Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etanercept and Adalimumab for Plaque Psoriasis not Associated with Arthritis

Economic Impact of Etanercept in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in Spain: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Etanercept (ETN), a highly effective biological agent for the treatment of psoriasis (PSO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is widely used in Spain. However, evidence of its economic impact is limited, indicating the need for a systematic review of the economic assessments conducted on the use of ETN in the treatment of both PSO and PsA in Spain.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment reports and not indexed sources up to November 2018. The inclusion criteria were economic evaluations (total and partial) and dose optimization studies published in English or Spanish on the use of ETN to treat PSO and PsA for ETN in Spain.

RESULTS

A total of 402 publications were identified, of which 32 were selected for inclusion in the review; of these 32 publications, 81.3% analyzed PSO (14 full economic evaluations, 5 partial economic evaluations and 7 dose optimization studies) and 18.8% analyzed PsA (1 economic analysis and 5 dose optimization studies). The perspective of the Spanish National Health Service (NHS) was used in 90.0% (n = 18) of the full and partial economic evaluations. The time horizons ranged from 12 weeks to 2 years. Reductions in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 50, 75 and 90% (PASI 50, 75 and 90, respectively) were most commonly used as efficacy outcomes in the complete evaluations. The economic impact of ETN ranged from €9110-14,337/PASI 75 at 12 weeks (50 mg/week) to €82,279/PASI 90 at 2 years, depending on the health outcome, time horizon and ETN dose used. Only one study determined the cost of using ETN for the treatment of PSO (€29,430-52,367/QALY for dose 2 × 25 mg/week or 50 mg/week, respectively). Only one partial economic evaluation on PSA was identified (NHS perspective), resulting in an ETN annual cost of €8585/patient-year.

CONCLUSION

Consistent evidence on the economic impact of ETN for the treatment of PSO and PSA in Spain is lacking, mainly due to the highly heterogeneous methodology used and the broad range of outcomes found in the economic evaluations published to date.

FUNDING

Pfizer S.L.U.

Biologicals and small molecules in psoriasis: A systematic review of economic evaluations

Biological therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis is highly effective but cost-intensive. This systematic review aimed at analyzing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A literature search was conducted until 30/06/2017 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EconLit. The quality of identified studies was assessed with the checklist by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance. Out of 482 records, 53 publications were eligible for inclusion. Half of the studies met between 20 and 25 of the quality checklist items, displaying moderate quality. Due to heterogeneity of studies, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Cost ranges per outcome were enormous across different studies due to diversity in assumptions and model design. Pairwise comparisons of biologicals revealed conflicting results. Overall, adalimumab appeared to be most cost-effective (100% of all aggregated pairwise comparisons), followed by ustekinumab (66.7%), and infliximab (60%). However, in study conclusions most recent publications favored secukinumab and apremilast (75% and 60% of the studies investigating these medications). Accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds varied between 30,000 and 50,000 USD/Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Three-quarters of studies were financially supported, and in 90% of those, results were consistent with the funder's interest. Economic evaluation of biologicals is crucial for responsible allocation of health care resources. In addition to summarizing the actual evidence this review highlights gaps and needs for future research.

Health economic analyses of psoriasis management: a systematic literature search

In the course of the chronic skin disease psoriasis, where a variety of treatment interventions is available, a strong growth of health economic studies comparing treatment costs and benefits can be noticed. The objective was to identify health economic evaluations of psoriasis treatments that have been published to date. Of particular interest were the mostly used analysis and outcome parameters, the compared treatments, and the question, if available health economic studies may be used to perform a meta-analysis of qualitative findings. A systematic literature search using PubMed Medline, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library was performed for articles, published and available until mid of January 2016. Among the key words were the terms "psoriasis" and "cost-effectiveness". The search resulted in 318 articles without duplicates. Thereof 60 health economic analyses in psoriasis management were identified. Most of these are cost-effectiveness evaluations (45). The clinical parameter PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) is the most often used cost-effectiveness outcome (33) followed by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (6). In case of cost-utility analyses, QALYs (quality-adjusted life-years) were mostly generated with the help of EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) (12), which was partly based on PASI and DLQI values. The majority of health economic studies is focusing on the direct medical and non-medical costs without consideration of productivity losses. Almost 70 % of 60 publications were conducted in Europe. Overall, most considered systemic treatments were the biological agents etanercept (36), adalimumab (27), and infliximab (26) followed by ustekinumab (17) and phototherapy (incl. UV-B, PUVA/psoralen combined with UV-A) (14). Comparisons including only topical treatments mostly focused on vitamin D treatment (14), corticosteroids (13), and coal tar products (6) followed by dithranol (5) and tazarotene (4). Given the setting, compared treatments, and study conditions, different results can be found for medical decision-making. Thereby, it can be noted that there are no standards on methods and outcomes measures available. This leads to a very limited comparability of health economic studies and presents no comfortable basis to examine a meta-analysis of health economic results. The presented systematic review shows the need for nationwide data and interpretation.

