Invasive fungal disease is associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: a single center, retrospective study

An update on pharmacotherapy for fungal infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

AREAS COVERED

We describe epidemiology, causes and risk factors of IFD in allogeneic HSCT discussing prophylaxis and treatment in various HSCT phases. We present the most recent studies on this thematic area, including novel data on currently available antifungals, i.e. formulations, dosing, safety, efficacy and therapeutic drug monitoring. Finally, we present the most recent relevant recommendations published. Literature search included PubMed, Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov between January 2014-April 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

The antifungal agents employed for prophylaxis and therapy should be predicated on local epidemiology of IFD. Fluconazole prophylaxis remains a first-line choice before engraftment when the main pathogen is Candida spp. After engraftment prophylaxis should be with mold-active agents (i.e. triazoles). For candidiasis echinocandins are suggested as first-line treatment, whereas aspergillosis responds well to mold-active azoles and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). For mucormycosis treatment of choice includes L-AmB and isavuconazole. Choice between fever-driven and diagnostics-driven strategies remains equivocal. Open research topics remain: 1) optimization of tools to ensure prompt and accurate IFD diagnosis to avoid unnecessary exposure to antifungals, drug interactions and cost; 2) refinement of treatment for resistant/refractory strains.

Ruxolitinib versus basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective study

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; not all patients respond to standard glucocorticoids treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib compared with basiliximab for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD). One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled, 81 in ruxolitinib and 48 in basiliximab group. The overall response (OR) at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group (72.8% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.031), as with complete response (CR) (58.0% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.013). Ruxolitinib led to significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (29.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.021). Besides, ruxolitinib showed higher 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year cumulative incidence of failure-free survival (FFS) (OS: 72.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.008; FFS: 58.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.014). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in ruxolitinib group (16.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005), and the 1-year relapse was not different. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, CMV-associated diseases and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases was similar between the two groups, but EBV viremia was significantly lower in ruxolitinib group (6.2% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that OR and survival were similar in ruxolitinib 5 mg twice daily (bid) and 10 mg bid groups. However, ruxolitinib 10 mg bid treatment markedly reduced 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD compared with 5 mg bid (21.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.016). Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was superior to basiliximab in SR-aGVHD treatment and cGVHD prophylaxis, therefore should be recommended.

Invasive Fungal Disease Among Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Undergoing Itraconazole Prophylaxis After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Itraconazole has been used for prevention of IFD, but data related to incidence and associated factors of IFD in pediatric and adolescent patients on itraconazole prophylaxis remain scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To identify incidence and risk factors associated with IFD among pediatric and adolescent patients receiving itraconazole prophylaxis after HSCT.

METHODS

Patients younger than 21 years who received itraconazole prophylaxis after HSCT from January 2007 to December 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. Incidence of IFD within 1 year and associated factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients received itraconazole during the pre-engraftment period. Of 170 patients, 29 had IFD, with an incidence of 17.1% at 1 year. IFD at 1 year was significantly associated with increased mortality. Of 29 patients with IFD, only 9 developed IFD while on itraconazole prophylaxis (5.3%), all of whom had invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. No invasive candidiasis occurred during itraconazole prophylaxis. Prolonged neutropenia (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.13), graft-versus-host disease within 100 days after transplantation (HR = 3.17; 95% CI, 1.17-8.57), and using etoposide in preconditioning regimens (HR = 21.60; 95% CI, 2.44-190.95) were significantly associated with IFD at 1 year. No patients had to discontinue itraconazole because of its adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole proffered good efficacy for prevention of candidiasis during the pre-engraftment period. Most IFD episodes occurred after the engraftment period when itraconazole had been discontinued. During this period, patients with risk factors require appropriate fungal prophylaxis.

Invasive fungal disease and the immunocompromised host including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Improved understanding and new strategic approach with sargramostim

In hosts with damaged or impaired immune systems such as those undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or intensive chemotherapy, breakthrough fungal infections can be fatal. Risk factors for breakthrough infections include severe neutropenia, use of corticosteroids, extended use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and intensive care unit admission. An individual's cumulative state of immunosuppression directly contributes to the likelihood of experiencing increased infection risk. Incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) after HCT may be up to 5-8%. Early intervention may improve IFI outcomes, although many infections are resistant to standard therapies (voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B, posaconazole or itraconazole, as single agents or in combination). We review herein several contributing factors that may contribute to the net state of immunosuppression in recipients of HCT. We also review a new approach for IFI utilizing adjunctive therapy with sargramostim, a yeast-derived recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF).

Is it time to reconsider prophylactic antimicrobial use for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? a narrative review of antimicrobials in stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving procedure for multiple types of hematological cancer, autoimmune diseases, and genetic-linked metabolic diseases in humans. Recipients of HSCT transplant are at high risk of microbial infections that significantly correlate with the presence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the degree of immunosuppression. Infection in HSCT patients is a leading cause of life-threatening complications and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers issues pertinent to infection in the HSCT patient, including bacterial and viral infection; strategies to reduce GVHD; infection patterns; resistance and treatment options; adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials, problems of antimicrobial resistance; perturbation of the microbiome; the role of prebiotics, probiotics, and antimicrobial peptides. We highlight potential strategies to minimize the use of antimicrobials.

