Successful Treatment of a Keratoacanthoma with Electrochemotherapy: A Case Report

Intralesional Treatments for Invasive Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most frequent cancer in humans and has the potential to progress locally, metastasize, and cause death in a subset of patients. cSCC is especially common in the elderly, and it will probably represent a major health concern in the near future. Surgery is the standard treatment for cSCC, but intralesional therapies can sometimes be considered for certain patients and under certain circumstances. The choice of intralesional treatment depends on the patient's characteristics and the clinician's previous experience and expertise. Here we are reviewing intralesional treatments for cSCC and keratoacanthoma (KA). We have started with some classic drugs, such as methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, interferon, and cryosurgery, but also comment on electrochemotherapy. Finally, we have focused on novel therapies, some of which are under development, and future perspectives, including intralesional immunotherapy and oncolytic viruses.

Definition of a Novel Plasmid-Based Gene Transfection Protocol of Mammalian Skeletal Muscles by Means of In Vivo Electroporation

We describe an original electroporation protocol for in vivo plasmid DNA transfection. The right hind limbs of C57 mice are exposed to a specifically designed train of permeabilizing electric pulses by transcutaneous application of tailored needle electrodes, immediately after the injection of pEGFP-C1 plasmid encoding GFP (Green Fluorescente Protein). The electroporated rodents show a greater GFP expression than the controls at three different time points (4, 10, and 15 days). The electroporated muscles display only mild interstitial myositis, with a significant increase in inflammatory cell infiltrates. Finally, mild gait abnormalities are registered in electroporated mice only in the first 48 h after the treatment. This protocol has proven to be highly efficient in terms of expression levels of the construct, is easy to apply since it does not require surgical exposure of the muscle and is well tolerated by the animals because it does not cause evident morphological and functional damage to the electroporated muscle.

The use of cisplatin electrochemotherapy in nonmelanoma skin cancers: A single-center study

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a well-known nonconventional skin cancer ablative method that was shown to be safe and effective for treating both locoregional disease spreading and disseminated cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions from different types of cancer. The most common medications used are bleomycin and cisplatin. In the last years many studies were performed on ECT, lead it to be a valid therapeutic option in many international guidelines. Nevertheless, there are still no clear indications regarding timing of its use. The main aim of this study was first to assess the safety and effectiveness of intralesional cisplatin ECT for treating different types of nonmelanoma skin cancer in a group of eligible patients. The second endpoint was to assess patients' tolerability and symptoms improvement through the treatment. A single-center prospective study was performed. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, or skin metastases were selected during 1 month. The ideal setting was the presence of two or three lesions with a maximum diameter of 2 cm. Both primary, recurrent, and metastatic lesions were included. Before and 8 weeks after treatment, all patients were evaluated to assess the number, measurement, and anatomical site of skin lesions using photography and metric notation. The medical device for membrane electroporation was the CLINIPORATOR EPS02 model. The cisplatin concentration was at least 1 mg/mL. The dose for each single lesion was calculated based on its volume, as is the standard procedure for ECT. Local or systemic adverse events and changes in symptoms were evaluated with a questionnaire based on a visual analog scale that was administrated before and after ECT. Eight patients with a total of 18 lesions underwent the procedure (six men and two women). Four out of eight (50%) patients had a complete response to the treatment. However, all eight patients had an overall tumor response (100%), experiencing an improvement in symptoms including less pain and bleeding from the tumor. Our study clearly show that ECT with intralesional cisplatin is a valuable and safety procedure for nonmelanoma skin cancer and cutaneous tumor metastasis. ECT with cisplatin was able to achieve a good local disease control leading to complete response in an half of cases. The results were stable after 1 year of follow-up. The outer ear area displayed a really good response, due to both ear's anatomical configuration and intralesional cisplatin pharmacological characteristics.

Relative Efficacy of Nonoperative Treatment of Keratoacanthomas

Background

Keratoacanthomas (KAs) are neoplasms of squamous epithelium which exhibit rapid growth and are often difficult to distinguish clinically from squamous cell carcinoma. Excision is the most common treatment, but in refractory cases or for KAs in cosmetically sensitive areas, nonoperative modalities may be better suited.

Objective

To compare efficacies of topical and intralesional therapies for the treatment of KAs.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed using Medline, Ovid, and Embase. Studies looking at the efficacy of topical or intralesional treatments for KAs were included. To compare efficacy, 2-tailed t-tests were performed, with P < .05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Forty-one studies were identified across 5 modalities. Both topical and intralesional treatments had high KA eradication rates (92%-100%). Intralesional 5-fluorouracil led to faster KA healing times when compared to intralesional methotrexate (3.7 vs 4.6 weeks, P = .017). Similarly, topical 5-fluorouracil led to faster time to heal than topical imiquimod (3.8 vs 7.6 weeks with imiquimod, P < .0001).

Conclusion

For nonoperative treatment of KAs, strong evidence currently exists for both topical and intralesional therapies. Decisions on which modality to use should be made on a case-by-case basis.