1
|
Tarawneh R, Pankratz VS. The search for clarity regarding "clinically meaningful outcomes" in Alzheimer disease clinical trials: CLARITY-AD and Beyond. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16:37. [PMID: 38365811 PMCID: PMC10870501 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01412-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
CLARITY-AD is an 18-month, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial which examined the safety and efficacy of the anti-amyloid agent, lecanemab, in mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzheimer disease (AD). Lecanemab effectively reduced mean brain amyloid burden and was associated with statistically significant favorable effects, reflected by moderately less decline in the primary and secondary clinical outcomes, at 18 months compared to placebo. However, there is controversy within the AD community regarding the clinical significance of these results and whether they translate into clinically meaningful and tangible benefits on cognition or daily functions.We here review the primary and secondary clinical outcomes of CLARITY-AD and present our interpretation of the potential clinical meaningfulness of the group-level differences in study outcomes in the context of the 18-month study duration. We propose that the validation of stage-appropriate group-level thresholds for clinical meaningfulness of AD trial outcomes in biologically confirmed cohorts will allow objective interpretation of trial results and guide clinical decision-making. Further, in accordance with FDA guidance which emphasizes patient-focused drug development, the contextualization of AD clinical trial outcomes can be facilitated by supplementary individual-level data analyses which measure the risk of disease progression or summarize intraindividual change, using prespecified thresholds of clinically meaningful change, in each of the study groups over the trial period. The concepts of "time-saved" and "time-based" slowing in disease progression can be used to communicate clinical outcomes associated with emerging disease-modifying AD therapies to various stakeholders. We also describe several factors that need to be considered when evaluating outcomes of emerging AD therapies, including disease stage, the neuropathologic complexity of AD, time-based effects of disease-modifying therapies, and the possible influence of individual factors on treatment response and/or risk for adverse events. The consideration of these factors in the design and reporting of future trials of emerging AD therapies will guide clinicians regarding their appropriateness for use in various patient populations.Finally, we emphasize that data from clinical cohorts with longer durations of treatment and follow-up, including extension studies and patient registries, is needed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of lecanemab in early symptomatic AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rawan Tarawneh
- Department of Neurology and Center for Memory and Aging, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - Vernon S Pankratz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Increased Hippocampal-Inferior Temporal Gyrus White Matter Connectivity following Donepezil Treatment in Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Diffusion Tensor Probabilistic Tractography Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12030967. [PMID: 36769615 PMCID: PMC9917574 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been increasing each year, and a defective hippocampus has been primarily associated with an early stage of AD. However, the effect of donepezil treatment on hippocampus-related networks is unknown. Thus, in the current study, we evaluated the hippocampal white matter (WM) connectivity in patients with early-stage AD before and after donepezil treatment using probabilistic tractography, and we further determined the WM integrity and changes in brain volume. Ten patients with early-stage AD (mean age = 72.4 ± 7.9 years; seven females and three males) and nine healthy controls (HC; mean age = 70.7 ± 3.5 years; six females and three males) underwent a magnetic resonance (MR) examination. After performing the first MR examination, the patients received donepezil treatment for 6 months. The brain volumes and diffusion tensor imaging scalars of 11 regions of interest (the superior/middle/inferior frontal gyrus, the superior/middle/inferior temporal gyrus, the amygdala, the caudate nucleus, the hippocampus, the putamen, and the thalamus) were measured using MR imaging and DTI, respectively. Seed-based structural connectivity analyses were focused on the hippocampus. The patients with early AD had a lower hippocampal volume and WM connectivity with the superior frontal gyrus and higher mean diffusivity (MD) and radial diffusivity (RD) in the amygdala than HC (p < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected). However, brain areas with a higher (or lower) brain volume and WM connectivity were not observed in the HC compared with the patients with early AD. After six months of donepezil treatment, the patients with early AD showed increased hippocampal-inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) WM connectivity (p < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected).
Collapse
|
3
|
Ashford JW, Schmitt FA, Bergeron MF, Bayley PJ, Clifford JO, Xu Q, Liu X, Zhou X, Kumar V, Buschke H, Dean M, Finkel SI, Hyer L, Perry G. Now is the Time to Improve Cognitive Screening and Assessment for Clinical and Research Advancement. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 87:305-315. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-220211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the only cause of death ranked in the top ten globally without precise early diagnosis or effective means of prevention or treatment. Further, AD was identified as a pandemic [1] well before COVID-19 was dubbed a 21st century pandemic [2]. And now, with the realization of the prominent secondary impacts of pandemics, there is a growing, widespread recognition of the tremendous magnitude of the impending burden from AD in an aging world population in the coming decades [3]. This appreciation has amplified the growing and pressing need for a new, efficacious, and practical platform to detect and track cognitive decline, beginning in the preliminary (prodromal) phases of the disease, sensitively, accurately, effectively, reliably, efficiently, and remotely [4–7]. Moreover, the parallel necessity of clarifying and understanding risk factors, developing successful prevention strategies [8–17], and discovering and monitoring viable and effective treatments could all benefit from accurate and efficient screening and assessment platforms. Modern recognition of AD [18] as a common affliction of the elderly began in 1968 with a paper by Blessed, Tomlinson, & Roth [19] in which two tests, one a brief assessment of cognitive function and the other a measure of daily function, demonstrated impairment which was associated with the postmortem counts of neurofibrillary tangles, composed mainly of microtubule-associated protein-tau (tau), in the brain, though not to senile plaques, composed mainly of amyloid-β (Aβ). Even in more recent analyses, the tangles correspond with the severity of dementia more than the plaques [20, 21]. Since 1960, a plethora of cognitive tests, paper and pencil [22, 23], simple screening models [24], and computerized [25–27], have been developed to assess the dysfunction associated with AD. However, there has been limited application of Modern Test Theory, which includes Item Characteristic Curve Analysis, used in the technological development of such tools [28–31], along with widespread failure to understand the underlying AD pathological process to guide test development [32, 33]. The lack of such development has likely been a major contributor to the failure of the field to develop timely screening approaches for AD [34, 35], inaccurate assessment of the progression of AD [36], and even now, failure to find an effective approach to stopping AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Wesson Ashford
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, VA Palo Alto HCS, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
| | - Frederick A. Schmitt
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, Psychology, Behavioral Science; Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, Spinal Cord & Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Peter J. Bayley
- War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, VA Palo Alto HCS, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
| | | | - Qun Xu
- Health Management Center, Department of Neurology, Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolei Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Yunnan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Yunnan, China
| | - Xianbo Zhou
- Center for Alzheimer’s Research, Washington Institute of Clinical Research, Vienna, VA, USA
- Zhongze Therapeutics, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Herman Buschke
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology and Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Lena and Joseph Gluck Distinguished Scholar in Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Dean
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Geriatric Division, Internal Medicine, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
| | - Sanford I. Finkel
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- University of Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lee Hyer
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Gateway Behavioral Health, Mercer University, School of Medicine, Savannah, GA, USA
| | - George Perry
- Medical, Scientific, Memory Screening Advisory Board, Alzheimer’s Foundation of American (AFA), New York, USA
- Brain Health Consortium, Department Biology and Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|