Surgical treatment of migraine headaches

Analyzing Google Search Trends for Migraine Surgery and Nurtec in Response to Public Announcements

Background

Nurtec, a versatile migraine medication, has gained popularity. However, the awareness of migraine surgery remains uncertain.

Methods

Following a descriptive approach, this cross-sectional study used Google Trends data as of December 1, 2023, to analyze internet search patterns. Approval from Vanderbilt University's institutional review board and adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were confirmed. Monthly relative search volume (RSV) data for "migraine surgery," "Nurtec," and "Rimegepant" were collected from January 1, 2004, to November 11, 2023, within the United States. Statistical analysis involved determining mean monthly RSV values and percentage changes for critical periods.

Results

For "Nurtec," a significant surge in RSV occurred from March 2020 to April 2020 (344%). Additional peaks were observed from June 2020 to July 2020 (66%), October 2020 to December 2020 (169%), May 2021 to June 2021 (33%), and May 2023 to June 2023 (14%). "Migraine surgery" exhibited a notable 400% increase in RSV, from March 2005 to May 2005. However, post-2006, RSV for "migraine surgery" consistently remained low without noticeable peaks.

Conclusions

The analysis of RSV trends for "Nurtec" and "migraine surgery" from 2004 to 2023 reveals the impact of pivotal events and marketing strategies on public interest. The distinct peaks in "Nurtec" RSV align with Food & Drug Administration approvals and marketing campaigns, highlighting the medication's accessibility. Conversely, the consistently low RSV for "migraine surgery" indicates limited awareness, emphasizing the need for enhanced promotion and education regarding surgical interventions.

Treatment delay from onset of occipital neuralgia symptoms to treatment with nerve decompression surgery: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the time between onset of occipital neuralgia symptoms and nerve decompression surgery, (2) perform a cost comparison analysis between surgical and nonsurgical treatment of occipital neuralgia, and (3) report postoperative results of nerve decompression for occipital neuralgia.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 1112) who underwent screening for nerve decompression surgery were evaluated for occipital neuralgia. Of those, 367 patients (33%) met the inclusion criteria. Timing of occipital neuralgia symptom onset and pain characteristics were prospectively collected. Cost associated with the nonsurgical treatment of occipital neuralgia was calculated for the period between onset of symptoms and surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients (73%) underwent occipital nerve decompression. The average time between onset of occipital neuralgia and surgery was 19 years (7.1-32). Postoperatively, the median number of pain days per month decreased by 17 (0-26, 57%) (P < .001), the median pain intensity decreased by 4 (2-8, 44%) (P < .001), and median pain duration in hours was reduced by 12 (2-23, 50%) (P < .001). The annual mean cost of nonsurgical occipital neuralgia treatment was $28 728.82 ($16 419.42-$41 198.41) per patient. The mean cost during the 19-year time frame before surgery was $545 847.75($311 968.90-$782 769.82).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients suffer from occipital neuralgia for an average of 19 years before undergoing surgery. Nerve decompression reduces symptom severity significantly and should be considered earlier in the treatment course of occipital neuralgia that is refractory to conservative treatment to prevent patient morbidity and decrease direct and indirect health care costs.

The Positive and Negative Predictive Value of Targeted Diagnostic Botox Injection in Nerve Decompression Migraine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Nerve decompression surgery is an effective treatment modality for patients who experience migraines. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) injections have been traditionally used as a method to identify trigger sites; however, there is a paucity in data regarding its diagnostic efficacy. The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic capacity of Botox in successfully identifying migraine trigger sites and predicting surgical success.

METHODS

A sensitivity analysis was performed on all patients receiving Botox for migraine trigger site localization followed by a surgical decompression of affected peripheral nerves. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients met our inclusion criteria and underwent targeted diagnostic Botox injection followed by a peripheral nerve deactivation surgery with at least 3 months' follow-up. Patients with successful Botox injections (defined as at least 50% improvement in Migraine Headache Index scores after injection) had significantly higher average reduction in migraine intensity (56.7% versus 25.8%; P = 0.020), frequency (78.1% versus 46.8%; P = 0.018), and Migraine Headache Index (89.7% versus 49.2%; P = 0.016) postsurgical deactivation. Sensitivity analysis shows that the use of Botox injection as a diagnostic modality for migraine headaches has a sensitivity of 56.7% and a specificity of 80.0%. The positive predictive value is 89.5% and the negative predictive value is 38.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic targeted Botox injections have a very high positive predictive value. It is therefore a useful diagnostic modality that can help identify migraine trigger sites and improve preoperative patient selection.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, II.

