Lasting Prolonged-Release Tapentadol for Moderate/Severe Non-Cancer Musculoskeletal Chronic Pain

Personality and psychiatric disorders in chronic pain male affected by erectile dysfunction: prospective and observational study

The prevalence of personality disorders (PDs) and sexual dysfunction in chronic pain patients is higher than in general population. Our main objective was to analyse the influence of PD in patients with erectile dysfunction and chronic non-cancer pain and their response to andrological treatment. One-hundred one patients were included along 30 months. Pain intensity, quality of life, sexual life quality, anxiety and depression were analysed together with opioid dose. Erectile functioning was measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and PDs with Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III). The mean age was 57 ± 12 years old, with moderate to severe pain, 70% were sexually active and presented moderate to severe ED. PDs were very frequent (31%, cut-off 85 and 84% cut-off 75 scores) mostly anxiety, compulsive, though disorder, somatoform and narcissistic. Self-defeating feature presence was significantly correlated (r = -0.4, 95% CI = -0.605 to -0.145, p = 0.002) with a more severe baseline ED and narcissistic, and a better response to andrological treatment (p = 0.010, d = 1.082). Patients with dysthymia features required significantly higher opioid doses vs. control (238 vs. 102 mg/day, respectively). These findings underline the importance of diagnosing PDs to rigorously treat patients with chronic pain and ED.

Tapentadol for Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent literature regarding tapentadol use in oncology patients and moderate or severe pain.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

We have conducted a review of the literature using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for all manuscripts published between 2008 and 2016, using the key words "tapentadol," "cancer," "pain," "tumor," and "malignant."

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria (four randomized clinical trials and five prospective cohort studies). The scope of the literature was diverse, with 15 instruments used to measure different aspects of pain (intensity, health status, quality of life, psychometric and well-being, perception of change, and neuropathic pain). All these studies concluded that tapentadol is seemingly a well-tolerated and efficacious agent for moderate-severe cancer pain, with few typically mild adverse reactions. However, the most significant detected weaknesses of research were that (1) existing studies do not clearly show a superiority of tapentadol with respect to previous generation opioids, (2) low-to-moderate sample sizes prevent obtaining robust conclusions about effectiveness, (3) there was an absence of noninferiority trials comparing tapentadol vs. fentanyl or oxycodone-naloxone, and (4) there was scarce generalizability of prospective observational studies.

CONCLUSION

Tapentadol is seemingly an effective, well-tolerated alternative for moderate or severe cancer pain. Most prospective cohort studies have relatively small samples, are restricted to few research centers, and lack detailed subgroup information. More experience is required to draw valid generalizable conclusions.