Meaningful Changes in What Matters to Individuals with Vitiligo: Content Validity and Meaningful Change Thresholds of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

Reliability of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index measurement tool for vitiligo

Background

A reliable instrument is needed to assess vitiligo severity and treatment response.

Objective

To assess inter- and intrarater variability and accuracy of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index among trained raters and to evaluate a proposed Vitiligo Area Scoring Index using equidistant 10% depigmentation increments (VASI 10%).

Methods

In this prospective study, 12 raters evaluated images of 10 participants with vitiligo on 2 occasions using total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) scores after training. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities and accuracy vs digital scores were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. VASI 10% scores were evaluated separately for interrater reliability and accuracy.

Results

F-VASI interrater reliability improved from "moderate" to "good" between time points, while T-VASI was "good" at both time points. Intrarater reliability ranged from "good" to "excellent" for T-VASI and "poor" to "excellent" for F-VASI. Accuracy intraclass correlation coefficient was "good" to "excellent" for most raters. Interrater reliability using VASI 10% was "moderate" for both T-VASI and F-VASI.

Limitations

Small participant population and number of raters; participants were not assessed in person; no repeated VASI 10% measures.

Conclusion

Vitiligo Area Scoring Index generally provides good to excellent reliability for assessment of vitiligo by raters who receive standardized training.

Assessing Participants' Experiences with Vitiligo from Patient Interviews

INTRODUCTION

Vitiligo is an autoimmune disease, causing skin depigmentation. Individuals with vitiligo incur substantial psychosocial burden and have expressed frustration with their treatments. Here, we describe the burden of vitiligo and opinions on what constitutes meaningful change among participants of two qualitative interview studies.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subgroup of adolescent and adult participants with vitiligo from two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials of ruxolitinib cream (Study 1) and a real-world panel (Study 2). Participants were asked about their disease burden, treatment goals, importance of facial/body improvement (treatment satisfaction: scale range 0-10), and meaningfulness of change (yes/no).

RESULTS

A total of 36 participants from Study 1 and 23 from Study 2 were interviewed. In Study 1, the highest degree of impact was on reduced self-esteem (facial lesions, 62.5%; body lesions, 55.6%), social inhibition (facial lesions, 65.6%; body lesions, 61.1%), and sun sensitivity (facial lesions, 31.3%; body lesions, 55.6%). Most participants (83.3%) reported that facial improvement was equally (36.1%) or more important (47.2%) than body improvement, with mean treatment satisfaction of 8.1 and 6.9, respectively. Meaningful change was reported by 83.3% and 92.9% of participants with 50-74% and ≥ 75% improvement per the facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index, respectively, and by 82.6% of participants with ≥ 25% improvement per the total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index per Study 1 outcomes at Week 24. In Study 2, most (82.6%) participants felt that the noticeability of their vitiligo affected their behavior. Nearly all (87.0%) said that an ideal treatment would repigment or return natural color to their facial skin; 56.5% considered ≥ 50% facial repigmentation to be the smallest meaningful improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants from both qualitative interviews expressed substantial psychosocial burden. Repigmentation in both facial and body vitiligo were important, with meaningful change determined to be ≥ 50% facial repigmentation and ≥ 25% body repigmentation.

Disease Course, Treatment Patterns and Goals Among Patients with Non-segmental Vitiligo Across Europe and the United States

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a lack of research regarding disease course and burden as well as treatment patterns and goals in patients with non-segmental vitiligo (NSV). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate disease course, treatment patterns and goals in patients with NSV.

METHODS

This analysis used secondary data from the Adelphi Real World Vitiligo Disease Specific Programme™ 2021, specifically, a survey of physicians and their adult and adolescent patients with NSV. Physicians categorized patients by the extent of NSV at time of survey completion as mild, moderate or severe/very severe. Physician-reported patient information included demographics, current/previously prescribed NSV therapies, treatment satisfaction and the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS). Patients completed a survey on treatment satisfaction and the VNS. Treatment pattern data were stratified by disease extent and Fitzpatrick skin type.

RESULTS

At survey completion, physicians reported that 38, 50 and 12% of patients (N = 1865) had improving, stable and deteriorating/progressing disease, respectively. Most patients (96%) with mild disease at treatment initiation still had mild disease at the time of survey completion. More than half of patients with moderate disease (62%) or severe/very severe disease (57%) at treatment initiation still had moderate or severe/very severe disease at survey completion. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) were the most common treatment in 40% of patients followed by phototherapy in 30%. Patients hoped for re-pigmentation (mild 56%, moderate 62%, severe/very severe 66%), reduction (mild 50%, moderate 56%, severe/very severe 49%) or cessation of affected areas with vitiligo (mild 48%, moderate 54%, severe/very severe 43%).

CONCLUSION

The study findings indicate that a significant proportion of patients with NSV are not improving on current treatments, most commonly TCIs and phototherapy. The results highlight the unmet need for novel and effective therapies to substantially improve re-pigmentation, an important treatment goal for patients with NSV.

Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5%: A Review in Non-Segmental Vitiligo

Topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream (Opzelura®), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is the first treatment to be approved in several countries for use in patients aged ≥ 12 years with non-segmental vitiligo. In the identical phase III TRuE-V1 and TRuE-V2 trials, significantly more ruxolitinib cream recipients were able to achieve statistically significant and clinically meaningful facial and total body repigmentation, as well as reductions in vitiligo noticeability, compared with vehicle recipients. Efficacy was sustained in longer-term analyses to week 104 of treatment. Ruxolitinib 1.5% cream was generally tolerable in these trials; the most common treatment-related adverse events were acne, pruritus and exfoliation, all at the application site. As with orally administered JAK inhibitors, topical ruxolitinib carries boxed warnings in the USA for serious infections, mortality, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and thrombosis, although the incidences were low with topical application. Thus, topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream is an effective and generally tolerable treatment option for patients aged ≥ 12 years with non-segmental vitiligo.

The effect of vitamin C on oxidative stress indices and skin regimentation of vitiligo patients

It has been suggested that vitamin C is involved in suppressing stress oxidation signaling in vitiligo disease. However, the effect of vitamin C supplementation on stress oxidative factors has not been investigated in vitiligo subjects. This study was designed to examine the effects on vitamin C supplementation on serum levels of stress oxidative factors and regimentation in vitiligo patients. Forty-four vitiligo patients will be recruited in this study. After block matching for sex and number of phototherapy sessions, they will be randomly assigned to receive 1000 mg/d vitamin C or placebo for 8 weeks. The weight, height, and waist circumference of participants will be measured. Determination of serum stress oxidative indices (CAT, SOD, GPX, MDA, TOS, TAC) will be done at study baseline and at the end of the trial. Also, the regimentation will be determined using the VASI score. This is the first randomized controlled trial that will determine the effect of vitamin C supplementation on serum levels of stress oxidative indices and regimentation in vitiligo patients. The results of this trial will provide clinical evidence on the effectiveness of vitamin C supplementation in controlling oxidative stress in vitiligo patients. Trial registration number: This study is registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials website (available at http://www.irct.ir , identifier: IRCT20230123057193N1), Registration date: 2023/04/17.

Implementation of the vitiligo area scoring index in clinical studies of patients with vitiligo: a scoping review

The vitiligo area scoring index (VASI) is a validated, reliable clinician-reported outcome measure widely used to assess the extent of skin depigmentation seen in patients with vitiligo and to measure patient responses to therapies for vitiligo in clinical trials. However, its implementation in studies is inconsistent and makes comparing results across different studies difficult. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize interventional clinical studies that applied the VASI to measure vitiligo and identify variability in VASI implementation. A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Interventional studies published between January 1946 and October 2020 that used the VASI as an outcome measure for assessing vitiligo response were reviewed for methodological approach. Great heterogeneity was found within the 55 included interventional studies that used VASI as an outcome measure. A total of 9 VASI subtypes were described by the authors within 10 intervention categories. VASI determined study eligibility in one study. Body surface area was most frequently established using inconsistent methods. We found unclear or ambiguously scaled assessments of depigmentation. Most VASI outcomes were reported as mean absolute difference, percentage VASI improvement, and percentage of patients who achieved the VASI endpoint. The VASI score was over 100 in one study. Our scoping review revealed many VASI methodology variations in interventional clinical studies of vitiligo. While VASI is a standard method to measure vitiligo changes, substantial heterogeneity in methodology limits reliable comparison and interpretation of findings from different clinical trials. Our findings may be used as a foundation to standardize the VASI outcome measure methodology, allowing for improved clinician training and rigorous data analysis across vitiligo research groups worldwide.

A Qualitative Study to Develop and Evaluate the Content Validity of the Vitiligo Patient Priority Outcome (ViPPO) Measures

INTRODUCTION

Vitiligo can be associated with a psychological burden, stigmatization and impaired quality of life. Tools to assess the impact of vitiligo exist; however, none were developed in line with the FDA's patient-reported outcome (PRO) Guidance for Industry. This study aimed to explore the content validity of two newly developed PRO measures to assess the impact of facial and total body vitiligo on how patients feel and function.

METHODS

Draft PRO measures were developed from existing literature and input from PRO experts, a patient advocate and a clinical expert. Qualitative interviews were conducted with US participants living with vitiligo and international dermatologists with vitiligo expertise. Concept elicitation methodology explored the relevance of concepts in the draft PRO, while cognitive debriefing assessed conceptual relevance and understanding/interpretation. Items were iteratively amended/added throughout the interview study.

RESULTS

The 60 participants included adults (n = 48, 63% female, 18-62 years old) and adolescents (n = 12, 67% female, 12-17 years old) with Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-VI. Expert dermatologists from the US (n = 8), EU (n = 4), India (n = 1) and Egypt (n = 1) participated. Concept elicitation was utilized to confirm the signs/symptoms of vitiligo and the associated impact on emotional/psychological wellbeing, social functioning, daily life and work/school. Conceptual saturation was achieved. Most participants reported impacts on their emotional/psychological wellbeing (n = 57, 95%), e.g. feeling self-conscious (n = 35, 58%). Participants reported impacts on social functioning (n = 53, 88%), e.g. vitiligo being noticed by others (n = 42, 70%). There was general consensus between participants and expert dermatologists. Cognitive debriefing confirmed that the items were well understood. Most items were conceptually relevant; feeling self-conscious and feeling frustrated were highly endorsed. Items were removed based on low conceptual relevance (feeling abandoned, skin roughness) and expected redundancy (four items), resulting in two measures with three proposed domain scores: Emotional/Psychological Wellbeing; Social Functioning; and Physical Sensation. No comprehension concerns were observed in relation to the 7-day recall period or the item response scale/options. Eight dermatologists reviewed the PRO measures, confirming comprehensiveness and relevance.

CONCLUSION

The draft Vitiligo Patient Priority Outcomes (ViPPO) measures evaluate the impact of facial (ViPPO-F) and total body (ViPPO-T) vitiligo on emotional/psychological and social functioning. The ViPPO measures are well understood, comprehensive and content valid for adults and adolescents with vitiligo.