1
|
González Rodríguez C, Aparicio Hernández M, Alarcón Torres I. Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies. ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE 2021; 2:313-331. [PMID: 37362416 PMCID: PMC10197362 DOI: 10.1515/almed-2021-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Anti-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) antibodies in the clinical laboratory are intimately linked to the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the characteristics of the analytical methods and the properties of the antibodies themselves are heterogeneous. To review the definition and properties of anti-double-stranded anti-DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies, the adequacy of analytical methods, and the clinical requirements for this biomarker. Through PubMed we searched the existing literature with the terms anti-dsDNA, editorial, review, guideline, meta-analysis and SLE. The last search, anti-dsDNA and SLE restricted to the last two years. Information was expanded through related articles and those published in official state bodies related to anti-dsDNA and SLE. Clinical laboratory methods for anti-dsDNA analysis and their characteristics are analyze. The clinical utility of anti-dsDNA in its diagnostic, clinical association and follow-up aspects of SLE is reviewed. There is wide variability in analytical methods and deficits in standardization persist. They are part of the current SLE classification criteria and are used as markers in the follow-up of the disease. Their diagnostic usefulness improves when they are determined in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive patients. In follow-up, quantification is of interest, preferably with the same analytical method (given the deficits in standardization).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - MªBelén Aparicio Hernández
- Servicio Bioquímica Clínica y Análisis Cínicos, Complejo Asistencial Universitario Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bossuyt X, Cohen Tervaert JW, Arimura Y, Blockmans D, Flores-Suárez LF, Guillevin L, Hellmich B, Jayne D, Jennette JC, Kallenberg CGM, Moiseev S, Novikov P, Radice A, Savige JA, Sinico RA, Specks U, van Paassen P, Zhao MH, Rasmussen N, Damoiseaux J, Csernok E. Position paper: Revised 2017 international consensus on testing of ANCAs in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017; 13:683-692. [PMID: 28905856 DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are valuable laboratory markers used for the diagnosis of well-defined types of small-vessel vasculitis, including granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). According to the 1999 international consensus on ANCA testing, indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) should be used to screen for ANCAs, and samples containing ANCAs should then be tested by immunoassays for proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCAs and myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCAs. The distinction between PR3-ANCAs and MPO-ANCAs has important clinical and pathogenic implications. As dependable immunoassays for PR3-ANCAs and MPO-ANCAs have become broadly available, there is increasing international agreement that high-quality immunoassays are the preferred screening method for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis. The present Consensus Statement proposes that high-quality immunoassays can be used as the primary screening method for patients suspected of having the ANCA-associated vaculitides GPA and MPA without the categorical need for IIF, and presents and discusses evidence to support this recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Bossuyt
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Leuven and Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Yoshihiro Arimura
- Kichijoji Asahi Hospital, 11-30-12 Kichijoji Honcho, Musashino, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
| | - Daniel Blockmans
- Clinical Department of General Internal Medicine, Research Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Laboratory of Clinical Infectious and Inflammatory Disorders, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez
- Primary Systemic Vasculitides Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Calzada de Tlalpan 4502, Colonia Sección XVI, CP 14080, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Loïc Guillevin
- National Referral Centre for Necrotizing Vasculitides and Systemic Sclerosis, Université Paris Descartes, Hôpital Cochin, L'Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris 75014, France
| | - Bernhard Hellmich
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Immunology, Vasculitis-Centre Tübingen-Kirchheim, Medius Klinik Kirchheim, University of Tübingen, Eugenstrasse 3, 73230 Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany
| | - David Jayne
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK
| | - J Charles Jennette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, 160 Medical Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Cees G M Kallenberg
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, AA21, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Sergey Moiseev
- Clinic of Nephrology, Internal and Occupational Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Rossolimo, 11/5, Moscow 119435, Russia
| | - Pavel Novikov
- Clinic of Nephrology, Internal and Occupational Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Rossolimo, 11/5, Moscow 119435, Russia
| | - Antonella Radice
- Microbiology and Virology Institute, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Via Pio II 3, 20153 Milan, Italy
| | - Judith Anne Savige
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Health, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Melbourne VIC 3050, Australia
| | - Renato Alberto Sinico
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore, 48, 20900 Monza MB, Italy
| | - Ulrich Specks
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 200 First Street, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Pieter van Paassen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Nephrology and Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ming-Hui Zhao
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Peking-Tsinghua Centre for Life Sciences; 8 Xishiku Street, Xichengqu, Beijing Shi, China
| | - Niels Rasmussen
- Department of Autoimmunology and Biomarkers, Statens Seruminstitut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Jan Damoiseaux
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elena Csernok
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Immunology, Vasculitis-Centre Tübingen-Kirchheim, Medius Klinik Kirchheim, University of Tübingen, Eugenstrasse 3, 73230 Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zenit RA evaluation, a solid-phase chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of anti-cellular antibodies. Bioanalysis 2017; 9:435-445. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2016-0252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The objective was to compare Zenit RA chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) from Menarini Diagnostics and ELISA from INOVA Diagnostics for the presence of specific anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-U1snRNP, anti-Sm, anti-Scl-70, anti-Jo-1 antibodies. Results/methodology: We studied 501 samples (178 connective autoimmune disease, 150 other autoimmune or inflammatory disease and 173 other disease or healthy). All samples were analyzed using CLIA and ELISA. The Kappa agreement was excellent for anti-SSA/Ro (0.864), good for anti-SSB/La (0.735), anti-Scl-70 (0.685) and ENA-screening (0.778), moderate for anti-RNP (0.563) and bad for anti-Sm (0.266) and anti-Jo-1 (0.243). Different combination of cut-off improved the specificity and agreement. Conclusion: Zenit RA CLIA for detecting autoantibodies, provides a simple, useful and accurate tool.
Collapse
|