Intravenous infusion for the controlled exposure to the dual ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar in nonhuman primates

Lenvatinib resistance mechanism and potential ways to conquer

Lenvatinib (LVN) has been appoved to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma, differentiated thyroid carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma. Further other cancer types also have been tried in pre-clinic and clinic without approvation by FDA. The extensive use of lenvastinib in clinical practice is sufficient to illustrate its important therapeutic role. Although the drug resistance has not arised largely in clinical, the studies focusing on the resistance of LVN increasingly. In order to keep up with the latest progress of resistance caused by LVN, we summerized the latest studies from identify published reports. In this review, we found the latest report about resistance caused by lenvatinib, which were contained the hotspot mechanism such as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ferroptosis, RNA modification and so on. The potential ways to conquer the resistance of LVN were embraced by nanotechnology, CRISPR technology and traditional combined strategy. The latest literature review of LVN caused resistance would bring some ways for further study of LVN. We call for more attention to the pharmacological parameters of LVN in clinic, which was rarely and would supply key elements for drug itself in human beings and help to find the resistance target or idea for further study.

Co-administration of MDR1 and BCRP or EGFR/PI3K inhibitors overcomes lenvatinib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma

Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer; however, some patients become refractory to lenvatinib. The underlying mechanism of lenvatinib resistance (LR) in patients with advanced HCC remains unclear. We focused on exploring the potential mechanism of LR and novel treatments of lenvatinib-resistant HCC. In particular, we established a Huh7 LR cell line and performed in vitro, bioinformatic, and biochemical assays. Additionally, we used a Huh7-LR cell-derived xenograft mouse model to confirm the results in vivo. Following LR induction, multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters were markedly upregulated, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), MEK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT pathways were activated. In vitro, the co-administration of elacridar, a dual MDR1 and BCRP inhibitor, with lenvatinib inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis of LR cells. These effects might be due to inhibiting cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) properties, by decreasing colony formation and downregulating CD133, EpCAM, SOX-9, and c-Myc expression. Moreover, the co-administration of gefitinib, an EGFR inhibitor, with lenvatinib retarded proliferation and induced apoptosis of LR cells. These similar effects might be caused by the inhibition of EGFR-mediated MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathway activation. In vivo, co-administration of lenvatinib with elacridar or gefitinib suppressed tumour growth and angiogenesis. Therefore, inhibiting MDR1 and BCRP transporters or targeting the EGFR/PI3K pathway might overcome LR in HCC. Notably, lenvatinib should be used to treat HCC after LR induction owing to its role in inhibiting tumour proliferation and angiogenesis. Our findings could help develop novel and effective treatment strategies for HCC.

Complete inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 at the blood-brain barrier by co-infusion of erlotinib and tariquidar to improve brain delivery of the model ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate [11C]erlotinib

P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) restrict at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) the brain distribution of the majority of currently known molecularly targeted anticancer drugs. To improve brain delivery of dual ABCB1/ABCG2 substrates, both ABCB1 and ABCG2 need to be inhibited simultaneously at the BBB. We examined the feasibility of simultaneous ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibition with i.v. co-infusion of erlotinib and tariquidar by studying brain distribution of the model ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate [¹¹C]erlotinib in mice and rhesus macaques with PET. Tolerability of the erlotinib/tariquidar combination was assessed in human embryonic stem cell-derived cerebral organoids. In mice and macaques, baseline brain distribution of [¹¹C]erlotinib was low (brain distribution volume, V_T,brain < 0.3 mL/cm³). Co-infusion of erlotinib and tariquidar increased V_T,brain in mice by 3.0-fold and in macaques by 3.4- to 5.0-fold, while infusion of erlotinib alone or tariquidar alone led to less pronounced V_T,brain increases in both species. Treatment of cerebral organoids with erlotinib/tariquidar led to an induction of Caspase-3-dependent apoptosis. Co-infusion of erlotinib/tariquidar may potentially allow for complete ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibition at the BBB, while simultaneously achieving brain-targeted EGFR inhibition. Our protocol may be applicable to enhance brain delivery of molecularly targeted anticancer drugs for a more effective treatment of brain tumors.

