Clinical Outcomes of Patient Subgroups in the TANGO II Study

Recent updates in treating carbapenem-resistant infections in patients with hematological malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hematological malignancies (PHMs) are at increased risk for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) due to frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged hospital stays. These infections result in high mortality and morbidity rates along with delays in chemotherapy, longer hospitalizations, and increased health care costs.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment alternatives for CRO infections in PHMs.

EXPERT OPINION

The best available treatment option for KPC and OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime/avibactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam remain as the alternative options. They can also be used as salvage therapy in KPC-positive Enterobacterales infections resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, if in vitro susceptibility is shown. Treatment of metallo-β-lactamase producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam or aztreonam/avibactam seems to be the most reliable option for metallo-β-lactamase producers. As a first-line option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, ceftolozane/tazobactam is preferable and ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam constitute alternative regimens. Although sulbactam/durlobactam is the most reliable option against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, its utility as monotherapy and in PHMs is not yet known. Cefiderocol can be selected as a 'last-resort' option for CRO infections. New risk score models supported by artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to predict the exact risk of infections in previously colonized patients.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses as Support for Meropenem-Vaborbactam Dosing Regimens and Susceptibility Breakpoints

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a fixed-dose beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor with potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment analyses were undertaken using population pharmacokinetic models, nonclinical PK-PD targets for efficacy, in vitro surveillance data, and simulation to provide support for 2 g meropenem-2 g vaborbactam every 8 h (q8h) administered as a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, and dosing regimens adjusted for patients with renal impairment. Simulated patients varying by renal function measure (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], mL/min/1.73 m² and absolute eGFR, mL/min) and resembling the clinical trial population (complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis) were generated. The PK-PD targets for meropenem, the percentage of time on day 1 that free-drug plasma concentrations were above the MIC (%T>MIC), and vaborbactam, the ratio of free-drug plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) on day 1 to the MIC (AUC:MIC ratio), were calculated. Percent probabilities of achieving meropenem free-drug plasma %T>MIC and vaborbactam free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio targets were assessed. MIC distributions for Enterobacterales, KPC-producing Enterobacterales, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were considered as part of an algorithm to assess PK-PD target attainment. For assessments of free-drug plasma PK-PD targets associated with a 1-log₁₀ CFU reduction from baseline, percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment ranged from 81.3 to 100% at meropenem-vaborbactam MIC values of 4 or 8 μg/mL among simulated patients. The results of these PK-PD target attainment analyses provide support for a dosing regimen of 2 g meropenem-2 g vaborbactam q8h administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion, with dosing regimens adjusted for patients with renal impairment and a meropenem-vaborbactam susceptibility breakpoint of ≤8 μg/mL (tested with a fixed vaborbactam concentration of 8 μg/mL) for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa based on these dosing regimens.

Novel investigational treatments for ventilator-associated pneumonia and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common; its prevalence has been highlighted by the Covid-19 pandemic. Even young patients can suffer severe nosocomial infection and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Multidrug-resistant bacteria can spread alarmingly fast around the globe and new antimicrobials are struggling to keep pace; hence physicians must stay abreast of new developments in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and VAP.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review examines novel antimicrobial investigational drugs and their implementation in the ICU setting for VAP. The paper highlights novel approaches such as monoclonal antibody treatments for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, and phage antibiotic synthesis. The paper also examines mechanisms of resistance in gram-negative bacteria, virulence factors and inhaled antibiotics and questions what may be on the horizon in terms of emerging treatment strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

The post-antibiotic era is rapidly approaching and the need for personalised medicine, point-of-care microbial sensitivity testing and development of biomarkers for severe infections is clear. Results from emerging and new antibiotics are encouraging, but infection control measures and de-escalation protocols must be employed to prolong their usefulness in critical illness.