Anti-rods/rings autoantibody seropositivity does not affect response to telaprevir treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection

The relevance between anti-rods/rings antibody and different treatment regimens in chronic hepatitis C virus infection

The antibodies and other issues associated with immunity in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been widely investigated, especially non-organ-specific antinuclear antibodies. Rods-rings (RR) antibody patterns are frequently observed due to pegylated IFN-α (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) treatment by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). We evaluated the relevance between anti-RR and PEG-IFN/RBV and/or direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens in chronic HCV. Sampling was done after achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) for 178 patients (aged >18 years). Patients were grouped according to treatment protocols (Group 1 [G1]: PEG-IFN/RBV [n = 53], Group 2 [G2]: PEG-IFN/RBV and Telaprevir or Boceprevir [n = 31], Group 3 [G3]: second- and third-wave DAA and previously received PEG-IFN/RBV (n = 38), and Group 4 [G4]: second- and third-wave DAA [n = 56]). Anti-RR was investigated by IIF (Euroimmun AG) test. Overall, 27 (15.16%) patients were anti-RR positive and received PEG-IFN/RBV. The numbers of anti-RR positivity for G1/2/3/4 (%) were 16/3/8/0 (30.2/9.6/21/0), respectively (p < .001). The anti-RR positivity rate for G1/2/3 was 22.13% (27/122, p = .088). Anti-RR was positive in 17.5% (11/63) of G1/2/3 patients who did not achieve SVR after the first treatment. This rate was 27.1% (16/59) in patients with SVR after the first treatment in G1/2 and there was no difference between these two classified groups in terms of antibody titers (p = .915). Anti-RR was detected up to 172 months after SVR. In summary, anti-RR was positive in high rates in patients receiving PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. Frequent monitoring is needed during patient follow-up to get more data on the relationship between anti-RR titer, treatment regimens, and SVR.

Anti-rods/rings autoantibody and IMPDH filaments: an update after fifteen years of discovery

Autoantibodies to unknown subcellular rod and ring-shaped structures were first discovered in sera from hepatitis C patients in 2005. Early studies showed a strong association between these anti-rods/rings antibodies (anti-RR) and the standard of care interferon-α plus ribavirin combination therapy (IFN/RBV), suggesting that anti-RR are drug-induced autoantibodies. In the context of hepatitis C, anti-RR have been linked with relapse from or lack of response to IFN/RBV in some patient cohorts. However, examples of anti-RR in other diseases and healthy individuals have also been reported over the years, although anti-RR remains a rare autoantibody response in general. The advent of new direct-acting antiviral drugs for chronic hepatitis C and studies of anti-RR from different parts of the world are also beginning to change the perception of anti-RR. The nucleotide biosynthetic enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) has been identified as the major autoantigen recognized by anti-RR. Coincidentally, the assembly of IMPDH into micron-scale rod and ring-shaped structures was discovered around the same time as anti-RR. Knowledge of the fundamental biological properties and cellular functions of these structures, referred to as "IMPDH filaments" by cell biologists, has advanced in parallel to anti-RR antibodies. Recent studies have revealed that IMPDH filament assembly is a mechanism to prevent feedback inhibition of IMPDH and is therefore important for the increased nucleotide production required in hyperproliferating cells, like activated T cells. Fifteen years later, we review the history and current knowledge in both the anti-RR autoantibody and IMPDH filament fields. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Anti-rods/rings are recognized as an example of a drug-induced autoantibody in hepatitis C patients treated with interferon and ribavirin, although new studies suggest anti-rods/rings may be detected in other contexts and may depend on unknown environmental or genetic factors in different populations. Recent data suggest that the assembly of IMPDH into rod and ring structures, the targets of anti-rods/rings autoantibody, is a mechanism for hyperproliferating cells, like activated T cells, to maintain increased guanine nucleotide levels to support rapid cell division.

