1
|
Li H, Duan X, Wu Z, Qin Y. Feasibility of laparoscopic enucleation for hemangioma in special hepatic segments. Front Surg 2023; 9:1111307. [PMID: 36733682 PMCID: PMC9887023 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1111307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aim This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic enucleation for liver hemangioma in special hepatic segments. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 58 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma at a single center from January 2016 to January 2022. Segments I, IVa, VII, and VIII are defined as special hepatic segments, attributing to the bad visualization and adjacent to important vessels such as hepatic veins and inferior vena cava that lead to a high risk in laparoscopic surgery. Patients were categorized into a special location group (SLG) and a normal location group (NLG) according to the location of hemangioma. General data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.288), gender (p = 0.331), body mass index (p = 0.168), the maximum diameter of hemangioma (p = 0.330), ASA risk grading (p = 0.615), and comorbidities (p > 0.05) between the two groups. The operation time (p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), and intraoperative blood transfusion rate (p = 0.047) were significantly higher in the SLG. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was higher in the SLG, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.089). In addition, the exhaust time (p = 0.03) and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.01) were significantly shorter in the NLG. The postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths. Conclusion Laparoscopic enucleation of hemangioma in special hepatic segments is difficult and has a critical risk of massive bleeding during surgery. Meanwhile, it is also safe, feasible, and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huixing Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuhong Duan
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenyu Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China,Correspondence: Zhenyu Wu
| | - Yugang Qin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang DM, Chen YF, Chen HY, Chiu CC, Lee KT, Wang JJ, Sun DP, Lee HH, Shiu YT, Chen IT, Shi HY. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting in 5-Year Quality-of-Life Comparison among Three Surgical Procedures for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010252. [PMID: 36612245 PMCID: PMC9818414 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This prospective longitudinal cohort study analyzed long-term changes in individual subscales of quality-of-life (QOL) measures and explored whether these changes were related to effective QOL predictors after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery. All 520 HCC patients in this study had completed QOL surveys before surgery and at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare the 5-year QOL among the three HCC surgical procedures. The QOL was significantly (p < 0.05) improved at 6 months after HCC surgery but plateaued at 2−5 years after surgery. In postoperative surveys, the effect size was largest in the nausea and vomiting subscales in patients who had received robotic surgery, and the effect size was smallest in the dyspnea subscale in patients who had received open surgery. It revealed the following explanatory variables for postoperative QOL: surgical procedure type, gender, age, hepatitis C, smoking, tumor stage, postoperative recurrence, and preoperative QOL. The comparisons revealed that, when evaluating QOL after HCC surgery, several factors other than the surgery itself should be considered. The analysis results also implied that postoperative quality of life might depend not only on the success of the surgical procedure, but also on preoperative quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Der-Ming Chang
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yuan’s General Hospital, Kaohsiung 80249, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Fu Chen
- Department of Clinical Education & Research, Yuan’s General Hospital, Kaohsiung 80249, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Yaw Chen
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yuan’s General Hospital, Kaohsiung 80249, Taiwan
| | - Chong-Chi Chiu
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education and Research, E-Da Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
| | - King-Teh Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Jhi-Joung Wang
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ding-Ping Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan 71710, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Hsien Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Tsz Shiu
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - I-Te Chen
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (I.-T.C.); (H.-Y.S.); Tel.: +886-7-3121101 (ext. 2648) (H.-Y.S.)