Minimally invasive nerve and artery sparing surgical approach for temporal migraines

Background

Temporal migraines (TM) present with throbbing, pulsating headaches in the temporal area. Different surgical techniques ranging from resecting the auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) and or ligating the superficial temporal artery (STA) have shown similar good results to decrease TM symptoms. No conclusive data supports a specific disease of the STA in TM patients. A minimally invasive technique is proposed to preserve both vascular and nerve structures.

Methods

Patients with drug resistant TM were selected and treated with two techniques: nerve sparing and nerve and artery sparing. The study included 57 patients with TM, with an average age of 47.5 years. TM improvement was quantified after at least one year of follow up time. STA biopsies were sent for histological analysis.

Results

Forty-two patients underwent nerve-sparing decompression, with a therapeutic success rate of 78.6%, corresponding to 22.1 days with migraine per month decreasing to 6.2. Histological analysis of the STA showed varying degrees of endofibrosis in 75% of the samples. Histological results do not correlate with the intensity of symptoms before or after surgery. Fifteen patients underwent nerve and artery sparing arteriolysis, with an overall therapeutic success rate of 86.6% of which 80% had >90% improvement. The average migraine days dropped from 24 to 2.5 days per month in this group.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive nerve sparing approaches are an effective and safe treatment to improve drug resistant TM symptoms. Endofibrosis of the STA was present in 75% of the cases, but it was found to be unrelated to pre-operative symptoms and outcome. Results are promising, but the limited numbers of patients treated with artery and nerve sparing technique needs further investigations.

Pearls for Starting a Headache Surgery Practice in Academic and Private Practice

There has been a growing body of evidence indicative of the effectiveness of headache surgery in treating patients with refractory headache disorders. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons issued a Policy Statement in 2018 stating that peripheral nerve decompression surgery for the treatment of refractory chronic headache disorders in select patients is considered a standard of care treatment. This endorsement sparked the interest of numerous plastic surgeons into initiating their own headache surgery practices. However, establishing a headache surgery clinic introduces challenges and considerations. This report outlines the key pillars for launching a successful headache surgery practice in academic and private practice environments.

The Efficacy of Trigger Site Surgery in the Elimination of Chronic Migraine Headache: An Update in the Rate of Success and Failure

Migraine headache (MH) is a prevalent neurovascular disorder that affects approximately 15% of the global population. They are more common in women and typically affect young and middle-aged individuals. Chronic MH is characterized by headaches occurring on ≥15 days per month for over three months. While only 5% of MHs are refractory, about 20%-50% do not respond to pharmacologic treatments. As a result, surgical interventions have emerged as an alternative method to eliminate MH since 2000 AD. These surgical treatments primarily target the peripheral mechanisms of MH, focusing on common trigger sites. Migraine surgery involves neurolysis of sensory branches of trigeminal and occipital nerves that supply the face and back of the head. Numerous clinical studies conducted between 2000 and 2021 have extensively described surgical interventions and their prognostic outcomes. After surgery, up to 80% of patients reported complete elimination of headaches, while 20%-35% experienced no relief. The failure to achieve complete elimination of MH can be attributed to various factors. The most common reason for a partial clinical response is the failure to identify all trigger sites or inadequate surgery on the trigger sites. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of current surgical interventions for MH at different trigger sites, including recent updates, success and failure rates, and potential causes of failure.

Treatment Delay in Patients Undergoing Headache Surgery (Nerve Decompression Surgery)

Background

Although headache surgery has been shown to be an effective treatment option for refractory headache disorders, it has not been included as part of the headache disorder management algorithm by non-surgical providers. This study aims to evaluate the delay in surgical management of patients with headache disorders. In addition, a cost comparison analysis between conservative and operative treatment of headache disorders was performed, and the surgical outcomes of headache surgery were reported.

