A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Anorectal Manometry in Patients With Fecal Incontinence After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Cohort Study

Background

Fecal incontinence commonly occurs in patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. There is a paucity of manometric data in pouch patients. We aimed to better define manometric parameters in pouch patients with fecal incontinence.

Methods

We compared clinical and manometric variables in ulcerative colitis patients with pouch and fecal incontinence to ulcerative colitis patients with pouch without fecal incontinence and to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Manometric data for the 3 cohorts were compared to established normative data. An independent-samples t-test was performed for continuous variables, and chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of incontinence in pouch patients (P < .05).

Results

Among 26 pouch patients with fecal incontinence (73% female), 26 pouch patients without fecal incontinence (35% female), and 84 patients with fecal incontinence without ulcerative colitis (68% female), there were no differences in anorectal pressures between patients with fecal incontinence. Lower pressures were observed in pouch patients with fecal incontinence compared to those without fecal incontinence. Resting pressure was similar between pouch patients with fecal incontinence and healthy controls (60.9 ± 36.1 mmHg vs. 66.9 ± 3.2 mmHg, P = .40). Female sex (P = .019) and defecatory disorders (P = .033) each independently predicted fecal incontinence in pouch patients.

Conclusions

Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have lower anorectal pressures compared to pouch patients without incontinence, though have similar pressures to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have similar resting pressures as healthy controls. Distinct manometric normative values for pouch patients are needed.

Ileo-Anal Pouch Anastomosis and New Remedial Approaches for Ulcerative Colitis: A Review Article

Ulcerative colitis (UC) causes diffuse friability and superficial wall degeneration that is accompanied by bleeding. UC, now recognized as a global illness, affects millions of people globally. The most effective treatment for UC is Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA). Many medical experts and patients favor proctocolectomy with IPAA because it improves bowel function and allows feces to pass via the anus. Considering the most recent research, systematic reviews, statistical analysis, and recommendations, a selective literature search was carried out. The database used was PubMed. The current work provides a summary of surgical alternatives, results, and pre-and postoperative treatment for UC patients. In the course of their illness, about 30% of UC patients will need surgery. Due to its natural limitation to the colon and rectum, UC may mostly be treated surgically. The preferred surgical process is a restorative proctocolectomy with an IPAA. A 30% postoperative complication rate and a 0.1% death rate for this operation are both shown in large studies. One of the biggest things preventing UC from being successfully treated surgically is pouchitis. A long-run success rate of the pouch is >90% after 10 follow-ups, despite a significant surgical complication rate. For patients with UC to have the best possible outcome, extensive collaboration among the various specialties in the pre and postoperative context is crucial. In skilled centers, more than 90% of the total patients can eventually achieve a decent quality of life despite a 30% likelihood of early postoperative problems. UC patients may be cured with proctocolectomy, but there is a risk of morbidity that must be considered, especially in pediatric patients. As a result of advancements in our comprehension of the pathogenic mechanisms causing UC, new therapies have been proposed, the most significant change being the emergence of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medications.

Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this project was to create an up-to-date joint European clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence (FI), using the best available evidence. These guidelines are intended to help guide all medical professionals treating adult patients with FI (e.g., general practitioners, surgeons, gastroenterologists, other healthcare workers) and any patients who are interested in information regarding the diagnosis and management of FI.

METHODS

These guidelines have been created in cooperation with members from the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) and the European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology (ESPCG). These members made up the guideline development group (GDG). Additionally, a patient advisory board (PAB) was created to reflect and comment on the draft guidelines from a patient perspective. Relevant review questions were established by the GDG along with a set of outcomes most important for decision making. A systematic literature search was performed using these review questions and outcomes as a framework. For each predefined review question, the study or studies with the highest level of study design were included. If evidence of a higher-level study design was available, no lower level of evidence was sought or included. Data from the studies were extracted by two reviewers for each predefined important outcome within each review question. Where possible, forest plots were created. After summarising the results for each review question, a systematic quality assessment using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach was performed. For each review question, we assessed the quality of evidence for every predetermined important outcome. After evidence review and quality assessment were completed, recommendations could be formulated. The wording used for each recommendation was dependent on the level of quality of evidence. Lower levels of evidence resulted in weaker recommendations and higher levels of evidence resulted in stronger recommendations. Recommendations were discussed within the GDG to reach consensus.

RESULTS

These guidelines contain 45 recommendations on the classification, diagnosis and management of FI in adult patients.

CONCLUSION

These multidisciplinary European guidelines provide an up-to-date comprehensive evidence-based framework with recommendations on the diagnosis and management of adult patients who suffer from FI.

Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

Functional results after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are generally good. However, some patients suffer from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) may represent a therapeutic alternative in these patients, but little is known about indication and results. The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence after IPAA and demonstrate SNS feasibility in these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes patients who received a SNS between 1993 and 2020 for increased stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Proctocolectomy was performed in a two- or three-step approach with ileostomy closure as the last step. Demographic, follow-up data and functional results were obtained from the hospital database.

RESULTS

SNS was performed in 23 patients. Median follow-up time after SNS was 6.5 years (min. 4.2-max. 8.8). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The median time from ileostomy closure to SNS implantation was 6 years (min. 0.5-max. 14.5). Continence after SNS improved in 16 patients (69%) with a median St. Marks score for anal incontinence of 19 (min. 4-max. 22) before SNS compared to 4 (0-10) after SNS placement (p = 0.012). In seven patients, SNS therapy was not successful.

CONCLUSION

SNS implantation improves symptoms in over two-thirds of patients suffering from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA. Awareness of the beneficial effects of SNS should be increased in physicians involved in the management of these patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): ulcerative colitis

The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of ulcerative colitis management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve the quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.

Outcomes and Management of the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in the Elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment for patients undergoing colectomy to maintain intestinal continuity. Earlier studies have suggested that outcomes are worse in elderly patients who underwent IPAA. However, more recent reports have shown that IPAA outcomes in the elderly are comparable to younger patients. We review the recent medical literature regarding outcomes and treatments for common complications in elderly IPAA patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Compared to younger patients, IPAA in the elderly is not associated with increased major surgical complications, but is associated with increased length of stay and re-admission rate for dehydration in older patients. Rates of fecal incontinence after IPAA were similar between younger and older patients. Sacral nerve stimulation has shown early promise as a possible treatment for fecal incontinence after IPAA, but more research is needed. Pouchitis is a common complication, and antibiotics remain first-line treatment options. Other treatment options include mesalamines, steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics. The efficacy of newer biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab has been reported, but more data is needed. IPAA is safe in the elderly with high self-reported patient satisfaction. However, the elderly IPAA patient warrants special consideration regarding outcomes and management.