| | - Hon-Yi Shi
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (I.-T.C.); (H.-Y.S.); Tel.: +886-7-3121101 (ext. 2648) (H.-Y.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ceccarelli G, Rocca A, De Rosa M, Fontani A, Ermili F, Andolfi E, Bugiantella W, Levi Sandri GB. Minimally invasive robotic-assisted combined colorectal and liver excision surgery: feasibility, safety and surgical technique in a pilot series. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1015-1022. [PMID: 33830484 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01009-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Different strategies may be adopted in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (LM). The role of laparoscopy has been investigated to define the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in a single-stage operation. In our study, we report our experience of 28 Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted combined Colorectal and Liver Excision Surgery (MIRACLES). From October 2012 to December 2019, 135 Robotic liver resections and 218 Robotic Colorectal resections were performed in our center. Twenty-eight patients underwent MIRACLES resection with 37 nodules removed. Fifty-two lesions in 28 patients were resected in minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery. Eighteen lesions were located in postero-superior liver segments (eight in segment VII, two in segment VIII, eight in segment IVa). Nine right colectomies, seven left colectomies, ten anterior rectal resections, one Hartmann and one MILES procedures were performed. The median surgical time of MIRACLES procedures was 332 min. Two conversions to open approach were necessary. Four major complications (> III) were observed. No postoperative mortality was recorded. The median hospital stay was 8 days. The median overall survival was 27.5 months. The MIRACLES approach is feasible and safe for colorectal resection and hepatic nodules located in all segments, with a low rate of postoperative complications. Surgical technique is demanding and should be reserved, presently, to tertiary centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy. .,San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy.
| | - Aldo Rocca
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis, 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontani
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Fabio Ermili
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- San Donato Hospital, General and Robotic Surgery Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Polo Ospedaliero Interaziendale Trapianti (POIT), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ishinuki T, Ota S, Harada K, Tatsumi H, Harada K, Miyanishi K, Nagayama M, Takemasa I, Ohyanagi T, Hui TT, Mizuguchi T. Health-related quality of life in patients that have undergone liver resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2021; 9:88-100. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i1.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality after hepatectomy has decreased, and the quality of various surgical approaches to hepatectomy have been evaluated. Various assessments of quality of life (QOL) after hepatectomy have been developed and investigated in different clinical settings.
AIM To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine two clinical topics: Laparoscopic hepatectomy vs open hepatectomy, and preoperative QOL status vs postoperative QOL status.
METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE, including the Cochrane Library Central. The following inclusion criteria were set for inclusion in this meta-analysis: (1) Studies comparing preoperative QOL and postoperative QOL; and (2) Studies comparing QOL between laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy.
RESULTS A total of 8 articles were included in this meta-analysis. QOL was better after laparoscopic hepatectomy than after open hepatectomy.
CONCLUSION The outcomes of evaluations of QOL after hepatectomy can depend on the type of questionnaire used, the timing of the assessment, and the etiology of the hepatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Ishinuki
- Department of Nursing, Surgical Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Shigenori Ota
- Departments of Surgery, Surgical Science and Oncology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Kohei Harada
- Division of Radiology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Hiroomi Tatsumi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Keisuke Harada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Koji Miyanishi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Minoru Nagayama
- Departments of Surgery, Surgical Science and Oncology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Departments of Surgery, Surgical Science and Oncology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan
| | - Toshio Ohyanagi
- Department of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Center for Medical Education, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| | - Thomas T Hui
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94598, United States
| | - Toru Mizuguchi
- Department of Nursing, Surgical Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pesi B, Bencini L, Moraldi L, Tofani F, Batignani G, Bechi P, Farsi M, Annecchiarico M, Coratti A. Robotic Versus Open Liver Resection in Hepatocarcinoma: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:468-474. [PMID: 33480668 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive approaches are spreading in every field of surgery, including liver surgery. However, studies comparing robotic hepatectomy with the conventional open approach regarding oncologic outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed demographics characteristics, pathologic features, surgical, and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent robotic and conventional open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS No significant differences in demographics features, tumor size, tumor location, and type of liver resection were found. The morbidity rate was similar, 23% for the open group versus 17% of the robotic group (P=0.605). Perioperative data analysis showed a greater estimated blood loss in patients who underwent open resection, if compared with robotic group (P=0.003). R0 resection and disease-free resection margins showed no statistically significant differences. The 3-year disease-free survival of the robotic group was comparable with that of the open group (54% vs. 37%; P=0.592), as was the 3-year overall survival (87% vs. 78%; P=0.203). CONCLUSIONS The surgical and the oncological outcomes seem to be comparable between minimally invasive and open hepatectomy. Robotic liver resections are effective, and do not compromise the oncological outcome, representing a reasonable alternative to the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetta Pesi
