An Italian survey on the use of T-tube in liver transplantation: old habits die hard!

Risk factors and management of biliary stones after living donor liver transplant and its effect on graft outcome

Background

Bile stones are associated with numerous complications in liver transplant recipients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been proven to be safe and highly effective in dealing with most post-transplant biliary complications.

Objective

The objective of this study was to identify the possible risk factors for bile stone formation on top of biliary stricture, the effects of stones on graft outcomes, and their management.

Methods

This case–control study included 83 patients who underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and suffered from postoperative biliary stricture with or without stones. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 55) included patients with biliary strictures with no stones and group 2 (n = 28) included patients who developed stones on top of biliary strictures. Data about the recipient and donor characteristics, surgical technique, blood lipid profile, immunosuppressive drugs, post-transplant complications, and interventions were collected from the medical records.

Results

The frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (71.4% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.036). The body mass index (BMI) of the donors was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (25.17 ± 2.53 vs. 23.68 ± 2.63, p = 0.015). Episodes of acute rejection were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (21.4% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.027). The ERCP was sufficient in most of the cases (89.2%) to ensure biliary drainage. The identified independent risk factors for biliary stones included HCV, biliary drain, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level.

Conclusion

Positive HCV, biliary drain insertion, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level were independent risk factors for developing bile stones on top of biliary strictures. Biliary stones were associated with high episodes of acute graft rejection, and they could be successfully managed by the ERCP modality.

Outcome of liver transplantation with grafts from brain-dead donors treated with dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, with particular reference to elderly donors

Prompted by the utilization of extended criteria donors, dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (D-HOPE) was introduced in liver transplantation to improve preservation. When donors after neurological determination of death (DBD) are used, D-HOPE effect on graft outcomes is unclear. To assess D-HOPE value in this setting and to identify ideal scenarios for its use, data on primary adult liver transplant recipients from January 2014 to April 2021 were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting, comparing outcomes of D-HOPE-treated grafts (n = 121) with those preserved by static cold storage (n = 723). End-ischemic D-HOPE was systematically applied since November 2017 based on donor and recipient characteristics and transplant logistics. D-HOPE use was associated with a significant reduction of early allograft failure (OR: 0.24; 0.83; p = .024), grade ≥3 complications (OR: 0.57; p = .046), comprehensive complication index (-7.20 points; p = .003), and improved patient and graft survival. These results were confirmed in the subset of elderly donors (>75-year-old). Although D-HOPE did not reduce the incidence of biliary complications, its use was associated with a reduced severity of ischemic cholangiopathy. In conclusion, D-HOPE improves postoperative outcomes and reduces early allograft loss in extended criteria DBD grafts.

Re-thinking of T-tube use in whole liver transplantation: an analysis on the risk of delayed graft function

The liver–gut axis has been identified as crucial mediator of liver regeneration. Thus, the use of a T-tube in liver transplantation (LT), which interrupts the enterohepatic bile circulation, may potentially have a detrimental effect on the early allograft functional recovery. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 261 patients transplanted with a whole liver graft, with a duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, who did not develop any surgical complication within postoperative day 14. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was defined according to the criteria of Olthoff et al. (EAD-O), and graded according to the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) score. EAD-O developed in 24.7% of recipients and the median MEAF score was 4.0 [interquartile range 2.9–5.5]. Both MEAF and EAD predicted 90-day post-LT mortality. A T-tube was used in 49.4% of cases (n = 129). After a propensity score matching for donor age, cold and warm ischemia time, donor risk index, balance of risk score, Child–Pugh class C, and MELD score, the T-tube group showed a significantly higher prevalence of EAD-O and value of MEAF than the no-T-tube group (EAD-O: 29 [34.1%] vs 16 [19.0%], p = 0.027; MEAF 4.5 [3.5–5.7] vs 3.7 [2.9–5.0], p = 0.014). In conclusion, T-tube use in LT may be a risk factor for EAD and higher MEAF, irrespective of graft quality and severity of pre-LT liver disease.

Pediatric T-tube in adult liver transplantation: Technical refinements of insertion and removal

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of extended-criteria donor organs, the interest around T-tubes in liver transplantation (LT) was restored whilst concerns regarding T-tube-related complications persist.

AIM

To describe insertion and removal protocols implemented at our institution to safely use pediatric rubber 5-French T-tubes and subsequent outcomes in a consecutive series of adult patients.

METHODS

Data of consecutive adult LT patients from brain-dead donors, treated from March 2017 to December 2019, were collected (i.e., biliary complications, adverse events, treatment after T-Tube removal). Patients with upfront hepatico-jejunostomy, endoscopically removed T-tubes, those who died or received retransplantation before T-tube removal were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included in this study; T-tubes were removed 158 d (median; IQR 128-206 d) after LT. In four (5.6%) patients accidental T-tube removal occurred requiring monitoring only; in 68 (94.4%) patients Nelaton drain insertion was performed according to our protocol, resulting in 18 (25%) patients with a biliary output, subsequently removed after 2 d (median; IQR 1-4 d). Three (4%) patients required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to persistent Nelaton drain output. Three (4%) patients developed suspected biliary peritonitis, requiring ERCP with sphincterotomy and nasobiliary drain insertion (only one revealing contrast extravasation); no patient required percutaneous drainage or emergency surgery.

CONCLUSION

The use of pediatric rubber 5-French T-tubes in LT proved safe in our series after insertion and removal procedure refinements.

Usefulness of T-Tube in Liver Transplantation: Still Effective or Outmoded Strategy?

Introduction: T-tube placement during liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of T-tube after LT in two cohorts differing in post-transplant risk. Methods: A total of 327 LTs performed between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. LTs from donation after circulatory death and living donation, split-liver transplants, and LTs with hepaticojejunostomy were excluded. T-tube was reserved for marginal grafts, high-risk recipients, and bile duct size discrepancy. A balance of risk (BAR) score of ≤9 defined the low-risk cohort (232 patients, 68 with and 164 without T-tube), while a BAR score of >9 defined the high-risk cohort (95 patients, 43 with and 52 without T-tube). Postoperative complications were estimated with the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Postoperative biliary complications were classified in anastomotic stricture (AS), non-anastomotic stricture (NAS), and biliary leakage (BL). Results: In the low-risk cohort, LTs with and without T-tube had similar rates of NAS (0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.36), AS (2.9 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.83), and BL (1.4 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.64). Analogous outcomes were found in the high-risk cohort: NAS (0 vs. 0), AS (0 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.11), and BL (0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.27). There were more postoperative complications among patients with T-tube, in both the low-risk (CCI 29 vs. 21, p < 0.001) and high-risk (CCI 51 vs. 29, p < 0.001) cohort. No differences in primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis, and mortality were observed. Conclusions: T-tube placement did not influence postoperative biliary complications. Although the two cohorts were normalized for post-transplant risk, LT recipients with T-tube had a more complicated course.