Esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula: a major issue after radical total gastrectomy

Nursing of a patient with multiple primary cancers: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Although the occurrence of multiple primary cancers (MPC) is not exceedingly common, it is not rare in clinical practice. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in its incidence. The frequent confusion between MPC and tumor metastasis or recurrence often leads to delays in diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to enhance understanding of MPC, improve diagnostic accuracy, guide precise clinical treatment, and implement a case management nursing model (CMNM) to facilitate quick patient recovery.

CASE SUMMARY

A 61-year-old female patient presented with persistent upper abdominal pain lasting over 2 months. Gastroscopy revealed the presence of both gastric and duodenal cancers. Following a thorough evaluation, the patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, cholecystectomy, and total gastrectomy. Post-surgery, an individualized case management nursing approach was applied, leading to a successful recovery. Three months after the surgery, follow-up examinations showed no signs of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The CMNM effectively promoted rapid patient recovery, enhanced the quality of orthopedic nursing services, and accelerated postoperative recovery, ultimately leading to increased patient satisfaction with nursing care.

Impact of anastomotic leakage on survival after surgery for gastric carcinoma: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The long-term survival of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastric cancer (GC) surgery is still debating. Our aim was to investigate the association between AL and survival of the patients following GC.

METHODS

We searched articles in databases from inception to July 2023 to retrieve literature related to postoperative AL and survival of GC patients. We evaluated the association of postoperative AL and survival of GC patients using the software STAT10.0.

RESULTS

Seven articles with 6209 GC patients were included. Our results showed that the postoperative AL were associated with pooled 1-year patient overall survival (OS) result in an odds ratio (OR) of 0.504 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.372-0.682; I2 = 84.1%; P = .000), pooled 3-year patient OS (OR = 0.467, 95% CI: 0.356-0.614; I2 = 85.3%; P = .000) and pooled 5-year patient OS (OR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.171-0.805; I2 = 82.5%; P = .012). The P value of Egger test were 0.759, 0.187, 0.175. The postoperative AL were associated with pooled 1-year patient disease-free survival (DFS) result in an OR of 0.538 (95% CI: 0.171-1.691; I2 = 89.0%; P = .289), the pooled 3-year patient DFS (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.119-1.431; I2 = 91.7%; P = .163), and the pooled 5-year patient DFS (OR = 0.344, 95% CI: 0.088-1.338; I2 = 91.0%; P = .124), and the P value of Egger test of pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS were 0.759, 0.247, 0.07.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative AL was correlated with a worse OS in GC patients, but not correlated with DFS in GC patients, but more studies are required to confirm this conclusion.

The three-tube method via precise interventional placement for esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula after gastrectomy: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage is a serious complication after total gastrectomy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of transnasal placement of drainage catheter, jejunal decompression tube, and jejunal nutrition tube under fluoroscopy for treatment of esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

This is retrospective review of patients with esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula treated with transnasal placement of abscess drainage catheter, decompression tube, and jejunal nutrition tube under fluoroscopy. Fistula healing time, patient survival, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status before and after treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in the study. Insertion of the transnasal abscess drainage catheter, decompression tube, and jejunal nutrition tube was successful on the first attempt in all patients, while 35 patients received transnasal abscess drainage, 13 received percutaneous abscess drainage, and 16 received transnasal drainage plus percutaneous abscess drainage. Immediately after placement of the tube, the mean volume of drainage was 180 mL (range, 10-850 mL); the amount steadily decreased from then on. The clinical success rate was 84.3% (54/64). Median time to fistula healing was 58 days (range, 7-357 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Transnasal insertion of transnasal abscess drainage catheter, jejunal decompression tube, and jejunal nutrition tube under fluoroscopy appears to be a simple, minimally invasive, effective, and safe method for treating esophagojejunal anastomotic fistula after gastrectomy.

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review is to identify patient-related, perioperative and technical risk factors for esophago-jejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases was performed. Studies providing factors predictive of EJAL by uni- and multivariate analysis or an estimate of association between EJAL and related risk factors were included. All studies were assessed for methodological quality, and a narrative synthesis of the results was performed. A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 42,489 patients who underwent gastrectomy with esophago-jejunal anastomosis. Age, BMI, impaired respiratory function, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), alcohol consumption, chronic renal failure, diabetes and mixed-type histology were identified as patient-related risk factors for EJAL at multivariate analysis. Likewise, among operative factors, laparoscopic approach, anastomosis type, additional organ resection, blood loss, intraoperative time and surgeon experience were found to be predictive factors for the development of EJAL. In clinical setting, we are able to identify several risk factors for EJAL. This can improve the recognition of higher-risk patients and their outcomes.

