Dravet Syndrome: Novel Approaches for the Most Common Genetic Epilepsy

Genetic exploration of Dravet syndrome: two case report

BACKGROUND

Dravet syndrome is an infantile-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) characterized by drug resistance, intractable seizures, and developmental comorbidities. This article focuses on manifestations in two Indonesian children with Javanese ethnicity who experienced Dravet syndrome with an SCN1A gene mutation, presenting genetic analysis findings using next-generation sequencing.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case series involving two Indonesian children with Javanese ethnicity whom had their first febrile seizure at the age of 3 months, triggered after immunization. Both patients had global developmental delay and intractable seizures. We observed distinct genetic findings in both our cases. The first patient revealed heterozygous deletion mutation in three genes (TTC21B, SCN1A, and SCN9A). In our second patient, previously unreported mutation was discovered at canonical splice site upstream of exon 24 of the SCN1A gene. Our patient's outcomes improved after therapeutic evaluation based on mutation findings When comparing clinical manifestations in our first and second patients, we found that the more severe the genetic mutation discovered, the more severe the patient's clinical manifestations.

CONCLUSION

These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive genetic testing beyond SCN1A, providing valuable insights for personalized management and tailored therapeutic interventions in patients with Dravet syndrome. Our study underscores the potential of next-generation sequencing in advancing genotype-phenotype correlations and enhancing diagnostic precision for effective disease management.

Testing of putative antiseizure medications in a preclinical Dravet syndrome zebrafish model

Dravet syndrome is a severe genetic epilepsy primarily caused by de novo mutations in a voltage-activated sodium channel gene (SCN1A). Patients face life-threatening seizures that are largely resistant to available anti-seizure medications. Preclinical Dravet syndrome animal models are a valuable tool to identify candidate anti-seizure medications for these patients. Among these, scn1lab mutant zebrafish, exhibiting spontaneous seizure-like activity, are particularly amenable to large-scale drug screening. Thus far, we have screened more than 3000 drug candidates in scn1lab zebrafish mutants, identifying valproate, stiripentol, and fenfluramine e.g. Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, with clinical application in the Dravet syndrome population. Successful phenotypic screening in scn1lab mutant zebrafish is rigorous and consists of two stages: (i) a locomotion-based assay measuring high-velocity convulsive swim behaviour and (ii) an electrophysiology-based assay, using in vivo local field potential recordings, to quantify electrographic seizure-like events. Historically, nearly 90% of drug candidates fail during translation from preclinical models to the clinic. With such a high failure rate, it becomes necessary to address issues of replication and false positive identification. Leveraging our scn1lab zebrafish assays is one approach to address these problems. Here, we curated a list of nine anti-seizure drug candidates recently identified by other groups using preclinical Dravet syndrome models: 1-Ethyl-2-benzimidazolinone, AA43279, chlorzoxazone, donepezil, lisuride, mifepristone, pargyline, soticlestat and vorinostat. First-stage locomotion-based assays in scn1lab mutant zebrafish identified only 1-Ethyl-2-benzimidazolinone, chlorzoxazone and lisuride. However, second-stage local field potential recording assays did not show significant suppression of spontaneous electrographic seizure activity for any of the nine anti-seizure drug candidates. Surprisingly, soticlestat induced frank electrographic seizure-like discharges in wild-type control zebrafish. Taken together, our results failed to replicate clear anti-seizure efficacy for these drug candidates highlighting a necessity for strict scientific standards in preclinical identification of anti-seizure medications.

Antisense oligonucleotides restore excitability, GABA signalling and sodium current density in a Dravet syndrome model

