Two's a Company, Three's a Crowd: A Review of Initiating or Switching to a Two-Drug Antiretroviral Regimen in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Patients Living with HIV-1

Tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, two-drug antiretroviral regimens are emerging fields in life-long treatment in people living with HIV.

OBJECTIVES

This randomized non-inferiority open-label controlled trial was designed to compare the 48-week efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir versus the standard triple therapy in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this combination has not been studied before.

METHODS

This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in treatment-experienced people with HIV who had HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL for at least two years. Patients received either tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir combination (26 patients) or a standard three-drug regimen (29 patients). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL during 48 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were CD4 cell count changes, the adherence rate, and adverse drug reactions, all over 48 weeks of study.

RESULTS

HIV viral load remained undetectable (HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL) during the 48 weeks of the study in both arms. The absolute CD4 cell count change was not significant between the two groups. The overall proportion of adverse effects in each group was comparable. The rate of adherence to treatment was acceptable in both groups, and no significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment simplification with tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir regimen as maintenance therapy was non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared to the standard triple therapy. Comparing efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.

The New Era of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy: When and Why to Make the Switch

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the availability of safe and effective oral combination antiretroviral therapy, barriers to maintaining viral suppression remain a challenge to ending the HIV epidemic. Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy was developed as an alternative to daily oral therapy. This review summarizes the current literature on the efficacy of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV-1, reasons to switch to injectable therapy, and barriers to switching.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is safe and effective in maintaining HIV-1 virologic suppression. Ideal candidates for switching to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine are virologically suppressed on oral regimens with good adherence and no history of virologic failure or baseline resistance. Indications to switch to injectable therapy include patient preference, the potential for improved adherence, and avoidance of adverse effects. Implementation research is needed to assess and overcome system barriers. Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is a novel alternative to oral antiretrovirals, with the potential to improve adherence and quality of life in people with HIV.

An indirect comparison of 144-week efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir plus lamivudine and second-generation integrase inhibitor-based, 3-drug, single-tablet regimens in therapy-naive people with HIV-1

BACKGROUND

The long-term efficacy and safety of the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) and 3-drug single-tablet regimens recommended for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive people with HIV-1 (PWH) have yet to be compared directly in clinical trials. This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was conducted to compare the durability of efficacy and long-term safety of DTG + 3TC vs second-generation, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based, 3-drug, single-tablet regimens bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) and DTG/abacavir/3TC (DTG/ABC/3TC) at Week 144 after treatment initiation.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified 4 trials evaluating the treatment regimens of interest in ART-naive PWH (GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2, GS-US-380-1489, and GS-US-380-1490). Safety, efficacy, and tolerability results were compared using fixed-effects Bucher ITC methodology to calculate relative outcomes.

RESULTS

Rates of virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, US Food and Drug Administration Snapshot analysis) and virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL) as well as mean change in CD4 + cell count were similar with DTG + 3TC, BIC/FTC/TAF, and DTG/ABC/3TC at Week 144. Serious adverse events occurred less frequently with DTG + 3TC compared with both BIC/FTC/TAF (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.87; P = 0.014) and DTG/ABC/3TC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P = 0.006). Discontinuations and overall adverse events were similar across all 3 regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the 2-drug regimen DTG + 3TC offers comparable and durable efficacy with fewer serious adverse events vs BIC/FTC/TAF and DTG/ABC/3TC through 144 weeks of treatment in ART-naive PWH. These long-term comparative data support the therapeutic value of DTG + 3TC for PWH.

Sex Differences in the Expression of Neuroimmune Molecules in the Spinal Cord of a Mouse Model of Antiretroviral-Induced Neuropathic Pain