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| | - Lapo Bencini
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| | - Federica Tofani
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| | - Giacomo Batignani
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Bechi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Farsi
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| | - Mario Annecchiarico
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Surgical Management of Hepatic Benign Disease: Have the Number of Liver Resections Increased in the Era of Minimally Invasive Approach? Analysis from the I Go MILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) Registry. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:2233-2243. [PMID: 31506894 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04260-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased expertise with minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) could cause an unjustified extension of indications to resect liver benign disease (BD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the operative risk of MILS for BD and if implementation and diffusion of MILS have widened indications for BD resection. METHODS A prospective study including centers with > 6 MILS for BD, enrolled in the I Go MILS registry from January 2015 to October 2016. Cysts fenestrations were excluded. RESULTS Eight hundred eighteen MILS were performed in 15 centers. One hundred seventy-three of these (21.1%) were for BD: conversion rate was 6.9%, postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 0 and 13.9%. During the same period, 3713 liver resections (open + MILS) were performed and 407 (11.0%) were for BD. A time-trend analysis showed that the total number of MILS and the number of MILS for malignant disease significantly increased, but this increasing trend was not documented for the number of MILS for BD, which remained stable during the study period of time. This trend was confirmed for the overall rate of resected BD (open + MILS) that remained stable. DISCUSSION BD represents a valid indication for MILS. For BD, 21.1% of MILS was performed, rate significantly lower than that previously reported in Italy. Although an evident growth of the use of MILS was observed during the time period analysis in Italy, this trend did not correspond to an increased number of MILS for BD, and the overall rate of resected BD was comparable to that reported in previous large open series.
Collapse
|
7
|
Wabitsch S, Schulz P, Fröschle F, Kästner A, Fehrenbach U, Benzing C, Haber PK, Denecke T, Pratschke J, Fikatas P, Schmelzle M. Incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:1108-1115. [PMID: 32124059 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07475-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive techniques have been broadly introduced to liver surgery during the last couple of years. In this study, we aimed to report the incidence and potential risk factors for incisional hernia (IH) as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). METHODS All patients undergoing LLR between January 2014 and June 2017 were contacted for an outpatient hernia examination. In all eligible patients, photo documentation of the scar was performed and IH was evaluated by clinical examination and by ultrasound. Patients also completed a questionnaire to evaluate IH-specific symptoms and HRQoL. Obtained results were retrospectively analyzed with regard to patients' characteristics, perioperative outcomes and applied minimally invasive techniques, such as multi-incision laparoscopic liver surgery or hand-assisted/single-incision laparoscopic surgery (HALS/SILS). RESULTS Of 184 patients undergoing surgery, 161 (87.5%) met the inclusion criteria and 49 patients (26.6%) participated in this study. After a median time of 26 months (range 19-50 months) after surgery, we observed an overall incidence of IH of 12%. Five of 6 patients were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25) and 5 of 6 hernias were located at the umbilical site. Univariate analysis suggested the performance status at time of operation (ASA score ≥ 3; HR 5.616, 95% CI 1.012-31.157, p = 0.048) and the approach (HALS/SILS, HR 6.571, 95% CI 1.097-39.379, p = 0.039) as potential risk factors for IH. A higher frequency of hernia-related physical restrictions (HRR; p = 0.058) and a decreased physical functioning (p = 0.17) were noted in patients with IH; however, both being short of statistical significance. CONCLUSION Advantages of laparoscopic surgery with regard to low rates of IH can be translated to minimally invasive liver surgery. Even though there are low rates of IH, patients with poor performance status at the time of operation should be monitored closely. While patients' characteristics are hard to influence, it might be worth focusing on surgical factors such as the approach and the closure of the umbilical site to further minimize the rate of IH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Wabitsch
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Schulz
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Fröschle
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Kästner
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Benzing
