Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents: Shorter or Longer?

Effectiveness of drug-coated balloon in acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has improved dramatically over the past 3 decades and is evolving. Percutaneous coronary intervention is an alternative means of achieving coronary revascularization. Previous studies comparing the published literature on drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents have drawn divergent conclusions. We perform a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DCB and drug-eluting stent in the management of AMI.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO network (registration number: CRD42023397266). We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocol to accomplish the systematic review protocol. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Weipu Database without any language restrictions from their inception to February 2022. The risk of bias will be assessed independently by 2 authors using parameters defined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions criteria. Statistical analysis will be performed using the STATA13.0 software (IBM, USA).

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be publicly available and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study will provide the evidence for the application of DCB in the treatment of AMI.

Drug-coated balloons in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (Review)

Drug-eluting stents are the standard revascularization strategy for the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis (ISR), stent thrombosis and reinfarction of target lesions following stent implantation present challenges. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs), which deliver antiproliferative drugs into the vessel wall without stent implantation, are a novel treatment option for percutaneous coronary intervention and have been proven to act as a promising strategy in the treatment of ISR and coronary small vessel disease. However, their role in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. The present review discusses current evidence for the treatment of AMI with DCBs.

Angiographic performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon in native coronary lesions: the FAtebenefratelli SIrolimus COated NATIVES prospective registry

AIMS

To evaluate the angiographic performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) in de novo coronary lesions.

METHODS

Out of an all-comer prospective registry of patients treated with the SCB at our center from April 2016 to September 2017, we selected those treated for a de novo stenosis on a native vessel, with a scheduled angiographic control at at least 4 months after the index procedure. We performed a centralized, blinded core-lab adjudicated quantitative coronary angiography analysis. Primary endpoint was late lumen loss. Secondary endpoints were binary restenosis and target-lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients with native coronary arteries treated with SCB and with angiographic follow-up entered the study; seven patients were excluded because a stent was implanted at the lesion site during the index procedure. The degree of calcification (assessed with coronary angiography) was high in six patients (30%) and the average lesion length was 20.52 ± 6.88 mm. The reference vessel diameter was 2.32 ± 0.44 mm and the percentage diameter stenosis was 67 ± 12. Procedural success was obtained in all patients. After a median of 6.6 ± 2.5 months, late lumen loss was 0.09 ± 0.34 mm and the percentage diameter stenosis was 31 ± 18. We observed two cases (10%) of binary restenosis which underwent subsequent target-lesion revascularization: in one a drug-eluting stent was implanted, whereas the other patient was treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon. No myocardial infarction or death was observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The use of a novel SCB in native coronary arteries was associated with good angiographic outcome at 6-month follow-up.

Immediate and short-term performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon during complex percutaneous coronary interventions. The FAtebenefratelli SIrolimus COated-balloon (FASICO) registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) currently represent an alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and they are also variably used for small coronary vessel and bifurcation lesion management. All DCB variably elute paclitaxel as an anti-proliferative drug. The first sirolimus coated balloon (SCB) received the CE mark in 2016, but its clinical performance has not been shown yet.

METHODS AND RESULTS

FASICO in an all-comer registry of the first consecutive patients with at least one lesion treated with SCB between March and July 2016 at the first European centre that used this device. All patients were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated database. Primary endpoint was procedural success; co-primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiac events at short-term follow-up. The 32 patients (34 lesions) enrolled had at least 6-month clinical follow up available. Forty-five percent had diabetes and indication to PCI was ISR in 47% of the cases. Lesions were always pre-dilated and device deployment was successful in all the cases. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of patients. We observed 3 cases of TLR at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SCB shows high immediate technical performance and adequate short-term efficacy and safety. The ongoing EASTBOURNE registry will shed light on mid-and long-term performance of this device in an adequately powered population.

Drug-Eluting Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions: A Comprehensive Review

Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a new application in percutaneous coronary intervention. DEBs have proven successful in the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but their role in de novo lesions is less clear. This paper provides a review of the current studies where DEBs have been used in coronary de novo lesions, either as part of a DEB-only strategy or in combination with another device, mainly a bare metal stent (BMS). By searching Pubmed and Embase we were able to identify 52 relevant studies, differing in design, intervention, and clinical setting, including patients with small vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, complex long lesions, acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and elderly. In 23 studies, a DEB was combined with a BMS, 25 studies used a DEB-only strategy with only provisional BMS implantation, and four studies combined a DEB with a drug-eluting stent (DES). In the vast majority of studies, DEB in combination with BMS does not seem to improve clinical or angiographic outcome compared with DES, whereas a DEB-only strategy seems promising, especially when predilatation and geographical mismatch are taken into account. A lower risk of recurrent thrombosis with DEB compared with DES is not evident from the current studies. In conclusion, the main indication for DEB seems to be small vessel disease, especially in clinical scenarios in which a contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy exists. The main approach should be a DEB-only strategy with only provisional bailout stenting, which has shown interesting results in different clinical scenarios. In general, larger randomized controlled studies with prolonged follow-up comparing DEB with best in class DES are warranted. Technical developments of DEBs including the use of different drugs might potentially improve the efficacy of such treatment.