The Lived Experience of Myasthenia Gravis: A Patient-Led Analysis

Recommendations for the management of myasthenia gravis in Belgium

International guidelines on the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been published but are not tailored to the Belgian situation. This publication presents recommendations from a group of Belgian MG experts for the practical management of MG in Belgium. It includes recommendations for treatment of adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) or ocular myasthenia gravis (oMG). Depending on the MG-related antibody a treatment sequence is suggested with therapies that can be added on if the treatment goal is not achieved. Selection of treatments was based on the level of evidence of efficacy, registration and reimbursement status in Belgium, common daily practice and the personal views and experiences of the authors. The paper reflects the situation in February 2024. In addition to the treatment considerations, other relevant aspects in the management of MG are addressed, including comorbidities, drugs aggravating disease symptoms, pregnancy, and vaccination. As many new treatments might potentially come to market, a realistic future perspective on the impact of these treatments on clinical practice is given. In conclusion, these recommendations intend to be a guide for neurologists treating patients with MG in Belgium.

Myasthenia Gravis Disease Burden and Its Impact on Satisfaction with Life: A Qualitative Survey of Patients' Perspectives in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) has a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life; however, many clinicians do not fully understand their patients' lived experience of the disease. To understand the actual conditions of patients with MG and clarify the problems they perceive, we conducted a survey to evaluate the effects of the disease on patients' daily life and work.

METHODS

A questionnaire-based, qualitative, cross-sectional, non-interventional survey was conducted in Japan between April and May 2022 in patients with MG who were receiving regular outpatient treatment. The questionnaire included items regarding the patients' disease characteristics and experience, satisfaction with life, current treatment status, and treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

In total, 452 patients were included in the survey population (66.6% aged ≥ 60 years; 64.6% with MG disease duration ≥ 10 years; 76.6% acetylcholine receptor [AChR] autoantibody positive). The symptoms of MG had a significant impact on the patients' daily lives, with the most common symptoms being fatigability (74.8%), ptosis (59.7%), diplopia (54.2%), and weakness in the arms and/or legs (50.9%). Patients commonly identified exercise (73.7%), work 68.0%), hobbies (60.4%), travel (60.0%), and socializing with friends (59.7%) as being difficult to perform, with approximately 50% of patients reporting that hospitalization sometimes interfered with their ability to work. In total, 27.2% of patients were dissatisfied with life, with the highest rates of dissatisfaction among patients who were either positive for muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies or seronegative for both AChR and MuSK autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

In Japanese patients with MG, over 25% are dissatisfied with life, indicating several unmet needs in this population.

Expert consensus recommendations for improving and standardising the assessment of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Regular and consistent disease assessment could provide a clearer picture of burden in generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) and improve patient care; however, the use of assessment tools in practice lacks standardisation. This modified Delphi approach was taken to review current evidence on assessment tool use in gMG and develop expert-derived consensus recommendations for good practice.

METHODS

A European expert panel of 15 experienced gMG neurologists contributed to development of this consensus, four of whom formed a lead Sub-committee. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) framework was used to define six clinical questions on gMG assessment tools, a systematic literature review was conducted, and evidence-based statements were developed. According to a modified Delphi voting process, consensus was reached when ≥70% of the experts rated agreement with a statement as ≥8 on a scale of 1-10.

RESULTS

Eighteen expert- and evidence-based consensus statements based on six themes were developed. Key recommendations include: consistent use of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score (MG-ADL) across clinical settings, followed by a simple question (e.g., Patient Acceptable Symptom State [PASS]) or scale to determine patient satisfaction in clinical practice; use of a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis [QMG] or quality of life [QoL] assessment when the MG-ADL indicates disease worsening; and consideration of symptom state to determine the timing and frequency of recommended assessments. Expert panel consensus was reached on all 18 statements after two voting rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

This process provided evidence- and expert consensus-based recommendations for the use of objective and subjective assessment tools across gMG research and care to improve management and outcomes for patients.

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG.

METHODS

Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022).

