Tacrolimus Variability: A Cause of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibody Formation in Children

Intrapatient Variability (IPV) and the Blood Concentration Normalized by the Dose (C/D Ratio) of Tacrolimus-Their Correlations and Effects on Long-Term Renal Allograft Function

Tacrolimus, in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids, is the basis of immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation. Tacrolimus intrapatient variability (IPV) and the blood concentration normalized by the dose (concentration/dose ratio, C/D ratio) both have an effect on the function of the transplanted kidney. In this study, we examined whether the metabolism rate affected IPV, whether the C/D ratio value was stable in the long-term follow-up, and whether it could be used for IPV measurements. In addition, our study population was examined for the effect of the C/D ratio and IPV on long-term renal function. The C/D ratio and IPV were examined in 170 patients at appointments held at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after RTx. The average time post renal transplantation was 70 months. Renal function defined as creatinine concentration at the last appointment was examined. Results: the mean C/D ratio in the study group was 1.63. A negative correlation between the C/D ratio and creatinine concentration at the end of the follow-up was observed. Between the C/D ratio < and ≥1.63 groups, significant differences in creatinine concentration at the last appointment were found. No relationship was identified between the mean C/D ratio and IPV. The C/D ratio values increased significantly over a longer post-transplant period (12, 24, 60 and 120 m). We did not find a correlation between the mean IPV and the creatinine concentration from the last appointment. Our study group was divided into terciles according to IPV, while no renal graft function differences were found at the same appointment. Conclusion: the C/D ratio is useful for assessing the effects of the metabolism rate of tacrolimus on the long-term renal graft function. The C/D ratio does not affect the IPV value. IPV calculated from variability of the C/D ratio does not influence transplanted kidney function. The C/D changes over time.

Patterns in Tacrolimus Variability and Association with De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Formation in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High tacrolimus intrapatient variability has been associated with inferior graft outcomes in patients with kidney transplants. We studied baseline patterns of tacrolimus intrapatient variability in pediatric patients with kidney transplants and examined these patterns in relation to C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

All tacrolimus levels in participants who underwent kidney-only transplantation at a single pediatric center from 2004 to 2018 (with at least 12-month follow-up, followed until 2019) were analyzed to determine baseline variability. Intrapatient variability was defined using the coefficient of variation (SD/mean ×100%) of all samples in a 6-month moving window. Routine de novo donor-specific antibody measurements were available for a subgroup of patients transplanted in 2010-2018. Cox proportional hazards models using tacrolimus intrapatient variability as a time-varying variable were used to examine the association between intrapatient variability and graft outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibody formation.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus intrapatient variability developed a steady-state baseline of 30% at 10 months post-transplant in 426 patients with a combined 31,125 tacrolimus levels. Included in the outcomes study were 220 patients, of whom 51 developed C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies. De novo donor-specific antibody formers had higher intrapatient variability, with a median of 38% (interquartile range, 28%-48%) compared with 28% (interquartile range, 20%-38%) for nondonor-specific antibody formers (P<0.001). Patients with high tacrolimus intrapatient variability (coefficient of variation >30%) had higher risk of de novo donor-specific antibody formation (hazard ratio, 5.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.45 to 11.68). Patients in the top quartile of tacrolimus intrapatient variability (coefficient of variation >41%) had the strongest association with C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibody formation (hazard ratio, 11.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.76 to 29.27).

CONCLUSIONS

High tacrolimus intrapatient variability was strongly associated with de novo donor-specific antibody formation.

Association of intraindividual tacrolimus variability with de novo donor-specific HLA antibody development and allograft rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with low immunological risk

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (Tac) intraindividual variability (TacIPV) in pediatric kidney transplant patients is only poorly understood. We investigated the impact of TacIPV on de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (dnDSA) development and allograft rejection in Caucasian pediatric recipients of a living or deceased donor kidney with low immunological risk.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study including 48 pediatric kidney transplant recipients. TacIPV was calculated based on coefficient of variation (CV%) 6-12 months posttransplant. TacIPV cutoff was set at the median (25%). Outcome parameters were dnDSA development and rejection episodes.

RESULTS

In total, 566 Tac levels were measured with median 11.0 (6.0-17.0) measurements per patient. The cutoff of 25% corresponded to the median CV% in our study cohort (25%, IQR 18-35%) and was comparable to cutoffs determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. High TacIPV was associated with higher risk of dnDSA development (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0-11.1, P = 0.047; Kaplan-Meier analysis P = 0.018) and any kind of rejection episodes (HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.1-14.8, P = 0.033; Kaplan-Meier analysis P = 0.010). There was a clear trend towards higher TacIPV below the age of 6 years. TacIPV (CV%) was stable over time. A TacIPV (CV%) cutoff of 30% or IPV quantification by mean absolute deviation (MAD) showed comparable results.