The pharmacokinetics of [18F]UCB-H revisited in the healthy non-human primate brain

Background

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the Synaptic Vesicle glycoprotein (SV) 2A is a new tool to quantify synaptic density. [¹⁸F]UCB-H was one of the first promising SV2A-ligands to be labelled and used in vivo in rodent and human, while limited information on its pharmacokinetic properties is available in the non-human primate. Here, we evaluate the reliability of the three most commonly used modelling approaches for [¹⁸F]UCB-H in the non-human cynomolgus primate, adding the coupled fit of the non-displaceable distribution volume (V_ND) as an alternative approach to improve unstable fit. The results are discussed in the light of the current state of SV2A PET ligands.

Results

[¹⁸F]UCB-H pharmacokinetic data was optimally fitted with a two-compartment model (2TCM), although the model did not always converge (large total volume of distribution (V_T) or large uncertainty of the estimate). 2TCM with coupled fit K₁/k₂ across brain regions stabilized the quantification, and confirmed a lower specific signal of [¹⁸F]UCB-H compared to the newest SV2A-ligands. However, the measures of V_ND and the influx parameter (K₁) are similar to what has been reported for other SV2A ligands. These data were reinforced by displacement studies using [¹⁹F]UCB-H, demonstrating only 50% displacement of the total [¹⁸F]UCB-H signal at maximal occupancy of SV2A. As previously demonstrated in clinical studies, the graphical method of Logan provided a more robust estimate of V_T with only a small bias compared to 2TCM.

Conclusions

Modeling issues with a 2TCM due to a slow component have previously been reported for other SV2A ligands with low specific binding, or after blocking of specific binding. As all SV2A ligands share chemical structural similarities, we hypothesize that this slow binding component is common for all SV2A ligands, but only hampers quantification when specific binding is low.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00777-8.

Inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 at the Mouse Blood-Brain Barrier with Marketed Drugs To Improve Brain Delivery of the Model ABCB1/ABCG2 Substrate [11C]erlotinib

P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) are two efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which effectively restrict brain distribution of diverse drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There is a crucial need for pharmacological ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibition protocols for a more effective treatment of brain diseases. In the present study, seven marketed drugs (osimertinib, erlotinib, nilotinib, imatinib, lapatinib, pazopanib, and cyclosporine A) and one nonmarketed drug (tariquidar), with known in vitro ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitory properties, were screened for their inhibitory potency at the BBB in vivo. Positron emission tomography (PET) using the model ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate [¹¹C]erlotinib was performed in mice. Tested inhibitors were administered as i.v. bolus injections at 30 min before the start of the PET scan, followed by a continuous i.v. infusion for the duration of the PET scan. Five of the tested drugs increased total distribution volume of [¹¹C]erlotinib in the brain ( V_T,brain) compared to vehicle-treated animals (tariquidar, + 69%; erlotinib, + 19% and +23% for the 21.5 mg/kg and the 43 mg/kg dose, respectively; imatinib, + 22%; lapatinib, + 25%; and cyclosporine A, + 49%). For all drugs, increases in [¹¹C]erlotinib brain distribution were lower than in Abcb1a/b^(-/-)Abcg2^(-/-) mice (+149%), which suggested that only partial ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibition was reached at the mouse BBB. The plasma concentrations of the tested drugs at the time of the PET scan were higher than clinically achievable plasma concentrations. Some of the tested drugs led to significant increases in blood radioactivity concentrations measured at the end of the PET scan (erlotinib, + 103% and +113% for the 21.5 mg/kg and the 43 mg/kg dose, respectively; imatinib, + 125%; and cyclosporine A, + 101%), which was most likely caused by decreased hepatobiliary excretion of radioactivity. Taken together, our data suggest that some marketed tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be repurposed to inhibit ABCB1 and ABCG2 at the BBB. From a clinical perspective, moderate increases in brain delivery despite the administration of high i.v. doses as well as peripheral drug-drug interactions due to transporter inhibition in clearance organs question the translatability of this concept.

