Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting for hard tissue engineering

Evaluating cells metabolic activity of bioinks for bioprinting: the role of cell-laden hydrogels and 3D printing on cell survival

Introduction

Tissue engineering has advanced significantly in recent years, owing primarily to additive manufacturing technology and the combination of biomaterials and cells known as 3D cell printing or Bioprinting. Nonetheless, various obstacles remain developing adequate 3D printed structures for biomedical applications, including bioinks optimization to meet biocompatibility and printability standards. Hydrogels are among the most intriguing bioinks because they mimic the natural extracellular matrix found in connective tissues and can create a highly hydrated environment that promotes cell attachment and proliferation; however, their mechanical properties are weak and difficult to control, making it difficult to print a proper 3D structure.

Methods

In this research, hydrogels based on Alginate and Gelatin are tested to evaluate the metabolic activity, going beyond the qualitative evaluation of cell viability. The easy-to-make hydrogel has been chosen due to the osmotic requirements of the cells for their metabolism, and the possibility to combine temperature and chemical crosslinking. Different compositions (%w/v) are tested (8% gel-7% alg, 4% gel-4% alg, 4% gel-2% alg), in order to obtain a 3D structure up to 10.3 ± 1.4 mm.

Results

The goal of this paper is to validate the obtained cell-laden 3D structures in terms of cell metabolic activity up to 7 days, further highlighting the difference between printed and not printed cell-laden hydrogels. To this end, MS5 cells viability is determined by implementing the live/dead staining with the analysis of the cellular metabolic activity through ATP assay, enhancing the evaluation of the actual cells activity over cells number.

Discussion

The results of the two tests are not always comparable, indicating that they are not interchangeable but provide complementary pieces of information.

Is it possible to 3D bioprint load-bearing bone implants? A critical review

Rehabilitative capabilities of any tissue engineered scaffold rely primarily on the triad of (i) biomechanical properties such as mechanical properties and architecture, (ii) chemical behavior such as regulation of cytokine expression, and (iii) cellular response modulation (including their recruitment and differentiation). The closer the implant can mimic the native tissue, the better it can rehabilitate the damage therein. Among the available fabrication techniques, only 3D bioprinting (3DBP) can satisfactorily replicate the inherent heterogeneity of the host tissue. However, 3DBP scaffolds typically suffer from poor mechanical properties, thereby, driving the increased research interest in development of load-bearing 3DBP orthopedic scaffolds in recent years. Typically, these scaffolds involve multi-material 3D printing, comprising of at-least one bioink and a load-bearing ink; such that mechanical and biological requirements of the biomaterials are decoupled. Ensuring high cellular survivability and good mechanical properties are of key concerns in all these studies. 3DBP of such scaffolds is in early developmental stages, and research data from only a handful of preliminary animal studies are available, owing to limitations in print-capabilities and restrictive materials library. This article presents a topically focused review of the state-of-the-art, while highlighting aspects like available 3DBP techniques; biomaterials' printability; mechanical and degradation behavior; and their overall bone-tissue rehabilitative efficacy. This collection amalgamates and critically analyses the research aimed at 3DBP of load-bearing scaffolds for fulfilling demands of personalized-medicine. We highlight the recent-advances in 3DBP techniques employing thermoplastics and phosphate-cements for load-bearing applications. Finally, we provide an outlook for possible future perspectives of 3DBP for load-bearing orthopedic applications. Overall, the article creates ample foundation for future research, as it gathers the latest and ongoing research that scientists could utilize.

Recent Developments of Silk-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications: A Special Focus on the Advancement of 3D Printing

Regenerative medicine has received potential attention around the globe, with improving cell performances, one of the necessary ideas for the advancements of regenerative medicine. It is crucial to enhance cell performances in the physiological system for drug release studies because the variation in cell environments between in vitro and in vivo develops a loop in drug estimation. On the other hand, tissue engineering is a potential path to integrate cells with scaffold biomaterials and produce growth factors to regenerate organs. Scaffold biomaterials are a prototype for tissue production and perform vital functions in tissue engineering. Silk fibroin is a natural fibrous polymer with significant usage in regenerative medicine because of the growing interest in leftovers for silk biomaterials in tissue engineering. Among various natural biopolymer-based biomaterials, silk fibroin-based biomaterials have attracted significant attention due to their outstanding mechanical properties, biocompatibility, hemocompatibility, and biodegradability for regenerative medicine and scaffold applications. This review article focused on highlighting the recent advancements of 3D printing in silk fibroin scaffold technologies for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.

In vivo evaluation of 3D printed polycaprolactone composite scaffold and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for vertical bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement on rabbit calvaria

This study evaluated 3D printed polycaprolactone (PCL) composite scaffold and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), loaded either onto a PCL composite scaffold or implant surface, for vertical bone augmentation with implant placement. Three-dimensional printed PCL frames were filled with powdered PCL, hydroxyapatite, and β-tricalcium phosphate. RhBMP-2 was loaded to the PCL composite scaffolds and implant surfaces, and rhBMP-2 release was quantified for 21 days. Experimental implants were placed bilaterally on 20 rabbit calvaria, and the PCL composite scaffolds were vertically augmented. The randomly allocated experimental groups were divided by carrier and rhBMP-2 dosage as no rhBMP-2 (control), 5 μg rhBMP-2 loaded to PCL composite (Scaffold/rhBMP-2[5 μg]), 5 μg rhBMP-2 loaded to implant (Implant/rhBMP-2[5 μg]), 30 μg rhBMP-2 loaded to PCL composite (Scaffold/rhBMP-2[30 μg]), and 30 μg rhBMP-2 loaded to implant (Implant/rhBMP-2[30 μg]). Histologic and histometric analyses were conducted after 8 weeks. In both scaffold-loading and implant-loading, rhBMP-2 released initially rapidly, then slowly and constantly. Released rhBMP-2 totaled 23.02 ± 1.03% and 24.69 ± 1.14% in the scaffold-loaded and implant-loaded groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in histologic bone-implant contact (%). Peri-implant bone density (%) was significantly higher in the Scaffold/rhBMP-2(30 μg) and Implant/rhBMP-2(30 μg) groups. Total bone density (%) was not significantly different between the Scaffold/rhBMP-2(5 μg), Implant/rhBMP-2(5 μg), and control groups, or between the Scaffold/rhBMP-2(30 μg) and Implant/rhBMP-2(30 μg) groups, but was significantly higher in the Scaffold/rhBMP-2(30 μg) and Implant/rhBMP-2(30 μg) groups than in the controls. Three-dimensional printed PCL composite scaffold with rhBMP-2 produced vertical osteogenesis and osseointegration, regardless of rhBMP-2 loading to the PCL composite scaffold or implant surface.

The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities

Bioprinting is a relatively new yet evolving technique predominantly used in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. 3D bioprinting techniques combine the advantages of creating Extracellular Matrix (ECM)like environments for cells and computer-aided tailoring of predetermined tissue shapes and structures. The essential application of bioprinting is for the regeneration or restoration of damaged and injured tissues by producing implantable tissues and organs. The capability of bioprinting is yet to be fully scrutinized in sectors like the patient-specific spatial distribution of cells, bio-robotics, etc. In this review, currently developed experimental systems and strategies for the bioprinting of different types of tissues as well as for drug delivery and cancer research are explored for potential applications. This review also digs into the most recent opportunities and future possibilities for the efficient implementation of bioprinting to restructure medical and technological practices.

Advances of Hydrogel-Based Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Bioprinting has gained immense attention and achieved the revolutionized progress for application in the multifunctional tissue regeneration. On account of the precise structural fabrication and mimicking complexity, hydrogel-based bio-inks are widely adopted for cartilage tissue engineering. Although more and more researchers have reported a number of literatures in this field, many challenges that should be addressed for the development of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting constructs still exist. Herein, this review is mainly focused on the introduction of various natural polymers and synthetic polymers in hydrogel-based bioprinted scaffolds, which are systematically discussed via emphasizing on the fabrication condition, mechanical property, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and biological performance for cartilage tissue repair. Further, this review describes the opportunities and challenges of this 3D bioprinting technique to construct complex bio-inks with adjustable mechanical and biological integrity, and meanwhile, the current possible solutions are also conducted for providing some suggestive ideas on developing more advanced bioprinting products from the bench to the clinic.

Bioprinting Technology in Skin, Heart, Pancreas and Cartilage Tissues: Progress and Challenges in Clinical Practice

Bioprinting is an emerging additive manufacturing technique which shows an outstanding potential for shaping customized functional substitutes for tissue engineering. Its introduction into the clinical space in order to replace injured organs could ideally overcome the limitations faced with allografts. Presently, even though there have been years of prolific research in the field, there is a wide gap to bridge in order to bring bioprinting from "bench to bedside". This is due to the fact that bioprinted designs have not yet reached the complexity required for clinical use, nor have clear GMP (good manufacturing practices) rules or precise regulatory guidelines been established. This review provides an overview of some of the most recent and remarkable achievements for skin, heart, pancreas and cartilage bioprinting breakthroughs while highlighting the critical shortcomings for each tissue type which is keeping this technique from becoming widespread reality.

