly improved glycaemic control with a lower hypoglycaemia risk and weight neutrality compared to traditional or complex insulin regimens. Moreover, the reduced injection frequency (once daily) and flexibility in the dosing schedule (with any major meal of the day) help mitigate patient resistance to insulin initiation or titration. This further reduces treatment burden, facilitating treatment adherence and enhancing patient convenience. These key benefits of FRCs over complex insulin regimens play a crucial role in long-term glycaemic management and overall treatment outcomes. Hence, the timely use of FRCs in the treatment algorithm for people with T2D represents a valuable strategy for optimising glycaemic control, addressing treatment barriers and enhancing patient-reported outcomes.

Effectiveness of insulin degludec/liraglutide versus insulin degludec/insulin aspart in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of once-daily insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) to that of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) after switching from basal insulin therapy at 6 months by assessing changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, and insulin doses in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Materials and methods

A total of 91 patients with T2D with HbA1c levels exceeding 7.0% were included in this study. Adjusted least square mean changes in HbA1c, body weight, and total insulin doses were compared between the IDegLira group and IDegAsp group. Subgroup analyses were performed, stratified by median values of HbA1c (< 8.5 and ≥ 8.5%), obesity (body mass index < 25 and ≥ 25 kg/m2), and basal insulin doses (< 14 and ≥ 14 units) at baseline to assess treatment interaction by subgroup.

Results

The IDegLira group showed a greater reduction in HbA1c levels than the IDegAsp group (- 0.17 vs - 0.79%, p = 0.003) with comparable body weight changes. The analyses of adjusted mean changes of total insulin doses showed that the IDegAsp group had a larger increase than the IDegLira group (3.64 vs 1.30 unis, p = 0.016). The effect of IDegLira on HbA1c levels was superior to that of IDegAsp in patients with high HbA1c. There were no inter-group differences in the rate of hypoglycemic episodes.

Conclusions

Once-daily IDegLira had greater effects on HbA1c and a lesser increase in insulin doses than IDegAsp when patients are switched from basal insulin therapy. Moreover, the effect on HbA1c was enhanced in patients with high HbA1c levels at baseline.

Switching from Multiple Insulin Injections to a Fixed Combination of Degludec and Liraglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from the Simplify Study After 6 Months

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of switching from basal bolus insulin treatment (BBIT) to a fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had preserved insulin secretion but inadequate glucose control. The study also aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing this therapeutic approach in common clinical practice settings.

METHODS

This was a non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study involving 234 patients with T2DM who were receiving BBIT. Inclusion criteria were duration of diabetes mellitus > 60 months, stable total daily dose of insulin (TDDI) ranging from > 20 to < 70 IU/day (approx. > 0.3 to < 0.7 IU/kg body weight/day), C-peptide levels > 10% above the lower limit, HbA1c levels > 7% and < 10% (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial), and body mass index > 25 kg/m². The primary endpoints were changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight at week 28 after treatment switching. Secondary endpoints included changes in the 7-point glycemic profile, hypoglycemia frequency, blood pressure, blood lipids, liver enzymes, insulin dose, and a patient questionnaire focusing on treatment satisfaction, concerns and impact on daily activities. A subgroup of 55 patients underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with the evaluation of CGM-derived parameters, such as time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), hypoglycemia, and glucose variability.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in HbA1c (8.6% vs. 7.6%; p < 0.0001) and body weight (97.8 vs. 94.0 kg; p < 0.0001) was observed at week 28 after treatment switching. Significant improvements were also seen in all measurements of the 7-point glycemic profile (p < 0.0001), reduction in the number of hypoglycemia episodes per patient, and the proportion of patients with at least one hypoglycemia event (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in daily insulin dose (55.6 vs. 32.7 IU/day; p < 0.0001), as well as improvements in blood pressure, blood lipids, and liver enzymes (gamma glutamyl transferase and alanine aminotransferase). The subgroup of patients who underwent CGM showed a significant increase in TIR (57.9% vs. 69.0%; p < 0.01) and a decrease in TAR (40.1% vs. 28.8%; p < 0.01), while TBR, hypoglycemia (number of episodes per patient and proportion of patients), and glucose variability did not change significantly.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that switching from BBIT to IDegLira in patients with T2DM and preserved insulin secretion can simplify treatment without compromising glycemic control. The switch to IDegLira was associated with significant improvements in various glucose control parameters, including HbA1c, glycemic profile, hypoglycemia, insulin doses, and CGM-derived parameters TIR and TAR. Additionally, it led to significant reductions in body weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, and liver enzyme levels. Switching to IDegLira may be considered a safe and beneficial approach in clinical practice settings, offering metabolic and individual advantages.

