Neonatal cholestasis with ductal paucity and steatosis

Common misdiagnoses of biliary atresia

OBJECTIVES

Discrimination of biliary atresia (BA) from other causes of neonatal cholestasis (NC) is challenging. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological findings in cholestatic infants who were provisionally diagnosed with BA and then excluded by intraoperative cholangiography compared with those with a definitive diagnosis of BA and to shed light on common misdiagnoses of BA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of infants diagnosed preoperatively with BA and referred to surgery between the years 2009 and 2013. On the basis of intraoperative cholangiography results, infants were divided into those with a definitive diagnosis of BA and those misdiagnosed with BA.

RESULTS

Out of 147 infants, there was a misdiagnosis of BA in 10 (6.8%) infants. Alanine transaminase was significantly higher in the non-BA group, whereas other clinical and laboratory findings were comparable in both groups. Hepatomegaly and abnormal gallbladder in ultrasound, and ductular proliferation and advanced grades of portal fibrosis in liver biopsy were significantly higher in infants with BA. However, giant cells were more common in the non-BA infants. Nonetheless, the frequency of clay stool, hepatomegaly, abnormal gallbladder, ductular proliferation, and advanced portal fibrosis was remarkable (100, 70, 40, 70, and 50%, respectively) in the misdiagnosed infants. The misdiagnoses were idiopathic neonatal hepatitis, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3, cytomegalovirus hepatitis, Alagille syndrome, and a cholangitic form of congenital hepatic fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

A meticulous preoperative workup should be performed to exclude other causes of NC even if signs of BA are present, especially if features such as giant cells in histopathology are present. This involves completing the NC workup in parallel involving all common causes of NC rather than performing them in series to avoid loss of valuable time and efforts.

Design and validation of a diagnostic score for biliary atresia

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The dilemma of early diagnosis of biliary Atresia (BA), particularly distinguishing it from other causes of neonatal cholestasis is challenging. The aim was to design and validate a scoring system for early discrimination of BA from other causes of neonatal cholestasis.

METHODS

A twelve-point scoring system was proposed according to clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, and histopathological parameters. A total of 135 patients with neonatal cholestasis in two sets were recruited to design (n=60) and validate (n=75) a scoring system. Parameters with significant statistical difference between BA (n=30) and non-BA (n=30) patients in the design set were analyzed by logistic regression to predict the presence or absence of BA then a scoring system was designed and validated.

RESULTS

The total score ranged from 0 to 37.18 and a cut-off value of >23.927 could discriminate BA from other causes of neonatal cholestasis with sensitivity and specificity of 100% each. By applying this score in the validation set, the accuracy was 98.83% in predicting BA. The diagnosis of BA was proposed correctly in 100% and the diagnosis of non-BA was proposed correctly in 97.67% of patients. By applying this model, unnecessary intraoperative cholangiography would be avoided in non-BA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoring system accurately separates infants with BA and those with non-BA, rendering intraoperative cholangiography for confirming or excluding BA unnecessary in a substantial proportion of patients.