Methods

Among 1112 patients who were screened, 271 (56%) patients underwent headache surgery. Data regarding the onset of headache disorder and pre- and postoperative pain characteristics were prospectively collected. To perform a cost comparison analysis, direct and indirect costs associated with the conservative treatment of headache disorders were calculated.

Results

The median duration between onset of headache disorder symptoms and headache surgery was 20 (8.2-32) years. The annual mean cost of conservative treatment of headache disorders was $49,463.78 ($30,933.87-$66,553.70) per patient. Over the 20-year time period before surgery, the mean cost was $989,275.65 ($618,677.31-$1,331,073.99). In comparison, the mean cost of headache surgery was $11,000. The median pain days per month decreased by 16 (0-25) (p<0.001), the median pain intensity reduced by 4 (2-7) (p<0.001), and the median pain duration decreased by 11 hours (0-22) (p<0.001).

Conclusion

This study shows that patients experience symptoms of headache disorders for an average of 20 years prior to undergoing headache surgery. Surgical treatment not only significantly improves headache pain but also reduces healthcare costs and should be implemented in the management algorithm of headache disorders.

Anatomic Anomalies of the Nerves Treated during Headache Surgery

Background

Headache surgery is a well-established, viable option for patients with chronic head pain/migraines refractory to conventional treatment modalities. These operations involve any number of seven primary nerves. In the occipital region, the surgical targets are the greater, lesser, and third occipital nerves. In the temporal region, they are the auriculotemporal and zygomaticotemporal nerves. In the forehead, the supraorbital and supratrochlear are targeted. The typical anatomic courses of these nerves are well established and documented in clinical and cadaveric studies. However, variations of this "typical" anatomy are quite common and relatively poorly understood. Headache surgeons should be aware of these common anomalies, as they may alter treatment in several meaningful ways.

Methods

In this article, we describe the experience of five established headache surgeons encompassing over 4000 cases with respect to the most common anomalies of the nerves typically addressed during headache surgery. Descriptions of anomalous nerve courses and suggestions for management are offered.

Results

Anomalies of all seven nerves addressed during headache operations occur with a frequency ranging from 2% to 50%, depending on anomaly type and nerve location. Variations of the temporal and occipital nerves are most common, whereas anomalies of the frontal nerves are relatively less common. Management includes broader dissection and/or transection of accessory injured nerves combined with strategies to reduce neuroma formation such as targeted reinnervation or regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces.

Conclusions

Understanding these myriad nerve anomalies is essential to any headache surgeon. Implications are relevant to preoperative planning, intraoperative dissection, and postoperative management.

Feasibility of Ultrasound Measurements of Peripheral Sensory Nerves in Head and Neck Area in Healthy Subjects

Background

Current diagnostic methods for nerve compression headaches consist of diagnostic nerve blocks. A less-invasive method that can possibly aid in the diagnosis is ultrasound, by measuring the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the affected nerve. However, this technique has not been validated, and articles evaluating CSA measurements in the asymptomatic population are missing in the current literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ultrasound measurements of peripheral extracranial nerves in the head and neck area in asymptomatic individuals.

Methods

The sensory nerves of the head and neck in healthy individuals were imaged by ultrasound. The CSA was measured at anatomical determined measurement sites for each nerve. To determine the feasibility of ultrasound measurements, the interrater reliability and the intrarater reliability were determined.

Results

In total, 60 healthy volunteers were included. We were able to image the nerves at nine of 11 measurement sites. The mean CSA of the frontal nerves ranged between 0.80 ± 0.42 mm2 and 1.20 ± 0.43 mm2, the mean CSA of the occipital nerves ranged between 2.90 ± 2.73 mm2 and 3.40 ± 1.91 mm2, and the mean CSA of the temporal nerves ranged between 0.92 ± 0.26 mm2 and 1.40 ± 1.11 mm2. The intrarater and interrater reliability of the CSA measurements was good (ICC: 0.75-0.78).

Conclusions

Ultrasound is a feasible method to evaluate CSA measurements of peripheral extracranial nerves in the head and neck area. Further research should be done to evaluate the use of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for nerve compression headache.

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Evaluation of Pain Sketches to Predict Outcomes in Headache Surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence has shown that patient drawings of pain can predict poor outcomes in headache surgery. Given that interpretation of pain drawings requires some clinical experience, the authors developed a machine learning framework capable of automatically interpreting pain drawings to predict surgical outcomes. This platform will allow surgeons with less clinical experience, neurologists, primary care practitioners, and even patients to better understand candidacy for headache surgery.

METHODS

A random forest machine learning algorithm was trained on 131 pain drawings provided prospectively by headache surgery patients before undergoing trigger-site deactivation surgery. Twenty-four features were used to describe the anatomical distribution of pain on each drawing for interpretation by the machine learning algorithm. Surgical outcome was measured by calculating percentage improvement in Migraine Headache Index at least 3 months after surgery. Artificial intelligence predictions were compared with clinician predictions of surgical outcome to determine artificial intelligence performance.

RESULTS

Evaluation of the data test set demonstrated that the algorithm was consistently more accurate (94%) than trained clinical evaluators. Artificial intelligence weighted diffuse pain, facial pain, and pain at the vertex as strong predictors of poor surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that structured algorithmic analysis is able to correlate pain patterns drawn by patients to Migraine Headache Index percentage improvement with good accuracy (94%). Further studies on larger data sets and inclusion of other significant clinical screening variables are required to improve outcome predictions in headache surgery and apply this tool to clinical practice.

Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Migraine in Adults: A Review of the Evidence

Background

Medical cannabis (MC) has been hypothesized as an alternative therapy for migraines, given the undesirable side effects of current migraine medications. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of MC in the treatment of migraine in adults.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science for eligible studies in adults aged 18 years and older. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. A narrative synthesis of the included studies was conducted.

Results

A total of 12 publications involving 1,980 participants in Italy and the United States of America were included.

Medical cannabis significantly reduced nausea and vomiting associated with migraine attacks after 6 months of use. Also, MC reduced the number of days of migraine after 30 days, and the frequency of migraine headaches per month. MC was 51% more effective in reducing migraines than non-cannabis products. Compared to amitriptyline, MC aborted migraine headaches in some (11.6%) users and reduced migraine frequency. While the use of MC for migraines was associated with the occurrence of medication overuse headaches (MOH), and the adverse events were mostly mild and occurred in 43.75% of patients who used oral cannabinoid preparations.

Conclusions

There is promising evidence that MC may have a beneficial effect on the onset and duration of migraine headaches in adults. However, well-designed experimental studies that assess MC's effectiveness and safety for treating migraine in adults are needed to support this hypothesis.

Clinical Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Diagnosis of Migraine Trigger Points

BACKGROUND

With a 13 percent global prevalence, migraine headaches are the most commonly diagnosed neurologic disorder, and are a top five cause of visits to the emergency room. Surgical techniques, such as decompression and/or ablation of neurovasculature, have shown to provide relief. Popular diagnostic modalities to identify trigger loci include handheld Doppler examinations and botulinum toxin injection. This article aims to establish the positive predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks for identifying therapeutic surgical targets for migraine headache surgery.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of 36 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent peripheral nerve blocks using 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and subsequent surgery on identified migraine headache trigger sites. Patients were grouped into successful and unsuccessful blocks and further categorized into successful and unsuccessful surgery subgroups. Group analysis was performed using paired t tests, and positive-predictive value calculations were performed on subgroups.

RESULTS

The preoperative Migraine Headache Index of patients with positive blocks was 152.71, versus 34.26 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Each index component also decreased significantly: frequency (22.11 versus 15.06 migraine headaches per month; p < 0.001), intensity (7.43 versus 4.12; p < 0.001), and duration (0.93 versus 0.55 days; p < 0.001). The positive-predictive value of diagnostic peripheral nerve blocks in identifying a migraine headache trigger site responsive to surgical intervention was calculated to be 0.89 (95 percent CI, 1 to 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the positive-predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks as used in the diagnostic workup of patients with chronic migraine headaches. Peripheral nerve blocks serve as a reliable clinical tool in mapping migraine trigger sites for surgical intervention while offering more flexibility in their administration and recording as compared to established diagnostic methods. .

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, IV.

A previously unreported variant of the auriculotemporal nerve

Venous fenestrations are rare and when present often are not pierced by regional nerves. Herein, we report an unusual case of a fenestrated superficial temporal vein (STV). Anterior to the external ear, where the STV and superficial temporal artery normally travel with the auriculotemporal nerve (ATN), the nerve was found to pierce the STV. The fenestration within the STV was approximately 0.35mm in diameter, and there was no sign of compression of the ATN as it traversed this vessel. Following the site of penetration of the STV by the ATN, the nerve had a normal course into the skin and surrounding fascia. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a fenestrated STV being pierced by the ATN. Such an anatomical variation might be considered by clinicians who treat patients with pathology of this region.

Surgical Management of Post-Traumatic Trigeminal Neuralgia - Case Report and Review of the Literature

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuralgia (PTTN), also known as anesthesia dolorosa , is at times a debilitating affliction, but remains a condition with minimal research and without definitive treatment, specifically in the periorbital and malar regions. Below we present a case of PTTN in a patient with historic facial trauma who has successfully achieved resolution of pain. We describe diagnostic and therapeutic anesthesia blocks and ablative procedures targeting the zygomaticofacial and zygomaticotemporal nerves. We promote awareness for the procedures and the potential large impact on the oral and maxillofacial surgery community when treating those suffering from facial pain. Finally, we present an algorithm that can aid surgeons in diagnosing and treating patients with PTTN.

Trigger-Site Deactivation Surgery for Nerve Compression Headaches

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify patients who are candidates for headache surgery. 2. Counsel the patient preoperatively with regard to success rates, recovery, and complications. 3. Develop a surgical plan for primary and secondary nerve decompression. 4. Understand the surgical anatomy at all trigger sites. 5. Select appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes.

SUMMARY

Headache surgery encompasses release of extracranial peripheral sensory nerves at seven sites. Keys to successful surgery include correct patient selection, detailed patient counseling, and meticulous surgical technique. This article is a practical step-by-step guide, from preoperative assessment to surgery and postoperative recovery. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes, in addition to complications and salvage procedures, are discussed. Intraoperative photographs, videos, and screening questionnaires are provided.

The Evolution of Migraine Surgery: Two Decades of Continual Research. My Current Thoughts

SUMMARY

A mere serendipitous finding has culminated in a life-changing development for patients and a colossally fulfilling field for many surgeons. The surgical treatment of migraine headaches has been embraced by many plastic surgeons after numerous investigations ensuring that the risks are minimal and the rewards inestimable. Seldom has a plastic surgery procedure been the subject of such scrutiny. Through retrospective, prospective pilot, prospective randomized, prospective randomized with sham surgery, and 5-year follow-up studies, the safety, efficacy, and longevity of the given operation have been confirmed. Although the first decade of this journey was focused on investigating effectiveness and risk profile, the second decade was largely devoted to improving results, reducing invasiveness, and shortening recovery. Multiple publications in peer-reviewed journals over the past 20 years, several independent studies from reputable surgeons at recognized centers, and over 40 studies from the author's center have established the surgical treatment of headaches as a standard practice.

Trigger areas nerve decompression for refractory chronic migraine

BACKGROUND

Chronic migraine refractory to medical treatment represents a common debilitating primary neurovascular disorder associated with great disability, high financial costs, reduced rates of productivity and impaired health-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility of scalp (trigger areas) nerve decompression as a treatment alternative in the management of refractory CM patients METHODS: From January 2005 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected data of 154 patients diagnosed with chronic migraine that underwent trigger site nerve decompression. These trigger areas were divided according the nerve compromise as frontal (supraorbital nerve), temporal (auriculotemporal nerve), occipital (greater occipital nerve). Following extensive clinical evaluation, the surgical treatment was performed after under local anesthesia and required the release of the affected nerve from surrounding connective tissue adhesions, and vascular conflicts.

RESULTS

Of the total amount of patients, 91 (59.09%) patients underwent auriculotemporal nerve decompression, 27 (13.63%) cases supraorbital nerve decompression, 15 (9.74%) patients greater occipital nerve decompression, and the remaining 21 (13.63%) patients had more than one procedure of nerve decompression. At 1-year follow or latest follow-up, 96 (62.2%) patients were considered as cured, 29 cases (18.83%) reported improvement of their symptoms, 21 (13.64%) patients considered only a partial symptomatic remission and 5 (3.25%) patients reported no change or failed surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Nerve decompression of trigger site areas (frontal, temporal, occipital) by removal of tissue, muscles and vessels in patients with medically refractory CM is a feasible alternative treatment modality with a high success of up to 80.5.

A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Treatment of Migraine Surgery Safety and Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical experience with migraine surgery has demonstrated both the safety and the efficacy of operative decompression of the peripheral nerves in the face, head, and neck for the alleviation of migraine symptoms. Because of the perceived novelty of these procedures, and the paranoia surrounding a theoretical loss of clinical territory, neurologists have condemned the field of migraine surgery. The Patient Safety Subcommittee of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons ventured to investigate the published safety track record of migraine surgery in the existing body of literature.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the relevant published literature was performed. The relevant databases and literature libraries were reviewed from the date of their inception through early 2018. These articles were reviewed and their findings analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine published articles were found that demonstrated a substantial, extensively replicated body of data that demonstrate a significant reduction in migraine headache symptoms and frequency (even complete elimination of headache pain) following trigger-site surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine surgery is a valid method of treatment for migraine sufferers when performed by experienced plastic surgeons following a methodical protocol. These operations are associated with a high level of safety. The safety and efficacy of migraine surgery should be recognized by plastic surgeons, insurance companies, and the neurology societies.

Hospital Burden of Migraine in United States Adults: A 15-year National Inpatient Sample Analysis

Background

Migraine headache is associated with high costs, but changes over time of inpatient burden in the United States are unknown. Understanding longitudinal trends is necessary to determine the costs of evolving inpatient treatments that target biological factors in the generation of pain such as vasodilation and aberrant activity of trigeminal neurotransmitters. We report the migraine hospital burden trend in the United States over 15 years.

Methods

Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Hospitalization Cost and Utilization Project databases were analyzed from 1997 to 2012. Inpatient costs were reported in dollars for the cost to the institution, whereas charges reflect the amount billed. These parameters were trended and the average annual percent change was calculated to illustrate year-to-year changes.

Results

Overall discharges for migraine headache reached a low of 30,761 discharges in 1999, and peaked in 2012 with 54,510 discharges. Average length of stay decreased from 3.5 days in 1997 to 2.8 days in 2012. Total inpatient charges increased from $176 million in 1999 to $1.2 billion in 2012. Inpatient costs totaled $322 million in 2012, with an average daily cost of $2,111.

Conclusions

Inpatient burden rapidly increased over the analyzed period, with hospital charges increasing from $5,939 per admission and $176 million nationwide in 1997, to $21,576 per admission and $1.2 billion nationwide in 2012. This trend provides context for research examining cost-effectiveness and quality of life benefits for current treatments. The study of these parameters together with better prevention and improved outpatient treatment may help alleviate the inpatient burden of migraine.

[Peripheral neurostimulation in headache treatment]

According to rough estimates, at least one third of the population in developed countries suffers, to varying degrees, from certain forms of primary headache, the modern pharmacotherapy of which is not always effective and has a number of limitations. The non-pharmacological treatment of headache can be an alternative to the prescription of pharmacological agents and the only possible assistance option for patients developing drug-resistant cephalalgias. This review describes various methods of electrical neuromodulation that are used for the management of primary headaches. The authors provide information on current stages in implementation of implantable and non-invasive equipment into clinical practice, which makes possible electrical stimulations of peripheral nerves and of the sphenopalatine ganglion, as well as allows transcranial magnetic stimulation. Also the appearance and usage of portable electrical devices available on the world market are described, and mechanisms that can underlie anticephalgic action of neuromodulation therapy are discussed. Special attention is paid to the methods that are applied for electrostimulation of the vagus nerve and occipital nerves.