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), drugs used to treat HIV infection, can cause neuropathic pain (NP) and neuroinflammation. An NRTI, 2′-3′-dideoxycytidine (ddC), was reported to induce mechanical allodynia and increase proinflammatory cytokines in the brains of female mice. In some models of NP, microglia activation is important for NP pathophysiology in male mice, while T cells are important in female mice. Age-matched female and male mice (BALB/c strain) treated intraperitoneally once daily with ddC for 5 days developed mechanical allodynia. Treatment with ddC increased Cd11b, H2-Aa, Cd3e, Mapk1, Il1b, Tnf, and Il10 mRNA levels in the spinal cords of female, but not male, mice, whereas there was no alteration found in Gfap and Mapk14 transcripts in both sexes on day 7 after ddC administration. The protein expression of CD11b and phospho-p38 MAPK was significantly increased in the spinal cords of ddC-treated female, but not male, mice, whereas Iba1 protein was elevated in ddC-treated male mice. There was no change in GFAP, CD3e, and phospho-p44/42 MAPK protein levels in both sexes. Thus, changes in neuroimmune cells and molecules in the spinal cords during ddC-induced neuroinflammation were sex-dependent, with female mice being more prone to neuroimmune changes than male mice.

Characteristics of 2-drug regimen users living with HIV-1 in a real-world setting: A large-scale medical claim database analysis in Japan

Background

Regimen simplification to 2-drug antiretroviral therapy (2-ART) may address potential tolerability issues, increase adherence, and reduce toxicity and potential drug-drug-interactions among people living with HIV-1 (PLWH). However, real-world treatment patterns and characteristics of 2-ART users are unclear.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study employed a large-scale medical claim database of Japanese hospitals to extract data on 4,293 PLWH aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of HIV and treated with any ART regimens between April 2008 and April 2019. A 2-ART cohort was compared with a 3-drug antiretroviral therapy (3-ART) cohort in terms of population characteristics, comorbid conditions, and treatment patterns. Treatment switching rates were calculated for each cohort followed by sensitivity analysis to confirm the robustness of the findings.

Results

There were 94 individuals identified in the 2-ART cohort. Compared to the standard 3-ART cohort (n = 3,993), the 2-ART cohort was older (median age 53 [IQR 44–64] vs 42 years [IQR 35–50]), with a lower proportion of males (87.2% vs 93.8%), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (median score 6 [IQR 5–8] vs 5 [IQR 4–6]), more co-medications (median 6 [IQR 4–11] vs 3 [IQR 2–7]), and a higher percentage of AIDS-defining conditions (66.0% vs 42.8%). The most common 2-ART were protease inhibitor (PI) + integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) + INSTI (33.0% and 31.9%, respectively). Overall, most of the regimens were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing (71.3%), with a decreasing trend over time (76.2% to 70.2%). ART regimen switch occurred more often in the 2-ART cohort than in the 3-ART cohort (33.0% vs 21.2%).

Conclusion

The profiles of individuals on 2-ART in Japan were demonstrated to be complex. Most were treated with NRTI-sparing regimens which may reflect an effort to reduce treatment-related toxicities.

Quantification of Total HIV DNA as a Marker to Measure Viral Reservoir: Methods and Potential Implications for Clinical Practice

The focus of this review is to examine the importance of quantifying total HIV DNA to target the HIV reservoir and the clinical implications and challenges involved in its future application in clinical practice. Despite intrinsic limitations, the quantification of total HIV DNA is currently the most widely used marker for exploring the HIV reservoir. As it allows estimating all forms of HIV DNA in the infected cells, total HIV DNA load is the biomarker of the HIV reservoir that provides most of the insights into HIV pathogenesis. The clinical role of total HIV-DNA in both untreated and treated patients is extensively supported by important lines of evidence. Thus, predictive models that include total HIV DNA load together with other variables could constitute a prognostic tool for use in clinical practice. To date, however, this marker has been primarily used in experimental evaluations. The main challenge is technical. Although the implementation of droplet digital PCR could improve analytical performance over real-time PCR, the lack of standardization has made cross-comparisons of the data difficult. An effort by investigators to compare protocols is needed. Furthermore, the main effort now should be to involve the biomedical industry in the development of certified assays for in vitro diagnostics use.