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - P K Haber
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Denecke
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Pratschke
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Fikatas
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery,, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wee IJY, Syn N, Lee LS, Tan SS, Chiow AKH. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the quality of life after hepatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:177-186. [PMID: 32008917 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of life (QoL) after hepatic resection is a pertinent issue that has been poorly studied. The aim of this study was to compare changes in QoL before and after hepatic resection. METHODS A systematic review was performed using Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. Whenever possible, pooled mean differences of survey scores pre- and post-operatively were calculated. RESULTS 22 studies were included comprising a total of 1785 participants. Using the EORTC-QLQ 30C survey, patients with benign disease tend to have better QoL post-surgery than those with malignant disease. There were post-operative improvements in the following FACT-HEP domains: physical at 9 months (MD 3.14, 95%CI 2.70 to 3.58, P < 0.001), social and family at 3 (MD 1.45, 95%CI 0.12 to 2.77, p = 0.030), 6 (MD 1.12, 95%CI 0.21 to 2.04, p = 0.020), 9 (MD 0.66, 95%CI 0.03 to 1.28, p = 0.040), and 12 (MD 0.58, 95%CI 0.12 to 1.03, p = 0.010) months, emotional at 9 (P < 0.001) and 24 months (P < 0.001), hepatobiliary at 24 months (p < 0.001), and global health status at 9 months (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION QoL scores tend to deteriorate post-surgery, but recover to baseline in the long-term at 9-months. Patients with malignant disease, and those who underwent major hepatectomy, have poorer QoL scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J Y Wee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lip Seng Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Siong San Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Department of General Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tohme S, Sanin GD, Patel V, Bress K, Ahmed N, Krane A, Tsung A, Steel JL. Health-Related Quality of Life as a Prognostic Factor in Patients After Resection of Hepatic Malignancies. J Surg Res 2019; 245:257-264. [PMID: 31421371 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have argued health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures to be prognostic of survival in patients with chronic disease processes including cancer; however, only a few small studies have evaluated HRQoL changes in the setting of oncologic resections. The objectives of the present study were to investigate factors predicting HRQoL, the change in HRQoL over time, and HRQoL prognostic value in patients undergoing surgical resection of hepatic malignancies. METHODS We administered the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, and Brief Pain Inventory to 128 patients with primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies enrolled between January 2008 to November 2011 and November 2013 to June 2015. Quality of life was obtained at the baseline, 4, 8, and 12 mo, using HRQoL questionnaires. RESULTS The mean age of all patients included was 61 y, 42.6% had hepatocellular carcinoma, and 50.7% had metastatic colorectal carcinoma. HRQoL decreased from baseline at the 4-mo follow-up but stabilized to preoperative values at 8 and 12 mo. Depressive symptoms (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.032), and fatigue (P < 0.001) were associated with HRQoL before surgery. Variables associated with HRQoL at 8 mo included extrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.002), depressive symptoms (P < 0.001), pain (P < 0.001), fatigue (P < 0.001), tumor macrovascular (P = 0.011), and microvascular invasion (P = 0.003). Using Cox regression and adjusting for demographics and disease-specific factors, preoperative HRQoL was significantly associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS HRQoL is independently associated with survival in patients with liver malignancies undergoing surgical resection. Major curative liver surgery can be performed with short-term worsening of HRQoL but long-term improvement and stabilization in overall quality of life for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Tohme
- Department of Surgery, UPMC Presbyterian, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Gloria D Sanin
- Department of Surgery, UPMC Presbyterian, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vishaal Patel
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn Bress
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Naadia Ahmed
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Krane
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Allan Tsung
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer L Steel
- UPMC Liver Cancer Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Waaler Bjørnelv GM, Aghayan DL, Kazaryan AM, Barkhatov L, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Edwin B, Andersen MH. Quality of life from a randomized trial of laparoscopic or open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1372-1380. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Most treatments for cancer cause a decline in patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Limiting this decline is a universal goal for healthcare providers. Using minimally invasive instead of open surgical techniques might be one way to achieve this. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative HRQoL after open and laparoscopic liver resection.
Methods
This was a predefined substudy of an RCT comparing open with laparoscopic liver resection. Patients with colorectal liver metastases were assigned randomly to open or laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection. HRQoL was assessed with the Short Form 36 questionnaire at baseline, and 1 and 4 months after surgery.
Results
A total of 280 patients were randomized, of whom 273 underwent surgery (129 laparoscopic, 144 open); 682 questionnaires (83.3 per cent) were available for analysis. One month after surgery, patients in the laparoscopic surgery group reported reduced scores in two HRQoL domains (physical functioning and role physical), whereas those in the open surgery group reported reduced scores in five domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, vitality and social functioning). Four months after surgery, HRQoL scores in the laparoscopic group had returned to preoperative levels, whereas patients in the open group reported reduced scores for two domains (role physical and general health). The between-group difference was statistically significant in favour of laparoscopy for four domains after 1 month (role physical, bodily pain, vitality and social functioning) and for one domain after 4 months (role physical).
Conclusion
Patients assigned to laparoscopic liver surgery reported better postoperative HRQoL than those assigned to open liver surgery. For role limitations caused by physical health problems, patients in the laparoscopic group reported better scores up to 4 months after surgery. Registration number: NCT01516710 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Å A Fretland
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - V J Dagenborg
- Department of Tumour Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - G M Waaler Bjørnelv
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - D L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery 1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - A M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery, Fonna Hospital Trust, Stord, Norway
- Department of Faculty Surgery 2, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Surgery 1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - L Barkhatov
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - R Kristiansen
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Information Technology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M W Fagerland
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M H Andersen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rocca A, Andolfi E, Zamboli AGI, Surfaro G, Tafuri D, Costa G, Frezza B, Scricciolo M, Amato M, Bianco P, Brongo S, Ceccarelli G, Giuliani A, Amato B. Management of Complications of First Instance of Hepatic Trauma in a Liver Surgery Unit: Portal Vein Ligation as a Conservative Therapeutic Strategy. Open Med (Wars) 2019; 14:376-383. [PMID: 31157303 PMCID: PMC6534101 DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the National Trauma Data Bank, the liver, after the spleen, is the first most injured organ in closed abdominal trauma. METHODS From June 2010 to December 2015 we observed in our department of Hepato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit of the A.O.R.N. A. Cardarelli of Naples 40 patients affected by hepatic trauma. In our retrospective study, we review our experience and propose portal vein ligation (PVL) as a first - line strategy for damage control surgery (DCS) in liver trauma. RESULTS 26/40 patients (65%) which received gauze-packing represented our study group. In 10 cases out of 26 patients (38,4%) the abdominal packing was enough to control the damage. In 7 cases (18,4%) we performed a liver resection. In 7 cases, after de-packing, we adopted PVL to achieve DCS. Trans Arterial Embolization was chosen in 6 patients. 2 of them were discharged 14 days later without performing any other procedure.In 3 cases we had to perform a right epatectomy in second instance. Two hepatectomies were due to hemoperitoneum, and the other for coleperitoneum. Two patients were treated in first instance by only doing hemostasis on the bleeding site. We observed 6 patients in first instance. Five of them underwent surgery with hepatic resection and surgical hemostasis of the bleeding site. The other one underwent to conservative management. In summary we performed 15 hepatic resections, 8 of them were right hepatectomies, 1 left hepatectomy, 2 trisegmentectomies V-VI-VII. So in second instance we operated on 10 patients out of 34 (30%). CONCLUSIONS The improved knowledge of clinical physio-pathology and the improvement of diagnostic and instrumental techniques had a great impact on the prognosis of liver trauma. We think that a rigid diagnostic protocol should be applied as this allows timely pathological finding, and consists of three successive but perfectly integrated steps: 1) patient reception, in close collaboration with the resuscitator; 2) accurate but quick diagnostic framing 3) therapeutic decisional making. Selective portal vein ligation is a well-tolerated and safe manoeuvre, which could be effective, even if not definitive, in treating these subjects. That is why we believe that it can be a choice to keep in mind especially in post-depacking bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- Via Sergio Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy General Surgery Unit, Clinica Padre Pio, Mondragone (CE), Italy Department of Abdominal Oncology, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale, IRCCS, Naples, Italy
- Centre of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno (CE), Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | | | | | - Domenico Tafuri