Anti-rod and ring antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C using direct-acting antivirals

Anti-rods and rings (anti-RR) antibody induction is related to the combination of interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. If the main factor leading to this autoimmune reaction is the combination of these drugs, is not well known, but in vitro studies shows that ribavirin alone can induce rods and rings structures. New direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) permit HCV treatment without needing interferon but may be associated with ribavirin in the most difficult-to-treat patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the occurrence of anti-RR in patients with chronic HCV infection, before and after 12 weeks of treatment with DAAs, with and without ribavirin. From Jun 2016 to Oct 2017, 52 HCV-infected patients were screened for anti-RR before and after DAA therapy, including sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, simeprevir, and ribavirin. Serum samples were analyzed using indirect immunofluorescence. The anti-RR was present in 11 (21%) of the 52 patients (51.9% male and mean age of 59.1 years) before using DAAs. All of them had been previously treated and previous exposed to interferon/ribavirin, with exposure time to ribavirin associated with the presence of anti-RR. After 12 weeks of DAA treatment, 3 patients (5.7%) developed the antibody in low titers, and two of them (66%) were interferon/ribavirin experienced. Only one of the 29 naïve patients (3.44%) developed anti-RR during the current treatment. Anti-RR was present in patients previously treated with interferon/ribavirin and can emerge after DAA treatment probably at a lower frequency than after interferon/ribavirin treatment.

Long-term persistence of anti-rods and rings antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C after antiviral treatment

Anti-rods and rings (anti-RR) antibodies are related to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). Only RBV induces rods/rings structures in vitro; but in vivo, the antibody appearance is related to the combination of these drugs, because data about patients using just one of these drugs alone is missing. Some studies suggest disappearance of these antibodies over time. The aim of this study was to describe the occurrence of anti-RR in patients with chronic hepatitis C treatment-naïve or previously PEG-IFN/RBV-experienced, evaluating the persistence of anti-RR antibodies long after PEG-IFN/RBV treatment. From 2016 to 2017, 70 HCV-infected patients were screened for anti-RR using indirect immunofluorescence. Demographic and clinical data about previous treatments against HCV were assessed. Thirty-four patients (49%) had been previously treated with PEG-IFN/RBV and the average time since they had received the last antiviral treatment was 85.4 months. Anti-RR seropositivity was detected in 16 patients (23%), and all of these had used PEG-IFN/RBV (corresponding to 47% of experienced patients). Previous antiviral treatment and previous exposure time to RBV were associated with anti-RR positivity. Median time elapsed since last treatment was similar between anti-RR-positive and anti-RR-negative patients. Anti-RR seropositivity was not observed in treatment-naïve patients, but was detected in almost half of patients previously treated with PEG-IFN and RBV, even after a long period without exposure to these drugs. This antibody was related to extended prior exposure to ribavirin.

Reference standards for the detection of anti-mitochondrial and anti-rods/rings autoantibodies

Background:

Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are found in >90% of primary biliary cholangitis patients. Anti-rods/rings antibodies (anti-RR) are most commonly associated with interferon-α and ribavirin treatment in hepatitis C patients. Clinical laboratories routinely screen for AMA and anti-RR using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2-IFA). Therefore, we sought to establish reference materials for use in AMA and anti-RR testing.

Methods:

AMA-positive and anti-RR-positive human plasma samples (AMA-REF and RR-REF), identified as potential reference materials based on preliminary data, were further validated by multiple laboratories using HEp-2-IFA, immunoprecipitation (IP), western blotting, IP-western, line immunoassay (LIA), addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results:

AMA-REF showed a strong positive cytoplasmic reticular/AMA staining pattern by HEp-2-IFA to ≥1:1280 dilution and positive signal on rodent kidney/stomach/liver tissue. AMA-REF reacted with E2/E3, E3BP, E1α and E1β subunits of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex by IP and western blotting and was positive for AMA antigens by LIA, ALBIA and ELISA. RR-REF showed a strong positive rods and rings staining pattern by HEp-2-IFA to ≥1:1280 dilution. RR-REF reacted with inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase by IP, IP-western and ALBIA. RR-REF also produced a nuclear homogenous staining pattern by HEp-2-IFA, immunoprecipitated proteins associated with anti-U1RNP antibody and reacted weakly with histones, nucleosomes, Sm and nRNP/Sm by LIA.

Conclusions:

AMA-REF and RR-REF are useful reference materials for academic or commercial clinical laboratories to calibrate and establish internal reference standards for immunodiagnostic assays. AMA-REF and RR-REF are now available for free distribution to qualified laboratories through Plasma Services Group.

Long-term antiviral hepatitis C treatment associated with Rods and Ring Cytoplasmic antibodies

Aim

Clinical description of a patient diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, which associated a rare anti-cytoplasmic pattern, known as “Rods and Ring”.

