Factors associated with deterioration of health-related quality of life in multiple system atrophy: 1-year follow-up study

Patient-perceived progression in multiple system atrophy: natural history of quality of life

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (Hr-QoL) scales provide crucial information on neurodegenerative disease progression, help improve patient care and constitute a meaningful endpoint for therapeutic research. However, Hr-QoL progression is usually poorly documented, as for multiple system atrophy (MSA), a rare and rapidly progressing alpha-synucleinopathy. This work aimed to describe Hr-QoL progression during the natural course of MSA, explore disparities between patients and identify informative items using a four-step statistical strategy.

METHODS

We leveraged the data of the French MSA cohort comprising annual assessments with the MSA-QoL questionnaire for more than 500 patients over up to 11 years. A four-step strategy (1) determined the subdimensions of Hr-QoL, (2) modelled the subdimension trajectories over time, (3) mapped item impairments with disease stages and (4) identified most informative items.

RESULTS

Four dimensions were identified. In addition to the original motor, non-motor and emotional domains, an oropharyngeal component was highlighted. While the motor and oropharyngeal domains deteriorated rapidly, the non-motor and emotional aspects were already impaired at cohort entry and deteriorated slowly over the disease course. Impairments were associated with sex, diagnosis subtype and delay since symptom onset. Except for the emotional domain, each dimension was driven by key identified items.

CONCLUSION

The multidimensional Hr-QoL deteriorates progressively over the course of MSA and brings essential knowledge for improving patient care. As exemplified with MSA, the thorough description of Hr-QoL over time using the four-step strategy can provide perspectives on neurodegenerative diseases' management to ultimately deliver better support focused on the patient's perspective.

Sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of multiple system atrophy

PURPOSE

To investigate sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of multiple system atrophy (MSA) through a literature review and an analysis of a retrospective cohort.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for articles including sex-related information in MSA. In a retrospective Innsbruck cohort, we investigated the baseline to last available follow-up clinical-demographic differences between men and women with MSA in a univariate fashion, followed by multivariable binary regression analysis.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 46 publications with sex-related information in MSA. Most studies found comparable survival rates between the sexes, while some recent reports suggested a potential survival benefit for women, possibly due to initial motor onset and overall less severe autonomic failure compared to men. The retrospective Innsbruck MSA cohort comprised 56 female and 60 male individuals with a comparable median follow-up of 27 months. At baseline, female sex was independently associated with depression (odds ratio [OR] 4.7; p = 0.007) and male sex with severe orthostatic hypotension (OR 5.5; p = 0.016). In addition, at last follow-up, female sex was associated with the intake of central nervous system-active drugs (OR 4.1; p = 0.029), whereas male sex was associated with the presence of supine hypertension (OR 3.0; p = 0.020) and the intake of antihypertensive medications (OR 8.7; p = 0.001). Male sex was also associated with initiation of antihypertensive medications over the observation period (OR 12.4; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The available literature and findings of the present study indicate sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of MSA and its evolution over time, highlighting the importance of considering sex in symptom exploration, therapeutic decision-making, and future clinical trial design.

Neurological update: the palliative care landscape for atypical parkinsonian syndromes

Atypical parkinsonian syndromes are neurodegenerative conditions, characterised by rapid disease progression and shorter life expectancy compared to idiopathic Parkinson's disease. These conditions inflict substantial physical and psychosocial burden on patients and their families; hence, there is a clear rationale for a palliative care approach from diagnosis. An interdisciplinary care model has been shown to improve symptom burden, quality of life and engagement with advance care planning, in a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative conditions. In this update, we summarise how the landscape for treating these patients has changed and the questions that still need to be resolved.

The Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale: Status, Critique, and Recommendations

The Unified Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) Rating Scale was developed to provide a surrogate marker of disease severity and clinical progression in patients with MSA. It is comprised of four subscales: UMSARS-I (12 items) rates patient-reported functional disability; UMSARS-II (14 items) assesses motor impairment based on a clinical examination; UMSARS-III records blood pressure and heart rate in the supine and standing positions; and UMSARS-IV (1 item) rates chore-based disability. Strengths of the UMSARS include its wide acceptance in the field, the comprehensive coverage of motor symptoms and its clinimetric properties (including reliability and validity). However, with its increasing use, potential areas of improvement in the UMSARS have become apparent. To address these limitations, a task force, involving clinicians, researchers, patient groups, and industry representatives, has recently been endorsed by the International Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Society. The present viewpoint summarizes strengths and weaknesses of the UMSARS and suggests a roadmap to develop an improved MSA clinical outcome assessment.

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life between People with Parkinson's Disease and Non-Parkinson's: Using Data Drawn from the '100 for Parkinson's' Smartphone-Based Prospective Study

Background: This study aims to assess the specific difference of the health-related quality of life between people with Parkinson's and non-Parkinson's. Methods: A total of 1710 people were drawn from a prospective study with a smartphone-based survey named '100 for Parkinson's' to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale were used to measure health-related quality of life and a linear mixed model was used to analyze the difference. Results: The mean difference of EQ-5D-5L index values between people with Parkinson's and non-Parkinson's was 0.15 (95%CI: 0.12, 0.18) at baseline; it changed to 0.17 (95%CI: 0.14, 0.20) at the end of study. The mean difference of EQ visual analogue scale scores between them increased from 10.18 (95%CI: 7.40, 12.96) to 12.19 (95%CI: 9.41, 14.97) from baseline to the end of study. Conclusion: Data can be captured from the participants' own smart devices and support the notion that health-related quality of life for people with Parkinson's is lower than non-Parkinson's. This analysis provides useful evidence for the EQ-5D instrument and is helpful for public health specialists and epidemiologists to assess the health needs of people with Parkinson's and indirectly improve their health status.