Coculture effects on the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells

In vitro co-culture models for the assessment of orthopedic antibacterial biomaterials

The antibacterial biofunctionality of bone implants is essential for the prevention and treatment of implant-associated infections (IAI). In vitro co-culture models are utilized to assess this and study bacteria-host cell interactions at the implant interface, aiding our understanding of biomaterial and the immune response against IAI without impeding the peri-implant bone tissue regeneration. This paper reviews existing co-culture models together with their characteristics, results, and clinical relevance. A total of 36 studies were found involving in vitro co-culture models between bacteria and osteogenic or immune cells at the interface with orthopedic antibacterial biomaterials. Most studies (∼67%) involved co-culture models of osteogenic cells and bacteria (osteo-bac), while 33% were co-culture models of immune cells and bacterial cells (im-bac). All models involve direct co-culture of two different cell types. The cell seeding sequence (simultaneous, bacteria-first, and cell-first) was used to mimic clinically relevant conditions and showed the greatest effect on the outcome for both types of co-culture models. The im-bac models are considered more relevant for early peri-implant infections, whereas the osteo-bac models suit late infections. The limitations of the current models and future directions to develop more relevant co-culture models to address specific research questions are also discussed.

Skeletal regeneration for segmental bone loss: Vascularised grafts, analogues and surrogates

Massive segmental bone defects (SBD) are mostly treated by removing the fibula and transplanting it complete with blood supply. While revolutionary 50 years ago, this remains the standard treatment. This review considers different strategies to repair SBD and emerging potential replacements for this highly invasive procedure. Prior to the technical breakthrough of microsurgery, researchers in the 1960s and 1970s had begun to make considerable progress in developing non autologous routes to repairing SBD. While the breaktthrough of vascularised bone transplantation solved the immediate problem of a lack of reliable repair strategies, much of their prior work is still relevant today. We challenge the assumption that mimicry is necessary or likely to be successful and instead point to the utility of quite crude (from a materials technology perspective), approaches. Together there are quite compelling indications that the body can regenerate entire bone segments with few or no exogenous factors. This is important, as there is a limit to how expensive a bone repair can be and still be widely available to all patients since cost restraints within healthcare systems are not likely to diminish in the near future. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review is significant because it is a multidisciplinary view of several surgeons and scientists as to what is driving improvement in segmental bone defect repair, why many approaches to date have not succeeded and why some quite basic approaches can be as effective as they are. While there are many reviews of the literature of grafting and bone repair the relative lack of substantial improvement and slow rate of progress in clinical translation is often overlooked and we seek to challenge the reader to consider the issue more broadly.

Coculture of Endothelial and Stromal Cells to Promote Concurrent Osteogenesis and Vasculogenesis

A key challenge in the treatment of large bone defects is the need to provide an adequate and stable vascular supply as new tissue develops. Bone tissue engineering applies selected biomaterials and cell types to create an environment that promotes tissue formation, maturation, and remodeling. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been widely used in these strategies because of their established effects on bone formation, and their ability to act as stabilizing pericytes that support vascular regeneration by endothelial cells (ECs). However, the creation of vascularized bone tissue in vitro requires coupling of osteogenesis and vasculogenesis in a three-dimensional (3D) biomaterial environment. In the present study, 3D fibrin hydrogels containing MSCs and ECs were prevascularized in vitro for 7 days to create an endothelial network in the matrix, and were subsequently cultured for a further 14 days under either continued vasculogenic stimulus, a combination of vasculogenic and osteogenic (hybrid) stimulus, or only osteogenic stimulus. It was found that ECs produced robust vessel networks in 3D fibrin matrices over 7 days of culture, and these networks continued to expand over the 14-day treatment period under vasculogenic conditions. Culture in hybrid medium resulted in maintenance of vessel networks for 14 days, while osteogenic culture abrogated vessel formation. These trends were mirrored in data representing overall cell viability and cell number in the 3D fibrin constructs. MSCs were found to colocalize with EC networks under vasculogenic and hybrid conditions, suggesting pericyte-like function. The bone marker alkaline phosphatase increased over time in hybrid and osteogenic media, but mineral deposition was evident only under purely osteogenic conditions. These results suggest that hybrid media compositions can support some aspects of multiphase tissue formation, but that alternative strategies are needed to obtain robust, concomitant vascularization, and osteogenesis in engineered tissues in vitro. Impact statement The combined use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and endothelial cells to concomitantly produce mature bone and a nourishing vasculature is a promising tissue engineering approach to treating large bone defects. However, it is challenging to create and maintain vascular networks in the presence of osteogenic cues. This study used a 3D fibrin matrix to demonstrate that prevascularization of the construct can lead to maintenance of vessel structures over time, but that osteogenesis is compromised under these conditions. This work illuminates the capacity of MSCs to serve as both supportive pericytes and as osteoprogenitor cells, and motivates new strategies for coupling osteogenesis and vasculogenesis in engineered bone tissues.

Cross-Talk Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) and Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in Bone Regeneration

Bone regeneration is a complex, well-orchestrated process based on the interactions between osteogenesis and angiogenesis, observed in both physiological and pathological situations. However, specific conditions (e.g., bone regeneration in large quantity, immunocompromised regenerative process) require additional support. Tissue engineering offers novel strategies. Bone regeneration requires a cell source, a matrix, growth factors and mechanical stimulation. Regenerative cells, endowed with proliferation and differentiation capacities, aim to recover, maintain, and improve bone functions. Vascularization is mandatory for bone formation, skeletal development, and different osseointegration processes. The latter delivers nutrients, growth factors, oxygen, minerals, etc. The development of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) cocultures has shown synergy between the two cell populations. The phenomena of osteogenesis and angiogenesis are intimately intertwined. Thus, cells of the endothelial line indirectly foster osteogenesis, and conversely, MSCs promote angiogenesis through different interaction mechanisms. In addition, various studies have highlighted the importance of the microenvironment via the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs). These EVs stimulate bone regeneration and angiogenesis. In this review, we describe (1) the phenomenon of bone regeneration by different sources of MSCs. We assess (2) the input of EPCs in coculture in bone regeneration and describe their contribution to the osteogenic potential of MSCs. We discuss (3) the interaction mechanisms between MSCs and EPCs in the context of osteogenesis: direct or indirect contact, production of growth factors, and the importance of the microenvironment via the release of EVs.

Double intratibial injection of human tonsil-derived mesenchymal stromal cells recovers postmenopausal osteoporotic bone mass

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Osteoporosis, which is a disease characterized by weakening of the bone, affects a large portion of the senior population. The current therapeutic options for osteoporosis have side effects, and there is no effective treatment for severe osteoporosis. Thus, we urgently need new treatment strategies, such as topical therapies and/or safe and effective stem cell therapies.

METHODS

We investigated the therapeutic potential of directly injecting human tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (TMSC) into the right proximal tibias of ovariectomized postmenopausal osteoporosis model mice. Injections were given once (1×) or twice (2×) during the 3-month experimental period. At the end of the experiment, micro-computed tomographic images revealed some improvement in the proximal tibias and more significant improvement in the femoral heads of treated mice.

RESULTS

Osteogenic effect was qualitatively and quantitatively more pronounced in TMSC/2×-treated mice. Furthermore, TMSC/2× mice exhibited significant recovery of the serum osteocalcin level, which is pathologically elevated in osteoporosis, and increased serum alkaline phosphatase, which indicates bone formation. TMSC therapy was generally well tolerated and caused no apparent toxicity in the experimental mice. Moreover, TMSC therapy reduced visceral fat.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that double injection of TMSC directly into the proximal tibia triggers recovery of osteoporosis, and thus could be a potential therapeutic approach for severe bone loss.