CONCLUSIONS

High TacIPV is associated with an increased risk of dnDSA development and rejection episodes > year 1 posttransplant even in patients with low immunological risk profile. Therefore, in patients with high TacIPV, potential causes should be addressed, and if not resolved, changes in immunosuppressive therapy should be considered. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Evaluation of Cumulative Effect of Standard Triple Immunosuppression on Prevention of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies (dnDSA) Production in Children after Kidney Transplantation—A Retrospective and Prospective Study

De novo Donor Specific Antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with inferior graft outcomes. Standard immunosuppression is expected to prevent dnDSA production in low-risk patients. We have evaluated a cumulative effect of a triple immunosuppression (CNI/MMF/Pred), as well as TAC concentration and coefficient of variation on the incidence of dnDSA production. Overall, 67 transplanted patients were evaluated in retrospective (dnDSA for-cause; n = 29) and prospective (dnDSA by protocol; n = 38) groups. In the retrospective group, the eGFR value at first dnDSA detection (median interval—4.0 years post-transplant) was 41 mL/min/1.73 m²; 55% of patients presented biopsy-proven cAMR, and 41% lost the graft within next 2.4 years. Patients from the prospective group presented 97% graft survival and eGFR of 76 mL/min/1.73 m² at 2 years follow-up, an overall incidence of 21% of dnDSA and 18% of acute (T cell) rejection. None of the patients from the prospective group developed cAMR. Median value of Vasudev score within 2 years of follow-up was not significantly higher in dsDSA negative patients, while median value of TAC C₀ > 1–24 months post-transplant was 7.9 in dnDSA negative vs. 7.1 ng/mL in dnDSA positive patients (p = 0.008). Conclusion: dnDSA-negative patients presented a higher exposure to tacrolimus, while not to the combined immunosuppression.

Transplantation and immunosuppression: a review of novel transplant-related immunosuppressant drugs

Immunosuppressive drugs used in the transplantation period are generally defined as induction and maintenance therapy. The use of immunosuppressants, which are particularly useful and have fewer side effects, decreased both mortality and morbidity. Many drugs such as steroids, calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine-A, tacrolimus), antimetabolites (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine), and mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) are used as immunosuppressive agents. Although immunosuppressant drugs cause many side effects such as hypertension, infection, and hyperlipidemia, they are the agents that should be used to prevent organ rejection. This shows the importance of individualized drug use. The optimal immunosuppressive therapy post-transplant is not established. Therefore, discovering less toxic but more potent new agents is of great importance, and new experimental and clinical studies are needed in this regard.Our review discussed the mechanism of immunosuppressants, new agents' discovery, and current therapeutic protocols in the transplantation.

Use of an electronic medication monitoring device to estimate medication adherence in kidney transplant patients

Electronic medication monitoring devices (EMD) have been used as a gold standard for assessing medication adherence. We used a wireless EMD (SimpleMed+), assessed its usability in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx), evaluated adherence, and analyzed concordance with other adherence measures. Fifty-five patients (53% female, mean age 46 years) at least 6 months after KTx agreed to use the EMD over a period of 8 weeks. Self-reported adherence was measured with the BAASIS, and immunosuppressant trough level variability was assessed prior to and again during the study period. Fourteen patients stopped using the EMD or were low users (<70%). These non-completers reported that using the EMD would interfere with their daily activities. Taking-adherence of the completers was high with 98.3% (±1.9) over the entire study period. Timing-adherence was somewhat lower (94.6% ± 7.9) and decreased during the second half of the study. We found statistically significant correlations between EMD results and self-reported adherence with moderate effect sizes, but no significant association with trough level variability. The low usage of the EMD supports the need to assess the practicability of an EMD before applying it in research and clinical routine. Taking- and timing-adherence of KTx patients using the EMD was satisfactory. Self-reported adherence might be a good enough estimate of medication adherence.

Tacrolimus intrapatient variability in solid organ transplantation: A multiorgan perspective

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus therapy in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is challenging due to its narrow therapeutic window and pharmacokinetic variability both between patients and within a single patient. Intrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus trough concentrations has become a novel marker of interest for predicting transplant outcomes. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the association of tacrolimus IPV with graft and patient outcomes and identify interventions to improve IPV in SOT recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase from database inception to September 20, 2020. Studies were eligible only if they evaluated an association between tacrolimus IPV and transplant outcomes. Both pediatric and adult studies were included. Measures of variability were limited to standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and time in therapeutic range.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 2008 and 2020 and were observational in nature. Majority of data were published in adult kidney transplant recipients and identified an association with rejection, de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA) formation, graft loss, and patient survival. Evaluation of IPV-directed interventions was limited to small preliminary studies.

CONCLUSIONS

High tacrolimus IPV has been associated with poor outcomes including acute rejection, dnDSA formation, graft loss, and patient mortality in SOT recipients. Future research should prospectively explore IPV-directed interventions to improve transplant outcomes.

Maintenance Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation: Integrating Novel Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Inform Calcineurin Inhibitor Dose Selection

Calcineurin inhibitors, the primary immunosuppressive therapy used to prevent alloreactivity of transplanted organs, have a narrow therapeutic index. Currently, treatment is individualized based on clinical assessment of the risk of rejection or toxicity guided by trough concentration monitoring. Advances in immune monitoring have identified potential markers that may have value in understanding calcineurin inhibitor pharmacodynamics. Integration of these markers has the potential to complement therapeutic drug monitoring. Existing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) data is largely limited to correlation between the biomarker and trough concentrations at single time points. Immune related gene expression currently has the most evidence supporting PK-PD integration. Novel biomarker-based approaches to pharmacodynamic monitoring including development of enhanced PK-PD models are proposed to realize the full clinical benefit.

Impacts of High Intra- and Inter-Individual Variability in Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics and Fast Tacrolimus Metabolism on Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus is a first-line calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and an integral part of the immunosuppressive strategy in solid organ transplantation. Being a dose-critical drug, tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index that necessitates periodic monitoring to maintain the drug’s efficacy and reduce the consequences of overexposure. Tacrolimus is characterized by substantial intra- and inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. At steady state, the tacrolimus blood concentration to daily dose ratio (C/D ratio) has been described as a surrogate for the estimation of the individual metabolism rate, where a low C/D ratio reflects a higher rate of metabolism. Fast tacrolimus metabolism (low C/D ratio) is associated with the risk of poor outcomes after transplantation, including reduced allograft function and survival, higher allograft rejection, CNI nephrotoxicity, a faster decline in kidney function, reduced death-censored graft survival (DCGS), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular events. In this article, we discuss the potential role of the C/D ratio in a noninvasive monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk for potential adverse events post-transplant.

Tacrolimus variability is associated with de novo donor-specific antibody development in pediatric renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibody (DSA) is a risk factor for antibody-mediated rejection and shortened graft survival. We investigated the role of intrapatient variability in tacrolimus trough levels on graft outcomes (i.e., de novo DSA, rejection, graft loss) in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study which included 38 pediatric renal transplant recipients. Intrapatient tacrolimus variability was defined using the coefficient of variation (CV; SD/Mean × 100) for all levels obtained after 3 months post-transplant. CV cut-points of 30%, 40%, and 50% were used in the analyses.

RESULTS

The median CV 43.1% (35.0%, 58.6%). Out of 38 patients, 19 (50%) developed de novo DSA. In the logistic regression model, after adjusting for age, rejection history, maintenance immunosuppression, and CV, for every 10% increase in tacrolimus variability, the odds of developing de novo DSA increased by 53% (p = 0.048, CI 1.0005, 1.11). Age at transplant was also an independent risk factor for DSA development; every 1 year increase in age was associated with a 31% increase in the odds of developing DSA (p = 0.03, CI 1.03, 1.67). At a CV cut-point ≥ 30%, higher tacrolimus variability was associated with an increased incidence of allograft rejection (0% vs 42%, < 30 and ≥ 30% respectively, p = 0.07). As there were few graft loss events (n = 4) in our study population, an association could not be determined between tacrolimus variability and graft loss.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus variability and age at transplant were identified as independent risk factors for de novo DSA development. There was an association between tacrolimus variability and rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Adding the assessment of tacrolimus variability to current monitoring methods may be an important step towards improving graft outcomes.

Impact of low tacrolimus exposure and high tacrolimus intra-patient variability on the development of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) directed against HLA are a major contributing factor to the chronic deterioration of renal allograft function. Several factors, including the degree of HLA matching, younger recipient age, and past sensitization events have been shown to increase the risk for the development of dnDSA. The development of dnDSA is also strongly associated with modifications in the immunosuppressive regimen, non-adherence, and under-immunosuppression.Areas covered: Tacrolimus is widely used after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and in recent years, both a high intra-patient variability in tacrolimus exposure and low tacrolimus exposure have been found to be associated with a higher risk of dnDSA development in kidney transplant recipients. This article provides an overview of current findings published in the recent 5 years regarding the relationship between tacrolimus exposure and variation therein and the development of dnDSA.Expert opinion: In this review, we describe how combining data on tacrolimus intra-patient variability and mean pre-dose concentration may be an effective tool to identify kidney transplant recipients who are at higher risk of developing dnDSA.