RESULTS

New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Real-World Case Series of Efgartigimod for Japanese Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Well-Tailored Treatment Cycle Intervals Contribute to Sustained Symptom Control

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations. Here, we aimed to examine and compare the treatment cycle intervals and efficacy of efgartigimod in four patients. This case series mainly offers insights into personalized treatment cycle intervals and the efficacy of efgartigimod for patients with MG in our facility in Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed four patients with MG (2 patients with early-onset, 1 with late-onset, and 1 with seronegative MG, mainly managed with oral immunosuppressants as prior treatments) who completed four or more cycles of efgartigimod treatment from January 2022 to September 2023. We focused on changes in serum immunoglobulin (IgG) level, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) titer, and quantitative MG (QMG) score.

RESULTS

Efgartigimod, administered at a median of 5.0 [IQR 5.0, 7.5] weeks between cycles, led to decreased serum IgG levels in all patients and reduced AChR-Ab titers in seropositive patients. All patients showed sustained MG symptom improvement, with considerably reduced QMG scores before efgartigimod treatment. None of the patients required rescue medications or developed treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Customized efgartigimod administration intervals effectively enhanced clinical outcomes in patients with MG without notable symptom fluctuations, demonstrating the benefits of individualized treatment approaches and validating the safety of efgartigimod during the study period.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment

BACKGROUND

Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research.

METHODS

MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings.

RESULTS

Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Improvement of fatigue in generalised myasthenia gravis with zilucoplan

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is a debilitating symptom of myasthenia gravis (MG). The impact of fatigue on MG can be assessed by Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Short Form Fatigue scale. Transformation of raw Neuro-QoL fatigue scores to T-scores is a known approach for facilitating clinical interpretation of clinically meaningful and fatigue severity thresholds.

METHODS

In the Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled RAISE study (NCT04115293), adults with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised MG (MG Foundation of America Disease Class II-IV) were randomised 1:1 to daily subcutaneous zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients completing RAISE could opt to receive zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg in an ongoing, open-label extension study, RAISE-XT (NCT04225871). In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated the long-term effect of zilucoplan on fatigue in RAISE patients who entered RAISE-XT. We report change in Neuro-QoL Short Form Fatigue T-scores and fatigue severity levels from RAISE baseline to Week 60.

RESULTS

Mean Neuro-QoL Short Form Fatigue T-scores improved from baseline to Week 12 in the zilucoplan group (n = 86) with a clinically meaningful difference versus placebo (n = 88; least squares mean difference: - 3.61 (nominal p-value = 0.0060]), and these improvements continued further to Week 60. At Week 12, more patients on zilucoplan (n = 34, 47.2%) experienced improvements in ≥ 1 fatigue severity level from baseline versus placebo (n = 23, 28.4%; p = 0.017). At Week 60, most (n = 55, 65.5%) patients had mild fatigue or none.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with zilucoplan demonstrated statistical and clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue scores and severity versus placebo during RAISE, which were sustained to Week 60 in RAISE-XT.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis.

METHODS

Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures.

RESULTS

In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients.

DISCUSSION

Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Perspectives of people with myasthenia gravis on physical activity and experience of physical activity advice from health professionals in the Australian context: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Physical activity is an important modifiable determinant of health. There has been a historical aversion to movement in people with myasthenia gravis (MG) due to the pathophysiology of the disease, however, research suggests engagement in physical activity is safe and does not exacerbate symptoms. There are currently no studies investigating the qualitative perspectives of people with MG on physical activity. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions of physical activity, barriers, enablers, and participants' experiences of physical activity advice from health professionals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were used, with verbatim transcripts analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Ten adults (median age 64.5 years) living in Australia with generalised MG were interviewed. Key findings were identified: (1) Physical activity is perceived to be important for general health and for MG; (2) Medical management and social support are key enablers; (3) Fatigue and pain are potential barriers; and (4) Experiences with healthcare professionals were considered insufficient and failed to provide disease specific advice regarding MG and physical activity.

CONCLUSION

People with MG have unique barriers and enablers to physical activity engagement that clinicians should consider when providing physical activity behaviour change support to this population.

Systematic review of the patient burden of generalised myasthenia gravis in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by muscle weakness, and progression from ocular (oMG) to generalised (gMG) symptoms results in a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the patient burden experienced by people living with gMG.

