MRI of mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions: a new updated morphological approach for the differential diagnosis

Imaging of pancreatic serous cystadenoma and common imitators

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms are lesions comprised of cystic components that show different biological behaviors, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, imaging features, and malignant potential and management. Benign cystic neoplasms include serous cystic neoplasms (SCAs). Other pancreatic cystic lesions have malignant potential, such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms. SCAs can be divided into microcystic (classic appearance), honeycomb, oligocystic/macrocystic, and solid patterns based on imaging appearance. They are usually solitary but may be multiple in von Hippel-Lindau disease, which may depict disseminated involvement. The variable appearances of SCAs can mimic other types of pancreatic cystic lesions, and cross-sectional imaging plays an important role in their differential diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography has helped in improving diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic cystic lesions by guiding tissue sampling (biopsy) or cyst fluid analysis. Immunohistochemistry and newer techniques such as radiomics have shown improved performance for preoperatively discriminating SCAs and their mimickers.

Misdiagnosis of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and the challenge of mimicking lesions: imaging diagnosis and differentiation strategies

The rising prevalence of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), particularly intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPMNs), has been attributed to increased utilization of advanced imaging techniques. Incidental detection of PCLs is frequent in abdominal CT and MRI scans, with IPMNs representing a significant portion of these lesions. Surveillance of IPMNs is recommended due to their malignant potential; however, their overlapping imaging features with benign entities can lead to misdiagnosis, overtreatment, and overutilization of healthcare resources. This paper aims to highlight and differentiate lesions often mistaken for IPMNs, providing insight into their imaging characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and distinctive features while highlighting the incidence of wrong diagnosis for these lesions. These lesions include serous cystadenomas, cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, mucinous cystic neoplasms, lymphoepithelial cysts, duodenal diverticula, pancreatic schwannomas, chronic pancreatitis, retention cysts, intrapancreatic accessory spleens, pancreatic lipomas, choledochal cysts, and others. Utilizing various imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced CT, MRI, and EUS, alongside histological and molecular analyses, can aid in accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Understanding these mimicry scenarios is crucial to avoid unnecessary surveillance, interventions, and the burden they place on both patients and healthcare systems. Improved recognition of these lesions can lead to better patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Risk Assessment and Radiomics Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN)

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a very common incidental finding during patient radiological assessment. These lesions may progress from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and even pancreatic cancer. The IPMN progression risk grows with time, so discontinuation of surveillance is not recommended. It is very important to identify imaging features that suggest LGD of IPMNs, and thus, distinguish lesions that only require careful surveillance from those that need surgical resection. It is important to know the management guidelines and especially the indications for surgery, to be able to point out in the report the findings that suggest malignant degeneration. The imaging tools employed for diagnosis and risk assessment are Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with contrast medium. According to the latest European guidelines, MRI is the method of choice for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with IPMN since this tool has a highest sensitivity in detecting mural nodules and intra-cystic septa. It plays a key role in the diagnosis of worrisome features and high-risk stigmata, which are associated with IPMNs malignant degeneration. Nowadays, the main limit of diagnostic tools is the ability to identify the precursor of pancreatic cancer. In this context, increasing attention is being given to artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics analysis. However, these tools remain in an exploratory phase, considering the limitations of currently published studies. Key limits include noncompliance with AI best practices, radiomics workflow standardization, and clear reporting of study methodology, including segmentation and data balancing. In the radiological report it is useful to note the type of IPMN so as the morphological features, size, rate growth, wall, septa and mural nodules, on which the indications for surveillance and surgery are based. These features should be reported so as the surveillance time should be suggested according to guidelines.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions (PCLs)

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are a common incidental finding on cross-sectional imaging. Given the high signal to noise and contrast resolution, multi-parametric capability and lack of ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the non-invasive method of choice to predict cyst type, risk stratify the presence of neoplasia, and monitor changes during surveillance. In many patients with PCLs, the combination of MRI and the patient's history and demographics will suffice to stratify lesions and guide treatment decisions. In other patients, especially those with worrisome or high-risk features, a multimodal diagnostic approach that includes endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fluid analysis, digital pathomics, and/or molecular analysis is often necessary to decide on management options. The application of radiomics and artificial intelligence in MRI may improve the ability to non-invasively stratify PCLs and better guide treatment decisions. This review will summarize the evidence on the evolution of MRI for PCLs, the prevalence of PCLs using MRI, and the MRI features to diagnose specific PCL types and early malignancy. We will also describe topics such as the utility of gadolinium and secretin in MRIs of PCLs, the limitations of MRI for PCLs, and future directions.

Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Differential Diagnosis and Radiology Correlation

Although the probability of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) being detected is raising year by year, their differential diagnosis and individualized treatment are still a challenge in clinical work. PCNs are tumors containing cystic components with different biological behaviors, and their clinical manifestations, epidemiology, imaging features, and malignant risks are different. Some are benign [e.g., serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs)], with a barely possible that turning into malignant, while others display a low or higher malignant risk [e.g., solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs)]. PCN management should concentrate on preventing the progression of malignant tumors while preventing complications caused by unnecessary surgical intervention. Clinically, various advanced imaging equipment are usually combined to obtain a more reliable preoperative diagnosis. The challenge for clinicians and radiologists is how to accurately diagnose PCNs before surgery so that corresponding surgical methods and follow-up strategies can be developed or not, as appropriate. The objective of this review is to sum up the clinical features, imaging findings and management of the most common PCNs according to the classic literature and latest guidelines.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Malignancy: Assessment, Guidelines, and the Field Defect

The widespread use of high-spatial-resolution cross-sectional imaging has led to an increase in detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. These lesions are a diverse group, ranging from indolent and premalignant lesions to invasive cancers. The diagnosis of several of these lesions can be suggested on the basis of their imaging appearance, while many other lesions require follow-up imaging and/or aspiration. The smaller cystic lesions, often branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, have overlapping imaging characteristics that make diagnostic assessment of the natural history and malignancy risk confusing. Expert panels have developed societal guidelines, based on a consensus, for surveillance of these lesions. However, these guidelines are often inconsistent and are constantly evolving as additional scientific data are accumulated. Identification of features associated with increased risk of malignancy is important for proper management. The concept of field defect, whereby pancreatic adenocarcinoma develops at a site different from the site of the pancreatic cyst, adds to the complexity of screening guidelines. As a result of the differences in guidelines, key stakeholders (eg, radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons) must review and come to a consensus regarding which guideline, or combination of guidelines, to follow at their individual institutions. Standardized reporting and macros are helpful for ensuring the uniformity of interpretations. Radiologists play a critical role in the detection and characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions, in the follow-up recommendations for these lesions, and in the detection of associated cancer. An invited commentary by Zaheer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

MRI is useful to suggest and exclude malignancy in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of MRI in differentiating benign (b-MCN) and malignant (m-MCN) MCN. European guidelines suggest that certain mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas can be conservatively managed.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of consecutive patients with resected MCN. MRIs were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to the pathological results. The authors compared b-MCN (i.e., mucinous-cystadenoma comprising high-grade dysplasia (HGD)) and m-MCN (i.e., cystadenocarcinoma).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (62 women [98%]) with 63 MCN (6 m-MCN, 2 HGD) were included. m-MCN tumors had a tendency to be larger than b-MCN (median 86 [25-103] vs. 45 [17-130] mm, p = .055). The combination of signal heterogeneity on T2-weighted imaging, wall thickness ≥ 5 mm, the presence of mural nodules ≥ 9 mm, and enhancing septa had an area under the ROC curve of 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-1.00) for the diagnosis of m-MCN. A total of 24 (37%), 20 (32%), 10 (16%), 5 (8%), and 4 (6%) out of 63 MCNs showed 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 of these features, respectively. The corresponding rate of m-MCN was 0%, 0%, 10%, 20%, and 100%, respectively, with a good-to-excellent inter-reader agreement. Patterns with a high NPV for m-MCN included an absence of enhancing septa or walls (NPV 97% and 100%, respectively), wall thickness < 3 mm (NPV 100%), and no mural nodules (NPV 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of 4 imaging features suggests malignant MCN on MRI. On the other hand, visualization of a thin non-enhancing wall with no mural nodules suggests benign MCN.

KEY POINTS

• A heterogenous signal on T2-weighted MRI, a ≥ 5-mm-thick wall, mural nodules ≥ 9 mm, and/or enhancing septa suggest malignant MCNs. • A thin non-enhancing wall with no mural nodules suggests benign MCNs. • MRI should be performed in the pre-therapeutic evaluation of MCN to help determine the therapeutic strategy in these patients.