- Department of Sport Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Surgical and Medical Department of Traslational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Frezza
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Marta Scricciolo
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Maurizio Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples. Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Bianco
- Centre of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturno (CE), Italy
| | - Sergio Brongo
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona University Hospital, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of general Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Transplantation, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, ‘A. Cardarelli’ Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples. Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu Q, Liu F, Ding J, Wei Y, Li B. Surgical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open approach for hepatic hemangioma: A propensity score matching analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e14485. [PMID: 30732219 PMCID: PMC6380717 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000014485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The main objective of the study was to compare the surgical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) of patients with hepatic hemangioma either by laparoscopic or open surgery using a propensity score analysis.We retrospectively reviewed patients with hepatic hemangioma undergoing laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) or open liver surgery (OLS) between January 2016 and December 2017. Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, and quality of life, according to Short Form-36 Healthy Survey (SF-36) questionnaire, were compared between groups. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) between the LLS and OLS groups.A total of 205 patients who involved in the analysis (80 LLS vs 125 OLS) were matched (1:1) by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, previous upper abdominal surgery, comorbidities, operation method, type of resection, tumor localization, size, and number. After PSM, 73 well-matched patients in each group were obtained. LLS was associated with significantly less blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay and fewer complications. The QOL scores weren't significantly different between the 2 groups, though the LLS group tended to be superior to the OLS group in terms of bodily pain (BP) and mental health (MH) at 3 months after surgery.In comparison with the conventional open approach, laparoscopic liver surgery for hepatic hemangioma appears to have improved short-term surgical outcomes and comparable QOL in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinqin Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital
| | - Jingjing Ding
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ceccarelli G, Andolfi E, Fontani A, Calise F, Rocca A, Giuliani A. Robot-assisted liver surgery in a general surgery unit with a "Referral Centre Hub&Spoke Learning Program". Early outcomes after our first 70 consecutive patients. MINERVA CHIR 2018; 73:460-468. [PMID: 29795060 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07651-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility and short-term outcomes of our first 70 consecutive patients treated by robotic-assisted liver resection after a reversal proctoring between a high HPB volume centre and our well-trained center in minimally invasive General Surgery. Six surgeons were involved in this Hub&Spoke learning program. METHODS From September 2012 to December 2016, 70 patients underwent robotic-assisted liver resections (RALR). We treated 18 patients affected by colorectal and gastric cancer with synchronous liver lesions suspected for metastases in a one-stage robotic-assisted procedure. For the first 20 procedures we had a tutor in the operatory room, who was present also in the next most difficult procedures. RESULTS The 30- and 90-day mortality rate was zero with an overall morbidity rate of 10.1%. Associated surgical procedures were performed in about 65,7% of patients. The observed conversion rate was 10%. The results of the first 20 cases were similar to the next 50 showing a shortned learning curve. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive robot-assisted liver resection is a safe technique; it allows overcoming many limits of conventional laparoscopy. This innovative, time-enduring Hub&Spoke may allow patients to undergo a proper standard of care also for complex surgical procedures, without the need of reaching referral centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graziano Ceccarelli
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.,Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, P.O. Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Department of General and Robotic Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Perugia, Italy
| | - Enrico Andolfi
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontani
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Unit of General and Robotic Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy - .,Unit of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, P.O. Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.,Department of Colorectal Cancer Surgery, G. Pascale Foundation and Institute for Research and Care, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Medicine and Health's Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Dramatic progresses had been made in the operation in the past 26 years. Procedure was extended to major liver resection, isolated resection of caudate lobe, living donor liver resection and associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Laparoscopic liver resection became a new group of HPB surgery and the international laparoscopic liver society was established in Paris followed by the first international congress of the society held in Paris in July 2017. This biannual congress would be top convention for surgeons specialized in laparoscopic liver surgery. The advantage of laparoscopic liver resection had been recognized by patients and surgeons and is gradually replacing conventional open liver resection in some experienced institutes worldwide. Most procedures, such as laparoscopic local resection and left lateral segmentectomy, could be routinely performed, but some procedures including laparoscopic hemihepatectomy still need to be further evaluated. For now, the establishment of a training system for laparoscopic liver surgeons became the most important issue for the popularization of laparoscopic liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu Z, Ding H, Xiong X, Huang Y. Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy was expected to be the standard for the treatment of left hepatic lobe lesions: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e9835. [PMID: 29443745 PMCID: PMC5839853 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000009835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy (LLLHS) has been widely accepted because of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. We aimed to assess the benefits and drawbacks of left lateral sectionectomy (of segments II/III) compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. METHODS Relevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline databases. We calculated odds ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for fixed-effects and random-effects models. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 14 trials involving 685 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between LLLHS and open LLHS (OLLHS) regarding analgesia (P = .31), pedicle clamping (P = .70), operative time (P = .54), hospital expenses (P = .64), postoperative alanine aminotransferase levels (P = .57), resection margin (95% CI -3.02-4.28; P = .73), or tumor recurrence (95% CI 0.51-3.05; P = .62). However, the LLLHS group showed significantly better results regarding blood transfusion (95% CI 0.14-0.73; P = .007), blood loss (95% CI -140.95 to -67.23; P <.001), total morbidity (95% CI 0.24-0.56; P <.01), and hospital stay (95% CI -3.84 to -2.31; P <.001) than the OLLHS group. CONCLUSION LLLHS has an advantage in the hospital stay, blood loss, and total morbidity. It is an ideal method for LLHS surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhou Liu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jiangxi Provincial Chest Hospital
| | - Haolong Ding
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital of Nanchang
| | - Xiaoli Xiong
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
| | - Yong Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. METHODS A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. RESULTS Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. DISCUSSION Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, increasingly sophisticated tools have allowed for more complex robotic surgery. Robotic hepatectomy, however, is still in its infancy. Our goals were to examine the adoption of robotic hepatectomy and to compare outcomes between open and robotic liver resections. METHODS The robotic hepatectomy experience of 64 patients was compared to a modern case-matched series of 64 open hepatectomy patients at the same center. Matching was according to benign/malignant diagnosis and number of segments resected. Patient data were obtained retrospectively. The main outcomes and measures were operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion rate (robotic to open), Pringle maneuver use, single non-anatomic wedge resection rate, resection margin size, complication rates (infectious, hepatic, pulmonary, cardiac), hospital stay length, ICU stay length, readmission rate, and 90-day mortality rate. RESULTS Sixty-four robotic hepatectomies were performed in 2010-2014. Forty-one percent were segmental and 34 % were wedge resections. There was a 6 % conversion rate, a 3 % 90-day mortality rate, and an 11 % morbidity rate. Compared to 64 matched patients who underwent open hepatectomy (2004-2012), there was a shorter median OR time (p = 0.02), lower median estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), and shorter median hospital stay (p < 0.001). Eleven of the robotic cases were isolated resections of tumors in segments 2, 7, and 8. CONCLUSIONS Robotic hepatectomy is safe and effective. Increasing experience in more centers will allow definition of which hepatectomies can be performed robotically, and will enable optimization of outcomes and prospective examination of the economic cost of each approach.
