Cardiovascular Drug Use and Risk of Actinic Keratosis: A Case-Control Study

Digitally Enhanced Methods for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment Responses in Actinic Keratoses: A New Avenue in Personalized Skin Care

Non-melanocytic skin cancers represent an important public health problem due to the increasing incidence and the important local destructive potential. Thus, the early diagnosis and treatment of precancerous lesions (actinic keratoses) is a priority for the dermatologist. In recent years, non-invasive skin imaging methods have seen an important development, moving from simple observational methods used in clinical research, to true diagnostic and treatment methods that make the dermatologist's life easier. Given the frequency of these precancerous lesions, their location on photo-exposed areas, as well as the long treatment periods, with variable, imprecise end-points, the need to use non-invasive imaging devices is increasingly evident to complete the clinical observations in the diagnosis and treatment of these lesions, with the aim of increasing accuracy and decreasing the adverse effects due to long treatment duration. This is the first review that brings together all skin imaging methods (dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, ultrasonography, dermoscopy-guided high frequency ultrasonography, and optical coherence tomography) used in the evaluation of actinic keratoses and their response to different treatment regimens.

Association between calcium channel blockers and the severity of actinic keratosis on face and scalp: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a skin condition associated with age, sun exposure, and immunosuppression. Certain drugs, such as photosensitizing medications and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), have been linked to AK. This study explores the impact of individual, behavioral, and exposure factors on the severity of AKs on the face and scalp.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on immunocompetent individuals with at least one AK on their face or scalp and assessed demographic factors, sun exposure and protection, history of skin cancer, and medication use within the last 6 months. The primary outcome was the Actinic Keratosis Area and Severity Index (AKASI) score, and a hierarchical generalized linear model was used to evaluate the variation in AKASI scores, adjusting for gender, age, and skin phototype.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy subjects between 39 and 92 years were evaluated. The majority had phototype I or II (77%), male gender (51%), personal history of skin cancer (55%), and low adherence to sunscreen use (29%). The use of photosensitizing medications was reported by 61%. Through multivariate analysis, older age (βSE  = 0.14; P < 0.01), lighter skin phototype (βSE  = 0.15; P = 0.01), history of skin cancer (βSE  = 0.12; P < 0.01), sunburning (βSE  = 0.12; P < 0.01), and use of CCBs (βSE  = 0.11; P = 0.02) were identified as independent risk factors for AK severity. Photosensitizing drugs were not identified as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Older age, lower skin phototype classifications, and a personal history of skin cancer were confirmed as severity risk factors for AK, while the use of CCBs was associated with more severe AK.

Risk Factors for Actinic Keratoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To integrate evidence and assess the risk factors associated with actinic keratosis (AK).

Methods

Unrestricted searches were conducted on five electronic databases, with an end-date parameter of September 2021. We summarized the study characteristics and pooled the results from individual studies by using a random-effects model. The risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was estimated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Sixteen studies were included in final analysis, and we assessed the AK risk among a variety of risk factors. Overall, the male sex (odds ratio (OR): 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.94-3.25; P < 0.01), age >45 years (OR = 7.65, 95% CI: 2.95-19.86; P < 0.01), light Fitzpatrick skin phototype (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.74-3.10; P < 0.01), light hair color (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.40-3.36; P < 0.01), light eye color (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03-2.70; P = 0.04), freckles on face/arms (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.37-2.58; P < 0.01), suffered positive history of other types of non-melanoma skin cancer (OR = 4.46, 95% CI: 2.71-7.33; P < 0.01), sunburns in childhood (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.47-3.70; P < 0.01) and adulthood (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.12-2.00; P < 0.01), severe sunburn (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.62-2.31; P < 0.01), and chronic occupational and/or recreational sun exposure (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 2.16-4.81; P < 0.01) increased the risk of AK. Moreover, sunscreen use (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77; P < 0.01) and history of atopy reduced the risk of AK. Sensitivity analysis yielded consistent results. The included studies showed a high risk of bias.

Conclusion

We confirm several well-known AK risk factors and their quantitative data, and summarized the uncommon risk factors and protective factors. Our results may inform on the design and implementation of AK screening and educational programs.

Use of calcium channel blockers in dermatology: a narrative review

Introduction: Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are commonly used for cardiovascular diseases. The evidence supporting the use of CCB in dermatology is mostly anecdotal and limited to case reports or small case series.Areas covered: This review article is divided into two parts. The first part discusses the therapeutic use of CCB in dermatology. The second part focuses on mucocutaneous adverse reactions due to the administration of CCB.Expert opinion: The use of CCB in dermatology is mainly based on its properties as a vasodilator and the inhibition of muscle contractions, such as pernio, anal fissures, facial wrinkles, and painful leiomyoma. However, there remain other modes of action to explain its clinical use in calcinosis, keloid, pressure ulcer, and fibromatosis. Compared to oral CCB, the lack of systemic side effects would make topical use of CCB an attractive alternative in the treatment of skin diseases, but the evidence for topical CCB is still limited, and there is a lack of standardized topical formulation. The main mucocutaneous adverse effects of CCB include gingival hyperplasia, phototoxicity, eczema, psoriasis and risk of skin cancers. Plausible factors for these adverse events include CCB's photoinstability, aldosterone synthesis inhibition, disturbed calcium homeostasis and immunosuppressive properties.