Dravet syndrome is an intractable developmental and epileptic encephalopathy caused by de novo variants in SCN1A resulting in haploinsufficiency of the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1. We showed previously that administration of the antisense oligonucleotide STK-001, also called ASO-22, generated using targeted augmentation of nuclear gene output technology to prevent inclusion of the nonsense-mediated decay, or poison, exon 20N in human SCN1A, increased productive Scn1a transcript and Nav1.1 expression and reduced the incidence of electrographic seizures and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Here, we investigated the mechanism of action of ASO-84, a surrogate for ASO-22 that also targets splicing of SCN1A exon 20N, in Scn1a+/- Dravet syndrome mouse brain. Scn1a +/- Dravet syndrome and wild-type mice received a single intracerebroventricular injection of antisense oligonucleotide or vehicle at postnatal Day 2. We examined the electrophysiological properties of cortical pyramidal neurons and parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking interneurons in brain slices at postnatal Days 21-25 and measured sodium currents in parvalbumin-positive interneurons acutely dissociated from postnatal Day 21-25 brain slices. We show that, in untreated Dravet syndrome mice, intrinsic cortical pyramidal neuron excitability was unchanged while cortical parvalbumin-positive interneurons showed biphasic excitability with initial hyperexcitability followed by hypoexcitability and depolarization block. Dravet syndrome parvalbumin-positive interneuron sodium current density was decreased compared to wild-type. GABAergic signalling to cortical pyramidal neurons was reduced in Dravet syndrome mice, suggesting decreased GABA release from interneurons. ASO-84 treatment restored action potential firing, sodium current density and GABAergic signalling in Dravet syndrome parvalbumin-positive interneurons. Our work suggests that interneuron excitability is selectively affected by ASO-84. This new work provides critical insights into the mechanism of action of this antisense oligonucleotide and supports the potential of antisense oligonucleotide-mediated upregulation of Nav1.1 as a successful strategy to treat Dravet syndrome.

Targeted Molecular Strategies for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Emerging Lessons from Dravet Syndrome

Dravet syndrome is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy mostly caused by heterozygous mutation of the SCN1A gene encoding the voltage-gated sodium channel α subunit Nav1.1. Multiple seizure types, cognitive deterioration, behavioral disturbances, ataxia, and sudden unexpected death associated with epilepsy are a hallmark of the disease. Recently approved antiseizure medications such as fenfluramine and cannabidiol have been shown to reduce seizure burden. However, patients with Dravet syndrome are still medically refractory in the majority of cases, and there is a high demand for new therapies aiming to improve behavioral and cognitive outcome. Drug-repurposing approaches for SCN1A-related Dravet syndrome are currently under investigation (i.e., lorcaserin, clemizole, and ataluren). New therapeutic concepts also arise from the field of precision medicine by upregulating functional SCN1A or by activating Nav1.1. These include antisense nucleotides directed against the nonproductive transcript of SCN1A with the poison exon 20N and against an inhibitory noncoding antisense RNA of SCN1A. Gene therapy approaches such as adeno-associated virus-based upregulation of SCN1A using a transcriptional activator (ETX101) or CRISPR/dCas technologies show promising results in preclinical studies. Although these new treatment concepts still need further clinical research, they offer great potential for precise and disease modifying treatment of Dravet syndrome.

Transcranial static magnetic stimulation reduces seizures in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome

Dravet syndrome is a rare form of severe genetic epilepsy characterized by recurrent and long-lasting seizures. It appears around the first year of life, with a quick evolution toward an increase in the frequency of the seizures, accompanied by a delay in motor and cognitive development, and does not respond well to antiepileptic medication. Most patients carry a mutation in the gene SCN1A encoding the α subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1, resulting in hyperexcitability of neural circuits and seizure onset. In this work, we applied transcranial static magnetic stimulation (tSMS), a non-invasive, safe, easy-to-use and affordable neuromodulatory tool that reduces neural excitability in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. We demonstrate that tSMS dramatically reduced the number of crises. Furthermore, crises recorded in the presence of the tSMS were shorter and less intense than in the sham condition. Since tSMS has demonstrated its efficacy at reducing cortical excitability in humans without showing unwanted side effects, in an attempt to anticipate a possible use of tSMS for Dravet Syndrome patients, we performed a numerical simulation in which the magnetic field generated by the magnet was modeled to estimate the magnetic field intensity reached in the cerebral cortex, which could help to design stimulation strategies in these patients. Our results provide a proof of concept for nonpharmacological treatment of Dravet syndrome, which opens the door to the design of new protocols for treatment.