Long-Term Efficacy of Etanercept for Plaque-Type Psoriasis and Estimated Cost in Daily Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

There are numerous clinical trials proving efficacy and safety profiles of etanercept. Newer studies, however, include patients with significant comorbidities, unstable psoriasis, or concomitant treatments.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide data on long-term response to etanercept and estimate the cost in daily practice.

METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study including patients with plaque-type psoriasis receiving etanercept 50 mg/wk for more than 6 months at the Dermatology Department of the University Hospital of La Coruña (Spain). Psoriasis severity was determined using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at baseline and then at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and annually until treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients aged 24 to 78 years were included. Response rates of 58.8% and 66.3% for PASI 75 score (reduction of at least 75% in PASI score compared with baseline) were achieved after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. Among patients who continued treatment, the PASI 75 score was maintained by 75.3% at 1 year, 82.5% at 2 years, and 88.2% at 3 years. The percentage of patients receiving other systemic treatments was 38.2%. Adverse effects were reported in 13.7%, all of them mild, except one case of urinary sepsis. The average cost per patient was €244.68 ± €45.27 per week and €34.95 ± €6.46 per day.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide data on long-term response to etanercept and its costs in a real-world setting. Response rates were higher than in some clinical trials, with progressive efficacy and not related to body mass index. Etanercept cost was comparable with that estimated in other studies. Combination with a conventional systemic agent can enhance efficacy without additional adverse events.

Efficacy and cost of etanercept in long-term psoriasis: Rational use in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

The advent of the biological therapies has led health expenditure in dermatology units. This study aims to evaluate, in our regular clinical practice, the patterns of use of etanercept and its influence on efficacy and safety outcomes, as well as the real costs associated with continuous and intermittent treatment regimens.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, non-interventionist, and multicenter study to analyze the experience of the treatment with etanercept in the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, given according to the daily clinical practice of the Dermatology Departments of the Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén and the Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville).

RESULTS

83.3% (n = 45) of the 54 patients included in our study received the continuous regimen of Etanercept, whereas 16.7% (n = 9) were given the intermittent regimen. 94.4% (n = 51) of the patients studied began the Etanercept treatment at a dose of 50 mg/week. The mean patient/year cost of the study population is €11 298.80 (95%CI €10 551.40-€12 046.20). Breaking down the first and the second year of treatment by regimen, in the continuous regimen the mean cost would be €12 294.15 and €12 327.05 in the first and the second year, respectively, and €10 302.07 and €4986.51 in the intermittent regimen.

DISCUSSION

Etanercept is a biologic that had demonstrated its versatility over the years and permits the individualization of treatment in our patients, thus having a direct impact on drug-related costs. This is well demonstrated in our series, where 94.4% of our patients begin with the dose of 50 mg/d. Our study yields relatively higher figures in patients on continuous therapy, with 77.1% of them maintaining PASI75 at week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

We present our experience in regular clinical practice with etanercept, showing it to be an effective, safe, and versatile drug that permits patient-tailored treatment, delivering a frankly satisfactory control of our psoriasis patients.

Psoriasis causes significant economic burden to patients

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis results in expenses to patients from many cost sources. Psoriasis treatments may result in considerable time and traveling costs, yet many studies fail to account for these costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the multidimensional economic burden of psoriasis to patients.

METHODS

The study was based on 232 Finnish patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis visiting a tertiary level dermatological clinic during a 1-year study period between October 1, 2009 and September 30, 2010. The data were based on a patient questionnaire, clinical data from the medical records and reimbursement data from the Finnish Social Insurance Institution. Item costs were based on true costs charged from the patients and all time cost estimates were based on the Human Capital Approach method.

RESULTS

199 patients with psoriasis and 33 with psoriatic arthritis were included in the study. Total costs were higher for patients receiving traditional systemic medications or phototherapy than those not receiving such treatment. Travel costs and travel time costs accounted for more than 60% of the costs of phototherapy. Skin care at home was time consuming and thus caused significant burden to patients. The majority of the visit costs arose from hospital visits and only a small proportion were attributed to visiting primary health care providers.

CONCLUSION

Visit charges and other patient co-payments were estimated to play a minor role in the total cost of psoriasis incurred by patients, while travel costs and lost time comprised the majority of the costs, which should not be omitted in future studies regarding costs of treatments.