METHODS

Electronic database searches (conducted March 2022), supplemented by interrogation of grey literature, were conducted to identify studies reporting patient burden outcomes in patients with gMG in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Results were synthesised narratively due to the heterogeneity across trials.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patient burden publications (representing 38 unique studies) were identified as relevant for inclusion in the systematic review, consisting of 37 publications reporting formal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and two publications describing alternative qualitative assessments of patient experience. The studies included a variety of measures including generic and disease-specific PROMs, as well as symptom-specific PROMs focusing on key comorbidities including depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep disturbance. The findings showed some variation across studies and PROMs; however, in general there was evidence for worse QoL in patients with gMG than in healthy controls or in patients with oMG, and a trend for worsening QoL with increasing MG severity.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the importance of considering patient QoL when developing and assessing treatment and management plans for patients with gMG. However, the heterogeneity identified across studies illustrates the need for further representative and well-powered studies in large cohorts administering consistent, validated questionnaires.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022328444.

Experience of Daily Life with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Qualitative Investigation and Assessment of Instrument Content Validity

INTRODUCTION

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare autoimmune disease. Symptoms of gMG are diverse, and understanding of their impact on patients is limited. This qualitative study aimed to provide an in-depth exploration of patients' daily experiences of gMG.

METHODS

Published qualitative studies were reviewed to identify the most important signs, symptoms, and functional impacts related to the patient experience in gMG. Semi-structured hybrid concept elicitation interviews (allowing spontaneous generation of disease concepts) and cognitive debriefing interviews (assessing the validity of existing disease assessments) were conducted with clinicians and adult patients with gMG. Signs, symptoms, and impacts were reviewed to understand which were most salient (i.e., reported by at least 50% of patients, with disturbance rating 5 or higher [10-point numeric scale]); concept saturation was also assessed. The disease conceptual model was updated. Existing clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) that capture how patients feel, function, and survive were assessed.

RESULTS

Interviews with patients (n = 24) identified seven new signs and symptoms and 37 new impacts compared with the literature. Concept saturation was reached. Signs and symptoms identified by patients as most important (salient) were shortness of breath, general fatigue, muscle weakness of arms, legs, and neck, dysphonia, dysarthria, trouble swallowing liquids, choking, and heat sensitivity. Patient-identified salient impacts were work life, depression, difficulty walking, grooming hair, showering, and brushing teeth, eating, personal relationships, family life, and participating in social activities. Clinicians considered ocular, respiratory, swallowing, speech/talking, and extremity function as key clinical manifestations of gMG. Patients and clinicians found clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to be conceptually relevant and comprehensive.

CONCLUSION

This research provides a holistic understanding of gMG signs, symptoms, and impacts experienced by patients, as observed by patients and clinicians. The conceptual model of gMG highlights the range of signs, symptoms, and impacts that adult patients with gMG experience in their everyday lives, emphasizing the humanistic impact and unmet needs.

Patient Pathway to Diagnosis of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease (MOGAD): Findings from a Multinational Survey of 204 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a rare demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. Despite increased recognition of MOGAD as a distinct disease and the availability of sensitive methods of MOG antibody testing, diagnostic challenges remain. We conducted a survey to explore the patient experience from the start of symptoms to final MOGAD diagnosis.

METHODS

A 23-question online survey (including multiple-choice and free-text responses) covering symptom history, healthcare interactions and impact of diagnosis was emailed to people living with MOGAD by The MOG Project patient advocacy group. People living with MOGAD could share the survey with their caregivers. Anonymised responses were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 204 people living with MOGAD or their caregivers from 21 countries completed the survey; most respondents were from North America. Age of symptom onset ranged from 1 to 66 (median 28) years. Symptoms that prompted patients to seek medical care included blurred vision/loss of vision (58.2%), eye pain (35.8%) and difficulty walking (25.4%). Patients most frequently presented to emergency care physicians (38.7%) and primary care doctors (26.0%), with the MOGAD diagnosis most often made by general neurologists (40.4%) or neuro-immunologists (30.0%). Patients saw a median of four doctors before diagnosis, with 26.5% of patients seeing at least six doctors. Although 60.6% of patients received a MOGAD diagnosis within 6 months of experiencing initial health problems, 17.7% experienced a ≥ 5-year delay. More than half of patients (55.4%) received an alternative primary diagnosis before final MOGAD diagnosis. Most respondents (60.6%) reported receiving insufficient information/resources at the time of MOGAD diagnosis. Diagnostic delay was associated with long-term negative consequences for physical health.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides unique insights from people living with MOGAD and their caregivers that could help address the challenges faced in the pathway to final MOGAD diagnosis.

Physician- and patient-reported perspectives on myasthenia gravis in Europe: a real-world survey

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, chronic, debilitating, unpredictable, and potentially life-threatening neuromuscular disease. There is a lack of real-world data on disease management that could be used to further understand and address unmet patient needs and burden. We aimed to provide comprehensive real-world insights in the management of MG in five European countries.

METHODS

Data were collected using the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme™ in MG, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their patients with MG in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Physician- and patient-reported clinical data were collected, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, disease history, treatments, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and quality of life outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 144 physicians completed 778 patient record forms from March to July 2020 in the UK, and from June to September 2020 in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Mean patient age at symptom onset was 47.7 years, with a mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis of 332.4 days (10.97 months). At diagnosis, 65.3% of patients were classified as Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Class II or above. Mean number of symptoms reported at diagnosis per patient was five, with ocular myasthenia reported in at least 50% of patients. At time of survey completion, the mean number of symptoms reported per patient was five and ocular myasthenia and ptosis were each still present in more than 50% of patients. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed chronic treatments in all countries. Of 657 patients treated with chronic treatment at the time of the survey, 62% continued to experience moderate-to-severe symptoms. On average, 3.1 healthcare professionals (HCPs) were involved in patient management, 6.2 consultations were made per patient with any HCP over the last 12 months, and 178 (22.9%) patients were hospitalized in the last 12 months. Overall, HCRU and disease management were similar across all countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated the high burden of MG despite current treatment options for patients with MG.

Exploring impairments and allied health professional utilisation in people with myasthenia gravis: A cross-sectional study

This study aimed to explore how people with myasthenia gravis experience impairments in vision, dizziness, hearing, and fatigue, and how these relate to balance confidence, community participation, and health-related quality of life. Additionally, this study investigated the utilisation and perception of the allied health role in managing these impairments in the Australian context. Visual and hearing impairments, along with fatigue, were found to be correlated with health-related quality of life and community participation to varying degrees, while visual impairment and dizziness were correlated with balance confidence. Perception and utilisation of allied health professionals was variable; common barriers to better utilisation included participant perception of clinicians having poor knowledge around myasthenia gravis, previous poor experiences with clinicians, uncertainty about the clinicians' role, and lack of awareness that symptoms were associated with myasthenia gravis. Further research exploring clinicians' knowledge of myasthenia gravis is recommended, along with education for people with the disease about symptoms associated and how to appropriately access care.

Evaluation of the quality of patient involvement in a patient-led analysis of the lived experience of a rare disease

BACKGROUND

Patients themselves are best placed to provide insights on the lived experience and to lead the analysis of such insights to bring the patient voice into peer-reviewed literature. In doing so, they can meet the authorship criteria for subsequent research publications. It is important to evaluate patient engagement to identify ways to improve future collaborations. Here, we describe the approach taken during a patient-led and patient co-authored analysis of the lived experience of generalized myasthenia gravis, which may be applicable to other indications. We also assessed the quality of patient engagement throughout the research project.

METHODS

We used self-reported experience surveys based on the Patient Focused Medicines Development Patient Engagement Quality Guidance criteria for assessing patient engagement. The surveys were adapted to focus on individual projects and assessed eight domains using a five-point Likert scale. In September 2020, we invited eight patient council members to complete a self-reported experience survey following qualitative lived experience data generation. We calculated the average experience score as a percentage of the maximum possible score. Patient authors (n = 1) and non-patient authors (n = 3) were invited to complete a similar survey in November 2021, with questions customized for relevance, to evaluate the authorship experience following publication of the research.

RESULTS

Overall, patient council members had a positive experience of taking part in this study, with an average experience score of 90% (71.6/80.0; n = 8). The patient author and non-patient authors rated their authorship experience highly, with average experience scores of 92% (78.0/85.0) and 97% (63.3/65.0), respectively. There were key aspects that contributed to the overall project success (e.g., ensuring that all participants were aligned on the project objectives at the outset and understood their roles and responsibilities). We also identified elements of the approach that could be improved in future collaborations.