Method

Clinical case report.

Results

A 76-year old female patient with chronic hepatitis C virus infection under treatment for several months with pegylated Interferon-Ribavirin (started eight months ago) presented for clinical and biological evaluation of the therapeutic response.

Conclusion

This is the first reported clinical case of a patient with cytoplasmic filamentous rods and rings autoantibodies associated with chronic hepatis C from the Clinical Hospital IRGH Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The presence of these antibodies appears to be triggered by antiviral therapy. Although these are newly identified antibodies, they could be used as serological markers for detecting patients at risk of developing associated autoimmune pathologies or nonresponders to the antiviral therapy. Likewise, their detection could identify patients with occult hepatitis C infection.

Ribavirin induces widespread accumulation of IMP dehydrogenase into rods/rings structures in multiple major mouse organs

Ribavirin (RBV) is a guanosine analogue triazole most commonly used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Although its mechanism of action is a matter of debate, several possibilities have been proposed, including depletion of guanine nucleotides through inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). IMPDH has been shown to assemble into micron-scale rod- and ring-shaped structures (rods/rings or RR), also called "IMPDH filaments," both in vitro and in vivo. Formation of RR structures can occur naturally, potentially to influence IMPDH activity, or when de novo guanosine monophosphate biosynthesis or IMPDH itself are inhibited by nutrient deprivation or drugs like RBV. Numerous studies have also reported the occurrence of autoantibodies targeting RR structures (anti-RR) in HCV patients previously treated or under treatment with interferon-α and ribavirin (IFN/RBV) combination therapy. For this brief study, we considered the strong association between RR autoantibodies and IFN/RBV treatment, and the lack of data assessing how RBV affects RR formation in a variety of tissues in vivo. First, RR structures formed in the spleen and pancreas of normal mice without any treatment. Then, in RBV-treated mice, we detected RR structures in a number of tissues, including stomach, liver, spleen, kidney, brain, skin, and cardiac and skeletal muscle. We made several intriguing observations: predominance of RR structures in the mucosa and submucosa layers of the stomach wall; a high proportion of RR-positive cells in the cerebral cortex, suggesting that RBV actually crosses the blood-brain barrier; and a higher ratio of rings to rods in the epidermis compared to the dermis layer of the skin. Screening for RR structures appears to be a useful method to track tissue penetration of RBV and the many RR-inducing drugs previously identified.

Autoantibodies to cytoplasmic rods and rings in patients with hepatitis C virus infection treated with direct-acting antivirals: The role of prior treatment with interferon plus ribavirin

INTRODUCTION

The cytoplasmic rods-rings (RR) pattern is found in hepatitis C (HCV) patients treated with interferon-ribavirin when studied with ANA-IIF. Ribavirin aggregates/induces antigenic changes in IMPDH-2, an enzyme necessary for ribavirin action.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Prospective search for anti-RR autoantibodies (HEp-2, INOVA) in patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) from October 2015 to June 2017. HCV-negative patients from up to June 2016 acted as controls. Anti-RR was analyzed at baseline and, mainly, during treatment and follow-up. The Chi-square test, Student's t-test and a logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Between October 2015 and June 2016, 1258 men and 2389 women who were HCV-negative and 137 men and 112 women who were HCV-positive patients were studied. Approximately 22.9% of HCV-negative and 13.2% of HCV-positive were ANA-IIF-positive (p<0.05). Three HCV-negative (0.08%) and 23 (9.2%) HCV-positive patients had anti-RR (p<0.001). A total of 122 patients received DAAs; 30 received DAA+RBV; 46 pre-treated with IFN-RBV received DAA; 31 pre-treated with IFN-RBV received DAA+RBV; 16 received IFNpeg-RBV; and 24 received IFN-RBV-DAA. None of the 122 DAA-treated patients showed anti-RR; anti-RR were identified in 14.8% of those treated with DAA-RBV; in 25.9% of those pre-treated with IFN-RBV receiving DAA; in 22.2% of IFN-RBV-pre-treated patients who received DAA+RBV; in 7.4% of those treated with IFNpeg-RBV and in 29.6% of those treated with IFNpeg-RBV-DAA. The multivariate analysis showed significant associations between anti-RR and "Exposure to IFN" and "Time of exposure to RBV".

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-RR autoantibodies were detected only in patients with current or past treatments with RBV, even in cases in which only DAAs were later administered.