The Cutting Edge of Headache Surgery: A Systematic Review on the Value of Extracranial Surgery in the Treatment of Chronic Headache

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a debilitating neurologic condition, with a large socioeconomic impact. There is a subgroup of patients that does not adequately respond to pharmacologic management and may have underlying neuralgia. Surgical decompression of extracranial sensory nerves has been proposed as an alternative therapy. The aim of this article is to review the evidence for the surgical treatment of neuralgias.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to study the efficacy of decompression of extracranial sensory nerves as a treatment for neuralgia. Clinical studies were included that studied patients, aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with any definition of headache and were treated with extracranial nerve decompression surgery. Outcome parameters included intensity (on a 10-point scale), duration (in days), and frequency (of headaches per month).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight articles were found describing extracranial nerve decompression in patients with headaches. Postoperative decrease in headache intensity ranged from 2 to 8.2, reduction of duration ranged from 0.04 to 1.04 days, and reduction in frequency ranged between 4 and 14.8 headaches per month. Total elimination of symptoms was achieved in 8.3 to 83 percent of cases. A detailed summary of the outcome of single-site decompression is described. Statistical pooling and therefore meta-analysis was not possible, because of articles having the same surgeon and an overlapping patient database.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve decompression surgery is an effective way of treating headaches in a specific population of patients with neuralgia. Although a meta-analysis of the current data was not possible, the extracranial decompression of peripheral head and neck sensory nerves has a high success rate.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Surgical Decompression Relative to Injection Therapy for Chronic Migraine Headaches

BACKGROUND

Common treatments for chronic migraine headaches include injection of corticosteroid and anesthetic agents at local trigger sites. However, the effects of therapy are short term, and lifelong treatment is often necessary. In contrast, surgical decompression of migraine trigger sites accomplishes the same goal yet demonstrates successful long-term elimination of chronic migraines.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to perform a cost-utility analysis to determine which patients would benefit most from available treatment options in a cost-conscious model.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis was performed, taking into consideration costs, probabilities, and health state utility scores of various interventions.

RESULTS

Injection therapy offered a minor improvement in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with surgical decompression (QALY Δ = 0.6). However, long-term injection therapy was significantly costlier to society than surgical decompression: injection treatment was estimated to cost $106,887.96 more than surgery. The results of our cost-utility analysis thus conferred a positive incremental cost-utility ratio of $178,163.27 in favor of surgical decompression.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery provides a durable intervention and has been shown in this study to be extremely cost effective despite a very minor QALY deficit compared with injection therapy. If patients are identified who require treatment in the form of injections for less than 8.25 years, they may fall into a group that should not be offered surgery.

Migraine Surgery

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

This article is a practical and technical guide for plastic surgeons interested in or practicing migraine surgery. It discusses the goals of migraine surgery including selection of appropriate candidates (screening form contained), pertinent anatomy, and surgical techniques with text summary, intraoperative photographs, and videos. In addition, pearls and pitfalls, the most common complications, and current procedural terminology (CPT) coding are detailed.

Radiologic Evaluation of Exiting Points of Supraorbital Region Neurovascular Bundles in Patients With Migraine

PURPOSE

To reveal the presence and nature of exiting points of supraorbital region neurovascular structures and determine the distances of those structures to midline with computed tomography images by taking into account gender and sides in patients with migraine.

METHODS

The study was conducted retrospectively on computed tomography images of 70 migraine and 70 control patients with a mean age of 39.5 ± 13.8 years (range: 18-80). Presence and nature (foramen or notch) of exiting points of neurovascular structures in terms of side and gender in both groups, and the distances of these structures to the midline of the face were evaluated.