CONCLUSION

In this patient-led analysis, patient council members, patient authors and non-patient authors had a positive experience of being involved in the project. We gained useful insights into elements that contributed to the project's success and ways to improve future patient-led projects on the lived experience.

Impact of social determinants of health on individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis and implications for patient support programs

Introduction

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important contributors to health outcomes, and better understanding their impact on individuals diagnosed with rare, chronic diseases with high burden and unmet need is critical. Characterizing SDOH burden can help improve the design of patient support programs (PSPs), using targeted approaches to remove barriers to access.

Methods

This study used a mixed-methods strategy employing a quantitative survey, which was designed based on qualitative interviews, to understand the unmet needs and awareness/utilization of PSPs among individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) and experiencing SDOH barriers. The survey was completed by 38 individuals living with gMG, of which the majority were non-White/Caucasian, unemployed, low income, and enrolled in public insurance. Common SDOH challenges, awareness/utilization of available PSPs, and unmet needs were identified.

Results

Financial and mental health concerns were the most common among individuals living with gMG and experiencing SDOH barriers throughout diagnosis, accessing treatment, initiating treatment, and continuing treatment. Awareness and utilization of existing support services were low, especially when accessing treatment. Educational, financial, and personalized support with high "human touch" were commonly perceived as the most valuable resources.

Implications

To better serve the needs of individuals with gMG experiencing SDOH barriers, PSPs should use a targeted approach to offer services tailored to harder-to-reach populations. Further, providers, advocacy groups, manufacturers, and public organizations in the gMG ecosystem should strengthen collaborations with PSPs to enable individuals living with gMG to access the services they need to improve their health outcomes.

Patient-reported impact of myasthenia gravis in the real world: findings from a digital observational survey-based study (MyRealWorld MG)

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the impact of myasthenia gravis (MG) - in terms of treatments, side effects, comorbidities, psychological health and work or study- in the real world from a patient perspective.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a prospective, observational, digital, longitudinal study. Adults diagnosed with MG residing in the USA, Japan, Germany, the UK, Italy, Spain or Canada were eligible to participate in the study. There were no other exclusion criteria. Participants used a bespoke smartphone application to confirm eligibility, provide consent and enter data about their MG into a profile, a tracker to record MG-related events and a series of patient-reported outcome instruments. 1693 participants completed at least 1 survey and were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

Results are presented as a percentage of respondents to each survey question. The study population was largely female (69% of 1586 respondents), with an average age of 49.9 years (SD 14.8). In the previous 12 months, 83.7% of 1412 respondents confirmed that they had received one or more routine treatments for MG, and 67.1% of 255 respondents confirmed that they had experienced a side effect in the previous month. Commonly experienced comorbidities reported by 966 respondents were thyroid problems, hypertension and anxiety, experienced by 37.5%, 31.4% and 28.0% of respondents, respectively.According to 889 respondents to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale survey, 52.7% and 43.2% had a score indicative of at least mild anxiety and mild depression, respectively. Of 257 respondents, 33.0% reported experiencing a work or study impact in the past month.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of baseline characteristics of the MyRealWorld MG study population indicates that, despite current treatments, patients experience notable burden. Further scheduled analyses will develop a longitudinal picture of MG burden.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04176211.

Safety and efficacy of rozanolixizumab in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (MycarinG): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Generalised myasthenia gravis is a chronic, unpredictable, and debilitating autoimmune disease. New treatments for this disease are needed because conventional therapies have limitations, such as side-effects (eg, increased infection risk) or inadequate control of symptoms. Rozanolixizumab is a neonatal Fc receptor blocker that might provide a novel therapeutic option for myasthenia gravis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of rozanolixizumab for generalised myasthenia gravis.

METHODS

MycarinG is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 3 study done at 81 outpatient centres and hospitals in Asia, Europe, and North America. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class II-IVa), a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of at least 3 (non-ocular symptoms), and a quantitative myasthenia gravis score of at least 11. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous infusions once a week for 6 weeks of either rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg, rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg, or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by AChR and MuSK autoantibody status. Investigators, patients, and people assessing outcomes were masked to random assignments. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 43 in MG-ADL score, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03971422) and EudraCT (2019-000968-18); an open-label extension study has been completed (NCT04124965; EudraCT 2019-000969-21) and another is underway (NCT04650854; EudraCT 2020-003230-20).