Physical blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound does not overcome the transporter-mediated efflux of erlotinib

Overcoming the efflux mediated by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains a challenge for the delivery of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib to the brain. Inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 at the mouse BBB improved the BBB permeation of erlotinib but could not be achieved in humans. BBB disruption induced by focused ultrasound (FUS) was investigated as a strategy to overcome the efflux transport of erlotinib in vivo. In rats, FUS combined with microbubbles allowed for a large and spatially controlled disruption of the BBB in the left hemisphere. ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibition was performed using elacridar (10 mg/kg i.v). The brain kinetics of erlotinib was studied using ¹¹C-erlotinib Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging in 5 groups (n = 4-5 rats per group) including a baseline group, immediately after sonication (FUS), 48 h after FUS (FUS + 48 h), elacridar (ELA) and their combination (FUS + ELA). BBB integrity was assessed using the Evan's Blue (EB) extravasation test. Brain exposure to ¹¹C-erlotinib was measured as the area under the curve (AUC) of the brain kinetics (% injected dose (%ID) versus time (min)) in volumes corresponding to the disrupted (left) and the intact (right) hemispheres, respectively. EB extravasation highlighted BBB disruption in the left hemisphere of animals of the FUS and FUS + ELA groups but not in the control and ELA groups. EB extravasation was not observed 48 h after FUS suggesting recovery of BBB integrity. Compared with the control group (AUC_Baseline = 1.4 ± 0.5%ID.min), physical BBB disruption did not impact the brain kinetics of ¹¹C-erlotinib in the left hemisphere (p > .05) either immediately (AUC_FUS = 1.2 ± 0.1%ID.min) or 48 h after FUS (AUC_FUS+48h = 1.1 ± 0.3%ID.min). Elacridar similarly increased ¹¹C-erlotinib brain exposure to the left hemisphere in the absence (AUC_ELA = 2.2 ± 0.5%ID.min, p < .001) and in the presence of BBB disruption (AUC_FUS+ELA = 2.1 ± 0.5%ID.min, p < .001). AUC_left was never significantly different from AUC_right (p > .05), in any of the tested conditions. BBB integrity is not the rate limiting step for erlotinib delivery to the brain which is mainly governed by ABC-mediated efflux. Efflux transport of erlotinib persisted despite BBB disruption.

A Proof-of-Concept Study to Inhibit ABCG2- and ABCB1-Mediated Efflux Transport at the Human Blood-Brain Barrier

The adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) are 2 efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that effectively restrict brain distribution of dual ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Pharmacologic inhibition of ABCB1/ABCG2 may improve the efficacy of dual-substrate drugs for treatment of brain tumors, but no marketed ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitors are currently available. In the present study, we examined the potential of supratherapeutic-dose oral erlotinib to inhibit ABCB1/ABCG2 activity at the human BBB. Methods: Healthy men underwent 2 consecutive PET scans with ¹¹C-erlotinib: a baseline scan and a second scan either with concurrent intravenous infusion of the ABCB1 inhibitor tariquidar (3.75 mg/min, n = 5) or after oral intake of single ascending doses of erlotinib (300 mg, n = 7; 650 mg, n = 8; or 1,000 mg, n = 2). Results: Although tariquidar administration had no effect on ¹¹C-erlotinib brain distribution, oral erlotinib led, at the 650-mg dose, to significant increases in volume of distribution (23% ± 13%, P = 0.008), influx rate constant of radioactivity from plasma into brain (58% ± 26%, P = 0.008), and area under the brain time-activity curve (78% ± 17%, P = 0.008), presumably because of combined partial saturation of ABCG2 and ABCB1 activity. Inclusion of further subjects into the 1,000-mg dose group was precluded by adverse skin events (rash). Conclusion: Supratherapeutic-dose erlotinib may be used to enhance brain delivery of ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate anticancer drugs, but its clinical applicability for continuous ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibition at the BBB may be limited by safety concerns.