Applications of 3D Bio-Printing in Tissue Engineering and Biomedicine

In recent years, 3D bio-printing technology has developed rapidly and become an advanced bio-manufacturing technology. At present, 3D bio-printing technology has been explored in the fields of tissue engineering, drug testing and screening, regenerative medicine and clinical disease research and has achieved many research results. Among them, the application of 3D bio-printing technology in tissue engineering has been widely concerned by researchers, and it contributing many breakthroughs in the preparation of tissue engineering scaffolds. In the future, it is possible to print fully functional tissues or organs by using 3D bio-printing technology which exhibiting great potential development prospects in th applications of organ transplantation and human body implants. It is expected to solve thebiomedical problems of organ shortage and repair of damaged tissues and organs. Besides,3Dbio-printing technology will benefit human beings in more fields. Therefore, this paper reviews the current applications, research progresses and limitations of 3D bio-printing technology in biomedical and life sciences, and discusses the main printing strategies of 3D bio-printing technology. And, the research emphases, possible development trends and suggestions of the application of 3D bio-printing are summarized to provide references for the application research of 3D bio-printing.

Modern Porous Polymer Implants: Synthesis, Properties, and Application

Abstract

The needs of modern surgery triggered the intensive development of transplantology, medical materials science, and tissue engineering. These directions require the use of innovative materials, among which porous polymers occupy one of the leading positions. The use of natural and synthetic polymers makes it possible to adjust the structure and combination of properties of a material to its particular application. This review generalizes and systematizes the results of recent studies describing requirements imposed on the structure and properties of synthetic (or artificial) porous polymer materials and implants on their basis and the advantages and limitations of synthesis methods. The most extensively employed, promising initial materials are considered, and the possible areas of application of polymer implants based on these materials are highlighted.

Electrospinning and 3D bioprinting for intervertebral disc tissue engineering

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a major cause of low back pain and represents a massive socioeconomic burden. Current conservative and surgical treatments fail to restore native tissue architecture and functionality. Tissue engineering strategies, especially those based on 3D bioprinting and electrospinning, have emerged as possible alternatives by producing cell-seeded scaffolds that replicate the structure of the IVD extracellular matrix. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advancements and limitations of 3D bioprinting and electrospinning for the treatment of IVD degeneration, focusing on future areas of research that may contribute to their clinical translation.

Beyond Polydimethylsiloxane: Alternative Materials for Fabrication of Organ-on-a-Chip Devices and Microphysiological Systems

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is the predominant material used for organ-on-a-chip devices and microphysiological systems (MPSs) due to its ease-of-use, elasticity, optical transparency, and inexpensive microfabrication. However, the absorption of small hydrophobic molecules by PDMS and the limited capacity for high-throughput manufacturing of PDMS-laden devices severely limit the application of these systems in personalized medicine, drug discovery, in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, and the investigation of cellular responses to drugs. Consequently, the relatively young field of organ-on-a-chip devices and MPSs is gradually beginning to make the transition to alternative, nonabsorptive materials for these crucial applications. This review examines some of the first steps that have been made in the development of organ-on-a-chip devices and MPSs composed of such alternative materials, including elastomers, hydrogels, thermoplastic polymers, and inorganic materials. It also provides an outlook on where PDMS-alternative devices are trending and the obstacles that must be overcome in the development of versatile devices based on alternative materials to PDMS.

Biological responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial surface

Biomedical scientists use chemistry-driven processes found in nature as an inspiration to design biomaterials as promising diagnostic tools, therapeutic solutions, or tissue substitutes. While substantial consideration is devoted to the design and validation of biomaterials, the nature of their interactions with the surrounding biological microenvironment is commonly neglected. This gap of knowledge could be owing to our poor understanding of biochemical signaling pathways, lack of reliable techniques for designing biomaterials with optimal physicochemical properties, and/or poor stability of biomaterial properties after implantation. The success of host responses to biomaterials, known as biocompatibility, depends on chemical principles as the root of both cell signaling pathways in the body and how the biomaterial surface is designed. Most of the current review papers have discussed chemical engineering and biological principles of designing biomaterials as separate topics, which has resulted in neglecting the main role of chemistry in this field. In this review, we discuss biocompatibility in the context of chemistry, what it is and how to assess it, while describing contributions from both biochemical cues and biomaterials as well as the means of harmonizing them. We address both biochemical signal-transduction pathways and engineering principles of designing a biomaterial with an emphasis on its surface physicochemistry. As we aim to show the role of chemistry in the crosstalk between the surface physicochemical properties and body responses, we concisely highlight the main biochemical signal-transduction pathways involved in the biocompatibility complex. Finally, we discuss the progress and challenges associated with the current strategies used for improving the chemical and physical interactions between cells and biomaterial surface.