EXPERT OPINION

Measures to control infection and its transmission remain significant HSCT management policy and planning issues. Transplant centers need to consider carefully prophylactic use of antimicrobials for neutropenic patients. The judicious use of appropriate antimicrobials remains a crucial part of the treatment protocol. However, antimicrobials' adverse effects cause microbiome diversity and dysbiosis and have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality.

Lung transplantation for late-onset non-infectious chronic pulmonary complications of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Background

Late onset non-infectious pulmonary complications (LONIPCs) following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) confer a significant mortality risk. Lung transplantation (LTx) has the potential to provide survival benefit but the impact of prior allo-HSCT on post-LTx outcomes is not well studied.

Methods

This retrospective, single-centre cohort study assessed the post-LTx outcomes of adults with LONIPCs of allo-HSCT. Outcomes of LTx for LONIPCs were compared to propensity-score matched LTx controls (n = 38, non-HSCT) and recipients of re-LTx (n = 70) for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

Results

Nineteen patients underwent DLTx for LONIPCs of allo-HSCT between 2003 and 2019. Post-LTx survival was 50% at 5-years. Survival to 1-year post-LTx was similar to matched controls (p = 0.473). Survival, conditional on 1-year survival, was lower in the allo-HSCT cohort (p = 0.034). An increased risk of death due to infection was identified in the allo-HSCT cohort compared to matched controls (p = 0.003). Compared to re-LTx recipients, the allo-HSCT cohort had superior survival to 1-year post-LTx (p = 0.034) but conditional 1-year survival was similar (p = 0.145).

Conclusion

This study identifies an increased risk of post-LTx mortality in recipients with previous allo-HSCT, associated with infection. It supports the hypothesis that allo-HSCT LTx recipients are relatively more immunosuppressed than patients undergoing LTx for other indications. Optimisation of post-LTx immunosuppressive and antimicrobial strategies to account for this finding should be considered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01699-8.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling mediates the abnormal osteogenic and adipogenic capabilities of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from chronic graft-versus-host disease patients

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the main cause of non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in bone marrow (BM) remain unclear in the pathophysiology of cGVHD. In this study, we analyzed BM-MSCs from 66 patients after allo-HSCT, including 33 with active cGVHD and 33 without cGVHD. BM-MSCs showed similar morphology, frequency, phenotype, and proliferation in patients with or without cGVHD. MSCs from the active cGVHD group showed a decreased apoptosis rate (P < 0.01). Osteogenic capacity was increased while adipogenic capacity was decreased in the active cGVHD MSCs compared with no-cGVHD MSCs. The expressions of osteogenic gene RUNX2 and COL1A1 were higher (P < 0.001) while adipogenic gene PPAR-γ and FABP4 were lower (P < 0.001) in the active cGVHD MSCs than no-cGVHD MSCs. These changes were associated with the severity of cGVHD (P < 0.0001; r = 0.534, r = 0.476, r = -0.796, and r = -0.747, respectively in RUNX2, COL1A1, PPAR-γ, and FABP4). The expression of Wnt/β-catenin pathway ligand Wnt3a was increased in cGVHD-MSCs. The dysfunction of cGVHD-MSCs could be reversed by Dickkopf related protein 1(DKK1) to inhibit the binding of Wnt3a. In summary, the differentiation of BM-MSCs was abnormal in active cGVHD, and its underlying mechanism is the upregulated of Wnt3a through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway of MSCs.

Anti-Ro52 Autoantibodies Are Related to Chronic Graft-vs.-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chronic graft-vs.-host disease (cGVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Previous studies have shown that autoantibodies play an important role in the development of cGVHD. Anti-nuclear autoantibodies (ANA) is the most frequently detected autoantibodies in patients with cGVHD, but the role of anti-Ro52 autoantibodies (anti-Ro52) in cGVHD remains largely unknown. In this study, we analyzed autoantibodies from 84 patients after allo-HSCT, including 42 with active cGVHD and 42 without cGVHD. Autoantibodies were found in 36 (42.9%) patients. Among these autoantibody-positive patients, 28 (77.8%) patients had active cGVHD. The most frequent autoantibodies in patients with active cGVHD were ANA (50.0%), anti-Ro52 (28.6%) and anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies type 2 (4.8%). We further explored the association between anti-Ro52 and cGVHD. Patients with active cGVHD had higher anti-Ro52 levels than patients without cGVHD (P < 0.05). The increases of anti-Ro52 levels were more significant in patients with moderate/severe cGVHD compared to those of patients without cGVHD (P < 0.05). Stratified and multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that moderate/severe cGVHD was an independent risk factor for the levels of anti-Ro52 (P < 0.01). ROC analysis confirmed anti-Ro52 as a risk factor for progression of skin cGVHD. Moreover, the anti-Ro52 levels were highly correlated with the levels of B cell-activating factor (BAFF) and IgG1 antibodies. Our study demonstrates that anti-Ro52 is associated with cGVHD. The increased levels of anti-Ro52 were associated with higher levels of BAFF and IgG1 antibodies, suggesting a mechanistic link between elevated anti-Ro52 levels and aberrant B cell homeostasis.