Japanese Type 1 Diabetes Database Study (TIDE-J): rationale and study design

Prediction of future insulin-deficiency in glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-positive patients with slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify risk factors that contribute to the progression of slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes by evaluating the positive predictive value (PPV) of factors associated with the progression to an insulin-dependent state.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected 60 slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes patients who tested positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) at diagnosis from the Japanese Type 1 Diabetes Database Study. GADA levels in these patients were concurrently measured using both radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-progressor group (fasting C-peptide [F-CPR] levels maintained ≥0.6 ng/mL), the progressor group showed a younger age at diagnosis, lower body mass index (BMI), lower F-CPR levels and a higher prevalence of insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A). The PPV of RIA-GADA increased from 56.3 to 70.0% in the high titer group (≥10 U/mL), and further increased to 76.9, 84.2, 81.0 and 75.0% when combined with specific thresholds for age at diagnosis <47 years, BMI <22.6 kg/m2, F-CPR <1.41 ng/mL and IA-2A positivity, respectively. In contrast, the PPV of ELISA-GADA (71.8%) remained the same at 73.1% in the high titer group (≥180 U/mL), but increased to 81.8, 82.4 and 79.0% when evaluated in conjunction with age at diagnosis, BMI and F-CPR level, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that, unlike RIA-GADA, ELISA-GADA shows no association between GADA titers and the risk of progression to an insulin-dependent state. The PPV improves when age at diagnosis, BMI and F-CPR levels are considered in combination.

Protocol of a Prospective Observational Study on Lifestyle and Quality of Life in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that the quality of life (QOL) of people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is poor and must be improved. However, the living situation and QOL of adults living with T1D in Japan have not been fully clarified. This study will examine their lifestyle, QOL, and clinical situation, as well as the relationships between them.

METHODS

This is a prospective, 5-year follow-up observational study. Between December 2019 and September 2021, we enrolled adults in Japan who were living with T1D and receiving insulin therapy, and are acquiring longitudinal clinical data and the responses to seven questionnaires regarding lifestyle and QOL. The primary study outcomes are (1) the relationship between Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scores and various factors including demographic data, clinical characteristics, medical history, lifestyle habits, treatment history, biochemical data, and the scores of questionnaires; and (2) the relationship between Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II scores and various factors aforementioned. The secondary outcomes are the relationships between various factors aforementioned and each of the following: (1) blood glucose control, (2) blood lipid control, (3) dietary patterns, (4) fear of hypoglycemia, (5) sleep patterns, and (6) physical activity.

PLANNED OUTCOME

We registered 352 participants. The median age was 49 (41-63) years, and the median duration of T1D was 13 (8-20) years. All the results will be available in 2026. We expect to clarify the factors associated with decreased QOL, and that this knowledge will contribute to improving QOL in adults in Japan who are living with T1D and receiving insulin therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov identifier, UMIN000044088.

Bivalent GAD autoantibody ELISA improves clinical utility and risk prediction for adult autoimmune diabetes

AIM/INTRODUCTION

To investigate the differences in the clinical significance and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA) affinity between RIA (RIA-GADA) and ELISA (ELISA-GADA) in patients with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 415 patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled, including 199 acute-onset type 1 diabetes, 168 slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM), and 48 fulminant type 1 diabetes. GADA affinity was measured by a competitive binding experiment using unlabeled recombinant human GAD65 protein, and the diagnostic performance of both assays and the relationship between GADA affinity and the decline of fasting C-peptide (F-CPR) were examined.

RESULTS

While the ELISA-GADA displayed a higher sensitivity than the RIA method in diagnosing type 1 diabetes in acute-onset patients, about 40% of SPIDDM patients with low-titer RIA-GADA were determined as negative by the ELISA method. Patients with type 1 diabetes with RIA-GADA alone had an older age of onset, less diabetic ketoacidosis, a higher BMI, and a higher F-CPR compared with patients positive for both RIA-GADA and ELISA-GADA. Additionally, 36% of RIA-GADA-positive patients had low-affinity GADA (<10¹⁰  L/mol), which was significantly higher than in the ELISA-GADA-positive patients (4%, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, over a 3 year monitoring period, F-CPR levels decreased in ELISA-GADA-positive SPIDDM, whereas it was maintained in patients with RIA-GADA alone, regardless of GADA affinity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that bivalent ELISA for GADA is superior to the RIA method in diagnosing type 1 diabetes. Moreover, the diagnostic superiority of the ELISA-GADA made possible the concurrent identification of SPIDDM patients at high-risk of early progression, and allowed for more accurate clinical diagnosis and management.

Comparing the clinical significance and antigen specificity of insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies between radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance and antigen specificity of autoantibodies to insulinoma-associated antigen-2 (IA-2A) by radioimmunoassay (RIA; IA-2A-RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; IA-2A-ELISA) in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 338 type 1 diabetic patients were enrolled, including 38 fulminant type 1 diabetes, 168 acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 137 slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM). The concordance, correlation of autoantibody titer, and the relationship between IA-2A and progression to the insulin-deficient state were examined. Also, competitive assay was used to examine the antigen specificity.

RESULTS

The prevalence of IA-2A-ELISA was 4-5% lower than that of IA-2A-RIA in both the acute-onset type 1 diabetes and SPIDDM, but the diagnostic sensitivities of both subtypes, when measured in combination with glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody, were comparable. The diagnosis of type 1 diabetes using either the RIA or ELISA methods showed substantial agreement with the exponential correlation of autoantibody titers detected by RIA and ELISA. Among the SPIDDM patients, the fasting C-peptide for IA-2A-positive cases by ELISA, but not the RIA method, was significantly lower than in the negative cases (P < 0.05). Furthermore, IA-2A-ELISA proved superior to the RIA method in predicting the progression to insulin deficiency in SPIDDM. Competitive analysis showed that even sera with discrepant results by RIA and ELISA have IA-2-specific autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that IA-2A-ELISA is a reliable marker not only for the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, but also for the prediction of future insulin dependency; that is, detection of IA-2A-ELISA helps identify a subtype of SPIDDM patients who would likely progress onto insulin-deficient state.