Preliminary investigation on a new natural based poly(gamma-glutamic acid)/Chitosan bioink

The study aims to investigate a novel bioink made from Chitosan (Cs)/ poly(gamma-glutamic acid) (Gamma-PGA) hydrogel that takes advantage of the two biodegradable and biocompatible polymers meeting most of the requirements for biomedical applications. The bioink could be an alternative to other materials commonly used in 3D-bioprinting such as gelatin or alginate. Cs/ Gamma-PGA hydrogel was prepared by double extrusion of Gamma-PGA and Cs solutions, where 2 × 10⁵ human adult fibroblasts per ml Cs solution had been loaded, through Cellink 3D-Bioprinter at 37°C. A computer aided design model was used to get 3D-bioprinting of a four layers grid hydrogel construct with 70% infill. Hydrogel characterization involved rheology, FTIR analysis, stability study (mass loss [ML], fluid uptake [FU]), and cell retaining ability into hydrogel. 3D-bioprinted hydrogel gelation time resulted to be <60 s, hydrogel structure was maintained up to 36.79 Pa shear stress, FTIR analysis demonstrated Gamma-PGA/Cs interpolyelectrolyte complex formation. The 3D-bioprinted hydrogel was stable for 35 days (35% ML) in cell culture medium, with increasing FU. Cell loaded 3D-bioprinted Cs 6% hydrogel was able to retain 70% of cells which survived to printing process and cell viability was maintained during 14 days incubation.

Cartilage and bone tissue engineering using adipose stromal/stem cells spheroids as building blocks

Scaffold-free techniques in the developmental tissue engineering area are designed to mimic in vivo embryonic processes with the aim of biofabricating, in vitro, tissues with more authentic properties. Cell clusters called spheroids are the basis for scaffold-free tissue engineering. In this review, we explore the use of spheroids from adult mesenchymal stem/stromal cells as a model in the developmental engineering area in order to mimic the developmental stages of cartilage and bone tissues. Spheroids from adult mesenchymal stromal/stem cells lineages recapitulate crucial events in bone and cartilage formation during embryogenesis, and are capable of spontaneously fusing to other spheroids, making them ideal building blocks for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Here, we discuss data from ours and other labs on the use of adipose stromal/stem cell spheroids in chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in vitro. Overall, recent studies support the notion that spheroids are ideal "building blocks" for tissue engineering by “bottom-up” approaches, which are based on tissue assembly by advanced techniques such as three-dimensional bioprinting. Further studies on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that orchestrate spheroid fusion are now crucial to support continued development of bottom-up tissue engineering approaches such as three-dimensional bioprinting.

Engineered 3D Polymer and Hydrogel Microenvironments for Cell Culture Applications

The realization of biomimetic microenvironments for cell biology applications such as organ-on-chip, in vitro drug screening, and tissue engineering is one of the most fascinating research areas in the field of bioengineering. The continuous evolution of additive manufacturing techniques provides the tools to engineer these architectures at different scales. Moreover, it is now possible to tailor their biomechanical and topological properties while taking inspiration from the characteristics of the extracellular matrix, the three-dimensional scaffold in which cells proliferate, migrate, and differentiate. In such context, there is therefore a continuous quest for synthetic and nature-derived composite materials that must hold biocompatible, biodegradable, bioactive features and also be compatible with the envisioned fabrication strategy. The structure of the current review is intended to provide to both micro-engineers and cell biologists a comparative overview of the characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks of the major 3D printing techniques, the most promising biomaterials candidates, and the trade-offs that must be considered in order to replicate the properties of natural microenvironments.

3D Printing of Silk Fibroin for Biomedical Applications

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is regarded as a critical technological-evolution in material engineering, especially for customized biomedicine. However, a big challenge that hinders the 3D printing technique applied in biomedical field is applicable bioink. Silk fibroin (SF) is used as a biomaterial for decades due to its remarkable high machinability and good biocompatibility and biodegradability, which provides a possible alternate of bioink for 3D printing. In this review, we summarize the requirements, characteristics and processabilities of SF bioink, in particular, focusing on the printing possibilities and capabilities of bioink. Further, the current achievements of cell-loading SF based bioinks were comprehensively viewed from their physical properties, chemical components, and bioactivities as well. Finally, the emerging issues and prospects of SF based bioink for 3D printing are given. This review provides a reference for the programmable and multiple processes and the further improvement of silk-based biomaterials fabrication by 3D printing.