Collapse
|
18
|
Giuliani A, Bianco P, Guerra G, Rocca A, Calise F. Totally laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastasis located in Segment 7 in a patient with situs inversus totalis. J Surg Case Rep 2017; 2017:rjw243. [PMID: 28096324 PMCID: PMC5241714 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjw243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a congenital condition consisting of a mirror image of transposition of the abdominal and thoracic organs occurring in about 1:5000 to 1:10 000 adults. We report on a 60-year-old male with a single colorectal liver metastasis in the Segment 7. The patients underwent a totally laparoscopic sub-segmentectomy. Intraoperative approach on a reverse posterior segment was difficult because of left-sided position of the liver. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged after 5 days. To our knowledge, only a few cases of open liver resections in patients with SIT have been published. This is, therefore, the first case of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis in a patient with SIT. We provide the readers with useful tips to perform minimally invasive liver surgery in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Transplantation, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, 'A. Cardarelli' Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Bianco
- Department of Transplantation, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, 'A. Cardarelli' Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Germano Guerra
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Department of Transplantation, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, 'A. Cardarelli' Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- Centre of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castelvolturo (CE), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giuliani A, Amato B, Marsilia GM, Tafuri D, Ceriello A, Santaniello W, Sodano L, Rocca A. Our experience of liver Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: from a misdiagnosis to liver transplantation with long term follow-up. Open Med (Wars) 2015; 10:508-512. [PMID: 28352745 PMCID: PMC5368874 DOI: 10.1515/med-2015-0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant Hepatic Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an uncommon vascular tumor of intermediate malignant potential. HEHE is a rare tumor and it is difficult to diagnose for surgeons, hepatologists, radiologists and pathologists. So, misdiagnosis with a delay of the treatment is not uncommon. We describe a case of a young woman with a diagnosis of HEHE made 6 years after the first evidence of liver mass with a very long term follow-up after surgical treatment. She had two diagnoses of Hepatocellurar carcinoma (HCC) and a diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma after three different fine needle biopsies. After clinical observation, a new laparoscopic core biopsy was performed. In a first time approach, considering clinical and radiological patterns, a diagnosis of Budd-Chiari Syndrome was finally made. For that the patient underwent an orthotopicliver transplantation (OLTx). The surgical sample histological analysis allowed a definitive diagnosis of HEHE. At last, at follow up 7 years after three OLTx the patient is still alive and in good health with no evidence of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Giuliani
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation,"A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Tafuri
- Department of Sport Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Ceriello
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation,"A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Walter Santaniello
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation,"A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Loredana Sodano
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation,"A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Transplantation, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy , Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Calise F, Giuliani A, Sodano L, Crolla E, Bianco P, Rocca A, Ceriello A. Segmentectomy: is minimally invasive surgery going to change a liver dogma? Updates Surg 2015. [PMID: 26198383 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0318-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, the respective approach to hepatic resections (for malignant or benign liver lesions) is oriented toward minimal parenchymal resection. This surgical behavior is sustained by several observations that surgical margin width is not correlated with recurrence of malignancies. Parenchymal-sparing resection reduces morbidity without changing long-term results and allows the possibility of re-do liver resection in case of recurrence. Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is performed worldwide and is considered a standard of care for many surgical procedures. MILS is associated with less blood loss, less analgesic requirements, and shorter length of hospital with a better quality of life. One of the more frequent criticisms to MILS is that it represents a more challenging approach for anatomical segmentectomies and that in most cases a non-anatomical resection could be performed with thinner resection margins compared with open surgery. But even in the presence of reduced surgical margins, oncological results in the short- and long-term follow-up seem to be the same such as open surgery. The purpose of this review is to try to understand whether chasing at any cost laparoscopic anatomical segmentectomies is still necessary whereas non-anatomical resections, with a parenchymal-sparing behavior, are feasible and overall recommended also in a laparoscopic approach. The message coming from this review is that MILS is opening more and more new frontiers that are still need to be supported by further experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvio Calise
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, "Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Total abdominal approach for postero-superior segments (7, 8) in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentric experience. Updates Surg 2015; 67:169-75. [PMID: 26076916 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0305-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resections are frequently performed for peripheral lesions located in the antero-inferior segments. Resection of postero-superior segments is more demanding and dangerous than other segmentectomies, resulting in a longer operation time and increased blood loss. To reduce technical challenges, some authors advocated a modified surgical approach for these segments with the patient placed in the left lateral decubitus with the right arm suspended and suggested technical variations like the use of an additional intercostal trocar, the placement of one or two additional trans-thoracic trocars, a hand-assisted approach or a hybrid method with a median laparotomy. In the present series of 88 patients from four hepatobiliary centers with high volume of activity in Italy, a standard lithotomic position has been routinely used without the need for left lateral decubitus or semi-prone position and through abdominal wall without use of trans-thoracic trocars. This approach allows a more comfortable use of the Pringle maneuver that we used routinely in hepatic resection for PS segments; and, a very short time is needed for conversion, whenever it is required. In our series, laparoscopic resection of liver tumors located in the postero-superior segments of the liver with a total abdominal approach is technically feasible and safe with short-term results similar to other laparoscopic liver resections.
Collapse
|