Testing of putative antiseizure drugs in a preclinical Dravet syndrome zebrafish model

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe genetic epilepsy primarily caused by de novo mutations in a voltage-activated sodium channel gene (SCN1A). Patients face life-threatening seizures that are largely resistant to available anti-seizure medications (ASM). Preclinical DS animal models are a valuable tool to identify candidate ASMs for these patients. Among these, scn1lab mutant zebrafish exhibiting spontaneous seizure-like activity are particularly amenable to large-scale drug screening. Prior screening in a scn1lab mutant zebrafish line generated using N-ethyl-Nnitrosourea (ENU) identified valproate, stiripentol, and fenfluramine e.g., Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs with clinical application in the DS population. Successful phenotypic screening in scn1lab mutant zebrafish consists of two stages: (i) a locomotion-based assay measuring high-velocity convulsive swim behavior and (ii) an electrophysiology-based assay, using in vivo local field potential (LFP) recordings, to quantify electrographic seizure-like events. Using this strategy more than 3000 drug candidates have been screened in scn1lab zebrafish mutants. Here, we curated a list of nine additional anti-seizure drug candidates recently identified in preclinical models: 1-EBIO, AA43279, chlorzoxazone, donepezil, lisuride, mifepristone, pargyline, soticlestat and vorinostat. First-stage locomotion-based assays in scn1lab mutant zebrafish identified only 1-EBIO, chlorzoxazone and lisuride. However, second-stage LFP recording assays did not show significant suppression of spontaneous electrographic seizure activity for any of the nine anti-seizure drug candidates. Surprisingly, soticlestat induced frank electrographic seizure-like discharges in wild-type control zebrafish. Taken together, our results failed to replicate clear anti-seizure efficacy for these drug candidates highlighting a necessity for strict scientific standards in preclinical identification of ASMs.

Intranasal Microemulsion as an Innovative and Promising Alternative to the Oral Route in Improving Stiripentol Brain Targeting

Stiripentol (STP) is a new-generation antiepileptic only available for oral administration. However, it is extremely unstable in acidic environments and undergoes gastrointestinal slow and incomplete dissolution. Thus, STP intranasal (IN) administration might overcome the high oral doses required to achieve therapeutic concentrations. An IN microemulsion and two variations were herein developed: the first contained a simpler external phase (FS6); the second one 0.25% of chitosan (FS6 + 0.25%CH); and the last 0.25% chitosan plus 1% albumin (FS6 + 0.25%CH + 1%BSA). STP pharmacokinetic profiles in mice were compared after IN (12.5 mg/kg), intravenous (12.5 mg/kg), and oral (100 mg/kg) administrations. All microemulsions homogeneously formed droplets with mean sizes ≤16 nm and pH between 5.5 and 6.2. Compared with oral route, IN FS6 resulted in a 37.4-fold and 110.6-fold increase of STP plasmatic and brain maximum concentrations, respectively. Eight hours after FS6 + 0.25%CH + 1%BSA administration, a second STP brain concentration peak was observed with STP targeting efficiency being 116.9% and direct-transport percentage 14.5%, suggesting that albumin may potentiate a direct STP brain transport. The relative systemic bioavailability was 947% (FS6), 893% (FS6 + 0.25%CH), and 1054% (FS6 + 0.25%CH + 1%BSA). Overall, STP IN administration using the developed microemulsions and significantly lower doses than those orally administrated might be a promising alternative to be clinically tested.

Epilepsy and Cognitive Impairment in Childhood and Adolescence: A Mini-Review

Managing epilepsy in people with an intellectual disability remains a therapeutic challenge and must take into account additional issues such as diagnostic difficulties and frequent drug resistance. Advances in genomic technologies improved our understanding of epilepsy and raised the possibility to develop patients-tailored treatments acting on the key molecular mechanisms involved in the development of the disease. In addition to conventional antiseizure medications (ASMs), ketogenic diet, hormone therapy and epilepsy surgery play an important role, especially in cases of drugresistance. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the mainfactors influencing cognition in children and adolescents with epilepsy and the main therapeutic options available for the epilepsies associated with intellectual disability.

Heat-induced seizures, premature mortality, and hyperactivity in a novel Scn1a nonsense model for Dravet syndrome

Dravet syndrome (Dravet) is a severe congenital developmental genetic epilepsy caused by de novo mutations in the SCN1A gene. Nonsense mutations are found in ∼20% of the patients, and the R613X mutation was identified in multiple patients. Here we characterized the epileptic and non-epileptic phenotypes of a novel preclinical Dravet mouse model harboring the R613X nonsense Scn1a mutation. Scn1a^WT/R613X mice, on a mixed C57BL/6J:129S1/SvImJ background, exhibited spontaneous seizures, susceptibility to heat-induced seizures, and premature mortality, recapitulating the core epileptic phenotypes of Dravet. In addition, these mice, available as an open-access model, demonstrated increased locomotor activity in the open-field test, modeling some non-epileptic Dravet-associated phenotypes. Conversely, Scn1a^WT/R613X mice, on the pure 129S1/SvImJ background, had a normal life span and were easy to breed. Homozygous Scn1a^R613X/R613X mice (pure 129S1/SvImJ background) died before P16. Our molecular analyses of hippocampal and cortical expression demonstrated that the premature stop codon induced by the R613X mutation reduced Scn1a mRNA and Na_V1.1 protein levels to ∼50% in heterozygous Scn1a^WT/R613X mice (on either genetic background), with marginal expression in homozygous Scn1a^R613X/R613X mice. Together, we introduce a novel Dravet model carrying the R613X Scn1a nonsense mutation that can be used to study the molecular and neuronal basis of Dravet, as well as the development of new therapies associated with SCN1A nonsense mutations in Dravet.

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics of SCN1A Associated Seizure Diseases

Although SCN1A variants result in a wide range of phenotypes, genotype-phenotype associations are not well established. We aimed to explore the phenotypic characteristics of SCN1A associated seizure diseases and establish genotype-phenotype correlations. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and results of genetic testing in 41 patients carrying SCN1A variants. Patients were divided into two groups based on their clinical manifestations: the Dravet Syndrome (DS) and non-DS groups. In the DS group, the age of seizure onset was significantly earlier and ranged from 3 to 11 months, with a median age of 6 months, than in the non-DS group, where it ranged from 7 months to 2 years, with a median age of 10 and a half months. In DS group, onset of seizures in 11 patients was febrile, in seven was afebrile, in two was febrile/afebrile and one patient developed fever post seizure. In the non-DS group, onset in all patients was febrile. While in the DS group, three patients had unilateral clonic seizures at onset, and the rest had generalized or secondary generalized seizures at onset, while in the non-DS group, all patients had generalized or secondary generalized seizures without unilateral clonic seizures. The duration of seizure in the DS group was significantly longer and ranged from 2 to 70 min (median, 20 min), than in the non-DS group where it ranged from 1 to 30 min (median, 5 min). Thirty-one patients harbored de novo variants, and nine patients had inherited variants. Localization of missense variants in the voltage sensor region (S4) or pore-forming region (S5–S6) was seen in seven of the 11 patients in the DS group and seven of the 17 patients in the non-DS group. The phenotypes of SCN1A-related seizure disease were diverse and spread over a continuous spectrum from mild to severe. The phenotypes demonstrate commonalities and individualistic differences and are not solely determined by variant location or type, but also due to functional changes, genetic modifiers as well as other known and unknown factors.

New Trends and Most Promising Therapeutic Strategies for Epilepsy Treatment

Background: Despite the wide availability of novel anti-seizure medications (ASMs), 30% of patients with epilepsy retain persistent seizures with a significant burden in comorbidity and an increased risk of premature death. This review aims to discuss the therapeutic strategies, both pharmacological and non-, which are currently in the pipeline.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened for experimental and clinical studies, meta-analysis, and structured reviews published between January 2018 and September 2021. The terms “epilepsy,” “treatment” or “therapy,” and “novel” were used to filter the results.

Conclusions: The common feature linking all the novel therapeutic approaches is the spasmodic rush toward precision medicine, aiming at holistically evaluating patients, and treating them accordingly as a whole. Toward this goal, different forms of intervention may be embraced, starting from the choice of the most suitable drug according to the type of epilepsy of an individual or expected adverse effects, to the outstanding field of gene therapy. Moreover, innovative insights come from in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the role of inflammation and stem cells in the brain. Further studies on both efficacy and safety are needed, with the challenge to mature evidence into reliable assets, ameliorating the symptoms of patients, and answering the challenges of this disease.