3D-Plotted Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds with Smaller Pore Sizes Improve In Vivo Bone Regeneration and Biomechanical Properties in a Critical-Sized Calvarial Defect Rat Model

Due to the difficulty in fabricating bioceramic scaffolds with smaller pore sizes by the current 3D printing technique, the effect of smaller pore sizes (below 400 µm) of 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds on the bone regeneration and biomechanical behavior is never studied. Herein beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds with interconnected smaller pores of three different sizes (100, 250, and 400 µm) are fabricated by 3D plotting. The resultant scaffolds are then implanted into rat critical-sized calvarial defects without any seeded cells. A custom-designed device is developed to investigate the biomechanical properties of the scaffolds after surgical implantation for 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The scaffolds with the 100 µm pore size are found to present the highest maximum load and stiffness, comparable to those of the autogenous bone, after being implanted for 12 weeks. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and histological analysis further indicate that the scaffolds with the 100 µm pore size achieve the highest percentage of new bone ingrowth, which correlates to their best in vivo biomechanical properties. This study demonstrates that tailoring the pore size of β-TCP scaffolds to a smaller range by 3D-plotting can be a facile and efficient approach to enhanced bone regeneration and biomechanical behaviors in bone repair.

Development of Printable Natural Cartilage Matrix Bioink for 3D Printing of Irregular Tissue Shape

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is known to provide instructive cues for cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation, and ultimately tissue regeneration. The use of decellularized ECM scaffolds for regenerative-medicine approaches is rapidly expanding. In this study, cartilage acellular matrix (CAM)-based bioink was developed to fabricate functional biomolecule-containing scaffolds. The CAM provides an adequate cartilage tissue-favorable environment for chondrogenic differentiation of cells. Conventional manufacturing techniques such as salt leaching, solvent casting, gas forming, and freeze drying when applied to CAM-based scaffolds cannot precisely control the scaffold geometry for mimicking tissue shape. As an alternative to the scaffold fabrication methods, 3D printing was recently introduced in the field of tissue engineering. 3D printing may better control the internal microstructure and external appearance because of the computer-assisted construction process. Hence, applications of the 3D printing technology to tissue engineering are rapidly proliferating. Therefore, printable ECM-based bioink should be developed for 3D structure stratification. The aim of this study was to develop printable natural CAM bioink for 3D printing of a tissue of irregular shape. Silk fibroin was chosen to support the printing of the CAM powder because it can be physically cross-linked and its viscosity can be easily controlled. The newly developed CAM-silk bioink was evaluated regarding printability, cell viability, and tissue differentiation. Moreover, we successfully demonstrated 3D printing of a cartilage-shaped scaffold using only this CAM-silk bioink. Future studies should assess the efficacy of in vivo implantation of 3D-printed cartilage-shaped scaffolds.

Development of non-orthogonal 3D-printed scaffolds to enhance their osteogenic performance

Non-orthogonal scaffolds positively influenced the osteogenic performance of a Saos-2 cell line, presenting a larger amount of calcium phosphate deposition.

Recent advances in cell-laden 3D bioprinting: materials, technologies and applications

Fabrication of 3D scaffolds with patient-specific designs, high structural and component complexity, and rapid on-demand production at a low-cost by printing technique has attracted ever-increasing interests in tissue engineering. Cell-laden 3D bioprinting offers good prospects for future organ transplantation. Compared with nonbiological 3D printing, cell-laden 3D bioprinting involves more complex factors, including the choice of printing materials, the strategy of gelling, cell viability and technical challenges. Although cell-populated 3D bioprinting has so many complex factors, it has proven to be a useful and exciting tool with wide potential applications in regenerative medicine to generate a variety of transplantable tissues. In this review, we first overview the bioprinting materials, gelling strategies and some major applications of cell-laden 3D bioprinting, with main focus on the recent advances and current challenges of the field. Finally, we propose some future directions of the cell-populated 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[Formula: see text]

In this review, we first overview the bioprinting materials, gelling strategies and some major applications of cell-populated 3D bioprinting, with main focus on the recent advances and current challenges of the field. Finally, we propose some future directions of the cell-laden 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: recent advances and future prospects

In the last decade, interest in the field of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has increased enormously. This review describes all the currently used bio-printing inks, including polymeric hydrogels, polymer bead microcarriers, cell aggregates and extracellular matrix proteins.