One-year safety and efficacy results of insulin treatment simplification with IDegLira in type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the sustained safety and efficacy of insulin treatment simplification with IDegLira in patients with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c ≤ 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) during a 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

Seventy-two adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c ≤ 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) participated in the trial (age 63.8 ± 9.5 years, HbA1c 6.4 ± 0.7%, [46 ± 8 mmol/mol] body weight 92.95 ± 18.83 kg, total daily insulin dose: 43.21 ± 10.80 units; mean ± SD). Previous insulins were stopped, and once daily IDegLira was started. IDegLira was titrated by the patients to achieve a self-measured prebreakfast plasma glucose concentration of ≥5 mmol/L to ≤6 mmol/L.

RESULTS

After 12 months, good glycaemic control was maintained, while body weight decreased significantly. Mean HbA1c changed to 6.2 ± 0.8% (44 ± 9 mmol/mol) (p = .109) and body weight changed by -3.89 kg to 89.06 ± 18.61 kg (p < .0001). The simplified treatment was safe and well-tolerated. Percentage of patients experiencing at least one episode of hypoglycaemia was 49% during the month before simplification and 17% during the last 3 months of the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin treatment simplification with IDegLira in selected patients with type 2 diabetes is safe, maintains adequate glycaemic control and is associated with weight loss over 12 months.

Transitioning from basal-bolus or premix insulin therapy to a combination of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in people with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Two fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are available for once-daily use in adults with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to review the clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of changing treatment from a basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen or a premix insulin to these combination treatments (fixed-ratio or loose) and provide expert opinion on the practicalities of making such a change.

METHODS

Relevant clinical and trial evidence and general review articles were identified through a literature review of ProQuest (comprising BIOSIS Previews®, Current Contents® Search, Embase® and MEDLINE®) for articles published between 2009 and 2021.

RESULTS

We identified nine articles reporting the results of FRCs, and seven articles reporting results of loose combinations of basal insulin and GLP-1RAs, in people who transitioned treatment from BBI or premix regimens. In most trials, combination treatment led to improved or equivalent glycaemic control, and a reduction in body weight or BMI, versus the original regimens. Some trials reported a reduction in total insulin dose. A few trials reported reduced or unchanged hypoglycaemia rates, or increased patient satisfaction, with combination therapy where these endpoints were examined. We provide guidance on transitioning of treatment and the patient types most likely to benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

In people not achieving glycaemic control with BBI or premix insulin regimens, an FRC or loose combination of basal insulin and GLP-1RA may improve control, decrease the risk of body weight gain or hypoglycaemia and reduce the complexity of treatment.

Titratable fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin plus a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist: A novel, simplified alternative to premix insulin for type 2 diabetes

Despite novel therapeutic options, many people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) do not achieve their HbA1c targets. Given the progressive nature of T2D, many individuals not controlled with oral therapy will require advancement to injectable therapy using either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), recently recommended as a first option, or traditionally a basal insulin. However, premix insulins remain frequently used, either as initial injectable therapy or as intensification from basal insulin. Premix insulin injections can potentially provide significant glycaemic improvements to basal insulin but at the expense of increased hypoglycaemia and weight gain and the need for multiple daily doses, which may affect treatment adherence. Real-world evidence suggests that glycaemic control often remains suboptimal with premix insulins. Fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of basal insulin and GLP-1 RAs provide a novel alternative to premix insulin for therapy intensification. While no direct comparisons between premix insulins and FRCs are available, results from meta-analyses suggest that FRCs may offer better HbA1c reductions, a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and less weight gain compared with premix insulin in a simplified treatment regimen. A head-to-head trial of T2D treatment intensification with premix insulin and a FRC of basal insulin plus a GLP-1 RA is currently in progress, which should help to clarify the outcomes for each treatment option. This review discusses the unmet needs of people with T2D treated with premix insulin and provides evidence supporting FRCs of basal insulin and GLP-1 RAs as an alternative treatment option.