Real-World Experience with Two-Drug Regimens in HIV-1-Infected Patients Beyond the Indication of Clinical Trials: 48 Weeks' Results

Data on two-drug regimens (2DRs) have shown high efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced HIV-1 patients. Current guidelines recommend 2DRs as alternative to three-drug regimens (3DRs) to reduce long-term drug exposure and costs. Nevertheless, real-world experience with 2DR is limited. This study assessed the use of 2DR in routine clinical practice in a tertiary hospital. A retrospective, observational, descriptive study was performed on the use of dual therapy in adult HIV-1 patients. Individuals on antiretroviral treatment (ART) with dolutegravir plus lamivudine or dolutegravir plus rilpivirine who started 2DR between November 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, were eligible for our study. Follow-up period was 48 weeks. Overall, 112 patients started 2DR; median age was 51 years and 88.4% were men. Most patients (97.3%) were treatment experienced before dual therapy, with 9.6 ± 8.0 years of prior ART on average. Around 96.4% of patients were virologically suppressed before 2DR. Most common reasons to start dual therapy were treatment simplification (49.5%), avoidance of long-term toxicities (21.1%), and intolerance to previous ART (18.3%). The main regimen used in dual therapy was dolutegravir plus lamivudine (98.2%). Only eight patients discontinued dual therapy; the main reason for discontinuation was toxicity. All patients who did not discontinue 2DR were virologically suppressed at week 48. ART simplification saved €130,117.58 during the study period. In our cohort, dual therapy was mainly used for virologically suppressed patients, before availability of the single-tablet 2DR. Switching to a 2DR may be a key option for treatment simplification and avoidance of long-term toxicities. Furthermore, 2DR could provide a more cost-effective alternative to 3DR.

Maraviroc as a potential HIV-1 latency-reversing agent in cell line models and ex vivo CD4 T cells

Recent studies have suggested that the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (MVC) may exert an HIV-1 latency reversal effect. This study aimed at defining MVC-mediated induction of HIV-1 in three cell line latency models and in ex vivo CD4 T cells from six patients with suppressed viraemia. HIV-1 induction was evaluated in TZM-bl cells by measuring HIV-1 LTR-driven luciferase expression, and in ACH-2 and U1 latently infected cell lines by measuring cell-free (CFR) and cell-associated (CAR) HIV-1 RNA by qPCR. NF-κB p65 was quantified in nuclear extracts by immunodetection. In ex vivo CD4 T cells, CAR, CFR and cell-associated DNA (CAD) were quantified at baseline and 1-7-14 days post-induction (T1, T7, T14). At T7 and T14, the infectivity of the CD4 T cells co-cultured with MOLT-4/CCR5 target cells was evaluated in the TZM-bl assay (TZA). Results were expressed as fold activation (FA) with respect to untreated cells. No LTR activation was observed in TZM-bl cells at any MVC concentration. NF-κB activation was only modestly upregulated (1.6±0.4) in TZM-bl cells with 5 µM MVC. Significant FA of HIV-1 expression was only detected at 80 µM MVC, namely on HIV-1 CFR in U1 (3.1±0.9; P=0.034) and ACH-2 cells (3.9±1.4; P=0.037). CFR was only weakly stimulated at 20 µM in ACH-2 (1.7±1.0 FA) cells and at 5 µM in U1 cells (1.9±0.5 FA). Although no consistent pattern of MVC-mediated activation was observed in ex vivo experiments, substantial FA values were detected sparsely on individual samples with different parameters. Notably, in one sample, MVC stimulated all parameters at T7 (2.3±0.2 CAD, 6.8±3.7 CAR, 18.7±16.7 CFR, 7.3±0.2 TZA). In conclusion, MVC variably induces HIV-1 production in some cell line models not previously used to test its latency reversal potential. In ex vivo CD4 T cells, MVC may exert patient-specific HIV-1 induction; however, clinically relevant patterns, if any, remain to be defined.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs): a brief overview of clinically approved drugs and combination regimens

The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are allosteric inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and are classified into generations depending on their discovery and resistance profiles. The NNRTIs are used in combination regimens with antiretroviral agents that target two or more enzymes in the viral life cycle. The combination regimens usually include a backbone of two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a third core agent among the NNRTIs or protease inhibitors. The combination regimens are maintained over long durations and consequently lead to long-term problems, including toxicity, drug-drug interactions, and increasing costs. This brief overview summarizes the pharmacokinetic profiles for NNRTIs and NNRTI-based combination regimens.