Differences in examination results of small anastomotic fistula after radical gastrectomy with afterward treatments: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gastrografin swallow, methylthioninium chloride test, and computed tomography (CT) are the main methods for postoperative anastomotic fistula detection. Correct selection and application of examinations and therapies are significant for the early diagnosis and treatment of small anastomotic fistulas after radical gastrectomy, which are conducive to postoperative recovery.

CASE SUMMARY

A 44-year-old woman underwent radical total gastrectomy for laparoscopic gastric cancer. The patient developed a fever after surgery. The methylthioninium chloride test and early CT suggested no anastomotic fistula, but gastrografin swallow and late CT showed the opposite result. The fistula was successfully closed using an endoscopic clip. The methylthioninium chloride test, gastrografin, and CT performed on different postoperative dates for small esophagojejunostomy fistulas are different. The size of the anastomotic fistula is an important factor for the success of endoscopic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The advantages and limitations of the diagnosis of different examinations of small esophagojejunostomy fistulas are noteworthy. The size of the leakage of the anastomosis is an important basis for selecting the repair method.

Computer tomography-guided negative pressure drainage treatment of intrathoracic esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage: A case report

BACKGROUND

Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) is a serious and potentially crucial complication of total gastrectomy and represents the major cause of postoperative death, with a mortality rate of up to 50%. However, treatment remains challenging and controversial. We report here the case of a patient whose intrathoracic EJAL was successfully treated with computer tomography (CT)-guided negative pressure drainage treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 69-year-old male patient complained of difficulty swallowing within the last six months. He was diagnosed with esophagogastric junction carcinoma, Siewert II, cT3N0M0 stage II. Total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy were performed. High fever, left chest pain and dyspnea appeared on postoperative day 5, and EJAL was confirmed by CT, gastroscopy and oral blue-dimethylene tests. Conservative treatment measures were applied immediately, including antibiotics, nasojejunal tubes, and repeated thoracic puncture and drainage under ultrasound guidance. However, without sufficient and effective drainage, the thoracic infection and systemic condition continued to deteriorate. With the cooperation of multiple departments, percutaneous CT-guided drainage (24 Fr 7 mm) in the thoracic cavity was successfully placed near the anastomotic leakage. Because of continuous negative pressure suction, the infection symptoms were effectively controlled and the general situation gradually recovered. Subsequent follow-up examination showed that the patient was in good condition.

CONCLUSION

Negative pressure drainage via CT may represent an effective minimally invasive approach to treating intrathoracic EJAL.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been recognized as one of the most serious public health crises. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of the pandemic on the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer (GC) in addition to their clinicopathological characteristics. We also verified adherence to the COVID-19 screening protocol adopted in the institution.

METHODS

All patients with GC who underwent surgical treatment between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups according to the time period: control group (2015-2019) and COVID group (2020-2021). The institutional protocol recommends that patients referred for surgery undergo RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were classified into the COVID group and 535 into the control group. The number of surgical procedures performed in the control group was 107 (SD±23.8) per year. Diagnostic procedures (p=0.005), preoperative chemotherapy (p<0.001), and adenocarcinomas without Lauren's subtype (p=0.009) were more frequent in the COVID group than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the pathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of curative GC between the two groups. Evaluation of protocol compliance showed that of 83 patients with GC in the COVID group, 19 (22.9%) were not tested for COVID-19 before surgery. Two patients tested positive for COVID-19 (one preoperative and one postoperative).

CONCLUSION

A decrease in the average number of surgeries and a higher frequency of diagnostic procedures occurred during the pandemic than in the previous time period. Tumor/node/metastasis classification, morbidity rates, and mortality rates in patients with GC during the pandemic did not differ from those in the previous time period. Accordingly, GC surgical treatment with acceptable screening protocol compliance could be safely performed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 2): UPDATE ON TREATMENT

BACKGROUND

: The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer of the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association BGCA (Part 1) was recently published. On this occasion, countless specialists working in the treatment of this disease expressed their opinion in the face of the statements presented.

AIM

: To present the BGCA Guidelines (Part 2) regarding indications for surgical treatment, operative techniques, extension of resection and multimodal treatment.

METHODS

To formulate these guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each declaration present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases initially with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, multimodal treatment. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation.

RESULTS

: Of the 43 statements present in this study, 11 (25,6%) were classified with level of evidence A, 20 (46,5%) B and 12 (27,9%) C. Regarding the degree of recommendation, 18 (41,9%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e one (2,3%) 3.

CONCLUSION

: The guidelines complement of the guidelines presented here allows surgeons and oncologists who work to combat gastric cancer to offer the best possible treatment, according to the local conditions available.

Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC.

METHODS

54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected.

RESULTS

among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups.

CONCLUSION

despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered.