Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase for Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fibrinogen: Structure, abnormalities and laboratory assays

Fibrinogen is the primary precursor protein for the fibrin clot, which is the final target of blood clotting. It is also an acute phase reactant that can vary under physiologic and inflammatory conditions. Disorders in fibrinogen concentration and/or function have been variably linked to the risk of bleeding and/or thrombosis. Fibrinogen assays are commonly used in the management of bleeding as well as the treatment of thrombosis. This chapter examines the structure of fibrinogen, its role in hemostasis as well as in bleeding abnormalities and measurement thereof with respect to clinical management.

Efficacy of urokinase and alteplase intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute phase cerebral infarction and impact on serum S-100β and nerve growth factor levels

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of urokinase and alteplase intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of acute phase cerebral infarction and investigate their impact on serum S-100β and nerve growth factor (NGF) levels.

METHODS

Parameters assessed included NIHSS score reduction, vascular recanalization rates, mRS, Barthel Index, and adverse reactions. Post-treatment blood samples were also collected for further analysis.

RESULTS

The clinical treatment effectiveness and Vascular recanalization rate in Group A was higher than in Group B, with p < 0.05. After treatment, the NIHSS score in Group A was lower than in Group B (p < 0.05), and the mRS score was slightly lower, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). After treatment, the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in Group A were lower than in the control group (p < 0.05). The S-100β level in Group A was lower than in Group B, and NGF level was higher than in Group B (p < 0.05). Group A had better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of both urokinase and alteplase intravenous thrombolysis for acute phase cerebral infarction have been demonstrated, yet disparities exist in neurological function recovery and regulation of biochemical indicators. Alteplase intravenous thrombolysis emerges as the superior option, displaying greater effectiveness and safety, alongside improved regulation of serum S-100β and NGF levels. Tailoring treatment plans to individual patient characteristics and drug mechanisms is essential. Given these findings, the promotion of alteplase intravenous thrombolysis in the management of acute phase cerebral infarction is justified.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties of alteplase and tenecteplase. The future of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

The drug most frequently used for thrombolysis in cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is alteplase. However, there is moderate-to-high-quality evidence that tenecteplase has similar or higher efficacy and safety. With improved pharmacokinetic properties over alteplase, tenecteplase could be a significant advantage in treating AIS.

AREAS COVERED

After conducting an extensive search on Scopus and PubMed, this manuscript reviews and compares the pharmacokinetic properties of alteplase and tenecteplase. Additionally, it provides information on pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and drug-drug interactions.

EXPERT OPINION

The pharmacokinetic profile of alteplase and tenecteplase is derived from studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thanks to its pharmacokinetic properties, tenecteplase is the drug closest to being the ideal fibrinolytic for AIS. Its longer half-life enables a single-bolus administration, which is particularly useful in emergencies. Tenecteplase has proven to have a good efficacy and safety profile in randomized clinical trials. Although we are awaiting the results of the ongoing phase 3 randomized clinical trials, we believe that tenecteplase has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of AIS through thrombolysis.