Typing of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains in a cohort of patients in an Italian intensive care Unit

Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Plasmid-Mediated Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Traits among Multidrug Resistant Enterococcus spp. in Egypt

Enterococcus spp. are remarkable multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria that are causing serious healthcare-associated infections. The current study investigated the frequency of Enterococcus spp., antimicrobial susceptibility, biofilm formation and the presence of some plasmid-mediated virulence characters and antimicrobial resistance determinants in enterococcal isolates from Egyptian hospitals in Cairo. Enterococcus bacterial isolates were recovered from different clinical specimens and identified using biochemical testing and KB005A HiStrep™ identification kit. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method and/or broth microdilution method were used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Phenotypic assays were performed to study biofilm formation and cytolysin and gelatinase production. PCR assays targeting the plasmid-carried genes aac(6’)-aph(2’), aph(3)-IIIa, vanA, agg and cylA were performed. In this study, 50 isolates of diverse Enterococcus spp. were identified with E. faecium was the most frequently isolated one. High resistance profiles were determined against tested antimicrobials and all isolates were MDR. Moderate biofilm formation was detected in 20% of isolates, 18% showed complete blood hemolysis and 12% produced gelatinase. All isolates carried the tested aminoglycosides resistance genes, while vanA was found only in 4 isolates (8%). The virulence genes agg and cylA were detected in 4% and 32% of isolates, respectively. In conclusion, E. faecium was the most prevalent species. The entire isolates set were MDR and the plasmid-carried aminoglycoside resistance genes were extensively disseminated among MDR isolates. Thus, regular surveillance studies, from the area of study or other geographical regions in Egypt, and strict infection control measures are required to monitor the emerging MDR enterococci.

Resistance mechanisms and epidemiology of multiresistant pathogens in Europe and efficacy of tigecycline in observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial drug resistance is a growing problem in Europe and, even with differences in epidemiology, it is of great concern. The treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) is hindered further by pathogens that are resistant to methicillin, carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins and glycopeptides.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An analysis of the microbiological results from five European observational studies (July 2006 to October 2011) evaluating the efficacy of tigecycline (prescribed as monotherapy or in combination with other antibacterials) for the treatment of cSSTI and cIAI is presented.

RESULTS

In total, 213 cSSTI and 623 cIAI patients were included; 34.4% and 56.6%, respectively, were critically ill in intensive care units. At baseline, at least one pathogen was isolated in 167 (78.4%) cSSTI and 464 (74.5%) cIAI patients, and 32.9% and 49.1% of infections were polymicrobial. In cSSTI, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (52.7% and 18.0%, respectively) were the most frequently isolated pathogens, whereas in cIAI most infections were due to E. coli (41.8%), Enterococcus faecium (40.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis (21.1%). Clinical response was observed in >80% of patients with E. coli in both cIAI and cSSTI. In cSSTI patients, the clinical response rate to S. aureus was 80.8%. For cIAI, 77.4% of E. faecium and 79.5% of E. faecalis patients responded to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline when given alone or in combination with other antibacterials appeared to be efficacious against multiple pathogens, affirming its role in real-life clinical practice as a broad-spectrum antibacterial for the treatment of patients with cSSTI and cIAI, including the critically ill, across Europe.

Trends and significance of VRE colonization in the ICU: a meta-analysis of published studies

Background

The burden and significance of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization in the ICU is not clearly understood.

Methods

We searched PubMed and EMBASE up to May 2013 for studies reporting the prevalence of VRE upon admission to the ICU and performed a meta-analysis to assess rates and trends of VRE colonization. We calculated the prevalence of VRE on admission and the acquisition (colonization and/or infection) rates to estimate time trends and the impact of colonization on ensuing VRE infections.

Findings

Across 37 studies (62,959 patients at risk), the estimated prevalence of VRE on admission to the ICU was 8.8% (7.1-10.6). Estimates were more consistent when cultures were obtained within 24 hours from admission. The VRE acquisition rate was 8.8% (95% CI 6.9-11.0) across 26 evaluable studies (35,364 patients at risk). Across US studies, VRE acquisition rate was 10.2% (95% CI 7.7-13.0) and demonstrated significant decline in annual trends. We used the US estimate of colonization on admission [12.3% (10.5-14.3)] to evaluate the impact of VRE colonization on admission in overall VRE prevalence. We demonstrated that VRE colonization on admission is a major determinant of the overall VRE burden in the ICU. Importantly, among colonized patients (including admitted and/or acquired cases) the VRE infection rates vary widely from 0-45% (with the risk of VRE bacteremia being reported from 0-16%) and <2% among those without a proven colonization.

Conclusion

In summary, up to 10.6% of patients admitted in the ICU are colonized with VRE on admission and a similar percentage will acquire VRE during their ICU stay. Importantly, colonization on admission is a major determinant of VRE dynamics in the ICU and the risk of VRE-related infections is close related to colonization.

[Glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus outbreak in an ICU with simultaneous circulation of two different clones]

AIM OF THE STUDY

To describe specific difficulties to control a glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus (GRE) outbreak occurring in an intensive care unit (ICU) during a regional epidemy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Following identification of a GRE clinical isolate in ICU, systematic screening was performed on admission and then weekly, by anal swabs. GRE carriers were isolated according to two processes: first (week [W] 2-W8), cohorting of carriers in a dedicated sector of the ICU, with dedicated HCW; this required closing four of the 16 ICU beds. Second (W8-W29), a specific unit was created outside the ICU. VanA-genotypes and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the first outbreak period (102 rectal swabs), two patients were found colonized at admission: the index case transferred from Nancy hospital, carrier of the Nancy epidemy PFGE profile strain, and one patient from the haemodialysis unit, carrier of a GRE strain presenting a different PFGE profile called the Thionville strain. Seven patients were newly identified as GRE colonized (2 by the Nancy strain and 5 by the Thionville strain). Defective running of the ICU was noted. During the second period (442 samples), six ICU patients were found colonized, including four at admission. No other case was identified in 16 weeks. Outbreak extension to other hospital units was checked at W19. The Thionville strain was not found in other regional hospitals.

CONCLUSION

ICUs concentrate GRE colonization risk. This study demonstrates interest of PFGE. These low virulence bacteria have few direct pathological consequences, but they cause organizational problems in ICUs.