FINDINGS

Between June 3, 2019, and June 30, 2021, 300 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 200 were enrolled. 66 (33%) were randomly assigned to rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg, 67 (34%) to rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg, and 67 (34%) to placebo. Reductions in MG-ADL score from baseline to day 43 were greater in the rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg group (least-squares mean change -3·37 [SE 0·49]) and in the rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg group (-3·40 [0·49]) than with placebo (-0·78 [0·49]; for 7 mg/kg, least-squares mean difference -2·59 [95% CI -4·09 to -1·25], p<0·0001; for 10 mg/kg, -2·62 [-3·99 to -1·16], p<0·0001). TEAEs were experienced by 52 (81%) of 64 patients treated with rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg, 57 (83%) of 69 treated with rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg, and 45 (67%) of 67 treated with placebo. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (29 [45%] patients in the rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg group, 26 [38%] in the rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 13 [19%] in the placebo group), diarrhoea (16 [25%], 11 [16%], and nine [13%]), and pyrexia (eight [13%], 14 [20%], and one [1%]). Five (8%) patients in the rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg group, seven (10%) in the rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg group, and six (9%) in the placebo group had a serious TEAE. No deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Rozanolixizumab showed clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported and investigator-assessed outcomes in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis, for both 7 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg doses. Both doses were generally well tolerated. These findings support the mechanism of action of neonatal Fc receptor inhibition in generalised myasthenia gravis. Rozanolixizumab represents a potential additional treatment option for patients with generalised myasthenia gravis.

FUNDING

UCB Pharma.

The best and worst of times in therapy development for myasthenia gravis

Within the last 5 years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved complement and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRN) inhibitors for treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis, and several other therapies are in late-stage clinical trials or under regulatory review. However, questions about which patients are most likely to benefit from which therapies, and the relative effectiveness of these very expensive drugs, has resulted in uncertainty around the place that they should occupy in the existing therapeutic armamentarium. MGNet (a Rare Diseases Clinical Research Consortium funded by the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke) held two meetings during the 14th International Conference of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America to discuss the most critical needs for clinical trial readiness and biomarker development in the context of therapy development for myasthenia gravis. Herein we provide a summary of these discussions, but not a consensus opinion, and offer a series of recommendations to guide focused research in the most critical areas. We welcome ongoing discussion through comments on this work.

Real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) among patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) over 3 years post-IVIg initiation.

METHODS

Patients with gMG who initiated IVIg treatment were identified from a United States claims database (Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse [IDV]®, January 1, 2014 - December 31, 2019). The frequency of subsequent IVIg treatment and associated cost during the year post-IVIg initiation were analyzed. Usage patterns of IVIg and concomitant gMG treatments during the year preceding and 3 years post-IVIg initiation were compared.

RESULTS

Among 1225 patients with gMG who initiated IVIg treatment, 706 patients (57.6%) received 1 to 5 IVIg treatment courses (intermittent IVIg users), and 519 patients (42.4%) received ≥6 IVIg treatment courses (chronic IVIg users) within the subsequent year. Mean annual medical cost per patient was nearly 2.5-fold higher for chronic vs. intermittent IVIg users ($161,478 vs. $64,888, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients using corticosteroids and nonsteroidal immunosuppressive treatments (NSISTs) was not reduced over the 3-year follow-up period following IVIg initiation, even for patients who continued annual chronic IVIg for 3 consecutive years post-initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients with gMG received chronic and multiple IVIg treatment courses within the first year once initiating IVIg treatment, indicating higher usage than expected. For all IVIg initiators, the proportion of patients using corticosteroids and NSISTs did not decrease over 3 years despite IVIg initiation.

Understanding the Symptom Burden and Impact of Myasthenia Gravis from the Patient's Perspective: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) experience functional impairment due to MG symptoms. This study aimed to assess, from the patient perspective, the symptoms, impacts, and treatment goals of individuals diagnosed with gMG.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth concept-elicitation interviews were conducted with 28 individuals diagnosed with gMG in the United States.

RESULTS

Participants reported gMG symptoms that affected many body regions and functions, with an average of 16 symptoms per participant. The most frequently reported symptoms were eyelid drooping (93%), physical fatigue (89%), symptoms affecting the legs (82%), difficulty breathing (82%), and difficulty holding head up (82%). Nearly all participants (96%) reported fluctuations in symptoms and severity. Participants' most bothersome symptoms were blurry/double vision (43%), breathing difficulties (36%), all-over fatigue (36%), and swallowing problems (29%). Impacts on physical functioning included an inability to participate in hobbies/sports, need for increased planning, and difficulties performing activities of daily living. All participants reported emotional impacts and impacts on their work and finances. Their treatment goals included reduced fatigue and weakness, improved symptom stability, and minimization of the impact of symptoms, in particular the emotional impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluctuating and unpredictable nature of gMG symptoms was found to have a substantial impact on patients' emotional, social, and economic well-being. Participants' goals for symptom management suggest that greater focus is needed to help them quickly resume a normal lifestyle by achieving symptom stability. Impacts of fluctuating and unpredictable symptoms are difficult to measure, but it is important to consider symptom fluctuation as well as ongoing symptomatology when making treatment decisions, and to recognize the impact of uncontrolled symptoms on patients, their partners/caregivers, and family/friends. These factors are often not reflected in burden/cost-of-illness studies.

New Targeted Agents in Myasthenia Gravis and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease for which multiple immunomodulatory therapies are available. Nevertheless, MG has a significant impact on patient quality of life. In recent years, experts' main efforts have focused on optimizing treatment strategies, since disease burden is considerably affected by their safety and tolerability profiles, especially in patients with refractory phenotypes. This article aims to offer neurologists caring for MG patients an overview of the most innovative targeted drugs specifically designed for this disease and summarizes the recent literature and more recent evidence on agents targeting B cells and plasmablasts, complement inhibitors, and neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists. Positive clinical trial results have been reported, and other studies are ongoing. Finally, we briefly discuss how the introduction of these novel targeted immunological therapies in a changing management paradigm would affect not only clinical outcomes, disease burden, safety, and tolerability, but also health spending in a condition that is increasingly managed based on a patient-centred model.

Hidden in plain sight? Identifying patient-authored publications

BACKGROUND

Patient advocates are increasingly authoring peer-reviewed publications that could enhance patient care and understanding of the lived experience. Although patient authorship may be seen as an innovation in the peer-reviewed publication environment and some may not be aware of or accept patient authorship, we know patient-authored publications exist. However, identifying patient-authored publications is often challenging and time-consuming.

MAIN BODY

In this commentary, we propose a definition for a patient author and patient-authored publications. We outline factors driving the increase in patient authorship, including patient interest, recognition of the value of including the patient voice and major funders recognising the importance of involving patient advocates in research. Evidence and experience-based guidance on patient authorship is emerging, and we highlight practical guidance for patient advocates on authoring peer-reviewed publications. To gain a better understanding of patient authorship, an efficient method is needed to identify patient-authored publications. A dataset on patient-authored publications could be used for a range of quantitative and qualitative research studies. The affiliation search function in PubMed can provide an easy, and reproducible way to identify a dataset of patient-authored publications in the international peer-reviewed literature, but only if patient authors include a standard metatag, (e.g. Patient Author) as one of their listed affiliations, combined with other affiliations as appropriate. From 2020 to 2021, there was a nine-fold increase in patient-authored publications in PubMed identified using the Patient Author tag. We recognize that terminology can be contentious and some authors may prefer alternative metatags. Further efforts are required to gain consensus on a suitable, standard metatag or set of metatags to use to show the true extent of patient authorship.

CONCLUSION

Patient authorship is not only legitimate, but it also exemplifies the principles of diversity, equity and inclusion. Stakeholders in the publication community need to review their policies and procedures to identify and address barriers to patient authorship. Patient advocates, funders, researchers and publishers could all help to promote awareness and acceptance of patient authorship and the merits of using a standard metatag or set of metatags, so that patient-authored publications are no longer hidden in plain sight.