Concomitant iGlarLixi and Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor Therapy in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: LixiLan-G Trial and Real-World Evidence Results

Safety and Effectiveness of Concomitant iGlarLixi and SGLT-2i Use in People with T2D During Ramadan Fasting: A SoliRam Study Sub-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work was to assess the safety and effectiveness of concomitant iGlarLixi and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) use in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who fasted during Ramadan.

METHODS

Of the 420 eligible participants from the SoliRam study, 174 were using SGLT-2i in addition to iGlarLixi and 246 were not using SGLT-2i, referred to as SGLT-2i user and non-user, respectively. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing ≥ 1 severe and/or symptomatic documented (< 70 mg/dl [< 3.9 mmol/l]) hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

More than 50% of participants in both groups were male. The mean weight, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were similar in both groups. Approximately half of participants in the SGLT-2i-user group and ~ 25% participants in the SGLT-2i-non-user group were on two oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs (OADs), whereas ~ 20% in the SGLT-2i-user group and ~ 1% of participants in the SGLT-2i-non-user group were on three OADs in addition to iGlarLixi. Around 35% and 55% of participants in the SGLT-2i-user and SGLT-2i-non-user groups, respectively, were taking concurrent sulphonylureas. About 97% of participants in both groups were able to fast for ≥ 25 days. The incidence of primary endpoint was low in both groups; SGLT-2i user: 0.6%, 4.2%, and 0.6% and SGLT-2i-non-user: 1.3%, 0.9% and 0% during pre-Ramadan, Ramadan, and post-Ramadan period, respectively. The incidence of severe and/or symptomatic documented (< 54 mg/dl [< 3.0 mmol/l]) hypoglycemia events was also low throughout the study, including during Ramadan. No severe hypoglycemia occurred during Ramadan in either group. Improvements in HbA1c and FPG, with a small reduction in weight, were observed from pre- to post-Ramadan in both groups. No serious adverse event was reported in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant iGlarLixi and SGLT-2i therapy with or without other OADs was demonstrated to be safe in adults with T2D during Ramadan fast, with a low risk of hypoglycemia and improvements in glycemic outcomes.

Consistent glycaemic efficacy and safety of concomitant use of iGlarLixi and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor therapy for type 2 diabetes: A patient-level pooled analysis of three randomised clinical trials

AIMS

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) with proven cardio- and reno-protective benefits are recommended in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and/or heart failure. This pooled analysis compared efficacy and safety outcomes of iGlarLixi with or without SGLT2is in people with T2D.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis evaluated outcomes in participants who were receiving an SGLT2i when initiating iGlarLixi (SGLT2i users) and those who were not (SGLT2i non-users) in a pooled dataset from three trials: LixiLan-G (advancing from a GLP-1 RA), SoliMix and LixiLan ONE CAN (advancing from basal insulin).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally similar between 219 users and 746 non-users. Least squares mean changes in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26 were similar for users (-1.2 % [95 % confidence intervals: -1.4 %, -1.1 %]) and non-users (-1.2 % [-1.2 %, -1.1 %]). Changes in body weight, fasting glucose and post-prandial glucose were similar between groups, as were hypoglycaemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled results from three studies of adults with T2D demonstrated that iGlarLixi provided similar clinically meaningful improvements in glycaemic control without increased hypoglycaemia risk, regardless of concomitant use of SGLT2is.

The Wedding Bells Sound Really Good! iGlarLixi Fixed-Ratio Combination in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review

iGlarLixi is a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. iGlarLixi has proven clinical benefits in terms of glycemia, weight control, and safety, defined by the risk of hypoglycemia. It simultaneously targets many pathophysiologic abnormalities which are at the root of type 2 diabetes and thus presents a complementary mode of action. Finally, it may also address diabetes treatment burden, and, by decreasing the complexity of treatment, it may improve patient adherence and persistence and fight against clinical inertia. This article reviews the results of major randomized controlled trials in people with type 2 diabetes that compared iGlarLixi to other therapeutic regimens, representing different intensification strategies, such as basal supported oral therapy, oral antidiabetic drugs, and a combination of the latter with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Moreover, as a supplement to randomized trials, data from real-world evidence have also been included.

Fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as a promising strategy for treating diabetes

The maintenance of appropriate glycemic control is important for the prevention of diabetic complications in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Numerous oral antidiabetic drugs are now clinically available, but in particular, the introduction of injection regimens using insulin and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)s represents promising step-up options for oral antidiabetic drug treatment. The recently licensed fixed-ratio combination (FRC) products, which comprise basal insulin and a GLP-1RA, have potent anti-hyperglycemic effects and reduce the undesirable side-effects of each component, such as body weight gain, hypoglycemia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Two FRCs-insulin degludec/Liraglutide and insulin glargine/Lixisenatide-are now clinically available and, to date, several phase II/III trials have been conducted in particular groups of subjects with T2D. However, their utility in real-world clinical settings is of interest for most clinicians. Recently reported real-world clinical trials of these two FRCs in various situations have demonstrated their efficacy regarding glycemic control and the quality of life of people with T2D. Their long-term safety and efficacy require confirmation, but a treatment strategy that includes an FRC may be compatible with the concept of “well-balanced” therapy in certain groups of patients with T2D who have inadequate glycemic control.

Use of iGlarLixi for Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Japanese Clinical Practice: SPARTA Japan, a Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Many individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) experience suboptimal glycemic control. Treatment intensification options include fixed-ratio combination products containing a basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, such as iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide). This study aimed to provide real-world evidence of the effect of iGlarLixi in Japanese clinical practice.

METHODS

SPARTA Japan was a non-comparative, observational study conducted at 27 institutions in Japan. Anonymized individual-level data from adults with T2D receiving iGlarLixi in routine clinical practice were retrospectively collected. The primary study objective was to assess the impact of iGlarLixi on the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 months' post-treatment initiation, with preplanned subanalyses to determine the influence of baseline characteristics. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included assessment of the proportion of individuals achieving HbA1c targets, change in body weight, and incidence and severity of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal events.

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 432 individuals, with data available at 6 months for 426. Of the 432 individuals, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 61.6 (12.8) years and the majority had a T2D duration of ≥ 10 years [mean (SD) 13.3 (10.4) years]. At 6 months, HbA1c had significantly decreased versus baseline ( -0.85%; P < 0.0001), with a greater decrease in those aged < 65 years, with a shorter duration of T2D and higher baseline HbA1c. A significant increase in the proportion of participants achieving age-specific HbA1c versus baseline was observed. Mean body weight decreased by 0.5 kg (P = 0.0034 versus baseline). There were few hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal events (in individuals with HbA1c data); no severe hypoglycemic events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this real-world study indicate that iGlarLixi may improve glycemic control without serious adverse events in Japanese individuals with T2D who have suboptimal glycemic control on current treatment regimens and switch to iGlarLixi.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR Trials Registry, UMIN000044126; registered 10 May 2021.

iGlarLixi versus basal plus Rapid-Acting insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin therapy: The SoliSimplify Real-World study

AIM

For people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on basal insulin (BI), guidelines recommend several treatment advancement options. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of once-daily iGlarLixi versus a multiple-injection BI + rapid acting insulin (RAI) regimen in adults with T2D advancing from BI therapy in real-world clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic medical records from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) database were analysed retrospectively using propensity score matching to compare therapy advancement with iGlarLixi or BI + RAI in US adults ≥18 years with T2D on BI who had ≥1 valid glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. The primary objective was non-inferiority of iGlarLixi to BI + RAI in HbA1c change from baseline to 6 months (margin 0.3%).

RESULTS

Propensity score matching generated cohorts with balanced baseline characteristics (N = 814 in each group). HbA1c reduction from baseline to 6 months with iGlarLixi was non-inferior to BI + RAI [mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.1 (-0.1, 0.2)%; one-sided p = .0032]. At 6 months, weight gain was significantly lower with iGlarLixi than with BI + RAI [-0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) kg; two-sided p = .0069]. Achievement of HbA1c <7% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain were similar between groups [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.15 (0.81, 1.63); p = .4280]. Hypoglycaemia was low in both groups, probably because of underreporting.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world clinical practice, glycaemic outcomes 6 months after treatment advancement from BI are similar for people with T2D using iGlarLixi versus BI + RAI, with iGlarLixi leading to less weight gain.