RESULTS

In migraine and control groups, the most commonly seen structure was single notch. Coexistence of foramen and notch was statistically significant in migraine and female migraine groups than control and female control groups (P < 0.05). Bilateral presence of supraorbital structure was 51.4% in migraine group and 64.3% in control group patients. In all cases, foramen-midline distance was statistically significant longer than the notch-midline distance (P < 0.05). In migraine patients, no statistically significant difference was detected regarding distances of foramen and notch to midline in terms of side and gender.

CONCLUSION

Consideration of variable presence and location of the supraorbital notch and foramen, analysis of computed tomography scan might be beneficial in preoperative planning of foraminotomy and fascial band release in adult migraine patients to prevent intraoperative complications. Also, coexistence is more frequent on left side in migraine patients that might cause overlooking those structures during surgery.

Entrapment Neuropathy: A Concept for Pathogenesis and Treatment of Headaches-A Narrative Review

Entrapment neuropathy is a known cause of neurological disorders. In the head and neck area, this pathophysiological mechanism could be a trigger for headache. Over the last few decades, injection of botulinum toxin type A in the muscles that are causing the compression as well as surgical decompression have proved to be effective treatment methods worldwide for large numbers of patients with daily headaches. In particular the entrapment of the supraorbital nerves in the glabellar musculature and the occipital nerves in the neck musculature are triggers for headache disorders for which many patients are still seeking an effective treatment. This article reviews the literature and aims to bring the concept of neural entrapment to the attention of a wider audience. By doing so, we hope to give more exposure to an effective and relatively safe headache treatment.

Surgical Treatment of Migraine Headache: Back to the Future

Understanding the history and evolution of ideas is key to developing an understanding of complex phenomena and is the foundation for surgical innovation. This historical review on migraine surgery takes us back to the beginnings of interventional management for migraine centuries ago, and reflects on present practices to highlight how far we have come. From Al-Zahrawi and Ambroise Paré to Bahman Guyuron, two common themes of the past and present have emerged in the treatment of migraine headache. Extracranial treatment of both nerves and vessels is being performed and analyzed, with no consensus among current practitioners as to which structure is involved. Knowledge of past theories and new insights will help guide our efforts in the future. One thing is clear: Where we are going, there are no roads. At least not yet.

Creating Value in Plastic Surgery

Value is defined as the worth, utility, or importance something holds. It can be derived from a variety of goods and services and is relative to a given industry or population. This article will discuss elements of plastic surgery that hold value as to how it pertains to the key players in a medical transaction. It will also discuss strategies for identifying and generating value. Roles of the different members in a plastic surgery transaction were analyzed, specifically the patient, the surgeon, and the facility. Different factors that generated value for all parties were identified throughout the literature. Factors identified that created value included the following: the surgeon's knowledge, experience, and decision-making ability; and technical skill/speed, restoration of life, restoration of form and function, restoration of psychological deficit, instant surgical results, convenience of access, outcomes, cost accounting, research, compassion, and bedside manner. Plastic surgeons can gear their practice to provide the system and their patients with services that hold value. We present several factors that can generate value for the patient, surgeon, and hospital system.

Interface Between Cosmetic and Migraine Surgery

This article describes connections between migraine surgery and cosmetic surgery including technical overlap, benefits for patients, and why every plastic surgeon may consider screening cosmetic surgery patients for migraine headache (MH). Contemporary migraine surgery began by an observation made following forehead rejuvenation, and the connection has continued. The prevalence of MH among females in the USA is 26%, and females account for 91% of cosmetic surgery procedures and 81-91% of migraine surgery procedures, which suggests substantial overlap between both patient populations. At the same time, recent reports show an overall increase in cosmetic facial procedures. Surgical techniques between some of the most commonly performed facial surgeries and migraine surgery overlap, creating opportunity for consolidation. In particular, forehead lift, blepharoplasty, septo-rhinoplasty, and rhytidectomy can easily be part of the migraine surgery, depending on the migraine trigger sites. Patients could benefit from simultaneous improvement in MH symptoms and rejuvenation of the face. Simple tools such as the Migraine Headache Index could be used to screen cosmetic surgery patients for MH. Similarity between patient populations, demand for both facial and MH procedures, and technical overlap suggest great incentive for plastic surgeons to combine both. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .