Evaluation and Management of the Geriatric Urologic Oncology Patient

Prognostic factors of renal cell cancer in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study

Mortality in renal cell cancer (RCC) is high in the elderly population. Comorbidities have a greater impact on overall prognosis of RCC among elderly patients than in younger patients. All new RCC cases were collected in people over 74 years of age between 1995 and 2018 from the Finnish cancer registry. The comorbidities were identified from the Care Registry for Healthcare. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to evaluate the risk of death based on comorbidities. The overall risk of death was analyzed using the Cox regression model. The risk for RCC death was analyzed using Fine and Gray regression analysis. Individual prognostic role of CCI components was evaluated by adding each component separately into the multivariable Fine and Gray regression model. Using the most prognostic comorbidities we constructed a nomogram to predict RCC mortality. Statistically significant prognostic factors of RCC death were tumor morphology (clear cell, papillary and chromophobe), sex, operative treatment, age, primary tumor extent and CCI. The strongest prognostic factors for overall mortality were tumor extent, tumor morphology and operative treatment. Among the components of CCI, the most important comorbidities predicting mortality were dementia, heart failure and kidney disease. The limitation of this study is that the comorbidities have only been recorded at inpatient and outpatient hospital contacts, which is why the prevalence of comorbidities is probably underestimated. In addition, physical performance status was not available from registry data, but it significantly affects the treatment decisions. RCC mortality is high in the elderly population. Among comorbidities, dementia and heart failure have the greatest impact on the prognosis. Curative treatment in selected elderly patients is efficient and should be considered in patients who can tolerate it and have only limited comorbidities.

Efficacy and safety of surgery in renal carcinoma patients 75 years and older: a retrospective analysis

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and complications of surgical treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma aged ≥ 75 years.

Methods

From January 2009 to May 2019, we assessed 166 patients aged 75 years and older, who either had radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) as treatments for diagnosed renal cell carcinoma. Patients were divided into one group of patients aged 75–79 years and the second group of patients ≥ 80 years. The complications and survival were compared between the two groups.

Results

All 166 patients were successfully operated on. Differences between the two groups were statistically significant in intraoperative and postoperative complications and Clavien–Dindo score of ≥ 1 (P = 0.02, P < 0.001, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed no significant correlation between a Clavien–Dindo score ≥ 1 versus gender, body mass index (BMI), lack of symptoms, KPS, baseline GFR, postoperative GFR, tumor size, tumor location, surgical method, and transfusion or no transfusion (ALL P > 0.05). Multifactor analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, partial nephrectomy, and operation time were independent predictors of a Clavien–Dindo score ≥ 1. No significant difference was found in OS between the two groups, (P < 0.0001), and no significant difference in CSS (P = 0.056). There was no significant difference in OS and CSS between the RN and PN groups (P = 0.143, P = 0.281, respectively).

Conclusions

According to our findings, the overall safety of surgical therapy for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma is adequate. PN should be carefully examined, especially over the age of 80. To select suitable patients based on an assessment of the tumor's complexity and patients' physical condition, such as age, underlying diseases and other conditions, technical feasibility, balance of benefits and a case-by-case.

[Concepts in geriatric uro-oncology]

Uro-oncology is not only concerned with treatment methods themselves but also with therapeutic objectives and decision-making concepts involving algorithms. We discuss whether the latter is applicable to all patients groups or needs to be adapted in order to be suitable for elderly and frail patients with regard to their lifestyle and living situation as well as their altered physiology.

Association of functional status and treatment choice among older men with prostate cancer in the Medicare Advantage population

BACKGROUND

There are several effective treatments for prostate cancer. To what extent a patient's functional status influences the treatment decision is unknown. This study examined the association between functional status and treatment among older men with prostate cancer.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data were used to identify men who were 65 years old or older and were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1998 and 2009. The primary outcome was treatment choice: conservative management, surgery, or radiation within 1 year of the diagnosis. The exposure was the functional status assessed as 4 measures within 3 domains: 1) physical function (activities of daily living [ADLs] and physical component summary score), 2) cognitive function (survey completer: self vs proxy), and 3) emotional well-being (mental component summary score). A multivariate, multinomial logistic regression was fitted with adjustments for several patient, tumor, and regional characteristics.

RESULTS

This study identified 508 conservative management patients, 195 surgery patients, and 603 radiation patients. Compared with men with no ADL dependency, those with any ADL dependency had lower odds of receiving surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.99) or radiation (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78) versus conservative management. ADL dependency did not differ when surgery and radiation were compared. Patients with a proxy survey response were less likely to receive surgery or radiation versus conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional status is associated with treatment choice for men with prostate cancer. Future research should examine whether this is due to physician recommendations, patient preferences, or a combination. Cancer 2016;122:3199-206. © 2016 American Cancer Society.